Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Sex Dev ; 16(1): 11-18, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34352789

RESUMEN

Provision of optimum healthcare for infants with atypical genitalia requires a clear understanding of the occurrence of this condition. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of atypical genitalia and its initial management. A prospective, electronic survey of clinicians within managed clinical networks in Scotland was undertaken between 2013 and 2019. Notification from clinicians was sought for term neonates requiring specialist input for atypical genitalia. Additional information was also sought from the 4 regional genetics laboratories that provided details for neonates who had an urgent karyotype performed for atypical genitalia or sex determination. In total, the study identified 171 term infants who required some investigation for atypical genitalia in the neonatal period, providing a birth prevalence of 1:1,881 term births. Of the 171 infants, 97 (57%) had specialist input over the first 3 months of life, providing a birth prevalence of 1:3,318 term births that received specialist input for atypical genitalia. A total of 92 of these 97 cases had complete 3-month follow-up data, 62 (67%) presented within 24 h of birth, and age at presentation ranged from birth to 28 days. Age at sex assignment ranged from birth to 14 days, and in 63 cases (68%), sex assignment occurred at birth. Thus, the birth prevalence of a case of atypical genitalia where sex assignment was reported to be delayed beyond birth was estimated at 1:11,097 births. In 1 case sex was re-assigned at 3 months. Atypical genitalia requiring specialist input within the first month of life are rare in term newborns, and in only a third of these cases, sex assignment is delayed beyond birth. This study provides new clinical benchmarks for comparing and improving the delivery of care in centres that manage these conditions.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Desarrollo Sexual , Trastornos del Desarrollo Sexual/epidemiología , Trastornos del Desarrollo Sexual/genética , Trastornos del Desarrollo Sexual/terapia , Genitales , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Análisis para Determinación del Sexo
2.
Int J Rheum Dis ; 18(3): 287-93, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25923606

RESUMEN

AIMS: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate, critically, the treatment options used in the management of bone loss associated with glucocorticoid (GC) use among children. METHODS: We performed a systematic search using PubMed, Cochrane clinical trial registry, Clinicaltiral.gov and Ovid databases (1 March, 2013). The search resulted in 34 eligible retrievals. Of them, seven clinical trials that fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected by two authors. RESULTS: Four studies have compared the effectiveness of bisphosphonates in the treatment of GC-induced low bone mineral density (BMD) in children. Remaining studies were on menatretenone + alfacacidol versus alfacalcidol alone, calcium + vitamin D versus placebo and alfacalcidol versus menatetrenone. In the four studies, bisphosphonates have shown the ability either to improve BMD or prevent bone loss associated with GC use in children. However, alendronate either in oral or intravenous routes and oral pamidronate were the only bisphosphnates that have been studied in children. Vitamin K2 (menatetrenone) combined with alfacalcidol has also preserved BMD in children on long-term GC therapy. Calcium combined with alfacalcidol has also prevented bone loss, greater than menatetrenone. Calcitriol together with Calcium in conventional doses has retarded bone loss, although the combination could not completely prevent the process. CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D derivatives such as calcitriol or alfacalcidol together with adequate calcium can be considered suitable treatment options to be started simultaneously when long-term GC therapy is needed in children. For children who have been on GCs or have already lost BMD, either oral pamidronate or alendronate in oral/intravenous routes can be considered based on the availability.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Calcio/uso terapéutico , Suplementos Dietéticos , Difosfonatos/uso terapéutico , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversos , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Vitamina D/uso terapéutico , Administración Intravenosa , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Calcio/administración & dosificación , Niño , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Osteoporosis/inducido químicamente , Osteoporosis/diagnóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vitamina D/administración & dosificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA