Analysis of Three-Dimensional Bone Microarchitecture of the Axis Exposes Pronounced Regional Heterogeneity Associated with Clinical Fracture Patterns.

The odontoid process (dens) of the second cervical vertebra (axis) is prone to fracture. While the importance of its skeletal integrity has been previously noted, representative three-dimensional microarchitecture analyses in humans are not available. This study aimed to determine the bone microarchitecture of the axis using high-resolution quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) and to derive clinical implications for the occurrence and treatment of axis fractures. For initial clinical reference, the apparent density of the axis was determined based on clinical computed tomography (CT) images in patients without and with fractures of the axis. Subsequently, 28 human axes (female 50%) obtained at autopsy were analyzed by HR-pQCT. Analyses were performed in three different regions corresponding to zones I (tip of dens), II (base of dens), and III (corpus axis) of the Anderson and D'Alonzo classification. Lower apparent densities based on clinical CT data were detected in zone II and III compared to zone I in both the group without and with fracture. In the autopsy specimens, cortical thickness and bone volume fraction decreased continuously from zone I to zone III. Trabecular and cortical tissue mineral density was lowest in zone III, with no differences between zones I and II. In conclusion, our clinical and high-resolution ex vivo imaging data highlight a marked regional heterogeneity of bone microarchitecture, with poor cortical and trabecular properties near the dens base. These results may partly explain why zones II and III are at high risk of fracture and osteosynthesis failure.

The role of the multidisciplinary health care team in the management of patients with Marfan syndrome.

Marfan syndrome (MFS) is a rare, severe, chronic, life-threatening disease with multiorgan involvement that requires optimal multidisciplinary care to normalize both prognosis and quality of life. In this article, each key team member of all the medical disciplines of a multidisciplinary health care team at the Hamburg Marfan center gives a personal account of his or her contribution in the management of patients with MFS. The authors show how, with the support of health care managers, key team members organize themselves in an organizational structure to create a common meaning, to maximize therapeutic success for patients with MFS. First, we show how the initiative and collaboration of patient representatives, scientists, and physicians resulted in the foundation of Marfan centers, initially in the US and later in Germany, and how and why such centers evolved over time. Then, we elucidate the three main structural elements; a team of coordinators, core disciplines, and auxiliary disciplines of health care. Moreover, we explain how a multidisciplinary health care team integrates into many other health care structures of a university medical center, including external quality assurance; quality management system; clinical risk management; center for rare diseases; aorta center; health care teams for pregnancy, for neonates, and for rehabilitation; and in structures for patient centeredness. We provide accounts of medical goals and standards for each core discipline, including pediatricians, pediatric cardiologists, cardiologists, human geneticists, heart surgeons, vascular surgeons, vascular interventionists, orthopedic surgeons, ophthalmologists, and nurses; and of auxiliary disciplines including forensic pathologists, radiologists, rhythmologists, pulmonologists, sleep specialists, orthodontists, dentists, neurologists, obstetric surgeons, psychiatrist/psychologist, and rehabilitation specialists. We conclude that a multidisciplinary health care team is a means to maximize therapeutic success.