Prognostic Value of the Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI) on Short- and Long-Term Outcome in Patients with Advanced Primary Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the prognostic impact of the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI) on both postoperative morbidity and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) treated at a tertiary gynecologic cancer center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Exploratory analysis of our prospectively documented tumor registry was performed. Data of all consecutive patients with stage IIIB-IV ovarian cancer who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery (PDS) from January 2000 to June 2016 were analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups, based on their ACCI: low (0-1), intermediate (2-3), and high (≥4), and postoperative surgical complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC). The Fisher's exact test, log-rank test, and Cox regression models were used to investigate the predictive value of the ACCI on postoperative complications and OS. RESULTS: Overall, 793 consecutive patients were identified; 328 (41.4%) patients were categorized as low ACCI, 342 (43.1%) as intermediate ACCI, and 123 (15.5%) as high ACCI. A high ACCI was significantly associated with severe postoperative complications (CDC 3-5; odds ratio 3.27, 95% confidence interval 1.97-5.43, p < 0.001). Median OS for patients with a low, intermediate, or high ACCI was 50, 40, and 23 months, respectively (p < 0.001), and the ACCI remained a significant prognostic factor for OS in multivariate analysis (p = 0.001). The same impact was observed in a sensitivity analysis including only those patients with complete tumor resection. CONCLUSION: The ACCI is associated with perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing PDS for EOC, and also has a prognostic impact on OS. The potential role of the ACCI as a selection criteria for different therapy strategies is currently under investigation in the ongoing, prospective, multicenter AGO-OVAR 19 trial.

The impact of type and number of bowel resections on anastomotic leakage risk in advanced ovarian cancer surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL) in patients undergoing primary advanced ovarian cancer surgery and to evaluate the prognostic implication of AL on overall survival in these patients. METHODS: We analyzed our institutional database for primary EOC and included all consecutive patients treated by debulking surgery including any type of full circumferential bowel resection beyond appendectomy between 1999 and 2015. We performed logistic regression models to identify risk factors for AL and log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the association between AL and survival. RESULTS: AL occurred in 36/800 (4.5%; 95% confidence interval [3%-6%]) of all patients with advanced ovarian cancer and 36/518 (6.9% [5%-9%]) patients undergoing bowel resection during debulking surgery. One hundred fifty-six (30.1%) patients had multiple bowel resections. In these patients, AL rate per patient was only slightly higher (9.0% [5%-13%]) than in patients with rectosigmoid resection only (6.9% [4%-10%]), despite the higher number of anastomosis. No independent predictive factors for AL were identified. AL was independently associated with shortened overall survival (HR 1.9 [1.2-3.4], p=0.01). CONCLUSION: In the present study, no predictive pre- and/or intraoperative risk factors for AL were identified. AL rate was mainly influenced by rectosigmoid resection and only marginally increased by additional bowel resections.

Prognostic Impact of Port-Site Metastasis After Diagnostic Laparoscopy for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the prevalence, morbidity, and prognostic impact of port-site metastasis (PSM) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) undergoing laparoscopy before subsequent primary debulking surgery (PDS). METHODS: All consecutive patients treated between 2000 and 2014, who had a laparoscopy followed by PDS, were extracted from our prospectively maintained database. All patients with histological examination of port-sites were included in this unicentric exploratory analysis. RESULTS: A total of 250 (25.5 %) of 982 patients with EOC underwent laparoscopy before PDS. Port-site resection was performed in those 214 (85.6 %) patients in whom a complete or almost complete resection with residuals ≤1 cm was achieved. Median interval between laparoscopy and PDS was 25 days. PSM was detected in 100 of 214 patients (46.7 %). Risk factors for PSM were higher tumor stage (odds ratio [OR] 13.5, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.9-62.0, p = 0.04), positive lymph node status (OR 3.0, 95 % CI 1.3-6.7, p = 0.009), and ascites >500 mL (OR 3.9, 95 % CI 1.5-10.0, p = 0.005). Wound healing disorders and postoperative morbidity were significantly higher in patients with PSM (Clavien-Dindo Classification grade 3-5: 41.0 vs. 14.9 %, p < 0.001). However, multivariate Cox-regression models did not identify PSM as independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of PSM after laparoscopy in EOC patients is considerably high. PSM had no impact on survival; however, PSM were associated with more postoperative complications and a higher surgical treatment burden. This should be balanced with the expected benefit when laparoscopy is considered for the management of EOC.

The revised 2014 FIGO staging system for epithelial ovarian cancer: Is a subclassification into FIGO stage IVA and IVB justified?

OBJECTIVE: The revised 2014 FIGO staging system for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) included many changes of the previous system, particularly dividing FIGO stage IV in two subgroups. We evaluated if classifying patients with EOC in FIGO stage IVA and IVB has any prognostic implication.