Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 34
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Surg Res ; 245: 360-366, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31425876

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While the prevalence of HIV infection in the population is 0.5%, it is higher among trauma patients as are rates of unknown seropositivity. Routine HIV screening for all trauma evaluations was implemented at our urban level I center in 2009. We aimed to evaluate use and results of the program in our trauma population. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of all trauma evaluations between July 2015 and February 2018. After passage of legislation rescinding the requirement for consent to perform HIV testing, our trauma service instituted an order set which automatically tested for HIV unless the ordering physician opted out. Patients found to be infected with HIV were to be counseled and referred to specialty care. RESULTS: Of 6175 consecutive trauma evaluations during the study period, 449 (7.3%) patients had been screened within the prior year and were excluded. Of the remaining cohort, 2024 (35.3%) patients were screened with 27 (1.3%) testing positive. Among those testing positive for infection, 100% were male, 77% white, 63% non-Hispanic, and 70% lacked insurance. Twenty-five (92.6%) patients received counseling and 19 were referred to specialty care. Age, gender, race, ethnicity, Injury Severity Score, trauma activation level, and payor type were not significant predictors for positive HIV screen on logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a significantly higher rate of HIV in the trauma population, only a third of patients are screened. Such high infection rates justify the existence of this screening program but steps must be taken to increase screening rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Consejo/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Texas/epidemiología
2.
J Surg Res ; 233: 163-166, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30502243

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It is reported that performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) at night leads to increased rates of complications and conversion to open. We hypothesize that it is safe to perform LC at night in appropriately selected patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of nonelective LC in adults at our institution performed between April 2007 and February 2015. We dichotomized the cases to either day or night. RESULTS: Five thousand two hundred four patients underwent LC, with 4628 during the day and 576 at night. There were no differences in age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, race, insurance type, pregnancy rate, or white blood cell count. There were also no differences in the prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, or renal failure. However, daytime patients had higher median initial total bilirubin (0.6 [0.4, 1.3] versus 0.5 [0.3, 1.0] mg/dL, P = 0.002) and lipase (33 [24, 56] versus 30 [22, 42] U/L, P < 0.001) values. There was no difference in case length, estimated blood loss, rate of conversion to open, biliary complications, length of stay (LOS) after operation, unanticipated return to the hospital in 60 d, or 60-d mortality. Daytime patients spent more time in the hospital with longer median LOS before surgery (1 [1, 2] versus 1 [0, 2] d, P < 0.001) and median total LOS (3 [2, 4] versus 2 [1, 3] d, P < 0.001) compared with night patients. CONCLUSIONS: At our institution, we perform LC safely during day or night. The lack of complications and shorter LOS justify performing LC at any hour.


Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/efectos adversos , Colecistitis Aguda/cirugía , Tratamiento de Urgencia/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adulto , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta/estadística & datos numéricos , Tratamiento de Urgencia/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fotoperiodo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Surg Endosc ; 33(12): 4128-4132, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30809727

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite international efforts to increase performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in rural Guatemala, the vast majority of cholecystectomies are still performed via the open cholecystectomy (OC) approach. Our goal was to explore barriers to the adoption of LC in Guatemala as well as possible mechanisms to overcome them. METHODS: We reviewed 9402 cholecystectomies performed over 14 years by surgeons at the Hospital Nacional de San Benito (HNSB) in El Peten, Guatemala, with either an open or a laparoscopic approach. We conducted personal interviews with all the surgeons who perform cholecystectomies at HNSB to determine current practice and barriers to adopting LC. RESULTS: Overall, seven general surgeons were interviewed who regularly perform cholecystectomy. Of the total number of cholecystectomies reviewed, 8440 (90%) were open and 962 (10%) were laparoscopic. The mean number of cholecystectomies performed per surgeon was 1341.1 ± 1244.9, with OC at 1205.7 ± 1194.9, and LC at 137.4 ± 188.0. Lack of formal training in laparoscopy was identified in 57% of surgeons. Lack of government funds to implement a laparoscopic program was noted by 71% of surgeons (29% felt there was insufficient ancillary staff, 29% poor allocation of hospital funding to purchase laparoscopic equipment/training). Lack of sufficient laparoscopic equipment was identified by 71% of surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Ninety percent of cholecystectomies performed by surgeons at HNSB continue to be OC. The major limitation is the lack of funding to provide sufficient equipment or ancillary staff. The majority of surgeons preferred to perform LC if these problems could be addressed.


Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales de Condado , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/economía , Guatemala/epidemiología , Recursos en Salud/economía , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Hospitales de Condado/economía , Hospitales de Condado/normas , Humanos , Población Rural , Cirujanos
4.
J Surg Res ; 218: 329-333, 2017 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28985869

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In this article, we report the current surgical approach to gallbladder disease at a major referral hospital in rural Guatemala. Complications in a cohort of patients undergoing open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy were catalogued. METHODS: We reviewed cholecystectomies performed by surgeons at the Hospital Nacional de San Benito in El Peten, Guatemala, after the adoption of the laparoscopic approach. Laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LCs) between 2014 and 2015 (n = 42) were reviewed and matched by 58 randomly selected open cholecystectomies (OCs) during the same period. RESULTS: Patient demographics were similar in the LC and OC groups. Of the 63 patients who had elective surgery, 43 (68%) underwent OC. Conversion rate, hospital length of stay, and readmission rate were 4%, 4.8 days, and 5%, respectively. Complications were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the low number of LCs, their complications were not different from that of OCs. During the study period, a large number of cholecystectomies continued to be open, even in the elective setting.


Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Enfermedades de la Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Guatemala , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
5.
J Surg Res ; 214: 197-202, 2017 06 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28624044

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite its utilization, the intraoperative (IO) assessment of complicated appendicitis (CA) is subjective. The histopathologic (HP) diagnosis should be the gold standard in identifying patients with CA; however, it is not immediately available to guide postoperative management. The objective of this study was to identify predictors of an HP diagnosis of CA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent appendectomy at our institution from 2011-2013 was conducted. CA was defined by perforation or abscess on pathology report. Predictors of an HP diagnosis of CA were evaluated using a multivariable regression model. RESULTS: A total of 239 of 1066 patients had CA based on IO assessment, whereas 143 of 239 patients (60%) had CA on HP and IO assessment. On multivariable analysis, an IO diagnosis of CA was associated with an HP diagnosis of CA (odds ratio [OR]: 10.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.19-16.58). Other risk factors were age (OR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.09-1.49), number of days of pain (OR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.07-1.37), increased heart rate (OR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.02-1.26), appendix size (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.03-1.16), and an appendicolith (OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.12-2.71) on preoperative CT imaging. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to age, increased heart rate, pain duration, appendix size and appendicolith, the IO assessment is also associated with an HP diagnosis of CA; however, 40% of patients were incorrectly classified. Using these predictors with improved IO grading may achieve more accurate diagnosis of CA.


Asunto(s)
Apendicitis/diagnóstico , Apendicitis/patología , Apéndice/patología , Absceso Abdominal/diagnóstico , Absceso Abdominal/etiología , Absceso Abdominal/patología , Adulto , Apendicectomía , Apendicitis/complicaciones , Apendicitis/cirugía , Apéndice/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 42: 150-155, 2017 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28242397

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the elective setting, both open surgical and endovascular therapies may be reasonable treatment options for many vascular conditions. However, an unstable or unfit patient with a vascular emergency may be less able to tolerate a definitive open vascular operation. We now report the outcomes for "damage control" endografting for unstable or unfit patients with vascular emergencies as bridge therapy before definitive open therapy. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent damage control endografting over a 9-year period (2005-2014) was performed. The primary inclusion criterion was the use of emergency damage control endografting as temporizing therapy to permit time for patient stabilization or optimization before definitive open repair. Patients who underwent endografting as planned definitive therapy were excluded. RESULTS: Indications for damage control endografting included arterial bleeding or expanding hematoma related to infected pseudoaneurysms (n = 5), infected grafts (n = 3), or cancer (n = 1). Anatomic locations included the aorta (n = 3), common iliac artery (n = 2), common femoral artery (n = 2), common carotid artery (n = 1), and subclavian artery (n = 1). The median age was 56 years (interquartile range [IQR] 51-70). Five of our patients were male and 4 patients were female. Median follow-up was 8 months (IQR 3-11). Operative (30-day) mortality was 11%. A single patient died on postoperative day 12 after undergoing aortic and duodenal reconstruction related to an aortoenteric fistula. Using the damage control approach, clinical stabilization was achieved in 8 of the 9 patients (88%). One patient with a bleeding infected common femoral artery pseudoaneurysm continued to bleed and required emergent open surgical repair. Definitive open repair was completed in 8 of the 9 patients (88%) at a median time interval of 3 days (IQR 1-10). Planned open repair was not performed in a patient with exsanguinating carotid hemorrhage after the associated cancer was deemed unresectable. CONCLUSIONS: Damage control endografting facilitates stabilization of the majority of unstable and unfit patients with vascular emergencies to allow definitive open repair under more favorable conditions. This technique should be employed rarely due to the expense, but it is a technique worthy of consideration in select patients.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Enfermedades Vasculares/cirugía , Anciano , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Urgencias Médicas , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades Vasculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Vasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Vasculares/mortalidad
7.
JAMA ; 318(10): 974, 2017 09 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28898380
8.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 93(6): 786-792, 2022 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36049153

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Higher center-level operative volume is associated with lower mortality after complex elective surgeries, but this relationship has not been robustly demonstrated for operative trauma. We hypothesized that trauma centers in Pennsylvania with higher operative trauma volumes would have lower risk-adjusted mortality rates than lower volume institutions. METHODS: We queried the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcomes Study database (2017-2019) for injured patients 18 years or older at Level I and II trauma centers who underwent an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10), procedure code -defined operative procedure within 6 hours of admission. The primary exposure was tertile of center-level operative volume. The primary outcome of interest was inpatient mortality. We entered factors associated with mortality in univariate analysis (age, injury severity, mechanism, physiology) into multivariable logistic regression models with tertiles of volume accounting for center-level clustering. We conducted secondary analyses varying the form of the association between the volume and mortality to including dichotomous and fractional polynomial models. RESULTS: We identified 3,650 patients at 29 centers meeting the inclusion criteria. Overall mortality was 15.9% (center-level range, 6.7-34.2%). Operative procedure types were cardiopulmonary (7.3%), vascular (20.1%), abdominopelvic (24.3%), and multiple (48.3%). The mean annual operative volume over the 3 years of data was 10 to 21 operations for low-volume centers, 22 to 47 for medium-volume centers, and 47 to 158 for high-volume centers. After controlling for patient demographics, physiology, and injury characteristics, there was no significant difference in mortality between highest and lowest tertile centers (odds ratio, 0.92; confidence interval, 0.57-1.49). Secondary analyses similarly demonstrated no relationship between center operative volume and mortality in key procedure subgroups. CONCLUSION: In a mature trauma system, we found no association between center-level operative volume and mortality for patients who required early operative intervention for trauma. Efforts to standardize the care of seriously injured patients in Pennsylvania may ensure that even lower-volume centers are prepared to generate satisfactory outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.


Asunto(s)
Centros Traumatológicos , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Pennsylvania/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria
9.
J Burn Care Res ; 41(1): 33-40, 2020 01 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31738430

RESUMEN

Severe burn leads to substantial skeletal muscle wasting that is associated with adverse outcomes and protracted recovery. The purpose of our study was to investigate muscle tissue homeostasis in response to severe burn. Muscle biopsies from the right m. lateralis were obtained from 10 adult burn patients at the time of their first operation. Patients were grouped by burn size (total body surface area of <30% vs ≥30%). Muscle fiber size and factors of cell death and muscle regeneration were examined. Muscle cell cross-sectional area was significantly smaller in the large-burn group (2174.3 ± 183.8 µm2 vs 3687.0 ± 527.2 µm2, P = .04). The expression of ubiquitin E3 ligase MuRF1 and cell death downstream effector caspace 3 was increased in the large-burn group (P < .05). No significant difference was seen between groups in expression of the myogenic factors Pax7, MyoD, or myogenin. Interestingly, Pax7 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) expression in muscle tissue were significantly correlated to injury severity only in the smaller-burn group (P < .05). In conclusion, muscle atrophy after burn is driven by apoptotic activation without an equal response of satellite cell activation, differentiation, and fusion.


Asunto(s)
Quemaduras/metabolismo , Quemaduras/patología , Homeostasis/fisiología , Músculo Esquelético/metabolismo , Músculo Esquelético/patología , Atrofia Muscular/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Quemaduras/complicaciones , Caspasa 3/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Proteínas Musculares/metabolismo , Atrofia Muscular/metabolismo , Atrofia Muscular/patología , Proteína MioD/metabolismo , Miogenina/metabolismo , Factor de Transcripción PAX7/metabolismo , Antígeno Nuclear de Célula en Proliferación/metabolismo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Proteínas de Motivos Tripartitos/metabolismo , Ubiquitina-Proteína Ligasas/metabolismo , Adulto Joven
10.
Am J Surg ; 218(3): 653-657, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30890262

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Little information exists on the value of online question banks in preparing residents for the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE). METHODS: We reviewed surgical residents' use of an online question bank (TrueLearn) and compared it to their ABSITE performance. RESULTS: The 2016-2017 records of 44 PGY 2-5 general surgery residents were examined. The total number of TrueLearn questions answered significantly correlated (p < 0.05) with correct answers and percentile rank on the 2017 ABSITE. If a resident was to complete the entire online TL question bank consisting of 1000 questions, the overall percentage correct and overall percentile on the ABSITE is estimated to increase by 3% and 20%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the TrueLearn question bank is associated with an improved percentage of ABSITE questions answered correctly and improved PGY percentile scores.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Cirugía General/educación , Hábitos , Internado y Residencia/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Consejos de Especialidades , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
11.
J Burn Care Res ; 40(4): 416-421, 2019 06 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31046088

RESUMEN

Their group previously demonstrated high-patient satisfaction for the treatment of hypertrophic burn scar (HBS) with the erbium: yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser, but this and other literature supporting the practice suffer from a common weakness of a reliance on subjective assessments by patients or providers. Herein, they sought to prospectively study the effects of Er:YAG fractional ablation on HBS using noninvasive, objective technologies to measure outcomes. Patients with HBS had identical regions of scar designated for treatment by the Er:YAG laser (TREAT) or to be left untreated (CONTROL). They prospectively collected scar measurements of TREAT and CONTROL regions preoperatively, 3 weeks, and 3 months after Er:YAG treatment. Scar measurements included viscoelastometry, transepidermal water loss, optical coherent tomography, and high-frequency ultrasound. Outcomes were measured for the aggregate difference between the TREAT group vs the CONTROL group, as well as within each group in isolation. Seventeen patients were seen preoperatively, followed by n = 15 at 3 weeks and n = 11 at 3 months. A mixed-model repeated measures analysis showed no significant effect of fractional ablation when comparing the overall TREAT group measurements with those of the CONTROL group. However, when considered as within-group measurements, TREAT scars showed significant improvement in viscoelastic deformity (P = .03), elastic deformity (P = .004), skin roughness (P = .05), and wrinkle depth (P = .04) after fractional ablation, whereas CONTROL scars showed no such within-group changes. HBS treated by the Er:YAG laser showed objective improvements, whereas no such changes were seen within the untreated scars over the same time frame.


