Cyclosporine protects the heart during aortic valve surgery.

BACKGROUND: Part of the myocardial damage occurring during cardiac surgery is a consequence of reperfusion injury. Cyclosporine, a potent inhibitor of the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore, attenuates reperfusion injury in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. This study investigated whether the administration of cyclosporine just before the aortic cross-unclamping would reduce myocardial injury in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery. METHODS: This study was a monocentric, prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial. Sixty-one patients, scheduled for elective aortic valve surgery, were randomly assigned (computer-generated randomization sequence) to receive either an intravenous bolus of cyclosporine (2.5 mg/kg, cyclosporine group, n = 30) or normal saline (control group, n = 31) 10 min before aortic cross-unclamping. The primary endpoint was the 72-h area under the curve for cardiac troponin I. RESULTS: Both groups were similar with respect to baseline characteristics and aortic cross-clamping duration. A significant 35% reduction of area under the curve for cardiac troponin I was observed in the cyclosporine group compared with the control group (242 ± 225 vs. 155 ± 71 arbitrary units, mean ± SD; mean difference, -86.2 ± 42.5; 95% CI, -172.3 to -0.1; P = 0.03). Cyclosporine beneficial effect remained significant after adjustment for aortic cross-clamping duration in each group (mean difference, -88 ± 34, 95% CI, -157 to -19; P = 0.01). None of the treated patients had significant side effects (odds ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.16 to 2.55; P = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: Cyclosporine administration at the time of reperfusion protects against reperfusion injury in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery. The clinical benefit of this protection requires confirmation in a larger clinical trial.

Management of Infective Endocarditis and Tibioperoneal Mycotic Aneurysm Following COVID-19 Infection.

Introduction: Infective endocarditis and mycotic tibioperoneal aneurysms are rare complications of COVID-19 infection. Medical therapy may not always be sufficient to reduce the high morbidity and mortality associated with these cardiovascular complications. Surgical treatment may need to be considered in such patients. Report: A 56 year old male patient with diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidaemia developed severe pneumonia from COVID-19 infection. He was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at another facility where he was ventilated for a period of six weeks. Blood culture isolated coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and an echocardiogram showed a 1.4 × 1.5 cm mitral valve vegetation. He was treated for a period of 12 weeks with various antibiotic combinations including meropenem, levofloxacin, and teicoplanin with no improvement. On presentation at the current centre, he complained of painful right calf swelling. Computed tomography angiography showed a 7 cm right tibioperoneal trunk aneurysm. He underwent lung and cardiac assessment, following which it was decided to proceed with one stage synchronous surgery. Cardiac surgery was started through a median sternotomy and Guiraudon transeptal approach, with mitral valve replacement using a bioprosthesis (Edwards Magna, size 29). This was immediately followed by a medial lower limb approach with ligation of the aneurysm, followed by arterial reconstruction using a reversed saphenous vein graft from the superficial femoral artery to the posterior tibial artery. He was placed on intravenous vancomycin and ceftriaxone for a period of six weeks. He was discharged home after day 31 on 75 mg aspirin daily. At six month follow up, he was symptom free with a palpable posterior tibial pulse. Discussion: Increased awareness and close surveillance are necessary for patients with severe COVID-19 infection. In those who develop unusual cardiovascular complications, one stage cardiac and vascular surgery may be feasible, as described in this case.

Is robotic assistance an added value in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery? A meta-analysis from propensity score-matched series.

