Practitioners' perceptions of the ASQ-TRAK developmental screening tool for use in Aboriginal children: A preliminary survey.

AIM: To determine health practitioners' experience of using the culturally adapted Ages and Stages Questionnaire - Talking about Raising Aboriginal Kids (ASQ-TRAK) and the Ages and Stages Questionnaire-3 (ASQ-3) with Australian Aboriginal families and their perception about parents' acceptability and understanding of the instruments. METHODS: We surveyed a convenience sample of practitioners who had used both the ASQ-TRAK and the ASQ-3 developmental screening tools with Aboriginal children in the Northern Territory and South Australia. We compared their experience and perception about parents' acceptability and understanding of both instruments. RESULTS: All 38 respondents used the ASQ-3 and 35 the ASQ-TRAK; 100% rated the ASQ-TRAK as more acceptable and easier to understand for parents compared with 68% (P < 0.001) and 52.6% (P < 0.001), respectively, for the ASQ-3. A greater proportion of respondents were satisfied using the ASQ-TRAK (100%) than the ASQ-3 (65.7%) (P = 0.003). A higher proportion indicated that the ASQ-TRAK was respectful (85.3% compared with ASQ-3 27.8%, P < 0.001), culturally relevant (70.6% compared to 16.2%, P < 0.001) and engaging (76.5% compared to 16.2%, P < 0.001). Qualitative exploration of respondents' comments supported the quantitative findings. The ASQ-TRAK was considered more culturally appropriate, engaging and useful. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that the culturally adapted ASQ-TRAK is preferred to the ASQ-3 by health practitioners in the Australian Aboriginal context. Failing to address cultural and linguistic factors and applying measurement tools developed for one population to another, is problematic in any setting. While further research is required to explore parents' experience directly, these data provide support for the ASQ-TRAK to be used in this context.

Changing health workforce attitudes to promote improved physical health in mental health service users: Keeping our Staff in Mind (KoSiM).

ISSUE ADDRESSED: People living with mental illness die on average 15 years earlier than the general population, primarily due to preventable and premature cardiovascular disease. Lifestyle interventions can be effective in reducing cardiovascular risk, yet mental health services do not routinely provide targeted lifestyle interventions. Exposing mental health staff to lifestyle interventions prior to targeting patients may be critical to changing culture and improving patient outcomes. This study aimed to improve the physical health of mental health staff through a targeted lifestyle intervention. METHODS: A pragmatic single-arm intervention study was conducted in a public mental health service, including inpatient and community settings, in Sydney, Australia. Participants in this study were n = 212 clinical and non-clinical staff. A five-session individualised lifestyle intervention (delivered over 5 weeks) incorporating physical activity and nutritional counselling was delivered by multidisciplinary teams. Participants were assessed at baseline, following the intervention, and at follow-up (mean = 16.7 weeks). The primary outcome was the barriers, attitudes, knowledge and confidence regarding screening, promoting and intervening to improve physical health outcomes of patients (M-BACK questionnaire). Secondary outcomes included anthropometric measures, cardiorespiratory fitness, sedentary time and nutritional intake. Repeated measures ANCOVAs were performed. RESULTS: A total of 212 staff (79% female) participated in this study. M-BACK total score significantly increased from baseline to follow-up (P < .001). Waist circumference, sedentary time and total energy intake all significantly decreased (all P's < .001) and cardiorespiratory fitness significantly increased (P < .001). CONCLUSION: A brief lifestyle intervention for staff of a public mental health service may increase the capability of the participants to improve their own physical health. SO WHAT?: Improving staff health may be an important strategy in improving the uptake and/or the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions targeting mental health service users.

Prevalence of food insecurity in community-dwelling people living with severe mental illness.

AIM: The present study aimed to measure the prevalence and severity of food insecurity in people with a severe mental illness, defined as schizophrenia and related psychoses, and bipolar disorder; and explore relationships between food insecurity status, and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. METHODS: This cross-sectional study recruited community-dwelling people with severe mental illness receiving clozapine and/or a long-acting injectable antipsychotic medication within three mental health services in Sydney, Australia. Participants completed the 18-item Household Food Insecurity Access Scale. Sociodemographic and medical information was obtained from participants' medical records. Independent samples t-test and chi-square analyses were used to test for between group differences based on food insecurity status. Binary logistic regression analyses adjusting for age and gender were used to determine the odds ratio. RESULTS: One-hundred and eighty-eight people completed the assessment: 63% were male, mean age was 49.2 ± 12.4 years, and the majority (85%) had a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Food insecurity was detected in 31% of participants. Of those who were food insecure, 12% were classified as severe, 13% as moderate and 7% as mild. Tobacco smoking was higher in food insecure people compared to food secure people (odds ratio = 3.1, 95% CI 1.3 to 7.1, p = 0.01). Food insecurity status was not associated with demographic, diagnostic or other clinical data. CONCLUSIONS: Food insecurity is highly prevalent among community-dwelling people with severe mental illness receiving clozapine and/or long-acting injectable antipsychotic medication. Food security screening should be considered as routine care for this population group.

Is Obesity in Young People With Psychosis a Foregone Conclusion? Markedly Excessive Energy Intake Is Evident Soon After Antipsychotic Initiation.

Introduction: Antipsychotic medication (APM) initiation is associated with rapid and substantial weight-gain and high rates of obesity. Obesity leads to premature onset of cardiometabolic diseases and contributes to the 15-20 year shortfall in life expectancy in those experiencing severe mental illness. Dietary energy intake excess is critical to weight management but is yet to be quantified in youth with first episode psychosis (FEP) receiving APM. This study aimed to describe the degree of energy overconsumption and the food sources contributing to this in youth with FEP. Materials and Methods: People aged 15-30 years with FEP receiving APM completed diet histories through qualified dietitians to assess energy imbalance and food sources. Outcome measures were: (i) energy balance; and (ii) intake of core and discretionary foods. Results: Participants (n = 93) were aged 15-29 years (mean = 21.4 ± 2.9 years) and exposed to APMs for a median for 8 months (Interquartile Range (IQR) 11 months). Energy balance was exceeded by 26%, by a median 1,837 kJ per day (IQR 5,365 kJ). APM polypharmacy and olanzapine were linked to larger excesses in dietary energy intake. The greatest contributors to energy intake were refined grain foods (33%) and discretionary foods (31%). Conclusion: Young people with FEP receiving APMs appear to have markedly excessive energy consumption, likely contributing to rapid weight-gain, and thereby seeding future poor physical health. Larger, prospective studies are needed to gain a greater understanding of dietary intake, and its effects on health, in people with FEP.