Efficacy and Safety of Intralesional Triamcinolone Versus Combination of Triamcinolone with 5-Fluorouracil in the Treatment of Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although keloids and hypertrophic scars are common benign hyperproliferative growths of dermal fibroblasts, the clinical problems including physical and psychological problems are significant and impairing, with few proven treatments. Intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) and combination of TAC with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) are widely used to treat keloids and hypertrophic scars, but their efficacy and safety remain controversial. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and CNKI for relevant trials. RESULTS: The mean scar height and the erythema score in the TAC + 5-FU group were lower than those in the TAC group after treatment (P < 0.05). The effectiveness based on observer assessment after treatment in the TAC + 5-FU group was superior than that in the TAC group (P < 0.05); further, the subgroup analysis showed the TAC + 5-FU group was also superior than the TAC group in the treatment of hypertrophic scars (P = 0.01), and there were no significant differences in the treatment of keloid (P = 0.12). The effectiveness based on patient self-assessment after treatment in the TAC + 5-FU group was also superior than the TAC group (P < 0.05). The overall complication rate in the TAC + 5-FU group was lower than the TAC group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Combination of TAC with 5-FU is more effective and safer than TAC alone therapy in the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars. Data on keloids alone or hypertrophic scars alone are, however, limited. A better understanding of effective after intralesional combination of TAC with 5-FU in the treatment of keloids alone or hypertrophic scars alone is imperative. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The Safety and Efficacy of Intralesional Verapamil Versus Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide for Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Keloids and hypertrophic scars often result after skin trauma. Currently, intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) is the criterion standard in nonsurgical management of keloids and hypertrophic scars. Intralesional verapamil may be an effective alternative modality, but it has been insufficiently studied. Accordingly, the study authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare the efficacy and safety of the two drugs. METHODS: The study authors systematically searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases for relevant trials published in any language through September 2018. RESULTS: According to the four studies included in this review, TAC improved scar pliability and vascularity more than verapamil after 3 weeks (P < .05). For scar height and scar pigmentation, no statistical difference was observed between the treatments (P > .05). The difference in effects on symptoms was not statistically significant (P = .89). For pain and telangiectasia, no statistical difference was observed (P > .05). Verapamil resulted in fewer cases of skin atrophy (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: It appears that TAC is more effective than verapamil for improving scar pliability and vascularity in keloids and hypertrophic scars after 3 weeks of treatment. However, verapamil has fewer adverse drug reactions than TAC, which allows for a longer treatment period and the possibility that it might be effective for patients who cannot receive TAC.

Sinus Wounds Management.

With aging populations and the increased incidence of cerebrovascular disease, diabetes, and other diseases, more and more patients suffer from pressure injuries. Pressure injuries are often difficult to heal because of the presence of sinus tracts, which make it difficult to clean and change dressings. Sinus wounds are common in patients with pressure injuries, but also occur after abdominal wall incision and in patients who have experienced a physical trauma that created a wound. It is difficult for clinicians to observe, evaluate, and repair sinus wounds because of the small surface defect and large and deep basement of each wound. This article reviews existing assessment methods and treatments for sinus wounds and proposes a new evaluation method and treatment (three-dimensional reconstruction and endoscopic techniques) to further improve treatment and provide better quality of care for patients with this type of wound.

The expression profile of lung long non-coding RNAs and mRNAs in a mouse model of smoke inhalation injury.

To study the potential expression of lung long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and mRNAs during smoke inhalation injury (SII), using a SII mouse model that we created in our previous work. Microarray was used to investigate the lncRNAs and mRNAs profiles. A bioinformatics analysis was performed. Changes in the top 10 down-regulated and 10 up-regulated lncRNAs were validated using Quantitative Reverse Transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR). The acute lung injury (ALI) mouse model was successfully induced by smoke inhalation, as confirmed by the aberrantly modified cell numbers of red blood cells and neutrophils counts, increased levels of TNF-α, IL-1ß, Bax, caspase-7, caspase-3, and decreased Bcl-2 content in lung tissues. When compared to the control mice, 577 lncRNAs and 517 mRNAs were found to be aberrantly expressed in the SII mice. According to the Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses, the altered mRNAs were enriched in acute-phase response, oxidoreductase activity, oxidation-reduction process, glutathione metabolism, the wnt signaling pathway, and ferroptosis. A lncRNA-related competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network, including 383 lncRNAs, 318 MicroRNAs (miRNAs), and 421 mRNAs specific to SII, was established. The changes in NONMMUT026843.2, NONMMUT065071.2, ENSMUST00000235858.1, NONMMUT131395.1, NONMMUT122516.1, NONMMUT057916.2, and NONMMUT013388.2 in the lung matched the microarray results. Our findings help to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the pathogenesis of SII as well as new insights into potential therapeutic targets.

Negative-pressure wound therapy in skin grafts: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

INTRODUCTION: Although skin grafts are widely used in reconstruction of large skin defect and complex wounds, many factors lead to suboptimal graft take. Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) reportedly increases the graft take rates when added to skin grafting, but a summary analysis of the data of randomized controlled trials has yet to be performed. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare the effectiveness and safety of NPWT and non-NPWT for patients with skin grafts. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CNKI for relevant trials based on predetermined eligibility criteria from database establishment to February 2020. Two reviewers screened citations and extracted data independently. The quality of the included studies was evaluated according to the Cochrane Handbook, whereas statistical heterogeneity was assessed using chi-square tests and I2 statistics. Review Manager 5.3 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Ten randomized controlled trials with 488 patients who underwent NPWT or non-NPWT were included. Compared with non-NPWT, NPWT yielded an improved the percentage of graft take, a reduction in days from grafting to discharge, with lower relative risk of re-operation, and no increased relative risk of adverse event. Further, the subgroup analysis showed an improved the percentage of graft take in negative pressure of 80 mmHg, and no improved the percentage of graft take in negative pressure of 125 mmHg. CONCLUSION: NPWT is more effective than non-NPWT for the integration of skin grafts, and the negative pressure of 80 mmHg can be recommended. Data on adverse events and negative pressure are, however, limited. A better understanding of complications after NPWT and the ideal negative pressure for the integration of skin grafts is imperative.

A case report of a woman after childbirth with a dehisced abdominal wound as well as fat liquefaction and large skin necrosis.

Recently high-frequency electric knife and abdominal binder are widely used in the abdominal operation in China. Nevertheless, with the high occurrence of the abdominal wound, we think that whether both these operations could be used or not. Here, we report the case of a 40-year-old female patient where negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) was applied to her dehisced abdominal wound as well as fat liquefaction and large skin necrosis with pleasing results. The patient with high fever was referred to our department from her earlier hospital for 6 days after cesarean delivery. During the surgery, her earlier doctor used a high-frequency electric knife for convenient-using, and after the operation, the patient immediately used an abdominal binder for good shape. However, the abdominal surgical incision was opened at postoperative day 3, with fat liquefaction releasing large fatty acids along both abdominal sides with penetration under the abdominal binder. After admitted at postoperative day 6 with aggravating wound, surgery was considered because of no reduction in the size of the wound. A series of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) or vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) as well as others, were operated. In the admitted 25th day, the wound was completely closed. NPWT is a practical and effective therapy for the treatment of numerous refractory and intractable wounds. Therefore, we suggest that the high-frequency electric knife and an abdominal binder should be avoided using an abdominal operation. This case is the first report of the use of NPWT over a dehisced abdominal wound with fat liquefaction and large skin necrosis on a postpartum patient in China.

Comparison of outcomes between minimally invasive oesophagectomy and open oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to compare perioperative outcomes between minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIE) and open oesophagectomy (OE). METHODS: PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched up to January 2015 using keywords: esophageal cancer, MIE, OE, hybrid MIE. Randomized controlled trials or prospective studies comparing the efficacy of OE with MIE or hybrid MIE in oesophageal cancer patients were included. Sensitivity analysis and quality assessment were performed. RESULTS: MIE required longer operation time (pooled standardized difference in means = 0.565; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.272, 0.858; P < 0.001) than OE, but resulted in less blood loss, shorter hospital stays, lower incidence of pneumonia and vocal cord palsy (P values ≤0.026). There was no difference between MIE and OE regarding lymph node yield (pooled standardized difference in means = 0.078; 95% CI = -0.111, 0.267; P = 0.419). Length of intensive care unit stay, in-hospital mortality and 30-day mortality were also similar (P values ≥0.419) in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Regarding certain clinical outcomes, MIE may be more beneficial than OE.