Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Cell Mol Life Sci ; 81(1): 364, 2024 Aug 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39172244

RESUMEN

While severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is characterized by impaired induction of interferons (IFNs) and IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs), the IFNs and ISGs in upper airway is essential to restrict the spread of respiratory virus. Here, we identified the prominent IFN and ISG upregulation in the nasopharynx (NP) of mild and even severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients (CoV2+) in Omicron era and to compare their clinical outcome depending on the level of IFNs and ISGs. Whereas the induction of IFNB was minimal, transcription of IFNA, IFNG, and IFNLs was significantly increased in the NP of CoV2 + patients. IFNs and ISGs may be more upregulated in the NP of CoV2 + patients at early phases of infection according to viral RNA levels and this is observed even in severe cases. IFN-related innate immune response might be characteristic in macrophages and monocytes at the NP and the CoV2 + patients with higher transcription of IFNs and ISGs in the NP showed a correlation with good prognosis of COVID-19. This study presents that IFNs and ISGs may be upregulated in the NP, even in severe CoV2 + patients depending on viral replication during Omicron-dominant period and the unique IFN-responsiveness in the NP links with COVID-19 clinical outcomes.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Inmunidad Innata , Interferones , Nasofaringe , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/virología , Nasofaringe/virología , Nasofaringe/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Interferones/metabolismo , Interferones/genética , Interferones/inmunología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano
2.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 79(9): 2327-2333, 2024 Sep 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38973607

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: When to perform echocardiography to rule out infective endocarditis (IE) in patients with viridans group streptococci (VGS) bloodstream infections (BSIs) is unclear. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify independent risk factors for IE in patients with VGS BSI. METHODS: This retrospective study conducted at Seoul National University Hospital from January 2013 to December 2022 involved patients with VGS and nutritionally variant streptococcal BSI, excluding single positive blood cultures and polymicrobial BSI cases. Independent risk factors were identified by multivariate logistic regression and sensitivity analyses according to echocardiography results, VGS species or the inclusion of possible IE cases. RESULTS: Of 845 VGS BSI cases, 349 were analysed and 86 IE cases were identified (24.6%). In the multivariate analysis, heart valve disease [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 14.14, 95% CI, 6.14-32.58; P < 0.001], persistent bacteraemia (aOR, 5.12, 95% CI, 2.03-12.94; P = 0.001), age (per year, aOR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1.00; P = 0.015), solid cancer (aOR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13-0.53; P < 0.001) and haematologic malignancy (aOR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01-0.41; P = 0.006) were independently associated with IE. Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results; also, infection by a member of the mitis group was independent risk factor for IE (aOR, 6.50; 95% CI, 2.87-14.68; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Younger age, heart valve disease, persistent bacteraemia, absence of underlying malignancy and BSI by a member of the mitis group were independent risk factors for IE in patients with VGS BSI. Echocardiographic evaluation could be prudently considered based on these clinicomicrobiological risk factors.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Infecciones Estreptocócicas , Estreptococos Viridans , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Masculino , Femenino , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estreptococos Viridans/aislamiento & purificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/epidemiología , Anciano , Ecocardiografía , Adulto , Endocarditis Bacteriana/microbiología , Endocarditis Bacteriana/epidemiología , Endocarditis/microbiología , Endocarditis/epidemiología
3.
J Korean Med Sci ; 39(4): e19, 2024 Jan 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38288533

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mpox is a viral illness with a characteristic skin rash caused by the monkeypox virus. In 2022, Mpox spread throughout the world, and an epidemic through domestic transmission started in South Korea in early 2023. This study aimed to summarize the clinical features of Mpox patients in South Korea. METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective study conducted at four hospitals in South Korea. All adult patients diagnosed with Mpox who were admitted to the study hospitals between June 1, 2022 and May 26, 2023 and were discharged by June 30, 2023 were reviewed. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included, accounting for 65.9% of Mpox cases reported in South Korea during the study period. Median age was 32 years and 97% (58/60) of patients were male. In total, 85% (51/60) of patients reported their sexual orientation as homosexual or bisexual. The most common route of transmission was sexual or close contact (55/60). Every patient had a skin rash and 88% (53/60) had constitutional symptoms. In total, 42% (25/60) of patients had human immunodeficiency virus and 25% (15/60) had concomitant sexually transmitted infections. Severe manifestations of Mpox were identified in only two patients. CONCLUSION: Mpox patients in South Korea were mainly young adult males and were infected through sexual contact. The clinical outcomes were favorable.


Asunto(s)
Exantema , Mpox , Adulto Joven , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , República de Corea/epidemiología , Conducta Sexual , Exantema/etiología
4.
J Korean Med Sci ; 36(38): e274, 2021 Oct 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34609094

RESUMEN

Applying work restrictions for asymptomatic healthcare personnel (HCP) with potential exposure to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is recommended to prevent transmission from potentially contagious HCP to patients and other HCP. However, it can lead to understaffing, which threatens the safety of both patients and HCP. We evaluated 203 COVID-19 exposure events at a single tertiary hospital from January 2020 to June 2021. A total of 2,365 HCP were potentially exposed, and work restrictions were imposed on 320 HCP, leading to the loss of 3,311 working days. However, only one of the work-restricted HCP was confirmed with COVID-19. During the study period, the work restriction measures might be taken excessively compared to their benefit, so establishing more effective standards for work restriction is required.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/transmisión , Personal de Salud , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Salud Laboral , Prevención Primaria/métodos , Humanos , República de Corea , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Lugar de Trabajo
5.
Cancer Res Treat ; 56(1): 324-333, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37448122

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: B-cell depleting therapies, including T-cell engager (TCE), are increasingly used for patients with hematologic malignancies, including during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between TCE therapy and COVID-19-related outcomes among patients with COVID-19 and B-cell lymphomas receiving B-cell depleting therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with B-cell lymphoma, who were admitted to Seoul Natio-nal University Hospital with COVID-19 between September 2021 and February 2023, and received B-cell depleting therapy before COVID-19 diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with severe to critical COVID-19 and COVID-19-related mortality. RESULTS: Of 54 patients with B-cell lymphomas and COVID-19 who received B-cell depleting therapy, 14 were treated with TCE (TCE group) and 40 with rituximab (RTX group). COVID-19-related mortality was higher in the TCE group than in the RTX group (57.1% vs. 12.5%, p=0.002). In multivariable analyses, TCE therapy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 7.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29 to 38.76; p=0.024) and older age (aOR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.13; p=0.035) were associated with severe to critical COVID-19. TCE therapy (aOR, 8.98; 95% CI, 1.48 to 54.40; p=0.017), older age (aOR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.26; p=0.022), and prior bendamustine therapy (aOR, 7.78; 95% CI, 1.17 to 51.65; p=0.034) were independent risk factors for COVID-19-related mortality. CONCLUSION: B-cell lymphoma patients treated with TCE had significantly worse outcomes from COVID-19 than those treated with RTX. TCE therapy should be used with caution in B-cell lymphoma patients during the COVID-19 epidemic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Linfoma de Células B , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Linfocitos T , Linfoma de Células B/complicaciones , Linfoma de Células B/tratamiento farmacológico
6.
Infect Dis (Lond) ; 56(2): 116-127, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37916860

RESUMEN

Background: The clinical outcomes and immunological features of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients receiving B-cell depletion therapy (BCDT), especially in Omicron variant era, have not been fully elucidated. We aimed to investigate the outcomes and immune responses of COVID-19 patients receiving BCDT during the Omicron period.Methods: We retrospectively compared clinical outcomes between COVID-19 patients treated with BCDT (the BCDT group) and those with the same underlying diseases not treated with BCDT (the non-BCDT group). For immunological analyses, we prospectively enrolled COVID-19 patients receiving BCDT and immunocompetent COVID-19 patients as controls. We measured humoral and cellular immune responses using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and flow cytometry.Results: Severe to critical COVID-19 was more frequent in the BCDT group than in the non-BCDT group (41.9% vs. 28.3%, p = .030). BCDT was an independent risk factor for severe to critical COVID-19 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-4.04, p = .010) as well as for COVID-19-related mortality (aOR 4.03, 95% CI 1.17-13.86, p = .027). Immunological analyses revealed that patients receiving BCDT had lower anti-S1 IgG titres and a tendency to higher proportions of activated CD4+ T-cells than the controls.Conclusions: BCDT was associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes in the Omicron period. Humoral immune response impairment and T-cell hyperactivation were the main immunological features of COVID-19 patients treated with BCDT, which may have contributed to the worse outcomes of COVID-19 in this population.


