RESUMEN
We report a case of a 28 year old female who presented to us in November 2016 with a swelling in front of neck for three years and worsening shortness of breath for last one year, causing right sided tracheal deviation and mildSuperior Vena Caval obstruction. X-ray showed a soft tissue density mass in antero-superior mediastinum with cephalad extension. Contrast enhanced CT neck and chest revealed a multi cystic lesion extending from the root of neck to anterior mediastinum causing compression and deviation of trachea, and nearby structures especially Superior Vena Cava (SVC) along with collateral formation. Mass was surgically excised from the neck and mediastinum with uneventful post-operative recovery. Histopathology was consistent with benign mature cystic teratoma.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Mediastino/diagnóstico por imagen , Teratoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Disnea/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias del Mediastino/complicaciones , Neoplasias del Mediastino/patología , Neoplasias del Mediastino/cirugía , Cuello , Invasividad Neoplásica , Síndrome de la Vena Cava Superior/etiología , Teratoma/complicaciones , Teratoma/patología , Teratoma/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: A volvulus is a serious surgical emergency caused by torsion or hyper-flexion of the bowel loop and its mesentery on a fixed point. Cecal volvulus is an uncommon cause of intestinal obstruction, accounting for just 1-1.5 % of all cases of bowel obstruction. CASE PRESENTATION: A 33-year-old intellectually disabled male presented to the emergency department with complaints of generalized abdominal pain, absolute constipation, and non-projectile vomiting. He had a grossly distended and rigid abdomen with generalized tenderness and guarding. The abdomen was hyper-resonant. Bowel sounds were hypoactive. Digital rectal examination revealed an empty and collapsed rectum with no stool staining of the finger. Laboratory reports showed leukocytosis and neutrophilia. Radiographic imaging was consistent with acute intestinal obstruction. Laparotomy was performed, and cecal volvulus with viable bowel and acute appendicitis was diagnosed intra-operatively. Manual detorsion, cecopexy, and appendectomy were performed. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course. The patient is still on follow-up since June 2023, and no complication has occurred. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Cecal volvulus is an uncommon cause of intestinal obstruction with multiple etiologies. The annual incidence of cecal volvulus is estimated to be between 2.8 and 7.1 cases per million. Cecal volvulus may lead to life-threatening complications such as bowel ischemia and perforation. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of cecal volvulus must be made promptly to prevent bowel gangrene and perforation. In this case, manual detorsion and cecopexy were performed as the bowel was viable per-operatively due to early surgical intervention.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: One anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) is up to date the third most performed obesity and metabolic procedure worldwide, which recently has been endorsed by ASMBS. The main criticisms are the risk of bile reflux, esophageal cancer, and malnutrition. Although IFSO has recognized this procedure, guidance is needed regarding selection criteria. To give clinicians a daily support in performing the right patient selection in OAGB/MGB, the aim of this paper is to generate clinical guidelines based on an expert modified Delphi consensus. METHODS: A committee of 57 recognized bariatric surgeons from 24 countries created 69 statements. Modified Delphi consensus voting was performed in two rounds. An agreement/disagreement among ≥ 70.0% of the experts was considered to indicate a consensus. RESULTS: Consensus was achieved for 56 statements. Remarkably, ≥ 90.0% of the experts felt that OAGB/MGB is an acceptable and suitable option "in patients with Body mass index (BMI) > 70, BMI > 60, BMI > 50 kg/m2 as a one-stage procedure," "as the second stage of a two-stage bariatric surgery after Sleeve Gastrectomy for BMI > 50 kg/m2 (instead of BPD/DS)," and "in patients with weight regain after restrictive procedures. No consensus was reached on the statement that OAGB/MGB is a suitable option in case of resistant Helicobacter pylori. This is likely as there is a concern that this procedure is associated with reflux and its related long-term complications including risk of cancer in the esophagus or stomach. Also no consensus reached on OAGB/MGB as conversional surgery in patients with GERD after restrictive procedures. Consensus for disagreement was predominantly achieved "in case of intestinal metaplasia of the stomach" (74.55%), "in patients with severe Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)(C,D)" (75.44%), "in patients with Barrett's metaplasia" (89.29%), and "in documented insulinoma" (89.47%). CONCLUSION: Patient selection in OAGB/MGB is still a point of discussion among experts. There was consensus that OAGB/MGB is a suitable option in elderly patients, patients with low BMI (30-35 kg/m2) with associated metabolic problems, and patients with BMIs more than 50 kg/m2 as one-stage procedure. OAGB/MGB can also be a safe procedure in vegetarian and vegan patients. Although OAGB/MGB can be a suitable procedure in patients with large hiatal hernia with concurrent hiatal hernia, it should not be offered to patients with grade C or D esophagitis or Barrett's metaplasia.