Surgical Utilization and Outcomes for Patients with Stage IV Melanoma in the Modern Immunotherapy Era.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of surgery for patients with stage IV melanoma in the modern era of effective immunotherapy is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate trends and outcomes after surgical resection of stage IV melanoma in the modern immunotherapy era. METHODS: Patients with stage IV melanoma who received surgery, immunotherapy, or both from 2012 to 2017 were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Demographics, facility-level characteristics, and use of immunotherapy were compared between patients who received surgery and those who did not. Multivariate Poisson regression modeling, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: The study identified 9800 patients with stage IV melanoma, and 2160 of these patients (22 %) underwent surgery. The patients who received surgery were more likely to be younger (P < 0.001), to have private insurance (P < 0.001), to have a higher median income (P = 0.008), and to receive treatment at academic/research programs (P < 0.001), whereas they were less likely to receive immunotherapy (33.7 % vs 36.6 %; P = 0.013). The patients who received immunotherapy had a lower likelihood of undergoing surgery (relative risk [RR], 0.82; 95 % confidence interval [CI[, 0.75-0.88; P < 0.001). The patients who received both surgery and immunotherapy had a better overall survival rate (hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 95 % CI, 0.36-0.46; P < 0.01) than the patients who received neither immunotherapy nor surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The use of immunotherapy was associated with a lower use of surgery for patients with stage IV melanoma. The patients with stage IV disease who received both surgery and immunotherapy had the highest overall survival rates.

A systematic review of heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback treatment following traumatic brain injury (TBI).

OBJECTIVE: Autonomic nervous system dysregulation is a common consequence of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Heart rate variability (HRV) is a cost-effective measure of autonomic nervous system functioning, with studies suggesting decreased HRV following moderate-to-severe TBI. HRV biofeedback treatment may improve post-TBI autonomic nervous system functioning and post-injury emotional and cognitive functioning. We provide a systematic evidence-based review of the state of the literature and effectiveness of HRV biofeedback following TBI. METHOD: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two coders coded each article and provided quality ratings. Seven papers met inclusion criteria. All studies included a measure of emotional functioning and 5 studies (63%) included neuropsychological outcomes. RESULTS: Participants completed 11 sessions of HRV biofeedback on average (range = 1 to 40). HRV biofeedback was associated with improved HRV following TBI. There was a positive relationship between increased HRV and TBI recovery following biofeedback, including improvements in cognitive and emotional functioning, and physical symptoms such as headaches, dizziness, and sleep problems. CONCLUSION: The literature on HRV biofeedback for TBI is promising, but in its infancy; effectiveness is unclear due to poor-to-fair study quality, and potential publication bias (all studies reported positive results).

Remote Assessment of Real-World Surgical Safety Checklist Performance Using the OR Black Box: A Multi-Institutional Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Large-scale evaluation of surgical safety checklist performance has been limited by the need for direct observation. The operating room (OR) Black Box is a multichannel surgical data capture platform that may allow for the holistic evaluation of checklist performance at scale. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective cohort study, data from 7 North American academic medical centers using the OR Black Box were collected between August 2020 and January 2022. All cases captured during this period were analyzed. Measures of checklist compliance, team engagement, and quality of checklist content review were investigated. RESULTS: Data from 7,243 surgical procedures were evaluated. A time-out was performed during most surgical procedures (98.4%, n = 7,127), whereas a debrief was performed during 62.3% (n = 4,510) of procedures. The mean percentage of OR staff who paused and participated during the time-out and debrief was 75.5% (SD 25.1%) and 54.6% (SD 36.4%), respectively. A team introduction (performed 42.6% of the time) was associated with more prompts completed (31.3% vs 18.7%, p < 0.001), a higher engagement score (0.90 vs 0.86, p < 0.001), and a higher percentage of team members who ceased other activities (80.3% vs 72%, p < 0.001) during the time-out. CONCLUSIONS: Remote assessment using OR Black Box data provides useful insight into surgical safety checklist performance. Many items included in the time-out and debrief were not routinely discussed. Completion of a team introduction was associated with improved time-out performance. There is potential to use OR Black Box metrics to improve intraoperative process measures.

Medicaid expansion and surgery for HPB/GI cancers: NCDB difference-in-difference analysis.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear if Medicaid expansion improved access to surgical resection for hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) and gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. METHODS: This was a quasi-experimental, cohort study using difference-in-difference analysis to evaluate differences in surgical resection for HPB/GI cancers in the post-Medicaid expansion era compared to the pre-Medicaid expansion era among patients residing in states that had Medicaid expansion versus not. RESULTS: During the pre- (2011-2013) and post-Medicaid expansion (2015-2017) eras, there were 49,954 patients between the ages of 40-64 who had liver cancer (n = 19,384; 38.8%), pancreatic cancer (n = 14,351; 28.7%), colorectal liver metastasis (n = 7566; 15.1%), or gastric cancer (n = 8653; 17.3%). 43.2% resided in expansion states (n = 21,577). There were no significant differences in the overall rates of surgical resection between expansion and non-expansion states before and after Medicaid expansion. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid expansion did not impact surgical resection for HPB/GI cancers.

Association between race, hospital volume of major liver surgery, and access to metastasectomy for colorectal liver metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated that non-White patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) were significantly less likely to undergo liver metastasectomy compared to White patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate differences in access to liver metastasectomy for CRLM according to race and hospital-year volume of liver surgery (HVLS). METHODS: The National Cancer Database (2011-2017) was used to identify patients with CRLM. Hospitals were stratified into quartiles according to HVLS. An adjusted Poisson regression model was used to evaluate the interaction between race and HVLS and access to liver metastasectomy. RESULTS: We identified 27,340 patients with CRLM. Non-White patients were less likely to undergo a liver metastasectomy compared to White patients (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.82-0.91, p < 0.001). This racial disparity persisted at the highest quartile HVLS hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Receiving cancer care at hospitals with the highest HVLS did not translate into equal access to liver metastasectomy for non-White patients with CRLM.