Asunto(s)
Linfocitos B , COVID-19 , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , COVID-19/terapia , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Infect Dis (Lond) ; : 1-8, 2024 Sep 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39283316

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Because patients infected with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) have been reported to be older than patients infected with influenza virus, the more frequent incidence of complications in RSV-infected patients may be age-related. This study compared clinical characteristics and outcomes in hospitalized adults infected with RSV with findings in age- and sex-matched adults infected with influenza virus. METHODS: The medical records of hospitalized adult patients infected with RSV or influenza virus at two university hospitals from 2013 to 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Virus infection was confirmed by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Each RSV-infected patient was matched by age and sex with two influenza virus-infected patients, and their clinical symptoms, laboratory parameters and hospital courses were compared. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 552 patients, 184 infected with RSV and 368 infected with influenza virus. Fever (71.2% vs. 79.9%, p = .022) and cough (70.1% vs. 80.4%, p = .007) were significantly less frequent in the RSV than in the influenza group, whereas white blood cell counts (9132/mm3 vs. 7616/mm3, p < .001) and C-reactive protein concentrations (10.25 vs. 8.88 mg/dL, p = .029) were significantly higher in the RSV group. The frequency of oxygen therapy was higher (60.3% vs. 48.6%, p = .010) and hospital stay was longer (8 vs. 6 days, p = .003) in RSV than in influenza virus-infected patients. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical symptoms were less frequent, but disease was more severe, in hospitalized adult patients infected with RSV than in age- and sex-matched patients infected with influenza. Greater attention should be paid to diagnosing and preventing RSV infection in adults.

8.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 13(1): 95, 2024 Aug 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39215349

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing controversy regarding whether single-occupancy rooms are superior to multiple-occupancy rooms in terms of infection prevention. We investigated whether treatment in a multiple-occupancy room is associated with an increased incidence of nosocomial coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) compared with treatment in a single-occupancy room. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, every hospitalization period of adult patients aged ≥ 18 years at a tertiary hospital in Korea from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022, was analyzed. If COVID-19 was diagnosed more than 5 days after hospitalization, the case was classified as nosocomial. We estimated the association between the number of patients per room and the risk of nosocomial COVID-19 using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: In total, 25,143 hospitalizations per room type were analyzed. The incidence rate of nosocomial COVID-19 increased according to the number of patients per room; it ranged from 3.05 to 38.64 cases per 10,000 patient-days between single- and 6-bed rooms, respectively. Additionally, the hazard ratios of nosocomial COVID-19 showed an increasing trend according to the number of patients per room, ranging from 0.14 (95% confidence interval 0.001-1.03) to 2.66 (95% confidence interval 1.60-4.85) between single- and 6-bed rooms, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that the incidence of nosocomial COVID-19 increased according to the number of patients per room. To reduce nosocomial infections by respiratory viruses, the use of multiple-occupancy rooms should be minimized.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infección Hospitalaria , Habitaciones de Pacientes , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , República de Corea/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Incidencia , Anciano , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Adulto , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales
9.
Jpn J Infect Dis ; 77(5): 285-288, 2024 Sep 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38684427

RESUMEN

The accurate identification of individuals without prior infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is pivotal for seroepidemiological studies and vaccine trials. Owing to widespread vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the anti-nucleocapsid antibody continues to serve as a valuable marker for individuals without a history of COVID-19. This study aimed to comprehensively assess anti-nucleocapsid antibody positivity using diverse commercial and in-house immunoassays among individuals who contracted COVID-19 more than three years earlier. We enrolled 44 participants with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 between January and May 2020 from the Seoul National University Hospital and its community treatment centers. The results showed anti-nucleocapsid antibody positivity ranging from 45.5% to 87.9%, depending on the immunoassay. This study highlights the importance of considering the limited anti-nucleocapsid antibody positivity in individuals, with a history of distant COVID-19, in seroepidemiological or vaccine research.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Inmunoensayo/métodos , Prueba Serológica para COVID-19/métodos , Fosfoproteínas/inmunología , República de Corea/epidemiología , Nucleocápside/inmunología , Anciano de 80 o más Años
10.
BMC Res Notes ; 15(1): 357, 2022 Dec 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36471453

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag rapid test device using nasal swabs and those of the SSf-COVID19 kit, one of RT-PCR tests, using saliva specimens. These tests were compared with RT-PCR tests using nasopharyngeal swabs for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The three diagnostic tests were simultaneously conducted for patients aged ≥ 18 years, who were about to be hospitalized or had been admitted for COVID-19 confirmed by RT-PCR in two research hospitals from August 20 to October 29, 2021. Nasal swabs were tested using the Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag rapid test device. More than 1 mL of saliva was self-collected and tested using the SSf-COVID19 kit. RESULTS: In total, 157 patients were investigated; 124 patients who were about to be hospitalized and 33 patients already admitted for COVID-19. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag rapid test device with nasal swabs were 64.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 47.9-78.5%) and 100.0% (95% CI 97.0-100.0%), respectively. The median time to confirm a positive result was 180 s (interquartile range 60-255 s). The overall sensitivity and specificity of the SSf-COVID19 kit with saliva specimens were 94.1% (95% CI 80.9-98.4%) and 100.0% (95% CI 97.0-100.0%), respectively.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2 , Hospitalización , Saliva , Hospitales , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Nasofaringe
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA