Guilt and Regret Experienced by Parents of Children Born Extremely Preterm.

OBJECTIVES: To explore decisional regret of parents of babies born extremely preterm and analyze neonatal, pediatric, and parental factors associated with regret. STUDY DESIGN: Parents of infants born <29 weeks of gestational age, aged between 18 months and 7 years, attending neonatal follow-up were enrolled. Hospital records were reviewed to examine morbidities and conversations with parents about levels of care. Parents were asked the following question: "Knowing what you know now, is there anything you would have done differently?" Mixed methods were used to analyze responses. RESULTS: In total, 248 parents (98% participation) answered, and 54% reported they did not have regret. Of those who reported regret (n = 113), 3 themes were most frequently invoked: 35% experienced guilt, thinking they were responsible for the preterm birth; 28% experienced regret about self-care decisions; and 20% regretted decisions related to their parental role, generally wishing they knew sooner how to get involved. None reported regret about life-and-death decisions made at birth or in the neonatal intensive care unit. Impairment at follow-up, gestational age, and decisions about levels/reorientation of care were not associated with regret. More mothers reported feeling guilt about the preterm birth (compared with fathers); parents of children with severe lesions on ultrasonography of the head were less likely to report regret. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-half of the parents of infants born extremely preterm had regrets regarding their neonatal intensive care unit stay. Causes of regret and guilt should be addressed and minimized.

Pulmonary important outcomes after extremely preterm birth: Parental perspectives.

AIM: To describe pulmonary important outcomes (PIO) reported by parents of children born extremely preterm. METHODS: Over 1-year, all parents of children aged 18 months-7-years born <29 weeks' GA were asked regarding their perspectives. The proportion of parents who described PIO and the themes they invoked were examined. Results were analysed using mixed methods. RESULTS: Among parental responses (n = 285, 98% participation rate), 44% spoke about PIO, invoking 24 themes pertaining to NICU hospitalisation and/or long-term respiratory health. Some themes had an impact primarily on the child (e.g. exercise limitation), while the majority had an impact on the whole family (e.g. hospital readmissions). None mentioned oxygen at 36 weeks nor bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). The proportion of responses invoking PIO were statistically similar between parents of children with and without BPD, born before or after 25 weeks or with birthweight < or ≥750 g. PIO were more likely to be mentioned in males and among those readmitted for respiratory problems. CONCLUSION: Parents describe many PIO, most related to the functional impact of lung disease on their child (and family), rather than the diagnosis of BPD itself. Most of these PIO are not primary outcomes in large neonatal trials nor collected in neonatal databases.

Parental Perspectives Regarding Outcomes of Very Preterm Infants: Toward a Balanced Approach.

OBJECTIVES: To explore parental perspectives regarding their preterm child at 18 months corrected age and to investigate whether reported answers correlate with level of neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) as defined by clinicians. We hypothesized that parents would report more negative concerns with increasing level of NDI. STUDY DESIGN: This study included 190 infants born <29 weeks of gestational age in 2009-2012 at 1 tertiary university health center. Infants underwent detailed developmental assessment at 18 months corrected age, and were classified into either absence or presence of mild to moderate or severe NDI. Parents were asked 2 open-ended questions: "What concerns you most about your child?" and "Please describe the best things about your child." Open-ended questions were analyzed using qualitative methodology. RESULTS: In this cohort, 49%, 43%, and 8% of participants had no, mild to moderate, and severe NDI. The majority of parents (72.8%) had both positive and negative aspects to report; 26.8% only had positive ones. The main positive themes invoked by parents included their child's personality (61%), happiness (40%), developmental outcome/progress (40%), and physical health (11%). The main themes regarding parental concerns included neurodevelopment (56%), notably language and behavior, and physical health (24%), particularly growth/nutrition and physical fragility. There was no association between positive themes and categories of NDI, but parents of children with mild to moderate NDI reported more concerns about development. CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal outcome research would benefit from incorporating parental perspectives regarding their child, including negative and positive aspects, enabling physicians to provide complete and balanced information to parents of all preterm infants.

Treatment of Refractory Epilepsy With MEK Inhibitor in Patients With RASopathy.

BACKGROUND: Several specific syndromes within the RASopathies spectrum lead to an increased risk of seizures up to developing refractory epileptic encephalopathy. Management remains symptomatic. METHODS: Here we report two patients treated with trametinib, a MEK1-2 inhibitor, as a precision strategy for drug-resistant epilepsy. Patient 1 is a six-year-old girl with cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome (BRAF p.F595L, germline mutation), and Patient 2 is a 14-month-old boy with Schimmelpenning syndrome (KRAS p.G12D, postzygotic somatic mutation). Trametinib was initiated at a dosage of 0.025 mg/kg/day. RESULTS: Patient 1 had multiple seizures per day, multifocal motor to bilateral tonic-clonic. Electroencephalography (EEG) showed a dramatic reduction in EEG discharges three months after trametinib onset, while a marked clinical improvement occurred after about five months, at the same dosage, and the girl is currently seizure-free for more than six months. Patient 2 had left cerebral hemiatrophy leading to right focal motor seizures, multiple per week to multiple per day, since the age of three months. On trametinib, he experienced an early benefit, remaining seizure-free for more than three months. However, after six months we observed recurrence of seizures. After 22 months of treatment, trametinib was discontinued because of a suspected drug-induced inflammatory colitis. After discontinuation, we observed a significant clinical and EEG "rebound effect." CONCLUSIONS: We provide proof of concept that MEK inhibition is a promising approach for the treatment of patients with refractory epilepsy with selected germline and mosaic RASopathies. Future trials are encouraged to better investigate their potentials and limitations.

