Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
IEEE Trans Med Imaging ; 34(10): 1993-2024, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25494501

RESUMEN

In this paper we report the set-up and results of the Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS) organized in conjunction with the MICCAI 2012 and 2013 conferences. Twenty state-of-the-art tumor segmentation algorithms were applied to a set of 65 multi-contrast MR scans of low- and high-grade glioma patients-manually annotated by up to four raters-and to 65 comparable scans generated using tumor image simulation software. Quantitative evaluations revealed considerable disagreement between the human raters in segmenting various tumor sub-regions (Dice scores in the range 74%-85%), illustrating the difficulty of this task. We found that different algorithms worked best for different sub-regions (reaching performance comparable to human inter-rater variability), but that no single algorithm ranked in the top for all sub-regions simultaneously. Fusing several good algorithms using a hierarchical majority vote yielded segmentations that consistently ranked above all individual algorithms, indicating remaining opportunities for further methodological improvements. The BRATS image data and manual annotations continue to be publicly available through an online evaluation system as an ongoing benchmarking resource.


Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Neuroimagen , Algoritmos , Benchmarking , Glioma/patología , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/normas , Neuroimagen/métodos , Neuroimagen/normas
2.
Open Biomed Eng J ; 6: 56-72, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22741026

RESUMEN

In this paper, a new technique is proposed for automatic segmentation of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions from brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. The technique uses a trained support vector machine (SVM) to discriminate between the blocks in regions of MS lesions and the blocks in non-MS lesion regions mainly based on the textural features with aid of the other features. The classification is done on each of the axial, sagittal and coronal sectional brain view independently and the resultant segmentations are aggregated to provide more accurate output segmentation. The main contribution of the proposed technique described in this paper is the use of textural features to detect MS lesions in a fully automated approach that does not rely on manually delineating the MS lesions. In addition, the technique introduces the concept of the multi-sectional view segmentation to produce verified segmentation. The proposed textural-based SVM technique was evaluated using three simulated datasets and more than fifty real MRI datasets. The results were compared with state of the art methods. The obtained results indicate that the proposed method would be viable for use in clinical practice for the detection of MS lesions in MRI.

3.
J Digit Imaging ; 16(4): 365-77, 2003 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14752607

RESUMEN

In this article we describe a statistical model that was developed to segment brain magnetic resonance images. The statistical segmentation algorithm was applied after a pre-processing stage involving the use of a 3D anisotropic filter along with histogram equalization techniques. The segmentation algorithm makes use of prior knowledge and a probability-based multivariate model designed to semi-automate the process of segmentation. The algorithm was applied to images obtained from the Center for Morphometric Analysis at Massachusetts General Hospital as part of the Internet Brain Segmentation Repository (IBSR). The developed algorithm showed improved accuracy over the k-means, adaptive Maximum Apriori Probability (MAP), biased MAP, and other algorithms. Experimental results showing the segmentation and the results of comparisons with other algorithms are provided. Results are based on an overlap criterion against expertly segmented images from the IBSR. The algorithm produced average results of approximately 80% overlap with the expertly segmented images (compared with 85% for manual segmentation and 55% for other algorithms).


Asunto(s)
Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Modelos Estadísticos , Algoritmos , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Análisis Multivariante , Reconocimiento de Normas Patrones Automatizadas , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA