Pharmacokinetics of isavuconazole at different target sites in healthy volunteers after single and multiple intravenous infusions.

BACKGROUND: Invasive aspergillosis is a severe fungal infection that affects multiple organ systems including the CNS and the lungs. Isavuconazole, a novel triazole antifungal agent, has demonstrated promising activity against Aspergillus spp. However, data on the penetration of isavuconazole into the CNS and ELF and intracellular accumulation remain limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective single-centre pharmacokinetic (PK) study in 12 healthy volunteers. Subjects received seven doses of 200 mg isavuconazole to achieve an assumed steady-state. After the first and final infusion, plasma sampling was conducted over 8 and 12 h, respectively. All subjects underwent one lumbar puncture and bronchoalveolar lavage, at either 2, 6 or 12 h post-infusion of the final dose. PBMCs were collected in six subjects from blood to determine intracellular isavuconazole concentrations at 6, 8 or 12 h. The AUC/MIC was calculated for an MIC value of 1 mg/L, which marks the EUCAST susceptibility breakpoint for Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus flavus. RESULTS: C max and AUC0-24h of isavuconazole in plasma under assumed steady-state conditions were 6.57 ±â€Š1.68 mg/L (mean ±â€ŠSD) and 106 ±â€Š32.1 h·mg/L, respectively. The average concentrations measured in CSF, ELF and in PBMCs were 0.07 ±â€Š0.03, 0.94 ±â€Š0.46 and 27.1 ±â€Š17.8 mg/L, respectively. The AUC/MIC in plasma, CSF, ELF and in PBMCs under steady-state conditions were 106 ±â€Š32.1, 1.68 ±â€Š0.72, 22.6 ±â€Š11.0 and 650 ±â€Š426 mg·h/L, respectively. CONCLUSION: Isavuconazole demonstrated moderate penetration into ELF, low penetrability into CSF and high accumulation in PBMCs. Current dosing regimens resulted in sufficient plasma exposure in all subjects to treat isolates with MICs ≤ 1 mg/L.

Association of prediabetes with clinical outcomes in patients with chronic coronary syndrome: a post hoc analysis of the ISCHEMIA and ISCHEMIA-CKD trials.

BACKGROUND: There is conflicting evidence whether prediabetes is associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. We aimed to assess the effect of prediabetes in patients with chronic coronary syndrome on clinical outcomes. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of data from the ISCHEMIA and ISCHEMIA-CKD trials, including patients with chronic coronary syndrome determined by coronary computed tomography angiography or exercise-stress testing. Participants were assigned to the normoglycemia group (HbA1c < 5.7% [< 39 mmol/mol]), prediabetes group (HbA1c 5.7-6.4% [40-47 mmol/mol]), or diabetes group (HbA1c ≥ 6.5% [≥ 48 mmol/mol]). The primary end point of this study was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular events and composites thereof. RESULTS: Overall, the primary endpoint all-cause mortality occurred in 330 (8.4%) of 3910 patients over a median follow-up time of 3.1 years (IQR 2.1-4.1). The primary endpoint all-cause mortality occurred in 37 (5.2%) of 716 patients in the normoglycemia group, in 63 (6.9%) of 911 in the prediabetes group, and in 230 (10.1%) of 2283 in the diabetes group. In the covariate-adjusted Cox model analysis, the estimated adjusted HR (aHR) in the prediabetes group as compared with the normoglycemia group was 1.45 (95%CI, 0.95-2.20). The aHR in the diabetes group as compared with the normoglycemia group was 1.84 (95%CI, 1.29-2.65). Prediabetes, compared with normoglycemia, was associated with an increased risk of stroke (aHR, 3.44, 95%CI, 1.15-10.25). Subgroup analyses suggested an increased risk of all-cause death associated with prediabetes in males and patients under 65 years. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic coronary syndrome, diabetes but not prediabetes was associated with significantly increased risk of all-cause death within a median follow-up period of 3.1 years. Trial Registration NCT01471522, BioLINCC ID 13936.

