RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Great East Japan Earthquake and the subsequent Fukushima nuclear power plant accident in 2011 posed significant challenges to the educational sector, particularly affecting nursing students in the disaster area. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no reports on the effects of the natural disaster coupled with the nuclear accident on the nursing students. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the impact of the Fukushima disasters on rate of academic failure events in nursing education. METHODS: A retrospective cohort approach was conducted, focusing on 677 students from Soma Nursing School admitted between 2001 and 2017. Four failure events-failure to pass the national examination, student retention, suspension, and withdrawal from school-were compared between three time periods: pre-disaster, early peri-disaster, and later peri-disaster. This analysis was followed by a questionnaire survey among the students and an interview with faculty members to gain further insights. RESULTS: Of the student cohort, 17% had at least one failure event. Students in the later peri-disaster phase faced an elevated failure rate at 29%. Variables such as being male, admission during later peri-disaster period, and local pre-admission residence played a significant role in these failure events in multivariate logistic regression analysis (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval, p value]; 2.63 [1.49-4.64, < 0.001], 3.207 [2.00-5.15, < 0.001], and 1.84 [1.12-3.02, 0.02], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the impact of the Great East Japan Earthquake and the following nuclear accident on nursing education. The elevated failure rates in the later peri-disaster period emphasize the challenges posed by continuing disaster phases. Thus, there is a need for intensified and tailored strategies in nursing education in disaster-affected regions.
RESUMEN
Japan's universal health-care system means that it is a very safe country in which to give birth. Perinatal outcomes in Japan are excellent, with low infant mortality and neonatal mortality. However, childbirth remains a challenge for many Japanese women, who are faced with a scarcity of places to give birth, limited availability of analgesia and social norms that favour natural birth. The number of birth facilities in Japan continues to decrease as fewer children are born. The numbers of qualified medical staff remain inadequate, with a continuing lack of female physicians, perpetuated by a pervasive negative gender bias. Recruitment efforts are underway, but few doctors want to specialize in obstetrics or gynaecology. Furthermore, around half of female obstetricians and gynaecologists in Japan's male-dominated medical system stop practising when they have their own children. The difficulty of obtaining analgesia during labour is another problem. Although low uptake of labour pain relief in Japan is said to be due to cultural influences, the root of the problem is a lack of qualified anaesthesiologists and the inflexibility of a system that will not allow other staff to be trained to administer labour analgesia. Problems with labour anaesthesia have been linked to 14 maternal deaths since 2010. Japanese policy-makers need to act to renovate the nation's obstetric facilities, reorganize regional perinatal care systems, train more obstetricians and anaesthesiologists, promote task-shifting and better integrate biomedical and traditional, non-medical care for pregnant women.
Le système de soins de santé universel du Japon en fait un pays très sûr pour les accouchements. Les résultats en matière de santé périnatale au Japon sont excellents, avec une mortalité infantile et une mortalité néonatale faibles. Néanmoins, l'accouchement reste problématique pour de nombreuses Japonaises, qui doivent faire face à un manque d'établissements adaptés pour les accouchements, à une disponibilité limitée de l'analgésie et à des normes sociales qui favorisent les accouchements naturels. Le nombre de maternités au Japon ne cesse de baisser, à mesure de la diminution du nombre de naissances. Les effectifs en personnel médical qualifié restent inappropriés, avec une pénurie persistante de femmes médecins, perpétuée par des préjugés négatifs généralisés liés au genre. Des efforts de recrutement sont en cours, mais peu de médecins souhaitent se spécialiser en obstétrique ou en gynécologie. Par ailleurs, dans le système médical japonais dominé par les hommes, près de la moitié des femmes obstétriciennes et gynécologues cessent de pratiquer dès qu'elles ont elles-mêmes des enfants. La difficulté à bénéficier d'une analgésie obstétricale pendant l'accouchement constitue un autre problème. Même si, au Japon, le faible recours au soulagement de la douleur pendant le travail est généralement imputé à des influences culturelles, le fond du problème est une pénurie d'anesthésistes qualifiés et le manque de souplesse d'un système qui ne permet pas de former d'autres professionnels de santé pour pouvoir pratiquer l'analgésie obstétricale. Les problèmes liés à la réalisation d'une analgésie obstétricale ont donné lieu à 14 décès maternels depuis 2010. Au Japon, les décideurs politiques doivent agir pour rénover les installations obstétricales du pays, réorganiser les systèmes régionaux de santé périnatale, former davantage d'obstétriciens et d'anesthésistes, promouvoir le transfert des tâches et mieux intégrer les soins biomédicaux et les soins traditionnels, non médicaux, pour les femmes enceintes.
