Navigation-Assisted Surgery for Locally Advanced Primary and Recurrent Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: In some surgical disciplines, navigation-assisted surgery has become standard of care, but in rectal cancer, indications for navigation and the utility of different technologies remain undetermined. METHODS: The NAVI-LARRC prospective study (NCT04512937; IDEAL Stage 2a) evaluated feasibility of navigation in patients with locally advanced primary (LARC) and recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). Included patients had advanced tumours with high risk of incomplete (R1/R2) resection, and navigation was considered likely to improve the probability of complete resection (R0). Tumours were classified according to pelvic compartmental involvement, as suggested by the Royal Marsden group. The BrainlabTM navigation platform was used for preoperative segmentation of tumour and pelvic anatomy, and for intraoperative navigation with optical tracking. R0 resection rates, surgeons' experiences, and adherence to the preoperative resection plan were assessed. RESULTS: Seventeen patients with tumours involving the posterior/lateral compartments underwent navigation-assisted procedures. Fifteen patients required abdominosacral resection, and 3 had resection of the sciatic nerve. R0 resection was obtained in 6/8 (75%) LARC and 6/9 (69%) LRRC cases. Preoperative segmentation was time-consuming (median 3.5 h), but intraoperative navigation was accurate. Surgeons reported navigation to be feasible, and adherence to the resection plan was satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: Navigation-assisted surgery using optical tracking was feasible. The preoperative planning was time-consuming, but intraoperative navigation was accurate and resulted in acceptable R0 resection rates. Selected patients are likely to benefit from navigation-assisted surgery.

Multimodal functional imaging for early response assessment in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Several imaging modalities are used in the early work-up of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment and there is a need to establish whether they provide similar or complimentary information. PURPOSE: To compare 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as early predictors of three-month outcomes for patients with GIST receiving TKI treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients with advanced GIST were prospectively included between February 2011 and June 2017. FDG PET, contrast-enhanced CT (CECT), and MRI were performed before and early after onset of TKI treatment (range 8-18 days). Early response was categorized according to mRECIST (CT), the Choi criteria (CECT), and PERCIST (FDG PET/CT). For MRI, volumetry from T2-weighted images and change in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from diffusion-weighted imaging was used. The reference standard for early assessment was the three-month mRECIST evaluation based on CT. At three months, both stable disease (SD) and partial response (PR) were categorized as response. Clinical usefulness was defined as agreement between early and three-month assessment. RESULTS: At the three-month assessment, 91% (32/35) were responders, 37% (13/35) PR, 54% (19/35) SD, and 9% (3/35) had progressive disease (PD). Early assessment correctly predicted three-month response in 93% (27/29) for MRI, 80% (28/35) for PERCIST, 74% (26/35) for Choi, and 23% (8/35) for mRECIST. Six patients had non-FDG-avid tumors. For the FDG-avid tumors, PET/CT correctly predicted three-month response in 97% (28/29). CONCLUSION: MRI was superior to CECT for early assessment of TKI-treatment response in GIST. If the tumor was FDG-avid, PET and MRI were equally good. Changes in functional parameters were superior to changes in longest tumor diameter (mRECIST).

Molecularly matched therapy in the context of sensitivity, resistance, and safety; patient outcomes in end-stage cancer - the MetAction study.

Background: In precision cancer medicine, the challenge is to prioritize DNA driver events, account for resistance markers, and procure sufficient information for treatment that maintains patient safety. The MetAction project, exploring how tumor molecular vulnerabilities predict therapy response, first established the required workflow for DNA sequencing and data interpretation (2014-2015). Here, we employed it to identify molecularly matched therapy and recorded outcome in end-stage cancer (2016-2019).Material and methods: Metastatic tissue from 26 patients (16 colorectal cancer cases) was sequenced by the Oncomine assay. The study tumor boards interpreted called variants with respect to sensitivity or resistance to matched therapy and recommended single-agent or combination treatment if considered tolerable. The primary endpoint was the rate of progression-free survival 1.3-fold longer than for the most recent systemic therapy. The objective response rate and overall survival were secondary endpoints.Results: Both common and rare actionable alterations were identified. Thirteen patients were found eligible for therapy following review of tumor sensitivity and resistance variants and patient tolerability. The interventions were inhibitors of ALK/ROS1-, BRAF-, EGFR-, FGFR-, mTOR-, PARP-, or PD-1-mediated signaling for 2-3 cases each. Among 10 patients who received treatment until radiologic evaluation, 6 (46% of the eligible cases) met the primary endpoint. Four colorectal cancer patients (15% of the total study cohort) had objective response. The only serious adverse event was a transient colitis, which appeared in 1 of the 2 patients given PD-1 inhibitor with complete response. Apart from those two, overall survival was similar for patients who did and did not receive study treatment.Conclusions: The systematic MetAction approach may point forward to a refined framework for how to interpret the complexity of sensitivity versus resistance and patient safety that resides in tumor sequence data, for the possibly improved outcome of precision cancer medicine in future studies. ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02142036.

