RESUMEN
EhcoBUTLER is an Information and Communication Technology (ICT) solution funded by the European Union (H2020; ID: 643566) and intended especially for elderly people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to improve their health, independence and quality of life, particularly at the social level. The purpose of this study is to assess the acceptability of ehcoBUTLER based on a survey delivered to potential users and actors involved in their care, exploring their expectations and preferences, while anticipating the system's functional requirements. The survey was delivered online to 313 participants (11% end users, 25% informal caregivers, 48% formal caregivers and 16% administration/management staff) from eight countries. Participants rated the different functionalities of ehcoBUTLER positively, 86.1% perceiving it as an interesting and useful system. Likewise, they assessed it as a commercially attractive product (75.1%). End users expressed a stronger preference for the social module. Nevertheless, they would be ready to pay a low monthly price for ehcoBUTLER. Professionals would be willing to pay choosing its functionalities modularly, but they would also expect it to be funded by the National Health System, centres or businesses. The conclusion is that all participants found ehcoBUTLER interesting, useful and ergonomic. However, to effectively implement it, it is necessary to bridge the digital gap and address the issue of insufficient investment in products aimed at older adults with cognitive impairment. To supplement cognitive training systems with social, emotional or entertainment functionalities could improve adherence to their use.
Asunto(s)
Actitud hacia los Computadores , Cuidadores/psicología , Disfunción Cognitiva/epidemiología , Tecnología de la Información , Prioridad del Paciente/psicología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/prevención & control , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/prevención & control , Ergonomía , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Estilo de Vida Saludable , Humanos , Relaciones Interpersonales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Interfaz Usuario-ComputadorRESUMEN
EhcoBUTLER is a tablet platform mainly aimed at the elderly with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to promote their well-being and health. The main objective of this study was to explore the perceptions and feedback level of the ehcoBUTLER potential users and stakeholders to improve its development. Through this exploration, the secondary objective was to contribute to the development of software/apps that promote their integral health. Focus groups were conducted (13 elderly with MCI, 13 with dementia, 12 caregivers, 11 professionals). The content and feedback level were analyzed. Participants liked the appearance of ehcoBUTLER, would like to use it, and were mainly interested in the emotional, healthy lifestyle, cognitive, and ergonomic tools. It is necessary to have prior training, more intuitive/customizable apps, low-price/free, offline/USB content, and add other activities/features. EhcoBUTLER is well-oriented to meet the needs and preferences of potential users. However, improvements in its usability, accessibility, and sustainability are needed. The participants' perspectives provided a comprehensive view to improve ehcoBUTLER, so that in the future, it can benefit the elderly to be active agents in their health; support caregivers in their role and to have a respite; and professionals to have a multi-intervention platform. The present findings can contribute to the development of tablet software/apps that promote the integral well-being of this population.
Asunto(s)
Disfunción Cognitiva , Demencia , Anciano , Cuidadores/psicología , Disfunción Cognitiva/psicología , Atención a la Salud , Demencia/psicología , Grupos Focales , Humanos , ComprimidosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Incorporating technology in cognitive interventions represents an innovation, making them more accessible, flexible, and cost-effective. This will not be feasible without adequate user-technology fit. Bearing in mind the importance of developing cognitive interventions whose technology is appropriate for elderly people with cognitive impairment, the objective of this systematic review was to find evidence about usability and user experience (UX) measurements and features of stimulation, training, and cognitive rehabilitation technologies for older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia. METHOD: The Medline, PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and PsycINFO databases were searched for literature published in the last 10 years (2009-2019), and three researchers independently reviewed potentially eligible studies, following specific inclusion criteria. A systematic review of the studies was conducted, presenting a qualitative synthesis of usability and UX measures with their outcomes, study characteristics and features of the cognitive intervention technologies. RESULTS: Ten studies were selected: five were cognitive stimulation and five were cognitive training. Most of them (60%) were computer-based programs with a serious game format. Efficiency and effectiveness were the most frequent measurements used for collecting objective usability data, showing that elderly people with cognitive impairment require more time (45%) and help (40%) but can complete tasks (60%). Regarding UX or subjective usability data, questionnaires and scales were the most used methods, reporting positive experience despite certain difficulties with the interface in five studies. CONCLUSION: Measuring usability and UX in cognitive intervention technologies for older adults with MCI or dementia provides an integrated view that can contribute to their development according to the needs and characteristics of the target population. More research is required to include this population group in usability and UX studies, as well as standardized tools and consensus on the relationship of these terms to guarantee the future effectiveness of cognitive intervention technologies. REVIEW REGISTRATION: This review was registered in the PROSPERO (CRD42020158147) International Register of Systematic Review Protocols.
RESUMEN
In recent years, different computer-based cognitive training (CT) programs for people with dementia (PwD) have been developed following a psychosocial approach. AIM: This systematic review aims to identify the methodological designs applied in the development of computer-based training (CCT) programs for the rehabilitation of cognitive functioning in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using the databases PubMed and PsycINFO. The search period was between 2000-2019. The study selection and data extraction processes were carried out by two independent reviewers. The protocol was registered in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under registration number CRD42020159027. RESULTS: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The most frequently used methodological design in the development of CCT programs for people with MCI or mild dementia was the user-centered design (UCD). This design involves an interactive system characterized by the inclusion of end users from the initial stages of its development, throughout the establishment of functional requirements, and in the evaluation of the program's usability and user-experience (UX). CONCLUSION: UCD was the most used methodological design for the development of CCT programs although there was quite some variation in how this design was applied. Recommendations for future studies about the development of CCT programs for people with MCI and mild dementia are given. Central focus should be the inclusion and active participation of end users from the initial stages of development.
RESUMEN
In recent years, technology has been implemented in the field of interventions for older adults. GRADIOR 4.5 is a cognitive software within the wide variety of available multimedia programs that support healthcare professionals in cognitive assessment and neuropsychological rehabilitation. The study aimed to evaluate the new version of GRADIOR (v4.5) based on the experience of people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), people with dementia (PWD), and healthcare professionals. A qualitative study using the focus group methodology was carried out involving 13 people with MCI, 13 PWD, and 11 healthcare professionals. An analysis of the content and the level of feedback was performed. The study showed that GRADIOR 4.5 might be sufficiently adapted to PWD and people with MCI. Participants were motivated to use GRADIOR 4.5, showed high acceptability of the software, and a positive attitude towards technology. However, healthcare professionals suggested significant improvements to the software. GRADIOR 4.5 appeared to be a promising intervention that, because of its positive experience and acceptability, could be systematically implemented to complement cognitive rehabilitation interventions for older adults with MCI and dementia. Finally, it is advisable to consider the suggestions gathered in this study for future developments.
RESUMEN
Due to the growing number of older adults with cognitive impairment, it is essential to delay the onset and progression of cognitive decline and promote a healthy lifestyle. The rapid growth of technology has considerably advanced the field of computerized cognitive interventions. Consequently, traditional cognitive interventions are being adapted and new multimedia systems are being developed to encourage health and independent living in old age. The primary objective of this review was to identify cognitive stimulation, training and rehabilitation programs aimed at older people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. PsycINFO, Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed, and CORDIS databases were searched from January 2008 to August 2018. Two researchers reviewed the potential studies individually for eligibility. Studies of computerized cognitive interventions for people with dementia and cognitive impairment were included if they clearly described objectives, users and functioning. A systematic review of the studies was carried out, providing a qualitative synthesis of the features and study characteristics of each software. Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria, and 11 different cognitive stimulation, training, and rehabilitation programs were identified. The studies found on cognitive intervention software indicate the existence of various technological programs for people with MCI and dementia. On the overall, the programs were aimed at people with different clinical conditions, able to create specific treatments and personalized training, optimized for portable devices, and user-friendly. However, the selected programs differ from each other in terms of objectives, usage mode and characteristics, even if they were used for the same purposes. Therefore, the information obtained in the review may be relevant to distinguish between programs and select the one that best suits each user. Thus, more information about the features and context of use is needed as well as more clinical studies to be able to compare among computerized cognitive programs.