Ablative margin quantification using deformable versus rigid image registration in colorectal liver metastasis thermal ablation: a retrospective single-center study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the correlation of minimal ablative margin (MAM) quantification using biomechanical deformable (DIR) versus intensity-based rigid image registration (RIR) with local outcomes following colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) thermal ablation. METHODS: This retrospective single-institution study included consecutive patients undergoing thermal ablation between May 2016 and October 2021. Patients who did not have intraprocedural pre- and post-ablation contrast-enhanced CT images for MAM quantification or follow-up period less than 1 year without residual tumor or local tumor progression (LTP) were excluded. DIR and RIR methods were used to quantify the MAM. The registration accuracy was compared using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to test MAM in predicting local tumor outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients (mean age 57; 44 men) with 139 tumors (mean diameter 1.5 cm ± 0.8 (SD)) were included. During a median follow-up of 29.4 months, there was one residual unablated tumor and the LTP rate was 17% (24/138). The ranges of DSC were 0.96-0.98 and 0.67-0.98 for DIR and RIR, respectively (p < 0.001). When using DIR, 27 (19%) tumors were partially or totally registered outside the liver, compared to 46 (33%) with RIR. Using DIR versus RIR, the corresponding median MAM was 4.7 mm versus 4.0 mm, respectively (p = 0.5). The AUC in predicting residual tumor and 1-year LTP for DIR versus RIR was 0.89 versus 0.72, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Ablative margin quantified on intra-procedural CT imaging using DIR method outperformed RIR for predicting local outcomes of CLM thermal ablation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The study supports the role of biomechanical deformable image registration as the preferred image registration method over rigid image registration for quantifying minimal ablative margins using intraprocedural contrast-enhanced CT images. KEY POINTS: • Accurate and reproducible image registration is a prerequisite for clinical application of image-based ablation confirmation methods. • When compared to intensity-based rigid image registration, biomechanical deformable image registration for minimal ablative margin quantification was more accurate for liver registration using intraprocedural contrast-enhanced CT images. • Biomechanical deformable image registration outperformed intensity-based rigid image registration for predicting local tumor outcomes following colorectal liver metastasis thermal ablation.

Ablative Margins of Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Deformable CT Image Registration and Autosegmentation.

Background Confirming ablation completeness with sufficient ablative margin is critical for local tumor control following colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) ablation. An image-based confirmation method considering patient- and ablation-related biomechanical deformation is an unmet need. Purpose To evaluate a biomechanical deformable image registration (DIR) method for three-dimensional (3D) minimal ablative margin (MAM) quantification and the association with local disease progression following CT-guided CLM ablation. Materials and Methods This single-institution retrospective study included patients with CLM treated with CT-guided microwave or radiofrequency ablation from October 2015 to March 2020. A biomechanical DIR method with AI-based autosegmentation of liver, tumors, and ablation zones on CT images was applied for MAM quantification retrospectively. The per-tumor incidence of local disease progression was defined as residual tumor or local tumor progression. Factors associated with local disease progression were evaluated using the multivariable Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model. Local disease progression sites were spatially localized with the tissue at risk for tumor progression (<5 mm) using a 3D ray-tracing method. Results Overall, 213 ablated CLMs (mean diameter, 1.4 cm) in 124 consecutive patients (mean age, 57 years ± 12 [SD]; 69 women) were evaluated, with a median follow-up interval of 25.8 months. In ablated CLMs, an MAM of 0 mm was depicted in 14.6% (31 of 213), from greater than 0 to less than 5 mm in 40.4% (86 of 213), and greater than or equal to 5 mm in 45.1% (96 of 213). The 2-year cumulative incidence of local disease progression was 72% for 0 mm and 12% for greater than 0 to less than 5 mm. No local disease progression was observed for an MAM greater than or equal to 5 mm. Among 117 tumors with an MAM less than 5 mm, 36 had local disease progression and 30 were spatially localized within the tissue at risk for tumor progression. On multivariable analysis, an MAM of 0 mm (subdistribution hazard ratio, 23.3; 95% CI: 10.8, 50.5; P < .001) was independently associated with local disease progression. Conclusion Biomechanical deformable image registration and autosegmentation on CT images enabled identification and spatial localization of colorectal liver metastases at risk for local disease progression following ablation, with a minimal ablative margin greater than or equal to 5 mm as the optimal end point. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Sofocleous in this issue.

Study Protocol STEREOLAB: Stereotactic Liver Ablation Assisted with Intra-Arterial CT Hepatic Arteriography and Ablation Confirmation Software Assessment.

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the technical efficacy and local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) of a standardized workflow for thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) consisting of CT during hepatic arteriography (CTHA)-based imaging analysis, stereotactic thermal ablation, and computer-based software assessment of ablation margins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This investigator initiated, single-center, single-arm prospective trial will enroll up to 50 patients (≤ 5 CRLM, Measuring ≤ 5 cm). Procedures will be performed in an angio-CT suite under general anesthesia. The primary objective is to estimate LTPFS with a follow-up of up to 2 years and secondary objectives are analysis of the impact of minimal ablative margins on LTPFS, adverse events, contrast media utilization and radiation exposure, overall oncological outcomes, and anesthesia/procedural time. Adverse events (AE) will be recorded by CTCAE (Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events), and Bayesian optimal phase-2 design will be applied for major intraprocedural AE stop boundaries. The institutional CRLM ablation registry will be used as benchmark for comparative analysis with the historical cohort. DISCUSSION: The STEREOLAB trial will introduce a high-precision and standardized thermal ablation workflow for CRLM consisting of CT during hepatic arteriography imaging, stereotactic guidance, and ablation confirmation. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: (NCT05361551).

Study Protocol COVER-ALL: Clinical Impact of a Volumetric Image Method for Confirming Tumour Coverage with Ablation on Patients with Malignant Liver Lesions.

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the intra-procedural use of a novel ablation confirmation (AC) method, consisting of biomechanical deformable image registration incorporating AI-based auto-segmentation, and its impact on tumor coverage by quantitative three-dimensional minimal ablative margin (MAM) CT-generated assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center, randomized, phase II, intent-to-treat trial is enrolling 100 subjects with primary and secondary liver tumors (≤ 3 tumors, 1-5 cm in diameter) undergoing microwave or radiofrequency ablation with a goal of achieving ≥ 5 mm MAM. For the experimental arm, the proposed novel AC method is utilized for ablation applicator(s) placement verification and MAM assessment. For the control arm, the same variables are assessed by visual inspection and anatomical landmarks-based quantitative measurements aided by co-registration of pre- and post-ablation contrast-enhanced CT images. The primary objective is to evaluate the impact of the proposed AC method on the MAM. Secondary objectives are 2-year LTP-free survival, complication rates, quality of life, liver function, other oncological outcomes, and impact of AC method on procedure workflow. DISCUSSION: The COVER-ALL trial will provide information on the role of a biomechanical deformable image registration-based ablation confirmation method incorporating AI-based auto-segmentation for improving MAM, which might translate in improvements of liver ablation efficacy. CONCLUSION: The COVER-ALL trial aims to provide information on the role of a novel intra-procedural AC method for improving MAM, which might translate in improvements of liver ablation efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04083378.

How to Measure Racism in Academic Health Centers.

Institutional racism is a set of practices and policies that disadvantage individuals not part of societies' dominant groups. In academic health centers (AHCs), institutional racism mediates structural racism; it is embedded in institutional policies, clinical practice, health professional training, and biomedical research. Measuring institutional racism in AHCs at the individual, intra-organizational, and extra-organizational levels renders visible how AHCs mediate structural racism by implementing policies that unfairly treat minority groups.