OBJECTIVES: There is still ongoing debate about the benefits of robotic assistance (R-MVS) in comparison with video assistance (V-MVS) in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. This study aims to update the current evidence. METHODS: Three propensity score-matched studies published from 2011 to 2021 were included with a total of 1193 patients operated on from 2005 (R-MVS: 536, V-MVS: 657). Data regarding early mortality, postoperative event, and time-related outcomes were extracted and submitted to a meta-analysis using weighted random-effects modeling. RESULTS: The incidence of early mortality, stroke, renal failure, conversion, atrial fibrillation, and prolonged ventilation were similar, all in the absence of heterogeneity. Reoperation for bleeding (odds ratio [OR]: 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16-0.81, p = 0.01) and the need for blood transfusion (OR: 0.30, 95% CI, 0.20-0.56, p = 0.001) were significantly lower in V-MVS group. Regarding time-related outcomes, there was evidence for important heterogeneity of treatment effect among the studies. Operative times were longer in R-MVS: differences in means were 20.7 min for cross-clamp time (95% CI, 9.07-32.3, p = 0.001), 20.7 min for cardiopulmonary bypass time (95% CI, 2.5-38.9, p = 0.03) and 40.2 min for total operative time (95% CI, 24.5-55.8, p < 0.001). Intensive care unit stay and hospital stay were reported in one study, and longer after R-MVS compared to V-MVS; the differences in means were 0.17 days (p = 0.005) and 0.6 days (p = 0.017), respectively. Total cost of both procedures was reported in an additional dedicated propensity score-matched series including 448 patients; it was 21% higher for R-MVS than for V-MVS. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed excellent outcomes of both video and robotic techniques with low incidence of morbidity and mortality. However, there is no evidence for an added value of robotic assistance in comparison with video assistance; the drawbacks of mini access are reported higher regardless the induced over cost.

Minithoracotomy versus sternotomy in mitral valve surgery: meta-analysis from recent matched and randomized studies.

BACKGROUND: There is still ongoing debate about the benefits of mini-thoracotomy (MTH) approach in mitral valve surgery in comparison with complete sternotomy (STER). This study aims to update the current evidence with mortality as primary end point. METHODS: The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched through June 2022. Two randomized studies and 16 propensity score matched studies published from 2011 to 2022 were included with a total of 12,997 patients operated on from 2005 (MTH: 6467, STER: 6530). Data regarding early mortality, stroke, reoperation for bleeding, new renal failure, new onset of atrial fibrillation, need of blood transfusion, prolonged ventilation, wound infection, time-related outcomes (cross clamp time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, ventilation time, length of intensive care unit stay, length of hospital stay), midterm mortality and reoperation, and costs were extracted and submitted to a meta-analysis using weighted random effects modeling. RESULTS: The incidence of early mortality, stroke, reoperation for bleeding and prolonged ventilation were similar, all in the absence of heterogeneity. However, the sub-group analysis showed a significant OR in favor of MTH when robotic enhancement was used. New renal failure (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.06-2.62, p = 0.03), new onset of atrial fibrillation (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.15-1.51, p = 0.001) and the need of blood transfusion (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.39-2.27, p = 0.001) were significantly lower in MTH group. Regarding time-related outcomes, there was evidence for important heterogeneity of treatment effect among the studies. Operative times were longer in MTH: differences in means were 20.7 min for cross clamp time (95% CI 14.9-26.4, p = 0.001), 36.8 min for CPB time (95% CI 29.8-43.9, p = 0.001) and 37.7 min for total operative time (95% CI 19.6-55.8, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in ventilation duration; however, the differences in means showed significantly shorter ICU stay and hospital stay after MTH compared to STER: - 0.6 days (95% CI - 1.1/- 0.21, p = 0.001) and - 1.88 days (95% CI - 2.72/- 1.05, p = 0.001) respectively, leading to a significant lower hospital cost after MTH compared to STER with difference in means - 4528 US$ (95% CI - 8725/- 326, p = 0.03). The mid-term mortality was significantly higher after STER compared to MTH: OR = 1.50, 1.09-2.308 (95% CI), p = 0.01; the rate of mid-term reoperation was reported similar in MTH and STER: OR = 0.76, 0.50-1.15 (95% CI), p = 0.19. CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis confirms that the MTH approach for mitral valve disease remains associated with prolonged operative times, but it is beneficial in terms of reduced postoperative complications (renal failure, atrial fibrillation, blood transfusion, wound infection), length of stay in ICU and in hospitalization, with finally a reduction in global cost. MTH approach appears associated with a significant reduction of postoperative mortality that must be confirmed by large randomized study.

Does the Addition of a Gastroepiploic Artery to Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Improve Survival?

It is unclear whether the additional conduit to supplement bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITA) influences the patient outcome in coronary surgery. This retrospective study compared long-term survival of patients undergoing left-sided BITA grafting in which the third conduit to the right coronary system (RCA) was either vein graft (SVG) or gastroepiploic artery (GEA). From 1989 to 2014, 1432 consecutive patients underwent left-sided revascularization with BITA associated with SVG (n = 599) or GEA (n = 833) to RCA. Propensity score was calculated by logistic regression model and patients were matched 1 to 1 leading to 2 groups of 320 matched patients. The primary end point was the overall mortality from any cause. GEA was used in significantly lower risk patients. The 30-day mortality was 1.6% without influence of the graft configuration. Postoperative follow-up was 13.6 ± 6.6 years and was 94% complete. The significant difference in patients' survival observed at 20 years in favor of GEA in unmatched groups (48 ± 4% vs 33 ± 6%, P < 0.001) was not confirmed in matched groups (41 ± 7% vs 36 ± 7%, P = 0.112). In multivariable Cox model analysis, the conduit used to RCA did not influence the long-term survival in matched groups, like no other graft configuration or operative parameter. Only complete revascularization remained predictor of survival (P = 0.016), with age (P < 0.0001), diabetes status (P = 0.007), and left ventricle ejection fraction (P < 0.0001). Long-term survival in patients undergoing BITA grafting is not affected by using GEA as third arterial conduit in alternative to SVG. Further studies are necessary to assess its impact on long-term cardiac events.

Impact of Bilateral versus Single Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting on the Long-Term Survival in Adults: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the survival of patients who had undergone bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting versus those with single internal thoracic artery grafting from the available literature. Moreover, this study will review the available literature regarding which of the two techniques seems to be the safest with long-term survival and reduced mortality rates. METHODS: A literature search of the databases was conducted to retrieve studies that fall under the study design of cohort and randomized controlled clinical trials in English from January 2015 to July 2021. Finally, seven studies were selected: four cohort studies and three other from a randomized trial. RESULTS: The cohort studies revealed that bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting is associated with lower mortality rates and better long-term survival outcomes than single internal thoracic artery grafting, while the ART randomized controlled clinical trials showed that there is no significant difference in mortality rates between both the coronary artery bypass grafting techniques. However, all studies concluded that bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting is associated with a higher frequency of deep sternal wound infections. CONCLUSION: The discrepancy in results between the cohort studies and randomized controlled clinical trial remains persistent. However, the stated advantages of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting are not strong enough to convince surgeons to alter their practice and the wide magnitude of expectations from the ART study was reckoned as inadequate. This may well be due to the presence of limited criteria for bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in identifying the impact on survival of extended arterial revascularization, and there is a new colossal expectation from the ongoing randomized trial based on multiple arterial grafting versus single arterial grafting.

How decisive is the number of distal arterial anastomoses in coronary bypass surgery?

BACKGROUND: The benefit of arterial revascularization in coronary surgery remains controversial. The incremental value of additional grafts to the left internal thoracic artery (ITA) has been mainly assessed according to the number of arterial grafts, possibly limiting the detection of its actual impact. We analyzed the influence of the number of distal arterial anastomoses (DAA) performed on late mortality in patients having received from one to three arterial grafts. METHODS: Retrospective review of 3685 primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) performed from 1989 to 2014 was conducted with a 13-year mean follow-up. One arterial graft (SITA) was used in 969 patients, two arterial grafts, ITA or gastroepiploic artery (GEA), in 1883 patients (BITA: 1644; SITA+GEA: 239), and three arterial grafts in 833 patients (BITA+GEA). Totally, 795 patients (22%) received one DAA, 1142 patients (31%) two, 1337 patients (36%) three, and 411 patients (11%) four or more. A sub-group analysis was done in the 2104 patients with 3-vessel disease who received at least 2 arterial grafts. RESULTS: In this series the early mortality was 1.6% and it was not influenced by the surgical technique. Late mortality was significantly influenced by age, gender, heart failure, LV ejection fraction, diabetes status, complete revascularization, number of arterial grafts, number of DAA, both ITA, sequential ITA graft, GEA graft. In multivariable analysis with Cox regression model, the number of DAA was the only technical significant independent prognosis factor of late survival (p < 0.0001), predominant over both ITA, complete revascularization and number of arterial grafts. The impact of the number of DAA on survival was found discriminant from 1 to 3; after 3 there was no more additional effect. In 3-vessel disease patients who received at least 2 arterial grafts, the number of DAA remained a significant independent prognosis factor of late survival (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The number of distal arterial anastomoses is an independent predictor of long-term survival, predominant over the number of arterial grafts and the completeness of the revascularization; higher the number, better the late survival. It is a strong support of the extensive use of arterial grafting in CABG.