Asunto(s)
Quemaduras/cirugía , Cicatriz Hipertrófica/cirugía , Láseres de Estado Sólido/uso terapéutico , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad/métodos , Adulto , Quemaduras/complicaciones , Cicatriz/etiología , Cicatriz/cirugía , Cicatriz Hipertrófica/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Am J Surg ; 218(5): 809-812, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31072593

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) are frequently utilized; however some ambulatory procedures may be performed in hospital outpatient departments (HOPs). Our aim was to compare operating room efficiency between our ASC and HOP. METHODS: We reviewed outpatient general surgery procedures performed at our ASC and HOP. Total case time was divided into five components: ancillary time, procedure time, exit time, turnover time, and nonoperative time. RESULTS: Overall, 220 procedures were included (114 ASC, 106 HOP). Expressed in minutes, the mean turnover time (29.8 ±â€¯9.6 vs. 24.5 ±â€¯12.7; p < 0.01), ancillary time (32.2 ±â€¯7.0 vs. 22.2 ±â€¯4.5; p < 0.01), procedure time (77.4 ±â€¯44.9 vs. 56.2 ±â€¯23.0 p < 0.01), exit time (11.8 ±â€¯4.4 vs. 8.5 ±â€¯4.3; p < 0.01), and nonoperative time (62.9 ±â€¯21.9 vs. 48.7 ±â€¯15.0; p < 0.01) were longer at the HOP than at the ASC. CONCLUSION: ASC outpatient procedures are more efficient than those performed at our HOP. A system evaluation of our HOP operating room efficiency is necessary.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Eficiencia Organizacional/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Universitarios/organización & administración , Quirófanos/organización & administración , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/organización & administración , Centros Quirúrgicos/organización & administración , Adulto , Cirugía General , Hospitales Universitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Quirófanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tempo Operativo , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Quirúrgicos/estadística & datos numéricos
13.
Am J Surg ; 217(4): 787-793, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30401479

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgical training is under scrutiny for the effect increased resident autonomy may have on patient outcomes. We hypothesize that as laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) difficulty increases, there will be increased involvement by senior residents and attending physicians with no differences in complications. METHODS: Ten acute care surgeons were asked to fill out a postoperative questionnaire regarding surgical difficulty after every LC between 11/9/2016 and 3/30/2017. Either the Jonckheere-Terpstra test, Mantel-Haenzel chi square test, or ANOVA was used to test for the association between perioperative data and surgical difficulty. RESULTS: A total of 190 LCs were analyzed. PGY level, percent of surgery time with attending surgeon involvement, partial cholecystectomy rate, and length of operation all significantly rose with increasing level of difficulty (p < 0.001) with no significant differences in 60-day emergency room bounce-backs, readmission, or complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: We found that as LC difficulty increases, so does attending surgeon and/or senior resident involvement, without increased morbidity.


Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/educación , Competencia Clínica , Seguridad del Paciente , Adulto , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Femenino , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Masculino , Tempo Operativo , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Texas
14.
J Burn Care Res ; 40(3): 281-286, 2019 04 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30816420