Prevalence and clinical implications of bloodstream infections in intensive care patients with or without burn injury: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Severe burn injuries are often accompanied by infections and associated with high morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to compare the prevalence and clinical impact of bacteremia between patients receiving intensive care with and without burns. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study at the University Hospital Vienna, Austria, analyzed blood cultures from intensive care unit (ICU) patients with and without burns (2012-2022) to assess the prevalence of bacteremia, the associated pathogen distribution and the 60-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: In 1170 ICU patients, 303 with burns and 867 without, the prevalence of bacteremia was similar among patients with at least one blood culture (31/157 [19.7%] versus 44/213 [20.7%], OR [95%CI] = 0.95 [0.57-1.57]). Burn patients exhibited a significantly higher frequency of microbiological sampling (51.5% versus 24.5%, p < 0.001), resulting in a higher overall prevalence of bacteremia (10.2% versus 5.1%, p = 0.002). 16.2% of all identified pathogens were multidrug-resistant (MDR). The 60-day all-cause mortality was higher in patients with MDR pathogens than in patients without bacteremia (41.7% versus 10.6%, p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Bacteremia prevalence was similar in burn and non-burn patients, with high rates of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. The 60-day all-cause mortality was significantly higher in patients with MDR pathogens than in patients without bacteremia.

Community-acquired and hospital-acquired bacterial co-infections in patients hospitalized with Covid-19 or influenza: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Bacterial co-infections are believed to be less frequent in patients with Covid-19 than influenza, but frequencies varied between studies. METHODS: This single-center retrospective, propensity score-matched analysis included adult patients with Covid-19 or influenza admitted to normal-care wards between 02/2014 and 12/2021. Covid-19 cases were propensity score matched to influenza cases at a 2:1 ratio. Community-acquired and hospital-acquired bacterial co-infections were defined as positive blood or respiratory cultures ≤ 48 h or > 48 h after hospital admission, respectively. The primary outcome was comparison of community-acquired and hospital-acquired bacterial infections between patients with Covid-19 and influenza in the propensity score-matched cohort. Secondary outcomes included frequency of early and late microbiological testing. RESULTS: A total of 1337 patients were included in the overall analysis, of which 360 patients with Covid-19 were matched to 180 patients with influenza. Early (≤ 48 h) microbiological sampling was performed in 138 (38.3%) patients with Covid-19 and 75 (41.7%) patients with influenza. Community-acquired bacterial co-infections were found in 14 (3.9%) of 360 patients with Covid-19 and 7 (3.9%) of 180 patients with influenza (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.3-2.7). Late (> 48 h) microbiological sampling was performed in 129 (35.8%) patients with Covid-19 and 74 (41.1%) patients with influenza. Hospital-acquired bacterial co-infections were found in 40 (11.1%) of 360 patients with Covid-19 and 20 (11.1%) of 180 patients with influenza (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.5-1.8). CONCLUSION: The rate of community-acquired and hospital-acquired bacterial co-infections was similar in hospitalized Covid-19 and influenza patients. These findings contrast previous literature reporting that bacterial co-infections are less common in Covid-19 than influenza.

Fluid management for sepsis-induced hypotension in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: a secondary analysis of the CLOVERS trial.

BACKGROUND: Early fluid management in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and sepsis-induced hypotension is challenging with limited evidence to support treatment recommendations. We aimed to compare an early restrictive versus liberal fluid management for sepsis-induced hypotension in patients with advanced CKD. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis included patients with advanced CKD (eGFR of less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or history of end-stage renal disease on chronic dialysis) from the crystalloid liberal or vasopressor early resuscitation in sepsis (CLOVERS) trial. The primary endpoint was death from any cause before discharge home by day 90. RESULTS: Of 1563 participants enrolled in the CLOVERS trial, 196 participants had advanced CKD (45% on chronic dialysis), with 92 participants randomly assigned to the restrictive treatment group and 104 assigned to the liberal fluid group. Death from any cause before discharge home by day 90 occurred significantly less often in the restrictive fluid group compared with the liberal fluid group (20 [21.7%] vs. 41 [39.4%], HR 0.5, 95% CI 0.29-0.85). Participants in the restrictive fluid group had more vasopressor-free days (19.7 ± 10.4 days vs. 15.4 ± 12.6 days; mean difference 4.3 days, 95% CI, 1.0-7.5) and ventilator-free days by day 28 (21.0 ± 11.8 vs. 16.5 ± 13.6 days; mean difference 4.5 days, 95% CI, 0.9-8.1). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced CKD and sepsis-induced hypotension, an early restrictive fluid strategy, prioritizing vasopressor use, was associated with a lower risk of death from any cause before discharge home by day 90 as compared with an early liberal fluid strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03434028 (2018-02-09), BioLINCC 14149.

