Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 130(6): 571-577, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33030042

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To develop a smartphone application providing sound therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for treating tinnitus and performing a proof-of-concept pilot study evaluating its potential efficacy. METHODS: An interactive smartphone application available on iOS and Android platforms was developed, which provided an 8-week tinnitus-specific CBT and personalized and frequency-matched sound therapy. Included patients presented to our tertiary clinic between 2017 and 2018, while those waitlisted were regarded as controls. Three surveys were administrated: Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7), and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). RESULTS: A total of 30 patients enrolled in this study consisting of 20 treatment and 10 control patients and mean age was 55.4 ± 11.6 years. Treatment and control patients had similar age, sex, and pre-enrolment GAD and PSS (all P > .05). Baseline THI scores were also similar between treatment and control cohorts (50.1 ± 21.9 vs 62.0 ± 20.7; P = .15). After 8 weeks, though changes in GAD and PSS scores were similar (P > .05), the treatment group reported a significantly greater improvement in THI scores (17.7 ± 15.8 vs 5.3 ± 10.5, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated potentially promising efficacy of a smartphone-based CBT and sound therapy platform for treating tinnitus and encourages future randomized controlled trials on this treatment modality.


Asunto(s)
Estimulación Acústica , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Aplicaciones Móviles , Sonido , Acúfeno/terapia , Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Teléfono Inteligente , Estrés Psicológico/psicología
2.
Laryngoscope ; 131(10): 2356-2360, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33625763

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: To assess and characterize online ratings and comments on pediatric otolaryngologists and determine factors that correlate with higher ratings. STUDY DESIGN: Online database analysis. METHODS: All American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology (ASPO) members were queried on Healthgrades, Vitals, RateMDs, and Yelp for their online ratings and comments as of June 2020. Ratings were normalized for comparison on a five-point Likert scale. All comments were categorized based on context and positive or negative quality. RESULTS: Of the 561 ASPO members, 489 (87%) were rated on at least one online platform. Of those rated, 410 (84%) were on Healthgrades, 429 (88%) on Vitals, 236 (48%) on RateMDs, and 72 (15%) on Yelp. Across all platforms, the average overall rating was 4.13 ± 0.03 (range, 1.00-5.00). We found significant positive correlations between overall ratings and specific ratings (P < .001) on all individual topics. In addition, the majority of all narrative comments were related to perceived physician bedside manner and clinical outcome, with negative comments correlating negatively with overall score (P < .05). Time spent with the physician was the only category in which both positive and negative comments showed significant correlation with the overall physician rating (P = .016 and P = .017, respectively). Attending a top-ranked medical school or residency program did not correlate with higher or lower ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Online ratings and comments for pediatric otolaryngologists are largely influenced by patient and parent perceptions of physician competence, comforting bedside manner, and office and time management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 131:2356-2360, 2021.


Asunto(s)
Internet/estadística & datos numéricos , Otorrinolaringólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Pediatras/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Otorrinolaringólogos/educación , Pediatras/educación , Percepción , Facultades de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirujanos/educación , Estados Unidos
3.
Otol Neurotol ; 42(7): 1001-1007, 2021 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33710150

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To describe a cohort of patients presenting with long-term sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) treated with prophylactic migraine and intratympanic steroid therapy. METHODS: Patients presenting to a neurotology clinic at least 6 weeks from SSNHL onset were included. All patients received migraine prophylactic medication (nortriptyline, topiramate, and/or verapamil) and lifestyle changes for at least 6 weeks, as well as intratympanic steroid injections, if appropriate. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (43% female) with a mean age of 64 ±â€Š11 years who presented 9 ±â€Š8 months (median = 5) from symptom onset were included. Posttreatment hearing thresholds were significantly improved compared with pretreatment thresholds at 500 Hz (49 ±â€Š19 dB versus 55 ±â€Š20 dB, p = 0.01), 1000 Hz (52 ±â€Š19 dB versus 57 ±â€Š21 dB, p = 0.03), low-frequency pure-tone average (53 ±â€Š15 dB versus 57 ±â€Š17 dB, p = 0.01), and speech-frequency pure-tone average (57 ±â€Š13 dB versus 60 ±â€Š15 dB, p = 0.02). Posttreatment word-recognition-score (WRS) and speech-recognition-threshold (SRT) were also significantly improved (45 ±â€Š28% versus 70 ±â€Š28% and 57 ±â€Š18 dB versus 50 ±â€Š16 dB, respectively, both p < 0.01). Notably, ≥15% improvement in WRS and ≥10 dB improvement in SRT was observed in 13 (68%) and 8 (40%) patients, respectively. Of the 11 patients who presented with initial < 50% WRS, 8 (73%) had improved posttreatment >50% WRS with an average improvement of 39 ±â€Š9%. CONCLUSIONS: Migraine medications in addition to intratympanic steroid injections significantly improved SRT and hearing frequencies in 40% and 29% of SSNHL patients, respectively, while significant WRS recovery was observed in most (68%) patients. This suggests SSNHL may be an otologic migraine phenomenon, which may be at least partially reversible even after the traditional 30-day postonset window.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural , Pérdida Auditiva Súbita , Trastornos Migrañosos , Anciano , Audiometría de Tonos Puros , Dexametasona , Femenino , Glucocorticoides , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/tratamiento farmacológico , Pérdida Auditiva Súbita/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Migrañosos/complicaciones , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Front Neurol ; 11: 1046, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33041986

RESUMEN

A perilymphatic fistula (PLF) is an abnormal communication between the perilymph-filled inner ear and the middle ear cavity, mastoid, or intracranial cavity. A PLF most commonly forms when the integrity of the oval or round window is compromised, and it may be trauma-induced or may occur with no known cause (idiopathic). Controversy regarding the diagnosis of idiopathic PLF has persisted for decades, and the presenting symptoms may be vague. However, potential exists for this condition to be one of the few etiologies of dizziness, tinnitus, and hearing loss that can be treated surgically. The aim of this review is to provide an update on classification, diagnosis, and treatment of PLF. Particular attention will be paid to idiopathic PLF and conditions that may have a similar presentation, with subsequent information on how best to distinguish them. Novel diagnostic criteria for PLF and management strategy for PLF and PLF-like symptoms is presented.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA