Increased risk of hypocalcemia with decreased kidney function in patients prescribed bisphosphonates based on real-world data from the MID-NET® in Japan: a new-user cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In the post-marketing stage, cases of hypocalcemia associated with bisphosphonate preparations (BPs) have been reported in patients with decreased kidney function, despite warning against use of BPs in such patients in the package insert (PI) of Japan. The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety of BPs in patients with decreased kidney function. METHODS: The cohort study was conducted in patients with osteoporosis and newly prescribed bisphosphonate utilizing real-world data from MID-NET® in Japan. The adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for hypocalcemia (a corrected serum Ca level < 8.00 mg/dL) relative to the normal group were calculated in each decreased kidney function group (mild, moderate or severe group). RESULTS: A total of 14,551 patients were included in the analysis, comprising 2,601 (17.88%) with normal (eGFR ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73m2), 7,613 (52.32%) with mild (60 ≤ eGFR < 90 mL/min/1.73m2), 3,919 (26.93%) with moderate (30 ≤ eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m2), and 418 (2.87%) with severe kidney function (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73m2). The aHRs (95% confidence interval) for hypocalcemia were 1.85 (0.75-4.57), 2.30 (0.86-6.21), and 22.74 (8.37-61.78) in the mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. The increased risk of hypocalcemia depending on kidney function was also observed even when calculating the aHR for each specific BP such as alendronate sodium hydrate, minodronic acid hydrate, and sodium risedronate hydrate. Furthermore, similar results were obtained in the sensitivity analysis by altering the outcome definition to a 20% or more reduction in corrected serum Ca level from the baseline, as well as when focusing on patients with more than one laboratory test result per 30 days during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the risk of hypocalcemia during BP prescription is higher in patients with decreased kidney function, particularly those with severely decreased kidney function. The quantitative real-world evidence on the safety risk of BPs obtained in this study has led to the PI revision describing a relationship between hypocalcemia risk and decreased kidney function as a regulatory action in Japan and will contribute to promoting the proper use of BPs with appropriate risk management in clinical practice.

Cardiovascular risks associated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors monotherapy compared with other antidiabetes drugs in the Japanese population: A nationwide cohort study.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the cardiovascular risk associated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4Is) as monotherapy compared with other antidiabetic drugs in Japan. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide cohort study involving 2 716 000 diabetes patients in Japan. New users of any antidiabetic drug as monotherapy between 1 April 2010 and 31 October 2014 were identified. Occurrences of myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), and stroke requiring hospitalization associated with DPP-4Is were compared with those associated with biguanides (BGs), sulfonylureas (SUs), or α-glucosidase inhibitors (α-GIs). Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for these outcomes were estimated by Cox proportional hazards model. Propensity score standardization was used to control for confounding. RESULTS: We identified 1 105 103 patients using DPP-4Is, 278 280 patients using BGs, 273 449 patients using SUs, and 217 026 patients using α-GIs. The risks of MI and HF for DPP-4I users were significantly higher than those for BG users (MI: aHR, 1.48 [95%CI, 1.20-1.82], HF: aHR, 1.46 [95%CI, 1.31-1.62]), while significantly lower than those for SU users (MI: aHR, 0.84 [95%CI, 0.72-0.98], HF: aHR, 0.86 [95%CI, 0.81-0.92]). The risk of MI for DPP-4I users was similar to that for α-GI users, while the risk of HF for DPP-4I users was slightly higher than for α-GI users (MI: aHR, 0.98 [95%CI, 0.82-1.17], HF: aHR, 1.12[95%CI, 1.04-1.21]). CONCLUSIONS: Risk of MI and HF requiring hospitalization associated with DPP-4Is as monotherapy was significantly higher than BGs, significantly lower than SUs, and similar to α-GIs.

Real-world prescription of anti-COVID-19 drugs in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: Prescription trends and patterns of anti-COVID-19 drugs in hospitalized patients were examined based on real world data to understand the use of anti-COVID-19 drugs in clinical practice in Japan. DESIGN: The longitudinal and cross-sectional study was conducted utilizing data from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021 of the MID-NET® medical information database, which stored the electronic medical records, administrative claim data, and diagnosis procedure combination data of patients in Japan. PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalized patients with a COVID-19-related diagnosis who received at least one anti-COVID-19 drug between April 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021. EXPOSURES: The following 14 drugs were included in this study: remdesivir, baricitinib, combination product of casirivimab and imdevimab, favipiravir, dexamethasone, ivermectin, azithromycin, nafamostat mesylate, camostat mesylate, ciclesonide, tocilizumab, sarilumab, combination product of lopinavir and ritonavir, and hydroxychloroquine. RESULTS: We identified 5,717 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and prescribed at least one anti-COVID-19 drug. The entire cohort generally included patients over 41-50 years and more males. The most common prescription pattern was dexamethasone monotherapy (22.9%), followed by the concomitant use of remdesivir and dexamethasone (15.0%), azithromycin monotherapy (15.0%), remdesivir monotherapy (10.2%), and nafamostat mesylate monotherapy (8.5%). However, an often prescribed anti-COVID-19 drug differed depending on the period. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study revealed the real-world situation of anti-COVID-19 drug prescriptions in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Japan. A prescribed drug would depend on the latest scientific evidence, such as efficacy, safety, and approval status, at the time of prescription. Understanding the prescription of anti-COVID-19 drugs will be important for providing the most up-to-date treatments to patients and evaluating the benefit and/or risk of anti-COVID-19 drugs based on the utilization of an electronic medical record database.

Risk of neutropenia in psoriasis patients prescribed anti-IL-23 antibody in comparison with anti-IL-17 antibody or adalimumab based on real-world data from the MID-NET® in Japan.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the risk of neutropenia during treatment with anti-IL-23 antibodies in patients with psoriasis. METHOD: We conducted an observational study with cohort design using MID-NET® in Japan. We identified patients with psoriasis who were newly prescribed anti-IL-23 antibodies, anti-IL-17-antibodies, adalimumab, or apremilast between January 1, 2009, and March 31, 2021. We estimated the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of anti-IL-23 antibodies compared to that of anti-IL-17 antibodies, adalimumab, or apremilast, for the risk of grade 2 (neutrophil count < 1,500/µL) or grade 3 (neutrophil count < 1,000/µL) neutropenia. RESULTS: Overall, 287 patients on anti-IL-23 antibodies, 189 patients on anti-IL-17 antibodies, 293 patients on adalimumab, and 540 patients on apremilast were included. Compared with anti-IL-17 antibodies, the aHR (95% confidence interval (CI)) of anti-IL-23 antibodies was 0.83 (0.27-2.51) for grade 2 and 0.40 (0.02-7.60) for grade 3 neutropenia; that when compared with adalimumab was 0.76 (0.28-2.06) for grade 2 but was not calculated for grade 3 as no cases were found; and that compared with apremilast was 3.88 (0.62-24.48) for grade 2 and 0.43 (0.02-11.63) for grade 3 neutropenia. CONCLUSION: No clear increase in the risk of neutropenia with anti-IL-23 antibodies was observed.

Lower Risks of Gastrointestinal Perforation and Intestinal Obstruction in Patients with Atypical Antipsychotics in Comparison with Typical Antipsychotics Based on Real-World Data from the MID-NET® in Japan.

Intestinal perforation and obstruction are known to be one of the adverse events caused by antipsychotics; however, warning information on package inserts varies among antipsychotics. To investigate the risks of gastrointestinal perforation and intestinal obstruction in patients prescribed atypical antipsychotics compared with those in patients prescribed typical antipsychotics, a nested case-control study was conducted utilizing real-world data from the MID-NET® medical information database in Japan. The study period spanned from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2018. We found that the risks of gastrointestinal perforation and intestinal obstruction in patients prescribed atypical antipsychotics were significantly lower than those in patients prescribed typical antipsychotics (adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.80). This finding was supported with prolonged periods for the exposure definition in the sensitivity analyses. In addition, no major differences in the risks of atypical antipsychotics, such as risperidone, quetiapine, olanzapine, and aripiprazole, were identified in this study. The safety profile regarding the lower risks of gastrointestinal perforation and intestinal obstruction in patients prescribed atypical antipsychotics should be considered when choosing antipsychotics in clinical practice in terms of the proper use of such drugs.

Characterizing Granulocytopenia Associated with Thiamazole in Patients with Hyperthyroidism Based on Real-World Data from the MID-NET in Japan.

Despite the requirement of routine blood tests during thiamazole treatment in Japan, granulocytopenia among patients treated with thiamazole has been occasionally reported to the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA). To characterize granulocytopenia in patients with thiamazole in Japan, the effects of routine blood tests were examined in a cohort of new users of thiamazole or propylthiouracil utilizing the MID-NET. The occurrence of granulocytopenia (neutrophil count ≤ 1,500/µL) in a given period was compared between patients with and without blood test results prior to the period. The trend in neutrophil count during thiamazole treatment was also compared between patients with and without granulocytopenia. A nested case-control study based on the cohort was conducted to identify potential risk factors for granulocytopenia during thiamazole treatment. In the new user cohort including 4,371 patients treated with thiamazole, the occurrence of granulocytopenia in patients who had undergone blood tests at all previous periods was similar or higher than that among those who had not undergone blood test in all previous periods (e.g., adjusted odds ratio in period 2 was 1.63). The neutrophil count was relatively lower in the group of patients with granulocytopenia even before the occurrence of granulocytopenia. In a nested case-control study, an upward tendency of the risk was observed when a patient was co-prescribed anti-arrhythmic drugs or antiulcer drugs with thiamazole. The characteristics of granulocytopenia during thiamazole treatment elucidated in this study should be recognized in clinical practice for the proper use of thiamazole.

Cardiovascular risk of urate-lowering drugs: A study using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan.

In the present study, we aimed to investigate the association between urate-lowering drugs and cardiovascular events, primarily focusing on the risk of febuxostat and topiroxostat when compared with allopurinol in Japan. We conducted an observational study with a cohort design using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan, including new urate-lowering drugs users between August 1, 2010, and March 31, 2018. Exposure and control groups were defined based on the first prescription of urate-lowering drugs as follows: febuxostat or topiroxostat for exposure groups, allopurinol for the control group, and benzbromarone for the secondary control group. The primary outcome was cardiovascular events, defined as a composite of acute coronary syndrome, cerebral infarction, and cerebral hemorrhage. Hazard ratios were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model. The number of patients in each exposure and control group was 1,357,671 in the febuxostat group, 83,683 in the topiroxostat group, 1,273,211 in the allopurinol group, and 258,786 in the benzbromarone group. The adjusted hazard ratios for the cardiovascular risk were 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95-0.98) for febuxostat and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.78-0.90) for topiroxostat groups. The benzbromarone group exhibited similar results. No increased cardiovascular risk was observed with febuxostat or topiroxostat when compared with allopurinol in patients with hyperuricemia in Japan. These results provide real-world evidence regarding the cardiovascular risk associated with urate-lowering drugs, indicating that no additional safety-related regulatory actions are warranted in Japan.

Use of National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups for examining practical utilization and safety signal of a drug to support regulatory assessment on postmarketing drug safety in Japan.

The Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) has conducted many pharmacoepidemiological studies for postmarketing drug safety assessments based on real-world data from medical information databases. One of these databases is the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan (NDB), containing health insurance claims of almost all Japanese individuals (over 100 million) since April 2009. This article describes the PMDA's regulatory experiences in utilizing the NDB for postmarketing drug safety assessment, especially focusing on the recent cases of use of the NDB to examine the practical utilization and safety signal of a drug. The studies helped support regulatory decision-making for postmarketing drug safety, such as considering a revision of prescribing information of a drug, confirming the appropriateness of safety measures, and checking safety signals in real-world situations. Different characteristics between the NDB and the MID-NET® (another database in Japan) were also discussed for appropriate selection of data source for drug safety assessment. Accumulated experiences of pharmacoepidemiological studies based on real-world data for postmarketing drug safety assessment will contribute to evolving regulatory decision-making based on real-world data in Japan.

Prescription trend and lactic acidosis in patients prescribed metformin before and after the revision of package insert for allowing metformin administration to patients with moderately decreased kidney function based on real-world data from MID-NET® in Japan.