Efficacy and Safety of Corticosteroid Therapy for Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized, Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. In the present study, we aimed to assess the effect of corticosteroids on all-cause mortality in patients hospitalized with CAP. METHODS: For this meta-analysis and meta-regression, we conducted a systematic search of trials that evaluated the effect of corticosteroid therapy in patients hospitalized with CAP through March 2023. We included randomized, controlled trials, comparing adjunctive corticosteroid therapy with the standard of care alone for treatment of patients hospitalized with CAP and reporting all-cause mortality. We excluded retrospective analyses, observational data, and trial protocols. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 30 days after hospital admission. The safety analysis included the frequency of adverse events and steroid-associated adverse events. RESULTS: The literature search identified 35 713 citations, of which 15 studies and 3367 patients were eligible for the final analysis. The all-cause mortality at 30 days was significantly lower in the corticosteroid group (104 of 1690, 6.15%) than in the control group (152 of 1677, 9.06%; risk ratio [RR], 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], .53 to .85; P = .001; I2 = 0%). In 9 studies (2549 patients) that reported the occurrence of adverse events, corticosteroid therapy was not associated with an increased risk of developing any adverse event compared with standard care (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, .65 to 1.24; P = .5; I2 = 88%). CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive systemic corticosteroid therapy in patients hospitalized with CAP was associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality by day 30. The benefits were more pronounced in patients with severe pneumonia.

Multiparametric Prediction Models for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccine Selection: Results of a Comparative Population-Based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: An understanding vaccine-dependent effects on protective and sustained humoral immune response is crucial to planning future vaccination strategies against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: In this multicenter, population-based, cohort study including 4601 individuals after primary vaccination against COVID-19 ≥ 4 months earlier we compared factors associated with residual antibody levels against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) across different vaccination strategies (BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, or ChAdOx1). RESULTS: Our main model including 3787 individuals (2 × BNT162b2, n = 2271; 2 × mRNA-1273, n = 251; 2 × ChAdOx1, n = 1265), predicted significantly lower levels of anti-RBD antibodies after 6 months in individuals vaccinated with ChAdOx1 (392.7 binding antibody units per milliliter [BAU/mL]) compared with those vaccinated with BNT162b2 (1179.5 BAU/mL) or mRNA-1273 (2098.2 BAU/mL). Vaccine-dependent association of antibody levels was found for age with a significant predicted difference in BAU/ml per year for BNT162b2 (-21.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], -24.7 to -18.3) and no significant association for mRNA-1273 (-4.0; 95% CI, -20.0 to 12.1) or ChAdOx1 (1.7; 95% CI, .2 to 3.1). The predicted decrease over time since full immunization was highest in mRNA-1273 (-23.4; 95% CI, -31.4 to -15.4) compared with BNT162b2 (-5.9; 95% CI, -7 to -4.8). CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed population-based evidence of vaccine-dependent effects of age and time since full immunization on humoral immune response. Findings underline the importance of individualized vaccine selection, especially in elderly individuals.

Effect of the human endotoxin challenge on tedizolid tissue penetration.

The effects of the human endotoxin challenge on tissue pharmacokinetics are unknown. In the present study, we aimed to assess the effect of the endotoxin challenge on interstitial fluid pharmacokinetics of tedizolid in healthy volunteers using intramuscular microdialysis. Eight healthy male subjects were treated with 200 mg of tedizolid phosphate for 6 days. On Day 6, an intravenous bolus of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (2 ng/kg body weight) was administered. LPS infusion did not affect plasma pharmacokinetics of tedizolid. In contrast, following LPS infusion, median muscle tissue fAUC (0.83 [0.75-1.15] vs. 1.14 [1.11-1.43] mg × h/L, P = .0078) and muscle tissue fCmax (0.15 [0.14-0.19] vs. 0.19 [0.18-0.24] mg/L, P = .0078) were significantly increased by 38% and 24%, respectively. The human endotoxin challenge was associated with increased tissue concentrations of tedizolid, without affecting its plasma concentration-time profile. The human endotoxin challenge combined with microdialysis may be used to investigate the influence of systemic inflammation on tissue pharmacokinetics.

Influence of tedizolid on the cytokine response to the endotoxin challenge in healthy volunteers: a cross-over trial.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical data suggested anti-inflammatory properties of tedizolid. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the influence of tedizolid on the cytokine response to the human endotoxin challenge and the effect of endotoxaemia on the pharmacokinetics and protein binding of tedizolid. METHODS: In this cross-over trial, 14 male healthy volunteers underwent two treatment periods: (A) 200 mg of tedizolid phosphate once daily for 6 days (3 days orally and 3 days intravenously), followed by an intravenous bolus of 2 ng/kg body weight of LPS on the last treatment day; and (B) intravenous bolus of LPS (2 ng/kg body weight) without concomitant tedizolid treatment. Participants underwent first period A or B, separated by at least 6 weeks. Plasma was sampled to assess cytokines and the pharmacokinetics of tedizolid. RESULTS: Following the endotoxin challenge, the peak plasma concentration (median [IQR]; 280 [155-502] versus 287 [132-541]  pg/mL; P = 0.875) and AUC0-24 (979 [676-1319] versus 1000 [647-1632]  pg·h/mL; P = 0.638) of interleukin-6 remained unchanged with and without concomitant tedizolid treatment. The peak concentration and AUC0-24 of TNF-α remained also unchanged with and without tedizolid (47 [31-61] versus 54 [27-69]  pg/mL; P = 0.73 and 197 [163-268] versus 234 [146-280]  pg·h/mL; P = 0.875, respectively). The total maximum concentration (mean ± SD; 2.94 ± 0.69 versus 2.96 ± 0.62 mg/L), total AUC0-24 (22.3 ± 3.8 versus 21.1 ± 3.6 mg·h/L) and protein binding (21.4% ± 1.7% versus 21.6% ± 1.9%) of tedizolid were similar with and without the endotoxin challenge. CONCLUSIONS: Tedizolid did not attenuate the LPS-induced cytokine response in healthy volunteers. Furthermore, endotoxaemia did not influence the plasma pharmacokinetics of tedizolid.

Comparison of pharmacokinetics and stability of generics of cefepime, linezolid and piperacillin/tazobactam with their respective originator drugs: an intravenous bioequivalence study in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy and quality of generic antibacterial drug formulations are often questioned by both healthcare specialists and patients. Therefore, the present study investigated the interchangeability of generic drugs with their originators by comparing bioequivalence parameters and stability data of generic cefepime, linezolid and piperacillin/tazobactam with their respective originator drugs. METHODS: In this open-label, randomized, crossover bioequivalence study, three groups of 12 healthy volunteers each received a single intravenous infusion of either 2 g of cefepime or 4.5 g of piperacillin/tazobactam and two generic formulations, or 600 mg of linezolid and one generic formulation. Plasma sampling was performed, with a 5 day washout period between study days. Stability was tested by storing reconstituted generic and originator products according to their own storage specifications and those of the comparator products. All concentrations were measured by LC-MS. RESULTS: Similar ratios of generic/originator (90% CI) Cmax were observed for Cefepime-MIP/Maxipime [93.7 (88.4-99.4)], Cefepime Sandoz/Maxipime [95.9 (89.1-103.2)], Linezolid Kabi/Zyvoxid [104.5 (91.1-119.9)], Piperacillin Kabi/Tazobac [95.9 (90.4-101.7)], Piperacillin Aurobindo/Tazobac [99.7 (84.9-104.7)], Tazobactam Kabi/Tazobac [93.4 (87.4-99.8)] and Tazobactam Aurobindo/Tazobac [97.4 (89.7-105.8)]. Accordingly, similar ratios of AUC0-t were observed for Cefepime-MIP/Maxipime [91.1 (87.6-94.8)], Cefepime Sandoz/Maxipime [97.9 (92.5-103.5)], Linezolid Kabi/Zyvoxid [99.7 (93.3-106.6)], Piperacillin Kabi/Tazobac [92.2 (88.3-96.3)], Piperacillin Aurobindo/Tazobac [99.9 (97.0-102.8)], Tazobactam Kabi/Tazobac [91.4 (86.4-96.7)] and Tazobactam Aurobindo/Tazobac [98.8 (94.3-103.6)]. Stable and similar concentrations were measured for all contiguous substances, regardless of storage conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with their respective originator drugs, generic cefepime, linezolid and piperacillin/tazobactam met the predetermined bioequivalence criteria. All formulations were stable under the storage conditions of their respective comparators.

