RESUMEN
A 58-year-old man with chronic renal disease underwent ileo-cecal resection with lymph node dissection for cancer of the ascending colon at his previous physician. The pathological diagnosis was pT3N0M0, pStage â ¡a. One year and 7 months after surgery, he was diagnosed with local and lymph node recurrence and referred to our department. Contrast- enhanced CT revealed that an irregular nodal shadow 25 mm in size adjacent to the superior mesenteric artery and the transvers part of duodenum, which was suspicious for lymph node recurrence. We regarded this patient as marginally resectable and neoadjuvant treatment was considered, but because the patient was on dialysis, we decided to operate without pre-operative treatment. Surgical findings showed invasion of a recurrent lymph node into a primary branch of the superior mesenteric artery and vein. We temporarily blocked these vessels and cut off these vessels after checking that blood flow in the intestine was maintained by intravenous injection of ICG. The lymph node was also invading the uncinate process of the pancreas and the transvers part of duodenum, we performed partial resection of those organs. Pathology revealed no tumor exposure on the dissected surface and R0 resection was achieved. The patient received 5 courses of postoperative folinate/ uracil/tegafur therapy and is alive 1 year postoperatively without recurrence.
Asunto(s)
Colon Ascendente , Neoplasias del Colon , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Colon Ascendente/patología , Arteria Mesentérica Superior , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Diálisis RenalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy (EPD) is a rare event for complex periampullary etiology. Increased intraoperative blood loss is correlated with poor postoperative outcomes. CASE SUMMARY: Two patients underwent EPD using a no-touch isolation technique, in which all arteries supplying the pancreatic head region were ligated and divided before manipulation of the pancreatic head and duodenum. The operative times were 220 and 239 min, and the blood loss was 70 and 270 g, respectively. The patients were discharged on the 14th and 10th postoperative day, respectively. Thirty-two patients underwent EPD for the treatment of neoplastic bleeding. The mean operative time was 361.6 min, and the mean blood loss was 747.3 g. The complication rate was 37.5%. The in-hospital mortality rate was 9.38%. CONCLUSION: The no-touch isolation technique is feasible, safe, and effective for reducing intraoperative blood loss in EPD.
RESUMEN
Rectal metastases of prostate cancer are rare and may be difficult to diagnose. In this report, we describe a case in which an extramural growth-type rectal tumor was resected and pathologically diagnosed as prostate cancer metastasis. A 70-year-old man on hormone therapy for prostate cancer with seminal vesicle invasion and pelvic lymph node metastasis was referred to our department after an imaging scan showed an extramural growth-type rectal tumor. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration was considered for diagnosis, but the patient preferred an early resection without the exam, so surgery was performed. Histopathological examination revealed that the lesion was in the adventitia of the rectum and metastasis of prostate cancer. Metastatic lesions of prostate cancer are not indicated for resection. A detailed preoperative study with the possibility of prostate cancer metastasis in mind is necessary because it is relevant to choosing the treatment strategy.