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cognitive rehabilitation is a highly individualised, non-pharmacological intervention for people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia, which in recent years has also been developed for various IT platforms. METHODS: In this study, we aim to evaluate the effectiveness of the cognitive rehabilitation software GRADIOR in a multi-centre, single-blinded randomised controlled trial with people with MCI and mild dementia. A total of 400 people with MCI and mild dementia will be randomly allocated to one of four groups. This trial will compare the cognitive rehabilitation treatment using the GRADIOR programme with a psychosocial stimulation intervention (PSS) using the ehcoBUTLER platform, with a combined treatment consisting of GRADIOR and ehcoBUTLER, and with a group receiving treatment as usual during a period of 1 year. DISCUSSION: The outcomes of this clinical trial will be to determine any relevant changes in cognition, mood, quality of life, activities of daily living and quality of patient-carer relationship after 4 months and 1 year of intervention in a cross-sectional group comparison. Participants will be followed-up for 1 year to investigate potential long-term effects of the conducted treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN, ID: 15742788 . Registered on 12 June 2017.
Asunto(s)
Cognición , Disfunción Cognitiva/rehabilitación , Demencia/rehabilitación , Psicoterapia/métodos , Programas Informáticos , Terapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Actividades Cotidianas , Afecto , Anciano , Disfunción Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Disfunción Cognitiva/psicología , Demencia/diagnóstico , Demencia/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Método Simple Ciego , España , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Introducción. La terapia de reminiscencia es una de las intervenciones psicosociales mas eficaces para personas con demencia. Objetivos. Analizar la eficacia de la terapia de reminiscencia grupal en personas con demencia y comprobar su participación en el diseno y evaluacion. Pacientes y métodos. Se revisaron las bases de datos CINHAL, PubMed, Psicodoc y PsycINFO, en el periodo 2004-2016, y se realizo una revision sistematica, evaluacion de calidad y metaanalisis de los articulos. Resultados. Los 14 estudios seleccionados presentaron riesgo de sesgo moderado, los participantes que recibieron terapia de reminiscencia experimentaron una mejoria leve en cognicion (dMR = 0,26; IC 95%: 0,11-0,40; p = 0,0006; I2 = 0%), y esta fue mayor que la del grupo control (dc = 0,37; IC 95%: 0,11-0,63; p = 0,005; I2 = 0%). No se encontraron mejorias en el estado de animo, la calidad de vida, las alteraciones de conducta ni las actividades de la vida diaria. Ningun estudio incluyo a las personas con demencia ni a sus acompanantes en el diseno y evaluacion. Conclusiones. La terapia de reminiscencia grupal tiene efectos favorables sobre la cognicion. Es necesaria la inclusion de las personas con demencia en el diseno y planificacion de las intervenciones, asi como la realizacion de mas ensayos clínicos aleatorizados (AU)
Introduction. Reminiscence therapy is one of the most effective psychosocial interventions for people with dementia. Aims. To analyse the effectiveness of group reminiscence therapy in people with dementia and to check their involvement in the design and evaluation of the interventions. Patients and methods. CINHAL, PubMed, Psicodoc and PsycINFO databases were searched for the period of 2004 to 2016. A systematic search was performed, as well as a quality assessment and a meta-analysis of the articles. Results. The 14 studies selected had a moderate risk of bias. People with dementia who received group reminiscence therapy experienced an improvement in cognition (dMR = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.11-0.40; p = 0.0006; I2 = 0%) which was larger than the one observed in the control group (dc = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.11-0.63; p = 0.005; I2 = 0%). There was no improvement in mood, quality of life, behaviour or activities of daily living. People with dementia were not included in the design nor in the evaluation of the interventions. Conclusions. Group reminiscence therapy for people with dementia has favourable effects in cognition. there is a need for the inclusion of people with dementia in the design and planning of the interventions and for more randomised controlled trials (AU)