Relationship between cycling mechanics and core stability.

Core stability has received considerable attention with regards to functional training in sports. Core stability provides the foundation from which power is generated in cycling. No research has described the relationship between core stability and cycling mechanics of the lower extremity. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between cycling mechanics and core stability. Hip, knee, and ankle joint kinematic and pedal force data were collected on 15 competitive cyclists while cycling untethered on a high-speed treadmill. The exhaustive cycling protocol consisted of cycling at 25.8 km x h(-1) while the grade was increased 1% every 3 minutes. A core fatigue workout was performed before the second treadmill test. Total frontal plane knee motion (test 1: 15.1 +/- 6.0 degrees ; test 2: 23.3 +/- 12.5 degrees), sagittal plane knee motion (test 1: 69.9 +/- 4.9 degrees ; test 2: 79.3 +/- 10.1 degrees), and sagittal plane ankle motion (test 1: 29.0 +/- 8.5 degrees ; test 2: 43.0 +/- 22.9 degrees) increased after the core fatigue protocol. No significant differences were demonstrated for pedaling forces. Core fatigue resulted in altered cycling mechanics that might increase the risk of injury because the knee joint is potentially exposed to greater stress. Improved core stability and endurance could promote greater alignment of the lower extremity when riding for extended durations as the core is more resistant to fatigue.

Thoracohumeral muscle activity alters glenohumeral joint biomechanics during active abduction.

Normal function of the glenohumeral joint depends on coordinated muscle forces that stabilize the joint while moving the shoulder. These forces can either provide compressive forces to press the humeral head into the glenoid or translational forces that may destabilize the glenohumeral joint. The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of pectoralis major and latissimus dorsi muscle activity on glenohumeral kinematics and joint reaction forces during simulated active abduction. Nine fresh-frozen whole upper extremities were tested using a dynamic shoulder testing apparatus. Seven muscle force combinations were examined: a standard combination and 10%, 20%, or 30% of the deltoid force applied to the latissimus dorsi or pectoralis major tendon, respectively. Pectoralis major and latissimus dorsi muscle activity decreased the maximum angle of glenohumeral abduction and external rotation, and increased the maximum horizontal adduction angle compared to the standard muscle combination. Thoracohumeral muscle activity also created a more anteriorly directed joint reaction force that resulted in anterior translation compared to the standard muscle combination. Therefore, the ratio between anteriorly directed translational forces and compressive forces increased during abduction due to this muscle activity, suggesting that thoracohumeral muscle activity may decrease glenohumeral stability based on the joint position and applied loads. A better understanding of the contribution of muscle forces to stability may improve rehabilitation protocols for the shoulder aimed at maximizing compression and minimizing translation at the glenohumeral joint.

Decreasing glenoid inclination improves function in shoulders with simulated massive rotator cuff tears.

BACKGROUND: A massive rotator cuff tear leads to poor shoulder function as evidenced by diminished glenohumeral abduction and superior translation of the humeral head compared to its normal position. The inclination angle of the glenoid has been associated with rotator cuff tears. The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of a decreased glenoid inclination angle on glenohumeral kinematics during active abduction in shoulders with a simulated, massive rotator cuff tear. METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen full upper extremities were tested using a dynamic shoulder testing apparatus. After recording the kinematics of the intact shoulder, a massive rotator cuff tear was surgically simulated. An osteotomy of the glenoid was then performed and the inclination angle was decreased by 30 degrees . The translation of the humeral head during abduction and the maximum abduction angle were recorded. FINDINGS: With an intact rotator cuff minimal humeral head translation on the glenoid occurred and the maximum abduction angle was mean 85.5 degrees (SD 7.4 degrees ). A massive rotator cuff tear resulted in superior translation of the humeral head with impingement on the acromion. The maximum abduction angle was mean 15.5 degrees (SD 9.4 degrees ). Decreasing the inclination angle of the glenoid resulted in a significant reduction of superior humeral head translation during abduction and there was no impingement on the acromion. The maximum abduction achieved was mean 28.5 degrees (SD 17.0 degrees ). INTERPRETATION: From a clinical perspective the reduced superior translation may decrease shoulder pain since the humeral head no longer impinges on the acromion. Further investigations are necessary to assess if the improvement in abduction is clinically significant.

Does Repair of a Hill-Sachs Defect Increase Stability at the Glenohumeral Joint?

BACKGROUND: The effect of osteoallograft repair of a Hill-Sachs lesion and the effect of allograft fit on glenohumeral translations in response to applied force are poorly understood. PURPOSE: To compare the impact of a 25% Hill-Sachs lesion, a perfect osteoallograft repair (PAR) of a 25% Hill-Sachs lesion, and an "imperfect" osteoallograft repair (IAR) of a 25% Hill-Sachs lesion on glenohumeral translations in response to a compressive load and either an anterior or posterior load in 3 clinically relevant arm positions. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system was used to apply joint compression (22 N) and an anterior or posterior load (44 N) to cadaveric shoulders (n = 9) with the skin and deltoid removed (intact) at 3 glenohumeral joint positions (abduction/external rotation): 0°/0°, 30°/30°, and 60°/60°. The 25% bony defect state, PAR state, and IAR state were created and the loading protocol was performed. Translational motion was measured in each position for each shoulder state. A nonparametric repeated-measures Friedman test with a Wilcoxon signed-rank post hoc test was performed to compare the biomechanical parameters (P < .05). RESULTS: Compared with the defect shoulder, the PAR shoulder had significantly less anterior translation with an anterior load in the 0°/0° (15.3 ± 8.2 vs 16.6 ± 9.0 mm, P = .008) and 30°/30° (13.6 ± 7.1 vs 14.2 ± 7.0 mm, P = .021) positions. Compared with IAR, the PAR shoulder had significantly less anterior translation with an anterior load in the 0°/0° (15.3 ± 8.2 vs 16.6 ± 9.0 mm, P = .008) and 30°/30° (13.6 ± 7.1 vs 14.4 ± 7.1 mm, P = .011) positions, and the defect shoulder had significantly less anterior translation with an anterior load in the 30°/30° (14.2 ± 7.0 vs 14.4 ± 7.0 mm, P = .038) position. CONCLUSION: PAR resulted in the least translational motion at the glenohumeral joint. The defect shoulder had significantly less translational motion at the joint compared with the IAR. An IAR resulted in the most translational motion at the glenohumeral joint. This demonstrates the biomechanical importance of performing an osteoallograft repair in which the allograft closely matches the Hill-Sachs defect and fully restores the preinjury state of the humeral head. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study demonstrates the importance of performing an osteoallograft repair of a Hill-Sachs defect that closely matches the preinjury state and restores normal humeral head anatomy.

Active stability of the glenohumeral joint decreases in the apprehension position.

BACKGROUND: Muscle forces that compress the glenohumeral joint during mid-ranges of motion may lead to increased translational forces in end-range positions, such as the apprehension position, where symptoms of anterior instability occur. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to quantify active stability provided by eight shoulder muscles in mid-range and end-range positions through muscle force vector analysis. METHODS: Lines of action were derived from a geometric model and muscle force magnitudes were estimated with electromyography-based techniques. Resultant muscle force vectors were calculated by summing individual muscle force vectors. RESULTS: Compared to mid-range positions, lines of action of resultant force vectors were more anteriorly directed in end-range positions compared to 15 degrees of abduction, up to 26 degrees. Consequently, anterior stability was lowest in the apprehension position. The magnitudes of the resultant force vectors were comparable to other studies. Based on a sensitivity analysis, lines of action of resultant force vectors vary up to 6 degrees within the population. CONCLUSIONS: Data obtained from this model will improve conservative management, post-surgical rehabilitation, and strength training protocols.

Pectoralis major tendon transfers above or underneath the conjoint tendon in subscapularis-deficient shoulders. An in vitro biomechanical analysis.

BACKGROUND: Different operative techniques for transfer of the pectoralis major tendon have been proposed for the treatment of irreparable ruptures of the subscapularis tendon. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of two techniques of transferring the pectoralis major tendon (above or underneath the conjoint tendon) on glenohumeral kinematics during active abduction in a biomechanical model of a subscapularis-deficient shoulder. METHODS: Six shoulder specimens were tested with a custom dynamic shoulder testing apparatus. After the kinematics of the intact shoulder were recorded, a complete tear of the subscapularis tendon was simulated surgically. A transfer of the clavicular portion of the pectoralis major muscle to the lesser tuberosity was then performed with the transferred tendon placed either above (tendon-transfer 1) or underneath (tendon-transfer 2) the conjoint tendon. For each condition, the maximum abduction angle as well as the external rotation angle and the superoinferior and anteroposterior humeral translations at the maximum abduction angle were recorded. RESULTS: With the rotator cuff intact, the mean maximum glenohumeral abduction angle (and standard error of the mean) was 86.3 degrees +/- 2.1 degrees and the mean amount of external rotation at the maximum abduction angle was 5.5 degrees +/- 7.6 degrees . A complete tear of the subscapularis tendon decreased the mean maximum abduction angle to 40.8 degrees +/- 2.4 degrees (p < 0.001) and increased the mean external rotation to 91.8 degrees +/- 4.8 degrees (p < 0.001). The mean humeral translations in the anterior and superior directions (+3.4 +/- 0.5 and +6.3 +/- 0.3 mm, respectively) at the maximum abduction angle were also increased (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001) when compared with those in the intact shoulder. Significant differences were found in the mean maximum abduction angle as well as the mean external rotation angle and humeral translations (anterior and superior) at maximum abduction between the tendon-transfer-1 condition (63.2 degrees +/- 13.5 degrees , 82.4 degrees +/- 6.6 degrees , 4.0 +/- 1.8 mm, and 3.3 +/- 1.9 mm, respectively) and tendon-transfer-2 condition (89.5 degrees +/- 12.3 degrees , 45.7 degrees +/- 22.5 degrees , -0.6 +/- 2.0 mm, and 0.5 +/- 2.3 mm, respectively). The tendon-transfer-2 condition restored glenohumeral kinematics that were closer to those in the intact shoulder than were those resulting from the tendon-transfer-1 condition. CONCLUSIONS: Transfer of the pectoralis major tendon in subscapularis-deficient shoulders partially restored the glenohumeral kinematics of the intact shoulder. One possible explanation for the superior effect of the tendon-transfer-2 condition is that, with a pectoralis major tendon transfer underneath the conjoint tendon, the line of action of the transferred tendon is closer to that of the subscapularis muscle.