A quantitative scale to define endoscopic torque control during natural orifice surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The drive to perform procedures with the least impact on the patient has meant that interest in natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) continues to proliferate. However, endoscope control within the extralumenal environment remains a significant challenge. This study aims to define a method to quantitatively assess endoscopic torque control as an indication of performance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fourteen endoscopists performed a ten-target navigational task within a simulated NOTES environment whilst wrist movements were tracked with an optical motion tracker. Patterns of wrist movements were translated to a binary form enabling differentiation of the specified movement from no movement. Three patterns were discernable suggesting the discrimination of purposeful over random manipulations. Three independent assessors scored 140 patterns on a scale of 1 to 3 determined by which pattern was the most appropriate fit. RESULTS: Mean score for novices was 16 (± 3) and for clinicians 22 (± 7). Inter-rater reliability (kappa statistic function) between the assessors ranged from 0.637 to 0.751 p < 0.001 referred to as a substantial assessment tool. The internal consistency between all variables using Chronbach's alpha function was 0.948 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pattern of movements extrapolated from the wrist can be used as a method of measuring endoscope torque control during a translumenal navigation task.

Rectal cancer: Watch-and-wait and continuing the rectal-preserving strategy with local excision for incomplete response or limited regrowth.

BACKGROUND: Deferral of conventional surgery for rectal cancer after neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy is gaining increasing interest, particularly for patients who are too frail to undergo major surgery but also those who wish to avoid the adverse effects of major surgery. We elected to undertake a pragmatic approach to include all comers in a cohort with the aim of reflecting the clinical outcomes for patients on a deferral from conventional rectal surgery pathway, treated with neo-adjuvant chemo-radiation (CRT) with or without selective local excision (LE) offered to those who failed to demonstrate a complete clinical response (cCR). METHODS: Rectal cancer patients treated with neo-adjuvant CRT were stratified to a group of complete responders to CRT on a "watch and wait" (WW) pathway and a group who were treated with an additional local excision for persistent tumour. RESULTS: Regrowth was noted in 26% (11/42) in the WW group after 2 years surveillance, disease free survival was 94.5% (80-99%) at 1 year and 74.9% (44-76.4%) at 3 years. Recurrence was noted in 45% (10/22) in the CRT + LE group, disease free survival at 1 and 3 years was 74% (53.4-88.1) and 66.2% (45.6-82.4) respectively. CONCLUSION: A WW strategy for cCR is a viable pathway in the non-operative management of rectal cancer. We found the use of CRT + LE is a useful option for those who hope to avoid surgery but caution should be exercised due to substantially higher risk of recurrence.