RESUMEN
Background: Pain secondary to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) can limit the administration of chemotherapy, cancer-treatment outcomes, and the quality of life of patients. Oxidative stress and inflammation are some of the key mechanisms involved in CIPN. Successful treatments for CIPN are limited. This report shows our preliminary experience using ozone treatment as a modulator of oxidative stress in chronic pain secondary to CIPN. Methods: Ozone treatment, by rectal insufflation, was administered in seven patients suffering from pain secondary to grade II or III CIPN. Pain was assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS). Results: All patients, except one, showed clinically relevant pain improvement. Median pain score according to the VAS was 7 (range: 5-8) before ozone treatment, 4 (range: 2-6) at the end of ozone treatment (p = 0.004), 5.5 (range: 1.8-6.3) 3 months after the end of ozone treatment (p = 0.008), and 6 (range: 2.6-6.6) 6 months after the end of ozone treatment (p = 0.008). The toxicity grade, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v.5.0), improved in half of the patients. Conclusion: This report shows that most patients obtained clinically relevant and long-lasting improvement in chronic pain secondary to CIPN after treatment with ozone. These observed effects merit further research and support our ongoing randomized clinical trial (NCT04299893).
RESUMEN
Background: Chronic pain secondary to treatment in cancer survivors without tumor evidence is not unusual. Its management often requires specific approaches that are different from those applied for cancer patients with advanced disease and short life expectancy. Some studies have described clinical benefit with ozone therapy (O3T) in the management of pain and side effects secondary to cancer treatment. Objective: We present our preliminary experience with O3T in the management of refractory pelvic pain syndromes secondary to cancer treatment. Design: Case series. Subjects and Methods: Six cancer patients (without tumor evidence) who had been treated previously with radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or endoscopic procedures and were suffering persistent or severe pelvic pain (median 14 months) received O3T using ozone-oxygen gas mixture insufflation as a complementary therapy in addition to their scheduled conventional treatment. Results: All cases, except one, showed clinically relevant pain improvement. Visual analog scale score with the standard treatment was 7.8 ± 2.1 before O3T, 4.3 ± 3.4 (p = 0.049) after one month, 3.3 ± 3.7 (p = 0.024) after two months, and 2.8 ± 3.8 (p = 0.020) after three months of O3T. The median value of "pain symptom" according to the U.S. National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v. 5.0 showed a decrease from 3 (range: 2-3) to 1 (range: 0-3) (p = 0.046). Conclusions: Following unsuccessful conventional treatments, O3T provided significant benefit in our patients with refractory pelvic pain secondary to cancer treatment. These results merit further evaluation in blinded, randomized clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Neoplasias , Ozono , Humanos , Ozono/uso terapéutico , Dolor Pélvico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Pélvico/etiología , SíndromeRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This article provides an overview of the potential use of ozone as an adjuvant during cancer treatment. METHODS: We summarize the findings of the most relevant publications focused on this goal, and we include our related clinical experience. RESULTS: Over several decades, prestigious journals have published in vitro studies on the capacity of ozone to induce direct damage on tumor cells and, as well, to enhance the effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Indirect effects have been demonstrated in animal models: immune modulation by ozone alone and sensitizing effect of radiotherapy by concurrent ozone administration. The effects of ozone in modifying hemoglobin dissociation curve, 2,3-diphosphoglycerate levels, locoregional blood flow, and tumor hypoxia provide additional support for potential beneficial effects during cancer treatment. Unfortunately, only a few clinical studies are available. Finally, we describe some works and our experience supporting the potential role of local ozone therapy in treating delayed healing after tumor resection, to avoid delays in commencing radiotherapy and chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro and animal studies, as well as isolated clinical reports, suggest the potential role of ozone as an adjuvant during radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. However, further research, such as randomized clinical trials, is required to demonstrate its potential usefulness as an adjuvant therapeutic tool.
RESUMEN
AIMS: Relapsed high-grade gliomas (HGGs) have poor prognoses and there is no standard treatment. HGGs have ischemia/hypoxia associated and, as such, drugs and oxygen have low access, with increased resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Tumor hypoxia modification can improve outcomes and overall survival in some patients with these tumors. In previous works, we have described that cervical spinal cord stimulation can modify tumor microenvironment in HGG by increasing tumor blood flow, oxygenation, and metabolism. The aim of this current, preliminary, nonrandomized, study was to assess the clinical effect of spinal cord stimulation during brain reirradiation and chemotherapy deployed for the treatment of recurrent HGG; the hypothesis being that an improvement in oxygenated blood supply would facilitate enhanced delivery of the scheduled therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven patients had spinal cord stimulation applied during the scheduled reirradiation and chemotherapy for the treatment of recurrent HGG (6 anaplastic gliomas and 1 glioblastoma). Median dose of previous irradiation was 60 Gy (range = 56-72 Gy) and median dose of reirradiation was 46 Gy (range = 40-46 Gy). Primary end point of the study was overall survival (OS) following confirmation of HGG relapse. RESULTS: From the time of diagnosis of last tumor relapse before reirradiation, median OS was 39 months (95% CI = 0-93) for the overall study group: 39 months (95% CI = 9-69) for those with anaplastic gliomas and 16 months for the patient with glioblastoma. Posttreatment, doses of corticosteroids was significantly decreased (P = .026) and performance status significantly improved (P = .046). CONCLUSIONS: Spinal cord stimulation during reirradiation and chemotherapy is feasible and well tolerated. In our study, spinal cord stimulation was associated with clinical improvement and longer survival than previously reported in recurrent anaplastic gliomas. Spinal cord stimulation as adjuvant during chemotherapy and reirradiation in relapsed HGGs merits further research.