Fragility and resilience: parental and family perspectives on the impacts of extreme prematurity.

OBJECTIVES: Extremely preterm babies have a significant risk of neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI). There has been little investigation regarding the impact of prematurity on families. The objective of this study was to explore parental perspectives regarding the impact of prematurity on themselves/their family. METHODS: Over 1 year, parents of children born <29 weeks' gestational age (GA) who were between 18 months old and 7 years old and came for their follow-up visit were invited to participate. They were asked to categorise the impacts of prematurity on their life and their family as positive, negative or both and to describe those impacts in their own words. Thematic analysis was performed by a multidisciplinary group, including parents. Logistic regression was performed to compare parental responses. RESULTS: Among parents (n=248, 98% participation rate), most (74%) reported that their child's prematurity had both positive and negative impacts on their life or their family's life, while 18% reported only positive impacts and 8% only negative impacts. These proportions were not correlated with GA, brain injury, nor level of NDI. The positive impacts reported included: an improved outlook on life, such as gratitude and perspective (48%), stronger family relationships (31%) and the gift of the child (28%). The negative themes were stress and fear (42%), loss of equilibrium due to medical fragility (35%) and concerns about developmental outcomes including the child's future (18%). CONCLUSION: Parents report both positive and negative impacts after an extremely preterm birth, independent of disability. These balanced perspectives should be included in neonatal research, clinical care and provider education.

Parental perspective on important health outcomes of extremely preterm infants.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Neonatal outcome research and clinical follow-up principally focus on neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) after extremely preterm birth, as defined by the scientific community, without parental input. This survey aimed to investigate parental perspectives about the health and development of their preterm children. METHODS: Parents of children aged 18 months to 7 years born <29 weeks' gestational age presenting at a neonatal follow-up clinic over a 1-year period were asked to evaluate their children's health and development. They were also asked the following question: 'if you could improve two things about your child, what would they be?' Responses were analysed using mixed methods. Logistic regressions were done to compare parental responses. RESULTS: 248 parents of 213 children (mean gestational age 26.6±1.6 weeks, 20% with severe NDI) were recruited. Parents evaluated their children's health at a median of 9/10. Parental priorities for health improvements were (1) development, mainly behaviour, emotional health and language/communication (55%); (2) respiratory heath and overall medical fragility (25%); and (3) feeding/growth issues (14%). Nineteen per cent explicitly mentioned 'no improvements'. Parents were more likely to state 'no improvements' if child had no versus severe NDI OR 4.33 (95% CI 1.47 to 12.75)) or if parents had no versus at least a high school diploma (OR 4.01 (95% 1.99 to 8.10)). CONCLUSIONS: Parents evaluate the health of their preterm children as being very good, with positive perspectives. Parental concerns outside the developmental sphere should also be addressed both in clinical follow-up and research.

Transition in acquired brain injury youth (TrABI-Y): a systematic literature review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Acquired brain injury (ABI) in paediatrics refers to children born with a neurological deficit, which will lead to a chronic neurological disorder. As advances in medical paediatric health progress, we are seeing these ABI youth transitioning into adult healthcare services while also going through different life events. Despite the growing number of young adult patients, access to transition programmes to facilitate the transition process is still limited and evidence on the effectiveness of these programmes is inconclusive. The purpose of this paper is to provide the protocol for an upcoming systematic literature review on this important issue. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The start of this systematic literature review is planned for 1 October 2019 and will end on 31 December 2021. According to the PICO framework developed, the Population and the Problem of interest (P) will include children, adolescents and young adults (0-18 years) diagnosed with ABI. The selected articles will have to involve an Intervention (I) relating to the healthcare of this population or life transitions from paediatric to adult-oriented care. Studies will be included if a Comparator (C) intervention was used. The expected Outcomes (O) will have to report quantitative or qualitative health-related outcomes post-transition. This comprehensive search of peer-reviewed literature will include articles published between 2010 and 2020. The databases to be searched include Medline, All EBM Reviews, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL. The selected articles will be appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A synthesis of the findings will be drafted to identify the effectiveness of available transition programmes as well as predictors, factors and determinants involved in the transition process. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This project is not associated with direct individuals. The dissemination plan includes strategies such as using this systematic literature review to develop a research project on transition that will be published.