Clinically relevant body composition methods for obese pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: There is no gold standard in body composition measurement in pediatric patients with obesity. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate if there are any differences between two bioelectrical impedance analysis techniques performed in children and adolescents with obesity. METHODS: Data were collected at the Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine in Vienna from September 2015 to May 2017. Body composition measurement was performed with TANITA scale and BIA-BIACORPUS. RESULTS: In total, 38 children and adolescents (age: 10-18 years, BMI: 25-54 kg/m2) were included. Boys had significantly increased fat free mass (TANITA p = 0.019, BIA p = 0.003), total body water (TANITA p = 0.020, BIA p = 0.005), and basal metabolic rate (TANITA p = 0.002, BIA p = 0.029). Girls had significantly increased body fat percentage with BIA (BIA p = 0.001). No significant gender differences of core abdominal area have been determined. TANITA overestimated body fat percentage (p < 0.001), fat mass (p = 0.002), and basal metabolic rate (p < 0.001) compared to BIA. TANITA underestimated fat free mass (p = 0.002) in comparison to BIA. The Bland Altman plot demonstrated a low agreement between the body composition methods. CONCLUSIONS: Low agreement between TANITA scale and BIA-BIACORPUS has been observed. Body composition measurement should always be performed by the same devices to obtain comparable results. At clinical routine due to its feasibility, safety, and efficiency, bioelectrical impedance analysis is appropriate for obese pediatric patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials NCT02545764 . Registered 10 September 2015.

Reproducibility of LPS-Induced ex vivo Cytokine Response of Healthy Volunteers Using a Whole Blood Assay.

Introduction: Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation of human whole blood ex vivo has been widely used to investigate human innate immune responses. However, there are uncertainties regarding the reproducibility and reliability of this assay. Methods: In this prospective, single-center study, cytokine responses (interleukin 8, interferon-α, interferon-γ, interleukin 10, interleukin 1-ß, interleukin 6, and tumor necrosis factor-α) to ex vivo whole blood LPS stimulation were assessed in 12 healthy volunteers. Cytokine levels were measured at 0, 2, and 4 h using a multiplex immunoassay (Luminex ®). Stimulation was repeated after six weeks. We examined reproducibility across technical and biological replicates at baseline and between repeated experiments after 6 weeks based on the area under the curve (AUC) of the individual cytokines using Pearson's correlation coefficient and the mean coefficient of variation. Results: The lowest mean coefficients of variation were observed for the technical replicates (5.4 to 9.2%), followed by the biological replicates (8.1 to 24.8%), and the repeated experiments after 6 weeks (17 to 31.2%). Between the baseline and 6-week AUCs, the following Pearson correlation coefficients R were observed: interleukin 10, 0.97; interferon-α, 0.84; interleukin 1-ß, 0.83; interleukin 8, 0.79; interleukin 6, 0.73; interferon-γ, 0.73; and tumor necrosis factor-α, 0.63. Discussion: The level of agreement between the baseline and week-6 cytokine response to ex vivo LPS stimulation was high across the seven cytokines analyzed. While interleukin 10 exhibited the lowest level of variability over time, tumor necrosis factor-α showed the highest variability in repeated experiments, which should be considered in the design and interpretation of future studies.

Phase I dose-escalation study to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an inhaled recombinant human ACE2.

Background: APN01 is a soluble recombinant human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (rhACE2), a key player in the renin-aldosterone-angiotensin system (RAAS). In clinical studies, APN01 was administered intravenously only, so far. The aim of this study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05065645) was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of inhaled APN01. Methods: This was a phase I, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study. Inhalation was conducted via a nebuliser over 15 min in three single ascending dose (SAD) cohorts (n=24) and two multiple ascending dose (MAD) cohorts (n=16: every 12 h for 7 days). Doses in the SAD cohort were 1.25, 2.5 and 5 mg·mL-1; doses in the MAD cohort were 2.5 and 5 mg·mL-1. Safety (including adverse events (AEs), laboratory findings and lung function results), PK and PD data were assessed. Results: In the SAD and MAD cohorts, treatment-related AEs were slightly more frequent in the active treatment group than in the placebo group. AEs were mild to moderate, with no dose-limiting toxicities. No clinically relevant changes in lung function and laboratory results were observed. The mean maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) values after single and multiple doses of 5 mg·mL-1 APN01 were 1.88 and 6.61 ng·mL-1, respectively. Among the PD variables, significance was found for ACE2 and angiotensin 1-5. Conclusions: The application of aerosolised APN01 is safe and well tolerated after single and multiple doses. By achieving a high local concentration in the lungs and low systemic bioavailability, inhaled rhACE2 may present a therapeutic option in ACE2-related diseases.

Immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 booster vaccination: A population-based clinical trial to identify the best vaccination strategy.