Novel Treatment with Intraperitoneal MOC31PE Immunotoxin in Colorectal Peritoneal Metastasis: Results From the ImmunoPeCa Phase 1 Trial.

BACKGROUND: MOC31PE immunotoxin was developed to rapidly kill cells expressing the tumor-associated epithelial cell adhesion molecule, which is highly expressed in colorectal cancer. Although cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) may offer long-term survival to patients with peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer (PM-CRC), most patients experience disease relapse and novel therapeutic options are needed. On this basis, MOC31PE is being developed as a novel therapeutic principle to target PM-CRC. METHODS: This was a dose-escalating phase I trial to evaluate the safety and toxicity (primary endpoint), pharmacokinetic profile, and neutralizing antibody response (secondary endpoints) upon intraperitoneal administration of MOC31PE in patients with PM-CRC undergoing CRS-HIPEC with Mitomycin C. Fifteen patients received the study drug at four dose levels (3+3+3+6), administered intraperitoneally as a single dose the day after CRS-HIPEC. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicity was observed, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. There was negligible systemic absorption of the study drug. Drug concentrations in peritoneal fluid samples were in the cytotoxic range and increased in a dose-dependent manner. MOC31PE recovered from peritoneal cavity retained its cytotoxic activity in cell-based assays. All patients developed neutralizing antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Intraperitoneal administration of MOC31PE was safe and well tolerated, and combined with low systemic uptake, MOC31PE seems ideal for local intraperitoneal treatment. The drug will be further evaluated in an ongoing phase II expansion cohort.

A Liver Phantom Study: CT Radiation Dose Reduction and Different Image Reconstruction Algorithms Affect Diagnostic Quality.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether iterative reconstruction techniques for different dose levels and/or reduction of tube potential can increase liver lesion detectability. METHODS: An anthropomorphic liver phantom was scanned at different dose levels (CTDIvol 15 mGy, 7.5 mGy, 5 mGy, and 2.6 mGy) and tube potential levels (120 kV, 100 kV, and 80 kV). Images were reconstructed with the following algorithms: filtered back projection (FBP), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR) 40%, and a model-based iterative reconstruction (Veo). The presence or absence of lesions was assessed independently on a 4-point scale by 4 readers. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated. RESULTS: Veo improved detectability of hyperdense liver lesions compared with both FBP and ASiR 40% at most dose levels (15 mGy, 7.5 mGy, and 5 mGy with P < 0.05). Veo also improved detectability at reduced tube potential compared with FBP (120 kV, 100 kV, and 80 kV at 5 mGy with P < 0.05) and ASiR 40% (120 kV and 100 kV at 5 mGy with P < 0.05). For ASiR 40%, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was significantly larger compared with FBP only at dose levels 7.5 mGy and 2.6 mGy at 120 kV. In general, the reduction of tube potential reduced the lesion detectability. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that iterative reconstruction algorithms, in particular Veo, improve lesion detectability in a liver phantom. However, a too aggressive dose reduction may result in poorer image quality. Results considering different tube potentials diverged, thus careful consideration is necessary upon tube potential reduction.

Ipilimumab and nivolumab combined with anthracycline-based chemotherapy in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a randomized phase 2b trial.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown minimal clinical activity in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (HR+mBC). Doxorubicin and low-dose cyclophosphamide are reported to induce immune responses and counter regulatory T cells (Tregs). Here, we report the efficacy and safety of combined programmed cell death protein-1/cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 blockade concomitant with or after immunomodulatory chemotherapy for HR+mBC. METHODS: Patients with HR+mBC starting first-/second- line chemotherapy (chemo) were randomized 2:3 to chemotherapy (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 20 mg/m2 every second week plus cyclophosphamide 50 mg by mouth/day in every other 2-week cycle) with or without concomitant ipilimumab (ipi; 1 mg/kg every sixth week) and nivolumab (nivo; 240 mg every second week). Patients in the chemo-only arm were offered cross-over to ipi/nivo without chemotherapy. Co-primary endpoints were safety in all patients starting therapy and progression-free survival (PFS) in the per-protocol (PP) population, defined as all patients evaluated for response and receiving at least two treatment cycles. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, Treg changes during therapy and assessment of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), mutational burden and immune gene signatures as biomarkers. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were randomized and received immune-chemo (N=49) or chemo-only (N=33), 16 patients continued to the ipi/nivo-only cross-over arm. Median follow-up was 41.4 months. Serious adverse events occurred in 63% in the immune-chemo arm, 39% in the chemo-only arm and 31% in the cross-over-arm. In the PP population (N=78) median PFS in the immune-chemo arm was 5.1 months, compared with 3.6 months in the chemo-only arm, with HR 0.94 (95% CI 0.59 to 1.51). Clinical benefit rates were 55% (26/47) and 48% (15/31) in the immune-chemo and chemo-only arms, respectively. In the cross-over-arm (ipi/nivo-only), objective responses were observed in 19% of patients (3/16) and clinical benefit in 25% (4/16). Treg levels in blood decreased after study chemotherapy. High-grade immune-related adverse events were associated with prolonged PFS. PD-L1 status and mutational burden were not associated with ipi/nivo benefit, whereas a numerical PFS advantage was observed for patients with a high Treg gene signature in tumor. CONCLUSION: The addition of ipi/nivo to chemotherapy increased toxicity without improving efficacy. Ipi/nivo administered sequentially to chemotherapy was tolerable and induced clinical responses. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03409198.

ImmunoPeCa trial: Long-term outcome following intraperitoneal MOC31PE immunotoxin treatment in colorectal peritoneal metastasis.

BACKGROUND: The ImmunoPeCa trial investigated the use of intraperitoneal MOC31PE immunotoxin as a novel therapeutic principle for the treatment of peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer (PM-CRC). We here report long-term outcome from the trial. METHODS: This was a dose-finding trial aiming to evaluate safety and toxicity (primary endpoint) upon a single dose of intraperitoneal MOC31PE in patients with PM-CRC undergoing CRS-HIPEC with mitomycin C. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were secondary endpoints. Twenty-one patients received the study drug at four dose levels on the first postoperative day, including six patients constituting an expansion cohort. RESULTS: With a 34-month follow-up, the median OS was not reached and the estimated 3-year OS was 78%. Median DFS for all patients was 21 months and the 3-year DFS was 33%, with a median follow-up of 31 months. When excluding patients with potential favorable characteristics from the analysis (n = 4), the median DFS was 13 months and the 3-year OS 72%. CONCLUSIONS: The promising long-term outcome combined with low systemic absorbance, high drug concentration and cytotoxic activity in peritoneal fluid support further investigations of clinical efficacy.

Integrative genomic analysis of peritoneal malignant mesothelioma: understanding a case with extraordinary chemotherapy response.

Peritoneal malignant mesothelioma is a rare disease with a generally poor prognosis and poor response to chemotherapy. To improve survival there is a need for increased molecular understanding of the disease, including chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance. We here present an unusual case concerning a young woman with extensive peritoneal mesothelioma who had a remarkable response to palliative chemotherapy (platinum/pemetrexed). Tumor samples collected at surgery before and after treatment were analyzed on the genomic and transcriptional levels (exome sequencing, RNA-seq, and smallRNA-seq). Integrative analysis of single nucleotide and copy-number variants, mutational signatures, and gene expression was performed to provide a comprehensive picture of the disease. LATS1/2 were identified as the main mutational drivers together with homozygous loss of BAP1 and PBRM1, which also may have contributed to the extraordinary chemotherapy response. The presence of the S3 mutational signature is consistent with homologous recombination DNA repair defects due to BAP1 loss. Up-regulation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway after treatment, supported by deactivated PTEN through miRNA regulation, is associated with cancer progression and could explain chemotherapy resistance. The molecular profile suggests potential benefit from experimental targeting of PARP, EZH2, the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and possibly also from immune checkpoint inhibition. In addition to providing the molecular background for this unusual case of peritoneal mesothelioma, the results show the potential value of integrative genomic analysis in precision medicine.

