Use of intramedullary locking nail for displaced intraarticular fractures of the calcaneus: what is the evidence?

INTRODUCTION: Intramedullary locking devices (ILDs) have recently been advocated as a minimally invasive approach to manage displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs), to minimise complications and improve outcomes. We reviewed clinical and biomechanical studies dealing with commercially available devices to identify their characteristics, efficacy and safety. METHODS: Following a PRISMA checklist, Medline, Scopus and EMBASE databases were searched to identify studies reporting the use of ILDs for treating DIACFs. Biomechanical studies were first evaluated. Cohort studies were then reviewed for demographics, surgical technique, postoperative protocol, clinical and radiographic scores, complications and reoperations. The modified Coleman Methodology Score (CMS) was used to assess the quality of studies. RESULTS: Eleven studies were identified which investigated two devices (Calcanail®, C-Nail®). Three biomechanical studies proved they offered adequate primary stability, stiffness, interfragmentary motion and load to failure. Eight clinical studies (321 feet, 308 patients) demonstrated a positive clinical and radiographic outcome at 16-months average follow-up. Metalware irritation (up to 20%) and temporary nerve entrapment symptoms (up to 30%) were the most common complications, while soft tissue issues (wound necrosis, delayed healing, infection) were reported in 3-5% of cases. Conversion to subtalar fusion was necessary in up to 6% of cases. Four (50%) out of 8 studies were authored by implant designers and in 5 (62%) relevant conflicts of interest were disclosed. Mean (± standard deviation) CMS was 59 ± 9.8, indicating moderate quality. CONCLUSIONS: Treating DIAFCs with ILDs leads to satisfactory clinical outcomes at short-term follow-up, enabling restoration of calcaneal height and improved subtalar joint congruency. Metalware irritation and temporary nerve entrapment symptoms are common complications although wound complications are less frequent than after open lateral approaches. The quality of evidence provided so far is moderate and potentially biased by the conflict of interest, raising concerns about the generalisability of results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V - Review of Level III to V studies.

Tibiotalar Incongruency in Clubfoot Treated Operatively Is a Predictor of Worse Outcome at a Mean of 26 Years.

The traditional approach to congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) has relied on stepwise manipulations, followed by surgery in severe or recurrent cases. The 3 aims of this study were: (1) to report long-term results of clubfoot treated by posterior capsulectomy and selective release (PCSR); (2) to determine the reliability of a visual scale in the assessment of intraoperative tibiotalar incongruency (TTI); and, (3) to assess the role of TTI as a prognostic factor. We reviewed data regarding 95 CTEV (65 patients) treated by PCSR at a minimum follow-up of 20 years. Patients underwent a physical and radiographic examination, and were assessed through multiple clinical scores. The inter- and intraobserver reliability for TTI evaluation was calculated on clinical photographs. Based on TTI, 52 CTEV were divided in 2 groups (30 congruent vs 22 incongruent) and compared. At a mean follow-up of 26.8 (from 24 to 31) years, 52 CTEV (38 patients) were available for the analysis. Functional results were globally satisfactory. The inter- (κ = 0.748) and intraobserver analysis (κ = 0.688) for the TTI visual assessment showed substantial agreement. In patients with incongruency, patient reported outcomes were significantly worse, with also a greater development of subtalar (p = .02), talonavicular and calcaneocuboid arthritis (p < .001 for both). In treating severe CTEV, the surgical PCSR performed in the first year of life obtains satisfactory clinical and patient-recorded outcomes at over 25 years of follow-up. The visual assessment of TTI is reproducible and potentially represents a long-term prognostic factor.

Knee septic arthritis caused by α-hemolytic Streptococcus in a patient with a recent history of knee arthroscopy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is a common procedure in orthopedic practice. Infections are uncommon complications of this procedure with an incidence rate of 0,01% - 3,4%. Staphylococcus spp are the predominant causative agents in such cases. We present a case of knee septic arthritis caused by α-hemolytic Streptococcus. CASE PRESENTATION: A 22-year-old woman diagnosed with obesity (body mass index [BMI] 35 kg/m2) but with no other major comorbidities underwent an arthroscopic selective meniscectomy with administration of intravenous cefazolin for antibiotic prophylaxis. After an uneventful period of 2 months, the patient returned with pain, fever and a discharging sinus at the site of anterolateral arthroscopic portal. Blood tests and magnetic resonance imaging revealed osteomyelitis involving the tibial plate. Cultures of synovial fluid obtained from the knee and a pharyngeal swab yielded α-hemolytic Streptococcus. Five days later, the patient underwent arthroscopic debridement with partial synovectomy. Intraoperative specimens yielded α-hemolytic Streptococcus. The patient received intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam, followed by an associative regimen of amoxicillin and clindamycin with clinical, laboratory and instrumental evidence of symptom resolution. CONCLUSION: The incidence of knee septic arthritis after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is 0.01-3.4%. This infection is usually caused by Staphylococcus spp. and in rare cases by commensal bacteria, such as α-hemolytic streptococci, secondary to transient bacteremia. Screening of the colonized area is important to prevent possible transient bacteremia. Diagnosis is based on isolation of the causative organisms from synovial fluid cultures, and treatment comprises arthroscopic debridement with individualized systemic antibiotic therapy based on the results of an antibiogram.