Introduction: This study was conducted to understand the impact of package insert (PI) revision in Japan on 18 June 2019 to allow metformin use for patients with moderately decreased kidney function (30 ≤ estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Methods: A new user cohort design was employed to examine the prescription trend and the occurrence of lactic acidosis in patients prescribed metformin before and after PI revision using the Medical Information Database Network (MID-NET®). Results: From 12 May 2016 to 31 March 2020, 5,874 patients (before, n = 4,702; after, n = 1,172) were identified as new metformin users, including 1,145 patients (before, n = 914; after, n = 231) with moderately decreased kidney function. Although no marked changes in metformin prescription were observed before and after PI revision, the daily metformin dose at the first prescription decreased after PI revision. For both before and after PI revision, less than 10 cases of lactic acidosis occurred in all patients prescribed metformin, and no lactic acidosis was observed in patients with moderately decreased kidney function. Conclusion: The results of this study are useful for understanding the safety of metformin use in patients with decreased kidney function and suggest no worse impacts of PI revision in Japan, indicating no further safety concerns on metformin use in patients with moderately decreased kidney function under the situation with careful use and safety monitoring of metformin.

Nested Case-Control Study Utilizing MID-NET® on Thrombocytopenia Associated With Pegfilgrastim in Patients Treated With Antineoplastic Agents.

Although several spontaneous case reports on the occurrence of thrombocytopenia in patients treated with human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) preparations have been accumulated, its actual causality is still unclear. To investigate the association between G-CSF preparations (filgrastim, nartograstim, lenograstim, and pegfilgrastim) available in Japan and thrombocytopenia in patients treated with antineoplastic agents, a nested case-control study was conducted using the Medical Information Database NETwork (MID-NET®) with the cohort of the Japanese population taking antineoplastic agents between 2009 and 2018. A case of thrombocytopenia was defined as a patient who had decreased platelet counts (< 50,000/mm3 ). We identified a maximum of 10 controls for each case matched on the index date. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of thrombocytopenia for the use of G-CSF preparations compared with nonuse were estimated using conditional logistic regression. From the cohort in which 33,124 patients were included, 733 cases and 5,592 controls were identified. Compared with the nonuse of G-CSF preparations, the use of any G-CSF preparations increased the risk of thrombocytopenia (aOR: 5.7, 95% CI: 4.3-7.5). More detailed analysis showed that a distinctive increased risk was observed when pegfilgrastim was prescribed at 2-7 days before the index date (aOR: 7.4 95% CI: 2.0-28.1). Associations of the other G-CSF preparations with thrombocytopenia were unclear due to the inconsistent results among different analyses. A significantly increased risk of thrombocytopenia associated with pegfilgrastim was identified, leading to a revision of precautions in the package inserts of pegfilgrastim as a regulatory safety action.

Atypical Antipsychotics and the Risk of Hyperlipidemia: A Sequence Symmetry Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Although hyperlipidemia is a well known adverse event of atypical antipsychotic (AAP) medication, there are few studies that have quantitatively compared the risks of various AAPs. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to comparatively evaluate the risk of hyperlipidemia associated with the use of AAPs approved in Japan through a consecutive epidemiological study. METHODS: We conducted a sequence symmetry analysis (SSA) using health insurance claims data to analyze the following nine AAPs approved for use in Japan: risperidone, paliperidone, perospirone hydrochloride hydrate, blonanserin, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine fumarate, aripiprazole, and zotepine. Exposed cases were identified from drug dispensing records as those who had been administered both AAPs and antihyperlipidemic drugs. The adjusted sequence ratio (ASR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) for each individual AAP and for all AAPs were calculated while controlling for time trends in dispensing patterns. RESULTS: Olanzapine was significantly associated with increased hyperlipidemia occurrence (ASR 1.56; 95 % CI 1.25-1.95). The ASRs obtained for risperidone (1.01; 95 % CI 0.80-1.27), perospirone hydrochloride hydrate (0.93; 95 % CI 0.63-1.39), blonanserin (0.83; 95 % CI 0.52-1.33), quetiapine fumarate (0.93; 95 % CI 0.73-1.18), and aripiprazole (1.02; 95 % CI 0.82-1.26) were approximately 1.0. Unstable estimates (wide CIs) were obtained for paliperidone and zotepine due to the small sample sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Among the AAPs used in Japan, only olanzapine was found to have an elevated risk of hyperlipidemia. In contrast, risperidone, perospirone hydrochloride hydrate, blonanserin, quetiapine fumarate, and aripiprazole had relatively low risks.