Implementing precision cancer medicine in the public health services of Norway: the diagnostic infrastructure and a cost estimate.

OBJECTIVE: Through the conduct of an individual-based intervention study, the main purpose of this project was to build and evaluate the required infrastructure that may enable routine practice of precision cancer medicine in the public health services of Norway, including modelling of costs. METHODS: An eligible patient had end-stage metastatic disease from a solid tumour. Metastatic tissue was analysed by DNA sequencing, using a 50-gene panel and a study-generated pipeline for analysis of sequence data, supplemented with fluorescence in situ hybridisation to cover relevant biomarkers. Cost estimations compared best supportive care, biomarker-agnostic treatment with a molecularly targeted agent and biomarker-based treatment with such a drug. These included costs for medication, outpatient clinic visits, admission from adverse events and the biomarker-based procedures. RESULTS: The diagnostic procedures, which comprised sampling of metastatic tissue, mutation analysis and data interpretation at the Molecular Tumor Board before integration with clinical data at the Clinical Tumor Board, were completed in median 18 (8-39) days for the 22 study patients. The 23 invasive procedures (12 from liver, 6 from lung, 5 from other sites) caused a single adverse event (pneumothorax). Per patient, 0-5 mutations were detected in metastatic tumours; however, no actionable target case was identified for the current single-agent therapy approach. Based on the cost modelling, the biomarker-based approach was 2.5-fold more costly than best supportive care and 2.5-fold less costly than the biomarker-agnostic option. CONCLUSIONS: The first project phase established a comprehensive diagnostic infrastructure for precision cancer medicine, which enabled expedite and safe mutation profiling of metastatic tumours and data interpretation at multidisciplinary tumour boards for patients with end-stage cancer. Furthermore, it prepared for protocol amendments, recently approved by the designated authorities for the second study phase, allowing more comprehensive mutation analysis and opportunities to define therapy targets.

Telomerase peptide vaccination combined with temozolomide: a clinical trial in stage IV melanoma patients.

PURPOSE: The study is a proof-of-principle trial evaluating toxicity, immune response, and clinical response in melanoma patients after combined therapy with temozolomide and the telomerase peptide vaccine GV1001. Our previous GV1001 trials showed immune responses in approximately 60% of lung or pancreatic cancer patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Twenty-five subjects with advanced stage IV melanoma (M1B or M1C) received concomitant temozolomide and GV1001. Temozolomide was administered 200 mg/m² orally for 5 days every fourth week, and GV1001 as eight injections over 11 weeks. Immune response was evaluated by delayed type hypersensitivity, T-cell proliferation, and cytokine assays. The immunologic responders continued monthly vaccination. RESULTS: The treatment was well tolerated. A GV1001-specific immune response was shown in 18 of 23 evaluated subjects (78%). Patients developing long-term T-cell memory survived more than those rapidly losing their responses. The immune response exhibited several characteristics of possible clinical significance including high IFNγ/IL-10 ratios, polyfunctional cytokine profiles, and recognition of naturally processed antigens. Survival compared favorably with matched controls from a benchmark meta-analysis (1 year: 44% vs. 24%, 2 years: 16% vs. 6.6%). The clinical responses developed gradually over years, contrary to what is expected from chemotherapy. Five patients developed partial tumor regression and six more recorded stable disease. One patient has no remaining disease on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scans after 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: The immunologic response rate is considerable compared with previous GV1001 trials without concomitant chemotherapy, although low toxicity is retained. The results warrant further studies of GV1001/temozolomide treatment and support the general concept of combining cancer vaccination with chemotherapy.