El sistema universal de atención sanitaria de Japón hace que sea un país muy seguro para dar a luz. Los resultados perinatales en Japón son excelentes, con baja mortalidad infantil y mortalidad neonatal. Sin embargo, el parto sigue siendo un problema para muchas mujeres japonesas, que se enfrentan a la escasez de lugares para dar a luz, la limitada disponibilidad de analgesia y las normas sociales que favorecen el parto natural. El número de centros de maternidad en Japón sigue disminuyendo a medida que nacen menos niños. El número de personal médico cualificado sigue siendo insuficiente, con una continua falta de mujeres médicas, perpetuada por un prejuicio de género negativo generalizado. Los esfuerzos de reclutamiento están en marcha, pero pocos médicos quieren especializarse en obstetricia o ginecología. Además, alrededor de la mitad de las obstetras y ginecólogas del sistema médico japonés dominado por los hombres dejan de ejercer cuando tienen sus propios hijos. La dificultad para obtener analgesia durante el trabajo de parto es otro problema. Aunque se dice que la baja aceptación del alivio del dolor del trabajo de parto en Japón se debe a influencias culturales, la raíz del problema es la falta de anestesiólogos calificados y la inflexibilidad de un sistema que no permitirá que otro personal esté capacitado para administrar la analgesia del trabajo de parto. Los problemas con la anestesia del trabajo de parto se han relacionado con 14 muertes maternas desde 2010. Los responsables de formular políticas en Japón deben actuar para renovar las instalaciones obstétricas del país, reorganizar los sistemas regionales de atención perinatal, capacitar a más obstetras y anestesiólogos, promover el cambio de tareas e integrar mejor la atención biomédica y la atención no médica tradicional para las mujeres embarazadas.
Asunto(s)
Analgesia/psicología , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Dolor de Parto/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor de Parto/psicología , Médicos/psicología , Anestesiólogos/provisión & distribución , Parto Obstétrico , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Trabajo de Parto , Servicios de Salud Materna , Área sin Atención Médica , Obstetricia , Parto , Médicos/provisión & distribución , Embarazo , SexismoAsunto(s)
Hiperlipoproteinemias , Hipolipemiantes , Lipoproteína(a) , ARN Interferente Pequeño , Humanos , Lipoproteína(a)/sangre , ARN Interferente Pequeño/efectos adversos , ARN Interferente Pequeño/uso terapéutico , Hipolipemiantes/efectos adversos , Hipolipemiantes/uso terapéutico , Hiperlipoproteinemias/sangre , Hiperlipoproteinemias/tratamiento farmacológicoAsunto(s)
Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control , VacunaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Little information is available concerning how patient delay may be affected by mass disasters. The main objectives of the present study are to identify whether there was a post-disaster increase in the risk of experiencing patient delay among breast cancer patients in an area affected by the 2011 triple disaster in Fukushima, Japan, and to elucidate factors associated with post-disaster patient delay. Sociodemographic factors (age, employment status, cohabitant status and evacuation status), health characteristics, and health access- and disaster-related factors were specifically considered. METHODS: Records of symptomatic breast cancer patients diagnosed from 2005 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed to calculate risk ratios (RRs) for patient delay in every year post-disaster compared with the pre-disaster baseline. Total and excessive patient delays were respectively defined as three months or more and twelve months or more from symptom recognition to first medical consultation. Logistic regression analysis was conducted for pre- and post-disaster patient delay in order to reveal any factors potentially associated with patient delay, and changes after the disaster. RESULTS: Two hundred nineteen breast cancer patients (122 pre-disaster and 97 post-disaster) were included. After adjustments for age, significant post-disaster increases in RRs of experiencing both total (RR: 1.66, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.02-2.70, p < 0.05) and excessive patient delay (RR: 4.49, 95% CI: 1.73-11.65, p < 0.01) were observed. The RRs for total patient delay peaked in the fourth year post-disaster, and significant increases in the risk of excessive patient delay were observed in the second, fourth, and fifth years post-disaster, with more than five times the risk observed pre-disaster. A family history of any cancer was the only factor significantly associated with total patient delay post-disaster (odds ratio: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.15-0.95, p < 0.05), while there were no variables associated with delay pre-disaster. CONCLUSIONS: The triple disaster in Fukushima appears to have led to an increased risk of patient delay among breast cancer patients, and this trend has continued for five years following the disaster.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Desastres , Terremotos , Accidente Nuclear de Fukushima , Tsunamis , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/etiología , Estrés Psicológico , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The academic scandal on a study on stimulustriggered acquisition of pluripotency (STAP) cells in Japan in 2014 involved suspicions of scientific misconduct by the lead author of the study after the paper had been reviewed on a peerreview website. This study investigated the discussions on STAP cells on Twitter and content of newspaper articles in an attempt to assess the role of social compared with traditional media in scientific peer review. OBJECTIVE: This study examined Twitter utilization in scientific peer review on STAP cells misconduct. METHODS: Searches for tweets and newspaper articles containing the term "STAP cells" were carried out through Twitter's search engine and Nikkei Telecom database, respectively. The search period was from January 1 to July 1, 2014. The nouns appearing in the "top tweets" and newspaper articles were extracted through a morphological analysis, and their frequency of appearance and changes over time were investigated. RESULTS: The total numbers of top tweets and newspaper articles containing the term were 134,958 and 1646, respectively. Negative words concerning STAP cells began to appear on Twitter by February 9-15, 2014, or 3 weeks after Obokata presented a paper on STAP cells. The number of negative words in newspaper articles gradually increased beginning in the week of March 12-18, 2014. A total of 1000 tweets were randomly selected, and they were found to contain STAP-related opinions (43.3%, 433/1000), links to news sites and other sources (41.4%, 414/1000), false scientific or medical claims (8.9%, 89/1000), and topics unrelated to STAP (6.4%, 64/1000). CONCLUSIONS: The discussion on scientific misconduct during the STAP cells scandal took place at an earlier stage on Twitter than in newspapers, a traditional medium.
Asunto(s)
Bioética , Células Madre Pluripotentes Inducidas/citología , Revisión por Pares/métodos , Mala Conducta Científica , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Humanos , Revisión por Pares/normasRESUMEN
A sensational newspaper article concerning a possible adverse reaction to the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine was published in March 2013 in Japan. In June 2013, the Japanese government suspended their proactive recommendation for vaccination, despite the lack of proof for a causal relationship. We searched Nikkei Telecom 21, the largest newspaper database in Japan, for articles published from January 2011 to December 2015 to evaluate the characteristics of newspaper publications about human papillomavirus vaccination. We identified 1138 HPV vaccine-related articles. Compared with those published before March 2013, articles concerning human papillomavirus vaccination after March 2013 were more likely to include adverse reaction-related and authority-related keywords; articles that included efficacy-related keywords decreased significantly. Negative-negative and negative-neutral articles became more frequent, and positive-positive and positive-neutral articles were less frequent. A sensational case report shaped the tone of negative media coverage as a catalyst, regardless of scientific statements from health authorities.
Asunto(s)
Medios de Comunicación de Masas/tendencias , Periódicos como Asunto , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus , Educación en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación en Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Japón , Medios de Comunicación de Masas/estadística & datos numéricos , VacunaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of sheathless guide catheters in transradial percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BACKGROUND: Transradial PCI for STEMI offers significant clinical benefits, including a reduced incidence of vascular complications. As the size of the radial artery is small, the radial artery is frequently damaged in this procedure using large-bore catheters. A sheathless guide catheter offers a solution to this problem as it does not require an introducer sheath. However, the efficacy and safety of sheathless guide catheters remain to be fully determined in emergent transradial PCI for STEMI. METHODS: Data on consecutive STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI at the Sendai Kousei Hospital between September 2010 and May 2013 were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the rate of acute procedural success without access site crossover. Secondary endpoints included door-to-balloon time, fluoroscopy time, volume of contrast, and radial artery stenosis or occlusion rate. RESULTS: We conducted transradial PCI for 478 patients with STEMI using a sheathless guide catheter. Acute procedural success was achieved in 466 patients (97.5%). The median door-to-balloon time was 45 min (range, 15-317 min). The median fluoroscopy time was 16.4 min (range, 10-90 min). The median volume of contrast was 134 mL (range, 31-431 mL). Radial stenosis or occlusion developed in 14 (3.8%) of the 370 evaluable patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that use of a sheathless guide catheter taking a transradial approach was effective and safe in primary PCI for STEMI. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Asunto(s)