RESUMEN

Delays to the operating room (OR) or discharge (DC) lead to longer lengths of stay and increased costs. Surprisingly, little work has been done to quantify the number and cost of delays for inpatients to the OR, and to DC to outpatient status. They reviewed their burn admissions to determine how often a patient experiences delays in healthcare delivery. Data for all burn admissions were prospectively collected from 2014 to 2016. A quality improvement filter was created to define acceptable parameters for patient throughput. Every hospital day was labeled as 1) No delay, 2) Operation, 3) Delay to the OR, or 4) Delay to DC. They had 1633 admissions: 432 ICU admissions (26%) and 1201 floor admissions (74%). Six hundred fifteen patients (37.7%) received an operation. Patients with delays included 331 with OR delays (20.3%) and 503 with DC delays (30.8%). Average delay days included (Mean ± SD): OR delay days = 4.7 ± 6.2 and DC delay days = 4.1 ± 4.4. Total number of hospital days was 13,009, divided into 1616 OR delay days (12%) and 2096 DC delay days (16%). Significant OR delays were due to patient unstable for OR (n = 387 [24%]), OR space availability (n = 662 [41%]), indeterminate wound depth (n = 437 [27%]), and donor site availability (n = 83 [5%]). Significant DC delays were due to medical goals not reached (n = 388 [19%]), pain control and wound care (n = 694 [33%]), PT/OT clearance (n = 168 [8.0%]), and DC placement delays (n = 754 [36%]). Costs for OR and DC delays ranged between US$1,000,000 and US$5,000,000. Costs of increasing OR capacity and/or additional social work ancillary staff can be justified through millions of dollars of savings annually.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Quirófanos/organización & administración , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/economía , Unidades de Quemados/organización & administración , California , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Innovación Organizacional , Alta del Paciente/economía , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
15.
J Burn Care Res ; 40(6): 752-756, 2019 10 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31264682

RESUMEN

The effects of injecting tumescence containing phenylephrine in pediatric burn patients are unknown, but anecdotally our clinicians note a high incidence of hypertension requiring treatment. This study sought to determine whether tumescence with phenylephrine was associated with hypertension requiring treatment in our pediatric burn patients. This was a retrospective cohort study of pediatric burn patients who underwent tangential excision with split-thickness autografting, excision alone, or autografting alone from 2013 to 2017. Records were reviewed for hypertensive episodes, defined as ≥2 consecutive blood pressure readings that were >2 SD above normal. Published intraoperative age- and sex-adjusted standards were used to define reference values. Parametric and nonparametric tests were used when appropriate. In total, 258 operations were evaluated. Mean patient age was 7.6 ± 5.2 years, and 64.7% were male. Patients were predominately white (69.8%). Overall, there was a 62.8% incidence of hypertension. On univariate logistic regression analysis, duration of operation, estimated blood loss, treated TBSA, and weight-adjusted volume of tumescence were significant predictors of intraoperative hypertension (P < .01). On multivariate analysis, weight-adjusted volume of tumescence alone was significantly associated with the presence of hypertension with an odds ratio of 2.0 (95% confidence interval: 1.33-3.04). Of the 162 operations which exhibited at least one episode of significant hypertension, 128 cases (79%) were treated. Intraoperative administration of phenylephrine-containing tumescence in pediatric burn patients is associated with clinically significant hypertension requiring treatment. This practice should be conducted with caution in pediatric burn operations until its clinical implications are defined.


Asunto(s)
Quemaduras/cirugía , Hipertensión/etiología , Inyecciones Subcutáneas/efectos adversos , Fenilefrina/efectos adversos , Vasoconstrictores/efectos adversos , Autoinjertos , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio , Fenilefrina/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante de Piel , Vasoconstrictores/administración & dosificación
16.
J Burn Care Res ; 40(1): 72-78, 2019 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30189043