Heart transplantation following cardiomyoplasty: a biological bridge.

OBJECTIVE: Dynamic cardiomyoplasty (CMP) was proposed as a treatment for refractory heart failure; more than 2000 procedures have been performed worldwide. Heart transplantation was indicated afterwards in some CMP patients with recurrent heart failure symptoms. This study reviews the multicentric French experience with CMP followed by heart transplantation. METHODS: From 1985 to 2007, 212 patients (mean age 53+/-11 years) with refractory heart failure (LVEF=22+/-9%, mean NYHA 3.2) underwent CMP in France. Heart transplantation was performed in 26 patients (12.3%), mean age: 51+/-11 years, within 2.3+/-3 years after CMP. Transplantation was indicated for persistent heart failure, i.e. no immediate improvement after CMP (19%) and for recurring heart failure (81%). RESULTS: The surgical technique of heart transplantation following cardiomyoplasty presents few particularities. Routine extracorporeal bypass was instituted between the vena cavas and the ascending aorta. As in most of these patients the CMP procedure had been performed without the need of extracorporeal circulation, hearts were free of previous cannulations for cardiopulmonary bypass. The latissimus dorsi muscle flap was divided as far as possible inside the left pleural cavity and its vascular pedicle was obturated. The proximal portion of the muscle as well as the muscular pacing electrodes were kept in place in the pleural cavity. The adhesions between the flap and the heart were not released so as to achieve an en bloc resection of the heart and the muscle flap. During removal of the recipient's heart, care was taken not to injure the left phrenic nerve that was frequently in tight relation with the latissimus dorsi muscle. Heart transplantation was then performed in a routine manner, the donor heart being anastomosed to remnant atria and great vessels. Mean follow-up was 5.5 years (longest 13.5 years). Survival at 10 years was 40% for early heart transplantation (done within 4 months of CMP) and 57% for transplantation performed at 3+/-2.8 years after CMP. CONCLUSIONS: Heart transplantation after CMP is technically feasible. Hospital mortality was higher when urgent transplantation was required. Long-term survival results are similar to those for primary heart transplantation. Cardiomyoplasty, when it fails, does not preclude transplantation, and when indicated, CMP could be considered as a biological bridge to heart transplantation.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with danaparoid sodium after massive pulmonary embolism.

During extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, anticoagulation therapy is usually achieved with unfractionated heparin. We report on an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with danaparoid sodium for a patient with severe respiratory failure due to massive pulmonary embolism and suspected type 2 heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Danaparoid, a low molecular weight heparinoid, is an alternative to heparin for patients who develop type 2 heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Danaparoid was given at 400 IU/h with an objective of antifactor Xa activity of 0.6-0.8 U/mL, which was monitored twice a day. No excessive bleeding or clotting of the circuit was noted. The patient was weaned from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after 9 days of treatment.

Should a reimplantation valve sparing procedure be done systematically in type A aortic dissection?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risks and benefits of a systematic reimplantation valve sparing procedure in the surgical treatment of type A aortic dissection (TAAD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From February December 2005, 15 consecutive patients (mean age 61+/-12 years) who underwent surgery for TAAD were analyzed prospectively. Eleven had a preoperative CT-scan and all had an echography. Eight patients presented with a preoperative aortic insufficiency>2/4 and seven had an ascending aortic aneurysm over 50mm. In 11 cases, arterial cannulation was performed directly into the ascending aorta. Surgical technique included complete resection and replacement of the ascending aorta using a reimplantation valve sparing technique (David), associated in 12 patients with an arch replacement, under mild (29.7+/-3.0 degrees C) hypothermia and cerebral selective antegrade perfusion. RESULTS: Aortic clamping, cerebral perfusion and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) times were respectively 93+/-29, 18+/-9, and 131+/-38min. Mean bleeding at 24h was 1165+/-846ml. Troponin I level at 24h was 21+/-30 microg/l. One patient had a right coronary artery bypass for a chronically occluded coronary. Another had a triple arterial revascularisation for pre-existing coronary dissection. One patient presented with a postoperative regressive right hemiparesia (normal CT-scan). Two patients underwent revision for bleeding (one was undergoing treatment by clopidogrel). One patient had at day 7 an implantation of a covered stentgraft on the descending aorta for a concomitant penetrating aortic ulcer. One patient died suddenly on POD 7 during a tracheal aspiration. Intubation and ICU times were respectively 9.5+/-16.3 and 16.2+/-20.9 days. Four patients with severe preoperative co morbidities had long intubations. Echographic and CT-scan control, done in postoperative and after a mean follow up of 11.0+/-4.8 months, did not show any residual aortic insufficiency (actuarial survival rate at 2 years of 93.3%). CONCLUSION: A reimplantation valve sparing procedure in the TAAD seems to be reliable and should be proposed systematically without emphasizing perioperative morbidity.

A new ultrasonic process for a renewal of aortic valve decalcification.

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve decalcification by ultrasound was given up. We evaluated a new ultrasound microhandpiece (Dissectron Penstyle) to rehabilitate this alternative treatment. METHODS: We used under magnifying lenses the ultrasound microhandpiece to decalcify 30 explanted aortic valves. In the cases with embedded calcifications the thin top of the probe could be introduced into the thickness of the leaflet preserving covering layers. RESULTS: The leaflets were totally decalcified and flexible, and surrounding structures were preserved as assessed by histological examination. CONCLUSION: This new approach of ultrasonic aortic valve decalcification gives good in vitro results which allow to consider a clinical evaluation of this procedure.

Comparison between 3 aortic clamps for video-assisted cardiac surgery: a histological study in a pig model.

OBJECTIVES: To assess histological traumatic effects of aortic clamps used in video-assisted surgery, an experimental study was undertaken in a pig model, comparing the Portaclamp, Endoclamp, and a metallic clamp. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 3 groups of 5 pigs each, the descending aorta was exposed through a posterolateral left thoracotomy. External clamps (Portaclamp and metallic clamp) were positioned at the middle of the aorta. Endoclamps were inserted at the top of the descending aorta through a small purse and inflated lower. After 60 minutes of clamping, the clamp was removed and the animal reperfused for 60 minutes. It was then sacrificed and the descending aorta was harvested for blind histological study using hemotoxylin-eosin staining of 4 samples per animal: A, before the clamping spot; B, at the clamping spot; C, after the clamping spot; D, a remote sample as control. RESULTS: In the Portaclamp and metallic clamp groups, there were no lesions of the intima in all aortic samples. In the Endoclamp group, severe lesions of the intima were observed on the clamping spot: endothelium crushing with flattening of cell nucleus (3/5) or endothelium stripping with vanishing of cell nucleus all gathered in 1 point (2/5). Only spongy lesions (clearance between fibers) located on the external third of the media and moderate inflammatory lesions of the adventice were observed with a random distribution in aortic samples without difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals the impressive lesions of the aortic intima due to the Endoclamp. The nonspecific lesions observed in media or adventice may be related to the surgical trauma of the procedure.

Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation with off-pump, epicardial, high-intensity focused ultrasound: results of a multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: A simplified alternative to the Cox maze procedure to treat atrial fibrillation with epicardial high-intensity focused ultrasound was evaluated clinically, and the initial clinical results were assessed at the 6-month follow-up visit. METHODS: From September 2002 through February 2004, 103 patients were prospectively enrolled in a multicenter study. Atrial fibrillation duration ranged from 6 to 240 months (mean, 44 months) and was permanent in 76 (74%) patients, paroxysmal in 22 (21%) patients, and persistent in 5 (5%) patients. All patients had concomitant operations, and ablation was performed epicardially on the beating heart before the concomitant procedure. The device automatically created a circumferential left atrial ablation around the pulmonary veins in an average of 10 minutes, and an additional mitral line was created epicardially in 35 (34%) patients with a handheld device by using the same technology. RESULTS: No complications or deaths were device or procedure related. There were 4 (3.8%) early deaths and 2 late extracardiac deaths. The 6-month follow-up was complete in all survivors. At the 6-month visit, freedom from atrial fibrillation was 85% in the entire study group (80% in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation, 88% in the 35 patients who had the additional mitral line, and 100% in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation). A pacemaker was implanted in 8 patients. Only the duration and type of atrial fibrillation significantly increased the risk of recurrence. CONCLUSION: Epicardial, off-pump, beating-heart ablation with acoustic energy is safe and cures 80% of patients with permanent atrial fibrillation associated with long-standing structural heart disease.

Off-pump coronary bypass surgery for left main coronary artery stenosis 10 years after heart transplantation: case report.

A patient with asymptomatic left main coronary artery stenosis 10 years after heart transplantation was treated successfully with off-pump coronary bypass surgery using both mammary arteries. New advances in bypass surgery may decrease the risk of revascularization in cardiac transplant recipients.

Totally endoscopic off-pump bilateral internal thoracic artery bypass grafting.

The introduction of robotic assistance has enabled totally endoscopic closed chest procedures, most often by left internal thoracic artery to left (LITA) anterior descending. Endoscopic stabilizers have made off-pump surgery feasible. We report the first case of a totally endoscopic off-pump bilateral ITA grafting in a 58-year-old patient.

Perioperative outcome and long-term survival of surgery for acute post-infarction mitral regurgitation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine factors predictive of mortality in patients undergoing emergency mitral valve surgery in the setting of severe post-infarction regurgitation. METHODS: Patients admitted for an acute myocardial infarction who required urgent mitral valve surgery for severe regurgitation were studied. Factors predictive of outcome were analysed. RESULTS: Fifty-five consecutive patients (mean 65+/-10 years, 37 males) were included. The infarct was inferior in 31 patients, posterior in 10, anterior in 9 and lateral in 5. Thirty-four patients (62%) were in Killip class IV. Peroperative findings confirmed total papillary muscle rupture in 25 patients (posteromedial in 21, anterolateral in 4), and partial rupture in 12 patients (posteromedial in 10, anterolateral in 2). Papillary muscle dysfunction without rupture was responsible for regurgitation in 18 patients (posteromedial in 15, anterolateral in 3). The mitral valve was replaced by a prosthesis in all but 4 patients, who had valvuloplasty. Coronary angiography was done in 32 patients, of whom 18 underwent concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting and 2 balloon angioplasty. Surgery was performed on average 7 days after infarction. Thirteen patients (24%) died during the perioperative period. Absence of coronary revascularisation was significantly associated with increased perioperative mortality (34% vs. 9%, P = 0.02). Of the 42 surviving patients, there were 5 deaths during a mean follow-up of 4.0+/-3.7 years. CONCLUSION: In patients with acute post-infarction mitral regurgitation, perioperative mortality is high, but can be improved with concomitant CABG in addition to valve surgery. Long-term outcome of survivors is favourable.

Early experience with a new aortic clamping system designed for port access cardiac surgery: the PortaClamp.

BACKGROUND: We report a clinical study to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of a new aortic crossclamping concept for use in port-access cardiac surgery. The limited access to the aorta in minimally invasive cardiac surgery mandates specific clamping modalities, which entail specific limitations, drawbacks, and costs. Therefore a new autoguided, extravascular, and atraumatic clamping system (PortaClamp) was developed to facilitate port-access surgery while potentially avoiding the complications and costs inherent to endoluminal clamping or "blind" crossclamping. METHODS: Twenty patients underwent various cardiac operations under cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic crossclamping with the PortaClamp between February and September 2003. The method of aortic clamping is described and the operative course and clinical outcome of the patients are reported as surrogates of feasibility and safety. RESULTS: The average time to position the clamp was 196 +/- 75 seconds. Crossclamping through a 10-mm port or incision was achieved successfully, enabling cardiac arrest throughout the procedure in every patient. No patient presented with cardiovascular accident or transient ischemic attack, aortic dissection, or hematoma. Intensive care unit times were 12 +/- 3 hours; length of stay was 7.2 +/- 1.1 days. CONCLUSION: From this early experience we conclude that the PortaClamp system is safe and can effectively be used to crossclamp the aorta inexpensively to facilitate port-access cardiac surgery. Further comparative studies with the existing systems are warranted to confirm that the atraumatic design provides further benefit.

[Carotid endarterectomy, clinical analysis of 43 cases].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the important points in carotid endarterectomy. METHODS: Carotid endarterectomy was performed upon 43 cases of carotid artery stenosis under cervical plexus anaesthesia. The operation was performed with shunting between the common carotid artery and the internal carotid artery in 2 cases. RESULTS: The average clamping time of carotid artery was 27 min +/- 7 min. There were one case suffering from transient ischemic attack (TIA), 7 cases suffering from hypertension and 2 cases suffering from light edema of the wound. All of the patients recovered uneventfully. Twenty-six patients who had suffered from TIA before operation felt much better after operation. The follow-up of one month to one year showed a better condition among all patients. CONCLUSION: Cervial plexus anaesthesia helps diagnose stroke during operation. Shunting between the common carotid artery and internal carotid artery helps avoid ischemic brain injury. The effect of operation depends upon complete removal of the residual tunica intima, complete exsufflation, and control of hypertension postoperationally.

Aortic valve stenosis after previous coronary bypass: transcatheter valve implantation or aortic valve replacement?

We report a prospective comparison between transcatheter valve implantation (TAVI, n = 13) and surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR, n = 10) in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis and previous coronary bypass surgery (CABG). All patients had at least bilateral patent internal thoracic arteries bypass without indication of repeat revascularization. After a similar post-procedure outcome, despite one early death in TAVI group, the 1-year survival was 100% in surgical group and in transfemoral TAVI group, and 73% in transapical TAVI group. When previous CABG is the lone surgical risk factor, indications for a TAVI procedure have to be cautious, specially if transfemoral approach is not possible.

Preliminary experience with Impella Recover(®) LP5.0 in nine patients with cardiogenic shock: a new circulatory support system in the intensive cardiac care unit.

AIM: Cardiogenic shock is associated with high mortality. We report our experience with the short-term left ventricular axial pump Impella LP5.0 in nine patients with severe ischaemic heart failure. METHODS: Six patients (group 1) presented with cardiogenic shock at the acute phase of an ST elevation myocardial infarction. Three patients (group 2) had severe ischaemic cardiomyopathy with temporary contra-indication to LVAD or transplantation. We measured haemodynamic and metabolic variables up to 96hours and recorded morbidity, mechanical pump failures, and mortality up to one year postimplantation. RESULTS: In all patients the Impella LP5.0 was safely placed through the right subclavian artery. Cardiac power output increased from 0.64 (0.07) W to 0.94 (0.44) W and 1.02 (0.30) W at 24 and 72hours, respectively. The Impella LP5.0 remained in place for 12 (7.2) days. In group 1, five patients were in INTERMACS Profile 3 at the time of pump insertion. Three could be weaned and survived. One patient in INTERMACS Profile 1 died of intractable heart failure within hours. In group 2, two of three patients underwent heart transplantation. Haemorrhage requiring transfusions was observed in four patients but only one case was directly related to the Impella LP5.0. CONCLUSION: Left ventricular assistance with the Impella LP5.0 appears to be well tolerated. It may be especially useful in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock who achieve INTERMACS Profile 3 with initial treatment.