Catéteres Cardíacos , Electrocardiografía , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angiografía Coronaria , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Arteria Radial , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Considering the health impacts of evacuation is fundamental to disaster planning especially for vulnerable elderly populations; however, evacuation-related mortality risks have not been well-investigated. We conducted an analysis to compare survival of evacuated and non-evacuated residents of elderly care facilities, following the Great East Japan Earthquake and subsequent Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant incident on 11th March 2011. OBJECTIVE: To assess associations between evacuation and mortality after the Fukushima nuclear incident; and to present discussion points on disaster planning, with reference to vulnerable elderly populations. METHODS: The study population comprised 1,215 residents admitted to seven elderly care facilities located 20-40km from the nuclear plant in the five years before the incident. Demographic and clinical characteristics were obtained from medical records. Evacuation histories were tracked until mid 2013. Main outcome measures are hazard ratios in evacuees versus non-evacuees using random-effects Cox proportional hazards models, and pre- and post-disaster survival probabilities and relative mortality incidence. RESULTS: Experiencing the disasters did not have a significant influence on mortality (hazard ratio 1.10, 95% confidence interval: 0.84-1.43). Evacuation was associated with 1.82 times higher mortality (95% confidence interval: 1.22-2.70) after adjusting for confounders, with the initial evacuation from the original facility associated with 3.37 times higher mortality risk (95% confidence interval: 1.66-6.81) than non evacuation. CONCLUSIONS: The government should consider updating its requirements for emergency planning for elderly facilities and ensure that, in a disaster setting, these facilities have the capacity and support to shelter in place for at least sufficient time to adequately prepare initial evacuation.
Asunto(s)
Planificación en Desastres/métodos , Desastres , Accidente Nuclear de Fukushima , Trabajo de Rescate/organización & administración , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terremotos , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Casas de Salud , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
After a major radioactive incident, accurate dose reconstruction is important for evaluating health risks and appropriate radiation protection policies. After the 2011 Japan Fukushima nuclear incident, we assessed the level of agreement between the modeled and directly measured dose and estimated the uncertainties. The study population comprised 520 school children from Minamisoma city, located 20 km north of the nuclear plant. The annual dose 1830 months after the incident was assessed using two approaches: estimation using the model proposed by the Japanese government and direct measurement by radiation dosemeters. The ratio of the average of modeled and measured doses was 3.0 (standard deviation (SD): 2.0). The reduction coefficient, an index for radiation attenuation properties, was 0.3 (SD: 0.1) on average, whereas the value used in the government model was 0.6. After adjusting for covariates, the coefficient had a significant negative correlation with the air dose rate in the dwelling location (p < 0.001), indicating that stronger building shielding effects are valuable in areas with higher air contamination levels. The present study demonstrated that some overestimation may have been related to uncertainties in radiation reduction effects, and that the air contamination level might provide a more important indicator of these effects.
Asunto(s)
Contaminación Radiactiva del Aire/análisis , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/estadística & datos numéricos , Accidente Nuclear de Fukushima , Modelos Teóricos , Dosis de Radiación , Monitoreo de Radiación/métodos , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Protección Radiológica/métodos , Análisis de Regresión , Medición de Riesgo , IncertidumbreRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: All-case post-marketing surveillance of newly approved anticancer drugs is usually conducted on all patients in Japan. The present study investigates whether all-case post-marketing surveillance identifies fatal adverse drug reactions undetected before market entry. METHODS: We examined fatal adverse drug reactions identified via all-case post-marketing surveillance by reviewing the disclosed post-marketing surveillance results, and determined the time points in which the fatal adverse drug reactions were initially reported by reviewing drug labels. We additionally scanned emergency alerts on the Japanese regulatory authority website to assess the relationship between all-case post-marketing surveillance and regulatory action. RESULTS: Twenty-five all-case post-marketing surveillances were performed between January 1999 and December 2009. Eight all-case post-marketing surveillances with final results included information on all fatal cases. Of these, the median number of patients was 1287 (range: 106-4998), the median number of fatal adverse drug reactions was 14.5 (range: 4-23). Of the 111 fatal adverse drug reactions detected in the eight post-marketing surveillances, only 28 (25.0%) and 22 (19.6%) were described on the initial global and the initial Japanese drug label, respectively, and 58 (52.3%) fatal adverse drug reactions were first described in the all-case post-marketing surveillance reports. Despite this, the regulatory authority issued only four warning letters, and two of these were prompted by case reports from the all-case post-marketing surveillance. CONCLUSION: All-case post-marketing surveillance of newly approved anticancer drugs in Japan was useful for the rigorous compilation of non-specific adverse drug reactions, but it rarely detected clinically significant fatal adverse drug reactions.