Use of a propofol infusion for anaesthetic maintenance in Guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus): a retrospective case series.

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively evaluate the feasibility of a propofol infusion for anaesthetic maintenance in guinea pigs. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. ANIMALS: Client-owned guinea pigs undergoing general anaesthesia. METHODS: Anaesthetic records of guinea pigs anaesthetized between March 2015 and March 2018 were reviewed. Animals administered a propofol infusion for > 20 minutes were identified and evaluated. Procedure performed, pre-anaesthetic medication, preoperative and intraoperative respiratory rate (fR) and heart rates (HRs), total amount of propofol administered, total anaesthesia and recovery times were extracted from the records and analysed using descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation tests. Data are reported as mean (range). RESULTS: Records of 14 animals meeting the criteria were identified. Following drug combinations were administered for premedication: butorphanol 0.43 (0.3-0.5) mg kg-1, medetomidine 0.1 (0.05-0.2) mg kg-1 and midazolam 1 (0.5-2) mg kg-1 (n = 3); methadone 0.33 (0.25-0.5) mg kg-1, medetomidine 0.07 (0.01-0.1) mg kg-1 and midazolam 0.66 (0.5-1) mg kg-1 (n = 3); butorphanol 0.5 mg kg-1, medetomidine 0.05 mg kg-1 and ketamine 5 mg kg-1 (n = 2); buprenorphine 0.01 mg kg-1, medetomidine 0.07 (0.04-1) mg kg-1 and ketamine 4 (3-5) mg kg-1 (n = 3); butorphanol 0.5 mg kg-1, alfaxalone 1 mg kg-1 and midazolam 0.5 mg kg-1 (n = 1); and methadone 0.38 (0.25-0.5) mg kg-1, medetomidine 0.08 (0.06-1) mg kg-1 with midazolam 0.75 (0.5-1) mg kg-1 (n = 2). Preoperative and intraoperative HRs were 240 (160-300) and 170 (140-200) beats minute-1, respectively. Preoperative and intraoperative fR were 63 (50-86) and 37 (18-80) breaths minute-1, respectively. The propofol infusion rate was 0.45 (0.17-0.80) mg kg-1 minute-1. Total anaesthesia and recovery times were 60 (25-145) and 17 (8-60) minutes, respectively. A slight correlation was found between total propofol dose infused and recovery time (r = 0.58). CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Propofol infusions may be a useful alternative to inhalant anaesthetics.

Thermography as an early predictive measurement for evaluating epidural and femoral-sciatic block success in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate skin temperature increase as an early predictive measure for evaluating epidural and femoral-sciatic block success in dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical trial. ANIMALS: A total of 29 dogs undergoing orthopaedic surgery on one hindlimb. METHODS: Dogs were anaesthetized and placed into lateral recumbency with the affected limb uppermost and the coat was clipped. Baseline infrared thermographic images (T0) of the affected limb, of the paw pad of the affected leg and of the ipsilateral paw pad were taken. Subsequently, dogs were administered either an epidural (EPI; n=11) or a femoral-sciatic block (FS; n=18) using bupivacaine 1 mg kg-1. Then, 2 minutes after placement of the block, thermographic images were obtained every 3 minutes for a total of four measurements (T1-T4) and surgery was commenced. Rescue analgesia consisting of fentanyl 1 µg kg-1 was administered if needed. A regional block was considered successful if the dose of fentanyl administered was less than the lower 95% confidence interval of the geometric mean of the total fentanyl used in each group. A ≥ 1 °C increase of skin temperature was considered as the minimum increase required for detection of a successful block. RESULTS: A total of 12 out of 18 blocks in the FS and eight of 11 in the EPI group were considered successful based on fentanyl consumption. Out of these, only four of 12 in the FS and one of eight in the EPI group developed an increase in temperature of ≥ 1 °C. Contrarily, four of six of the nonsuccessful cases in the FS and three of three in the EPI group developed an increase in temperature of ≥ 1 °C. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Contrary to reports in humans, thermography did not indicate regional block success prior to surgery in dogs. However further studies under more controlled conditions are needed to determine whether thermography can be used to indicate failure of regional blockade.

Evaluation of agreement between invasive and non-invasive blood pressure measurement using the PetMAP™ device in rabbits.

Background: Measurement of arterial blood pressure is recommended in anaesthetized animals to guide perioperative treatment. Invasive blood pressure measurement is considered the gold standard, however it is also technically challenging, requires specialised equipment and carries certain risks. For these reasons, non-invasive blood pressure measurement devices are commonly used and are expected to provide accurate and reliable results. This requirement is particularly true for rabbits, in whom peri-anaesthetic hypotension is commonly observed and in whom perioperative mortality remains disproportionally high. Several authors have compared different non-invasive devices with invasive measurements in rabbits and have reported contrasting results. However, to date no comparison between invasive measurements and the PetMAP™ device, that has been designed specifically for veterinary medicine, has been reported. Aim and hypothesis: The aim of the study was the comparison of invasive blood pressure measurement with PetMAP™ in rabbits. We hypothesised that PetMAP™ would show acceptable agreement with the invasive measurements according to the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine guidelines. Materials and methods: Sixteen client-owned rabbits presenting for various surgical interventions were included in the study. Invasive measurements were performed by cannulation of an auricular artery. The PetMAP™ cuff was applied distal to the elbow according to the manufacturer's guidelines. For each measurement with PetMAP™, three invasive blood pressure values were recorded. The mean of the three invasive values was compared with one value measured with PetMAP™. Results: Data collected from 16 rabbits were used for statistical analysis. In the clinical setting, the PetMAP™ device showed significant overestimation of systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure, which were measured in the auricular artery. In addition, the bias was not constant, implying that the device poorly predicted changes in blood pressure. Conclusion: The PetMAP™ device did not meet any of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine recommendations.

Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Shetland Ponies: A Description of a Three-Point Injection Technique and Evaluation of Potential Analgesic Effects.

Colic surgery is one of the most painful procedures carried out in horses. Common strategies to alleviate immediate postsurgical abdominal pain include the administration of potent systemic analgesics; however, these may cause unwanted adverse effects such as cardiovascular depression, ileus, and ataxia. The administration of local anesthetics at the incision site in form of an ultrasound-guided subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block may therefore be preferred to provide adequate analgesia without significant side effects. To date, no technique for a TAP block in horses undergoing median celiotomy has been described. The objective of the study was to develop a TAP block technique, which will lead to the desensitization of the ventrolateral abdominal wall and adjacent skin area of experimental Shetland Ponies using bupivacaine 0.125%. This is a prospective, blinded, self-controlled trial. A cadaver study was performed to determine the ideal injection points and the volume required to stain the nerves responsible for the sensation of the ventrolateral abdominal wall and skin in Shetland pony cadavers (i.e., T9-L 2). Subsequently, using the ideal injectate volume and the landmarks obtained in the first phase of the study, six Shetland ponies received a bilateral TAP injection, either with a local anesthetic solution (bupivacaine 0.125%) or with saline in a randomized, crossover, blinded fashion. Effectiveness was determined over a 4 hour postinjection time, by using a pinprick technique. Significant differences were found to the responses of the pinprick evaluation between the bupivacaine- and saline-treated sides after 30 minutes of TAP block injection. Reported "learned behavior" could have affected the results of the pinprick testing. The TAP block technique reported in this study using bupivacaine 0.125% appeared effective in desensitizing the lower abdomen of ponies for up to 2 hours. Further research is required to apply this technique in horses undergoing celiotomy. Potentially larger volumes and/or higher concentrations of bupivacaine may be necessary to provide longer duration of action of the block.