BACKGROUND: Various SARS-CoV-2 variants of concerns (VOCs) characterized by higher transmissibility and immune evasion have emerged. Despite reduced vaccine efficacy against VOCs, currently available vaccines provide protection. Population-based evidence on the humoral immune response after booster vaccination is crucial to guide future vaccination strategies and in preparation for imminent COVID-19 waves. METHODS: This multicenter, population-based cohort study included 4697 individuals ≥18 years of age who received a booster vaccination. Antibody levels against SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) and neutralizing antibodies against wild-type (WT) virus and Omicron variants were assessed at baseline (day of booster vaccination) and after four weeks. Safety was evaluated daily within the first week using a participant-completed electronic diary. Antibody levels were compared across different vaccination strategies, taking into account individual host factors. RESULTS: Our main model including 3838 participants revealed that individuals who received a booster with mRNA-1273 compared to BNT162b2 vaccine had a significantly higher increase (95 %CI) in anti-RBD-antibody levels (37,707 BAU/mL [34,575-40,839] vs. 27,176 BAU/mL [26,265-28,087]), and of neutralization levels against WT (1,681 [1490-1872] vs. 1141 [1004-1278] and Omicron variant (422 [369-474] vs. 329 [284-374]). Neutralizing antibody titres highly correlated with anti-RBD antibodies, with neutralizing capacity 4.4 fold higher against WT compared to Omicron. No differences in safety were found between the two booster vaccines. CONCLUSION: Our study underlines the superiority of a booster vaccination with mRNA-1273, independent of the primary vaccination and therefore provides guidance on the vaccination strategy.

Individualized antimicrobial dose optimization: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring and Model-informed precision dosing allow dose individualization to increase drug effectivity and reduce toxicity. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the available evidence on the clinical efficacy of individualized antimicrobial dosing optimization. METHODS: Data sources: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from database inception to 11 November 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Published peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials. PARTICIPANTS: Human subjects aged ≥18 years receiving an antibiotic or antifungal drug. INTERVENTIONS: Patients receiving individualized antimicrobial dose adjustment. ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS: Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: The primary outcome was the risk of mortality. Secondary outcomes included target attainment, treatment failure, clinical and microbiological cure, length of stay, treatment duration, and adverse events. Effect sizes were pooled using a random-effects model. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed by inconsistency testing (I2). RESULTS: Ten randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis (1241 participants; n = 624 in the individualized antimicrobial dosing group and n = 617 in the control group). Individualized antimicrobial dose optimization was associated with a numerical decrease in mortality (risk ratio [RR] = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.71-1.05), without reaching statistical significance. Moreover, it was associated with significantly higher target attainment rates (RR = 1.41; 95% CI, 1.13-1.76) and a significant decrease in treatment failure (RR = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54-0.92). Individualized antimicrobial dose optimization was associated with improvement, but not significant in clinical cure (RR = 1.33; 95% CI, 0.94-1.33) and microbiological outcome (RR = 1.25; CI, 1.00-1.57), as well as with a significant decrease in the risk of nephrotoxicity (RR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrated that target attainment, treatment failure, and nephrotoxicity were significantly improved in patients who underwent individualized antimicrobial dose optimization. It showed an improvement in mortality, clinical cure or microbiological outcome, although not significant.

Association between reactogenicity and immunogenicity after BNT162b2 booster vaccination: a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: A weak correlation between symptom severity and antibody levels after primary immunization against COVID-19 has already been shown. This study aimed to describe the association between reactogenicity and immunogenicity after booster vaccination. METHODS: This secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study included 484 healthcare workers who received a booster vaccination with BNT162b2. Anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) antibodies were assessed at baseline and 28 days after booster vaccination. Side effects were graded (none, mild, moderate, or severe) and reported daily for 7 days after booster vaccination. Spearman correlation coefficient (rho) was used to determine the correlations between the severity of each symptom and anti-RBD levels before vaccination and 28 days after. The Bonferroni method was used to adjust p values for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: Most of the 484 participants reported at least one local (451 [93.2%]) or systemic (437 [90.3%]) post-booster symptom. No correlations between the severity of local symptoms and antibody levels were found. Except for nausea, systemic symptoms showed weak but statistically significant correlations with 28-day anti-RBD levels (fatigue [rho = 0.23, p < 0.01], fever [rho = 22, p < 0.01], headache [rho = 0.15, p 0.03], arthralgia [rho = 0.2, p < 0.01], myalgia [rho = 0.17, p < 0.01]). There was no association between post-booster symptoms and pre-booster antibody levels. DISCUSSION: This study showed only a weak correlation between the severity of systemic post-booster symptoms and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels at 28 days. Therefore, self-reported symptom severity cannot be used to predict immunogenicity after booster vaccination.