RESUMEN
The National HIV/AIDS Strategy (NHAS) clearly emphasized the need to provide services to black men who have sex with men (MSM). However, there are no estimates of the unmet HIV-related service delivery needs among black MSM. We estimate that of 195,313 black MSM living with HIV in the US, 50,196 were not yet diagnosed, and 145,118 were aware of their seropositivity (of whom 67,625 were not linked to care and 77,493 were linked to care). Also, of those already diagnosed, ~43,390 had undetectable viral load and 101,728 had detectable viral load. Approximately 19,545 of diagnosed black MSM engage in unprotected risk behavior in serostatus-discordant partnerships. The cost of delivering services needed to meet the NHAS goals is ~$2.475 billion in 2011 U.S. dollars. Mathematical modeling suggests that provisions of these services would avert 6213 HIV infections at an economically favorable cost of $20,032 per quality-adjusted life year saved.
Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por VIH/economía , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/economía , Homosexualidad Masculina , Vivienda/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Infecciones por VIH/terapia , Seropositividad para VIH , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Asunción de Riesgos , Parejas Sexuales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Sexo Inseguro , Carga Viral , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Engaging partners in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of cancer education programs is critical for improving the health of our communities. A 2-year pilot education intervention on prostate cancer decision making and participation in medical research was funded by the National Cancer Institute. The partnership involving community members and clinical staff at a cancer center was used to develop recruitment strategies and plan for the implementation of the intervention with African-American middle-age and older men and female family members. We assessed partners' perceptions of this community-academic-clinical research collaboration. In year 2, eight project advisory council members were selected among existing partners and year 1 participants to serve as a formal committee. Council members were required to participate in telephone and in person meetings and actively support recruitment/implementation efforts. At the conclusion of the project, 20 individuals (all clinical and community partners, including the eight advisory council members) were invited to complete a survey to assess their perceived impact of the collaboration on the community and provide suggestions for future collaborations. Most partners agreed that their organization benefitted from the collaboration and that various aspects of the advisory council process (e.g., both formal and informal communication) worked well. The most noted accomplishment of the partnership related to leveraging the collaboration to make men more knowledgeable about prostate cancer decision making. Suggested improvements for future collaborations included distributing more frequent updates regarding project successes. Evaluating partners' perceptions of this collaboration provided important recommendations for future planning, implementation, and evaluation of community-based cancer education programs.
Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos/organización & administración , Redes Comunitarias/organización & administración , Conducta Cooperativa , Educación en Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Neoplasias de la Próstata/prevención & control , Humanos , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Pronóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/etnología , South CarolinaRESUMEN
Prostate cancer (PrCA) is the most commonly diagnosed non-skin cancer among men. PrCA mortality in African-American (AA) men in South Carolina is ~50% higher than for AAs in the U.S as a whole. AA men also have low rates of participation in cancer research. This paper describes partnership development and recruitment efforts of a Community-Academic-Clinical research team for a PrCA education intervention with AA men and women that was designed to address the discordance between high rates of PrCA mortality and limited participation in cancer research. Guided by Vesey's framework on recruitment and retention of minority groups in research, recruitment strategies were selected and implemented following multiple brainstorming sessions with partners having established community relationships. Based on findings from these sessions culturally appropriate strategies are recommended for recruiting AA men and women for PrCA education research. Community-based research recruitment challenges and lessons learned are presented.
Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos , Negro o Afroamericano/psicología , Toma de Decisiones , Educación en Salud/organización & administración , Selección de Paciente , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Características de la Residencia , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Neoplasias de la Próstata/prevención & control , South CarolinaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To explore/identify patient perspectives regarding seeking, delaying, and avoiding health care services, particularly barriers and facilitators. DESIGN: Face-to-face interviews with health plan survey respondents. SETTING: An integrated health plan providing comprehensive care to 480,000 people in Oregon and Washington. PARTICIPANTS: Willing respondents randomly selected to maximize heterogeneity within the following strata: gender, health care utilization, and self-reported alcohol consumption (indicator of health practices). Participants were 75 men and 75 women (150 total), 21 to 64 years old, with ≥12 months of health plan membership. METHOD: Participants were recruited by letter (52.5% agreed). Data collection stopped when planned interviews were completed; saturation (the point at which additional interviews were not producing novel information) was achieved for key study questions. Semi-structured interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded. Reviews of codes related to care seeking and feelings/attitudes about providers produced common themes. RESULTS: Facilitators of care seeking included welcoming staff, collaborative relationships with providers, and education about the value of preventive care. Barriers included costs, time needed for appointments, and cumbersome processes. Some participants delayed procedures, some avoided care until absolutely necessary, others framed care as routinely necessary. CONCLUSION: Increasing comfort, improving appointment and visit-related processes, having positive patient-physician relationships, and enhancing communication and clinician-provided education may facilitate appropriate use of preventive services. Further research is needed with larger, representative samples to evaluate findings.