RESUMEN

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and morbid complication in patients with severe burn. The reported incidence of AKI and mortality in this population varies widely due to inconsistent and changing definitions. They aimed to examine the incidence, severity, and hospital mortality of patients with AKI after burn using consensus criteria. This is a retrospective cohort study of adults with thermal injury admitted to the Parkland burn intensive care unit (ICU) from 2008 to 2015. One thousand forty adult patients with burn were admitted to the burn ICU. AKI was defined by KDIGO serum creatinine criteria. Primary outcome includes hospital death and secondary outcome includes length of mechanical ventilation, ICU, and hospital stay. All available serum creatinine measurements were used to determine the occurrence of AKI during the hospitalization. All relevant clinical data were collected. The median total body surface area (TBSA) of burn was 16% (IQR: 6%-29%). AKI occurred in 601 patients (58%; AKI stage 1, 60%; stage 2, 19.8%; stage 3, 10.5%; and stage 3 requiring renal replacement therapy [3-RRT], 9.7%). Patients with AKI had larger TBSA burn (median 20.5% vs 11.0%; P < .001) and more mechanical ventilation and hospitalization days than patients without AKI. The hospital death rate was higher in those with AKI vs those without AKI (19.7% vs 3.9%; P < .001) and increased by each AKI severity stage (P trend < .001). AKI severity was independently associated with hospital mortality in the small burn group (for TBSA ≤ 10%: stage 1 adjusted OR 9.3; 95% CI, 2.6-33.0; stage 2-3 OR, 35.0; 95% CI, 9.0-136.8; stage 3-RRT OR, 30.7; 95% CI, 4.2-226.4) and medium burn group (TBSA 10%-40%: stage 2-3 OR, 6.5; 95% CI, 1.9-22.1; stage 3-RRT OR, 35.1; 95% CI, 8.2-150.3). AKI was not independently associated with hospital death in the large burn group (TBSA > 40%). Urine output data were unavailable. AKI occurs frequently in patients after burn. Presence of and increasing severity of AKI are associated with increased hospital mortality. AKI appears to be independently and strongly associated with mortality in patients with TBSA ≤ 40%. Further investigation to develop risk-stratification tools tailoring this susceptible population is direly needed.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/etiología , Quemaduras/complicaciones , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Lesión Renal Aguda/mortalidad , Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Adulto , Quemaduras/mortalidad , Creatinina/sangre , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos
17.
Am J Surg ; 217(1): 90-97, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30190078

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Parkland Grading Scale for Cholecystitis (PGS) was developed as an intraoperative grading scale to stratify gallbladder (GB) disease severity during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). We aimed to prospectively validate this scale as a measure of LC outcomes. METHODS: Eleven surgeons took pictures of and prospectively graded the initial view of 317 GBs using PGS while performing LC (LIVE) between 9/2016 and 3/2017. Three independent surgeon raters retrospectively graded these saved GB images (STORED). The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) statistic assessed rater reliability. Fisher's Exact, Jonckheere-Terpstra, or ANOVA tested association between peri-operative data and gallbladder grade. RESULTS: ICC between LIVE and STORED PGS grades demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC = 0.8210). Diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, difficulty of surgery, incidence of partial and open cholecystectomy rates, pre-op WBC, length of operation, and bile leak rates all significantly increased with increasing grade. CONCLUSIONS: PGS is a highly reliable, simple, operative based scale that can accurately predict outcomes after LC. TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY: The Parkland Grading Scale for Cholecystitis was found to be a reliable and accurate predictor of laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes. Diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, surgical difficulty, incidence of partial and open cholecystectomy rates, pre-op WBC, operation length, and bile leak rates all significantly increased with increasing grade.


Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Colecistitis/diagnóstico , Colecistitis/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto Joven
18.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 86(3): 471-478, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30399131

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previously, our group developed the Parkland grading scale for cholecystitis (PGS) to stratify gallbladder (GB) disease severity that can be determined immediately when performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). In prior studies, PGS demonstrated excellent interrater reliability and was internally validated as an accurate measure of LC outcomes. Here, we compare PGS against a more complex cholecystitis severity score developed by the national trauma society, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST), which requires clinical, operative, imaging, and pathologic inputs, as a predictor of LC outcomes. METHODS: Eleven acute care surgeons prospectively graded 179 GBs using PGS and filled out a postoperative questionnaire regarding the difficulty of the surgery. Three independent raters retrospectively graded these GBs using PGS from images stored in the electronic medical record. Three additional surgeons then assigned separate AAST scores to each GB. The intraclass correlation coefficient statistic assessed rater reliability for both PGS and AAST. The PGS score and the median AAST score became predictors in separate linear, logistic, and negative binomial regression models to estimate perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: The average intraclass correlation coefficient of PGS and AAST was 0.8647 and 0.8341, respectively. Parkland grading scale for cholecystitis was found to be a superior predictor of increasing operative difficulty (R, 0.566 vs. 0.202), case length (R, 0.217 vs. 0.037), open conversion rates (area under the curve, 0.904 vs. 0.757), and complication rates (area under the curve, 0.7039 vs. 0.6474) defined as retained stone, small-bowel obstruction, wound infection, or postoperative biliary leak. Parkland grading scale for cholecystitis performed similar to AAST in predicting partial cholecystectomy, readmission, bile leak rates, and length of stay. CONCLUSION: Both PGS and AAST are accurate predictors of LC outcomes. Parkland grading scale for cholecystitis was found to be a superior predictor of subjective operative difficulty, case length, open conversion rates, and complication rates. Parkland grading scale for cholecystitis has the advantage of being a simpler, operative-based scale which can be scored at a single point in time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Single institution, retrospective review, level IV.


Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Colecistitis/patología , Colecistitis/cirugía , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Texas
19.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care ; 36(8): 669-674, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30614253

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The value of defining goals of care (GoC) for geriatric patients is well known to the palliative care community but is a newer concept for many trauma surgeons. Palliative care specialists and trauma surgeons were surveyed to elicit the specialties' attitudes regarding (1) importance of GoC conversations for injured seniors; (2) confidence in their own specialty's ability to conduct these conversations; and (3) confidence in the ability of the other specialty to do so. METHODS: A 13-item survey was developed by the steering committee of a multicenter, palliative care-focused consortium and beta-tested by trauma surgeons and palliative care specialists unaffiliated with the consortium. The finalized instrument was electronically circulated to active physician members of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma and American Academy for Hospice and Palliative Medicine. RESULTS: Respondents included 118 trauma surgeons (8.8%) and 244 palliative care specialists (5.7%). Palliative physicians rated being more familiar with GoC, were more likely to report high-quality training in performing conversations, believed more palliative specialists were needed in intensive care units, and had more interest in conducting conversations relative to trauma surgeons. Both groups believed themselves to perform GoC discussions better than the other specialty perceived them to do so and favored their own specialty leading team discussions. CONCLUSIONS: Both groups believe themselves to conduct GoC discussions for injured seniors better than the other specialty perceived them to do so, which led to disparate views on the optimal leadership of these discussions.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Cuidados Paliativos/psicología , Medicina Paliativa/organización & administración , Planificación de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Cirujanos/psicología , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comunicación , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Cuidado Terminal/psicología , Estados Unidos
20.
Am J Surg ; 218(6): 1143-1151, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31575418

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Trauma prediction scores such as Revised Trauma Score (RTS) and Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS)) are used to predict mortality, but do not include comorbidities. We analyzed the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA PS) for predicting mortality in trauma patients undergoing surgery. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective study compared the mortality predictive ability of ASA PS, RTS, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and TRISS using a complete case analysis with mixed effects logistic regression. Associations with mortality and AROC were calculated for each measure alone and tested for differences using chi-square. RESULTS: Of 3,042 patients, 230 (8%) died. The AROC for mortality for TRISS was 0.938 (95%CI 0.921, 0.954), RTS 0.845 (95%CI 0.815, 0.875), and ASA PS 0.886 (95%CI 0.864, 0.908). ASA PS + TRISS did not improve mortality predictive ability (p = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: ASA PS was a good predictor of mortality in trauma patients, although combined with TRISS it did not improve predictive ability.


Asunto(s)
Anestesiólogos , Heridas y Lesiones/clasificación , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sociedades Médicas , Índices de Gravedad del Trauma , Estados Unidos , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA