Accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy with 3 Gy per fraction for central/ultra-central lung tumors: toxicity to mediastinal organs.

BACKGROUND: Accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy with 3 Gy per fraction is routinely performed for central lung tumors in Japan. However, the tolerable doses to mediastinal organs at risk during this procedure are unclear. This study aimed to clarify the rate of toxicities and tolerable doses to mediastinal organs. METHODS: Patients treated with accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy using a total dose of 60-75 Gy, with 3 Gy per fraction, for central lung tumors (July 2009-April 2021) were retrospectively reviewed. We extracted patients who received ≥30 Gy irradiation to each mediastinal organ and analyzed dosimetric factors, including doses to 0.03, 0.5, 1, 4 and 10 mL of each organ, in relation to grade 3-5 toxicities, except for radiation pneumonitis. RESULTS: In total, 251 organs in 91 (ultra-central, 24) lesions were analyzed, with a median follow-up duration of 26 months (range, 4-94). The prescribed doses were 75/72/69/66/63/60 Gy for 52/14/16/3/2/4 lesions, respectively. Grade 3 bronchopulmonary hemorrhage was confirmed in two (2.2%) patients, whose tumors were located ultra-centrally. The two patients with toxicity received up to 74.5 and 71.6 Gy to the bronchus. Among patients who received 70 Gy or more to the bronchus, the incidence rate was 7% (2/28 patients). CONCLUSION: The rate of severe toxicities was low (2.2%). Although we did not identify the dose tolerance of the organs, because of the low incidence rate, we did note that doses of >70 Gy to the bronchus were likely to cause bronchopulmonary hemorrhage.

Local control of stereotactic body radiotherapy with dynamic tumor tracking for lung tumors: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Dynamic tumor tracking (DTT) is a method of respiratory motion management in radiotherapy. It reduces the radiation field but risks delivering an insufficient radiation dose to the tumor. We investigated the local control of DTT-stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung tumors. METHODS: Patients treated with SBRT for early-stage, non-small-cell lung cancer and lung metastases (2013-18) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with tumor motion >1 cm were treated with DTT-SBRT (DTT group); those with tumor motion ≤1 cm were treated with static-SBRT (static group). A static planning target volume for the static-SBRT plan was also created for patients in the DTT group, and planning target volume reduction relative to the planning target volume for the DTT-SBRT plan was assessed. Patients were matched in a 1:1 ratio using a propensity score predictive of the SBRT technique. RESULTS: Of the 245 lesions in 218 patients (median follow-up, 25.4 months), 69 were treated with DTT-SBRT and 176 with static-SBRT. The median planning target volume reduction in the DTT group was 30.3%. After propensity score matching, 124 lesions were included (62 per group). Two-year local control rates for the DTT and static groups were 94.2 and 95.9%, respectively, for all lesions (P = 0.19) and 96.3 and 94.5%, respectively, for matched lesions (P = 0.79). In univariate analysis, DTT-SBRT was not associated with local control for all lesions (hazard ratio, 2.06; P = 0.20) or matched lesions (hazard ratio, 1.22; P = 0.79). No grade 4/5 toxicities were observed. CONCLUSIONS: DTT-SBRT for lung tumors reduced the planning target volume, but not local control rates. DTT was useful for respiratory motion management.

Radiation therapy and the risk of herpes zoster in patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: The role and impact of radiation therapy (RT) on the development of herpes zoster (HZ) has not been well studied. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between RT and HZ. METHODS: A propensity score-matched, retrospective cohort study was conducted using institutional cancer registry data and medical records from 2011 to 2015. The risk of developing HZ in the RT and non-RT groups was compared using a Cox proportional hazards model. Associations also were explored between the RT field and the anatomic location of HZ in patients who developed HZ after RT. The expected number of HZ events within the radiation field was calculated according to the RT received by each patient; then, this number was compared with the observed number of in-field events. RESULTS: Of 17,655 patients, propensity score matching yielded 4350 pairs; of these, 3891 pairs were eligible for comparison. The cumulative incidence of HZ in the RT group (vs the non-RT group) during the first 5 years after the index date was 2.1% (vs 0.7%) at 1 year, 3.0% (vs 1.0%) at 2 years, 3.4% (vs 1.3%) at 3 years, 4.1% vs 1.7% at 4 years, and 4.4% vs 1.8% at 5 years. The RT group showed a significantly higher risk of HZ than the non-RT group (hazard ratio, 2.59, 95% CI, 1.84-3.66). In the 120 patients who developed HZ after RT, HZ events were observed significantly more frequently within the RT field than expected (74 vs 43.8 events; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cancer who received RT showed a significantly higher risk of HZ, which was commonly observed within the radiation field.

Oncological outcomes for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with neoadjuvant endocrine and external-beam radiation therapy followed by adjuvant continuous/intermittent endocrine therapy in an open-label, randomized, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: To date, research has not determined the optimal procedure for adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa) treated for 6 months with neoadjuvant ADT and external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT). METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial enrolled 303 patients with locally advanced PCa between 2001 and 2006. Participants were treated with neoadjuvant ADT for 6 months. Then, 280 patients whose prostate-specific antigen levels were less than pretreatment levels and less than 10 ng/mL were randomized. All 280 participants were treated with 72 Gy of EBRT in combination with adjuvant ADT for 8 months. Thereafter, participants were assigned to long-term ADT (5 years in all; arm 1) or intermittent ADT (arm 2). The primary endpoint was modified biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) with respect to nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) progression, clinical relapse, or any cause of death. RESULTS: The median follow-up time after randomization was 8.2 years. Among the 136 and 144 men assigned to trial arms 1 and 2, respectively, 24 and 30 progressed to nmCRPC or clinical relapse, and 5 and 6 died of PCa. The 5-year modified bRFS rates were 84.8% and 82.8% in trial arms 1 and 2, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.132; 95% confidence interval, 0.744-1.722). CONCLUSIONS: Although modified bRFS data did not demonstrate noninferiority for arm 2, intermittent adjuvant ADT after EBRT with 14 months of neoadjuvant and short-term adjuvant ADT is a promising treatment strategy, especially in a population of responders after 6 months of ADT for locally advanced PCa.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for bone metastases in patients with colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy for colorectal cancer-derived bone metastases and identify factors predicting treatment failure. METHODS: Patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy for bone metastases from colorectal cancer between September 2013 and June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The prescribed dose for spine and non-spine bone metastases was 24 Gy in two fractions and 35 Gy in five fractions, respectively. The end point was local failure, which was defined as tumour progression on imaging evaluations. In addition, various treatment- and tumour-specific factors were evaluated to determine predictors of local failure. RESULTS: This study included 43 lesions in 38 patients, with solitary bone metastases in 18 lesions (42%), re-irradiation stereotactic body radiotherapy in 28 lesions (65%) and postoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy due to spinal cord compression in 10 lesions (23%). The median follow-up after stereotactic body radiotherapy was 12 (range, 2-60) months. The 1-year LF rate was 44%. In the univariate analysis, sacral metastases (P = 0.02) were found to be significantly correlated with LF, and multiple-course systemic therapy before stereotactic body radiotherapy (P= 0.06) and large target volume (P = 0.07) showed a trend towards an association with LF. However, these factors were not independent predictors of LF in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: More than 40% of the lesions treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy for bone metastases from colorectal cancer showed LF within 1 year. No poor prognostic factors could be identified statistically. The poor outcomes in all groups indicate that the treatment intensity of the stereotactic body radiotherapy was insufficient to control colorectal cancer bone metastases.

Safety of radiotherapy for hemodialysis patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: The number of hemodialysis (HD) patients is increasing worldwide, and they are at a higher risk of cancer than the general population. Because HD patients are more likely to have inflammation, radiotherapy (RT)-induced adverse effects (AEs) are theoretically expected to be worse for HD patients. Since only a few reports have been published on this subject, we aimed to evaluate the tolerability of RT in HD patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed AEs related to RT for HD patients. Our study included patients from three institutions treated between January 2007 and July 2017. The patient eligibility criteria were (i) receipt of maintenance HD 2-3 times per week for end-stage renal disease prior to the start of RT and (ii) pathologically confirmed malignancies. The endpoints were acute and late non-hematologic AEs. RESULTS: The study included 56 patients. The most common histology was head and neck cancer (23%), followed by lung cancer (14%) and prostate cancer (11%). The median radiation dose was 60 (range, 12-93.8) Gy at an equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2). The RT completion rate was 96%. Patients had a median follow-up period after RT of 9.1 (range 0.5-98.1) months. Grade 3 or worse acute and late AEs were noted in 6 (11%) and 3 (7%) patients, respectively. In the acute phase, 2 patients had grade 5 AEs, both of which were infections. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that RT for HD patients is clinically tolerable. However, some patients can experience severe infections related to treatment.

Postradiotherapy persistent lymphopenia as a poor prognostic factor in patients with cervical cancer receiving radiotherapy: a single-center, retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy (RT) is effective in cervical cancer; radiation-induced lymphopenia correlates with poor survival outcome in several cancer types. We investigated the association of total lymphocyte count (TLC) with survival outcomes in patients with cervical cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 168 patients with cervical cancer initially treated with definitive RT. We obtained clinicopathological data and TLCs before RT and at the end and at 6 months after RT. Patient-, treatment-, and tumor-specific factors were evaluated to determine their predictive values for overall survival. The association of overall and progression-free survivals with lymphopenia at each point was evaluated. RESULTS: Median follow-up duration was 44 (interquartile range: 25-67) months. Median TLCs before RT and at the end and at 6 months after RT were 1625/mm3, 400/mm3, and 800/mm3 (interquartile range: 1270-1930/mm3, 290-550/mm3, and 600-1067/mm3), respectively. For overall survival, in addition to FIGO stage, body mass index, histology, treatment, and presence of para-aortic lymph node metastasis, lymphopenia at 6 months after RT was a poor prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (P = 0.0026; hazard ratio [HR], 3.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.48-6.33). For progression-free survival, TLCs before and at 6 months after RT were poor prognostic factors in univariate analysis (P = 0.0318 and 0.0081, respectively); however, the latter was the only independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (P = 0.0021; HR, 2.67; 95% CI: 1.43-4.99). CONCLUSION: Post-RT persistent lymphopenia could be a poor prognostic factor for patients with cervical cancer who receive RT.

[A Case of Pulmonary Metastasis from Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Treated by Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy].

We report a case of pulmonary metastasis from hilar cholangiocarcinoma successfully treated by stereotactic body radiotherapy. The patient was a 70-year-old woman who underwent extended left hemi-hepatectomy with bile duct reconstruction for hilar cholangiocarcinoma at the age of 67. Pathological diagnosis indicated a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. We followed up the patient without adjuvant chemotherapy. Nineteen months after the initial resection, a solitary pulmonary metastasis was detected in the right upper lobe. The patient received gemcitabine plus cisplatin(GC)therapy. After 4 courses of GC therapy, the size of the pulmonary metastasis was unchanged. Therefore, we performed a thoracoscopic wedge resection. Pathological diagnosis indicated that the pulmonary metastasis originated from the cholangiocarcinoma. Fifteen months after the pulmonary resection, another solitary pulmonary metastasis was detected in the left lower lobe. As the patient refused further chemotherapy, we performed stereotactic body radiotherapy(SBRT)(50 Gy/4 Fr). An adverse event of Grade 1 radiation pneumonitis was observed. The metastasis disappeared after SBRT. Twenty-eight months after SBRT and 70 months after the initial surgery, the patient is alive without recurrence.

Appropriate endpoints for stereotactic body radiotherapy for bone metastasis: Classification into five treatment groups.

Treatment of bone metastasis using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is being widely used in clinical practice. The reported clinical advantages of SBRT include high pain and local control rates, high response rates against bone metastasis from radio-resistant tumors, and safe re-irradiations. Although most reports in the literature use local control as the primary treatment endpoint, this endpoint is not appropriate because local control does not relate directly to patient benefit. Herein, we proposed five pathophysiology-based patient groups, as well as appropriate endpoints for each group.

Clinical outcomes following conventional external beam radiotherapy boost in Japanese patients with cervical cancer who are ineligible for intracavitary brachytherapy.

OBJECTIVE: While external beam radiotherapy boost has been one of the standard management options for locally advanced cervical cancer that is not treatable with intracavitary brachytherapy, its efficacy remains unclear. We assessed clinical outcomes in Japanese patients with cervical cancer who underwent external beam radiotherapy alone and identified related prognostic factors. METHODS: Patients treated with definitive external beam radiotherapy for cervical cancer unsuitable for intracavitary brachytherapy, including whole pelvic irradiation and external beam radiotherapy boost, were retrospectively examined. The endpoints were progression-free survival, overall survival and adverse events. Additionally, various patient-, tumor- and treatment-specific factors were evaluated to identify significant predictors of progression-free survival. RESULTS: The study included 37 patients; 3 (8%), 5 (14%), 17 (46%) and 12 (32%) had clinical International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages I, II, III and IVA, respectively. A total radiation dose of 56-70.2 Gy was administered (84% of patients received 59.4-60.4 Gy). The median follow-up period after radiotherapy was 17 (range, 2-84) months. The progression-free survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 45 and 29%, respectively; the corresponding overall survival rates were 74 and 43%, respectively. On univariate and multivariate analyses of progression-free survival at 2 years, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IVA and a maximum primary tumor diameter >5 cm were associated with significantly worse outcomes (P = 0.026 and P = 0.027, respectively). CONCLUSION: Approximately 70% of patients with cervical cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy boost instead of intracavitary brachytherapy experienced disease progression within 2 years. These results stress the necessity of devising alternative non-intracavitary brachytherapy treatment approaches, particularly for patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IVA and bulky primary tumors.

A prospective multicentre feasibility study of stereotactic body radiotherapy in Japanese patients with spinal metastases.

OBJECTIVE: Stereotactic body radiotherapy has emerged as an attractive alternative to conventional radiotherapy for spinal metastases. However, it has limitations, including the need for advanced techniques and specific adverse effects. The present trial aimed to validate the feasibility and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy in Japanese patients with spinal metastases. METHODS: Patients with one or two spinal metastases received stereotactic body radiotherapy of 24 Gy in two fractions. The primary endpoint was the proportion of severe adverse effects (≥ grade 3) in patients within 6 months after spine stereotactic body radiotherapy. Adverse effects were evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4. The treatment protocol was considered feasible and tolerable if the proportion of severe adverse effects was 10% or less. RESULTS: Overall, 20 spinal segments in 20 patients who registered between March 2014 and October 2015 were included. Minor and major deviations were observed in the planning of 2 and 0 cases, respectively. The treatment completion rate was 100%. The median follow-up after registration was 24.5 (range: 1-61) months. Although four patients experienced acute grade 2 adverse effects, no grade 3 or higher adverse effects were observed within 6 months after spine stereotactic body radiotherapy. Vertebral compression fractures were observed in two patients (14 and 16 months after stereotactic body radiotherapy). The local control and pain response rates at 6 months were 100 and 83%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the feasibility and safety of spine stereotactic body radiotherapy in Japanese patients with spinal metastases.

Determining the recommended dose of stereotactic body radiotherapy boost in patients with cervical cancer who are unsuitable for intracavitary brachytherapy: a phase I dose-escalation study.

OBJECTIVE: Some patients are ineligible for intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) for locally advanced cervical cancer. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) could be a good treatment option for such patients. This phase I clinical trial aimed to determine the recommended SBRT boost dose for ICBT-ineligible cervical cancer patients. METHODS: Patients with untreated uterine cervical cancer (clinical stages IB1-IIIB) who were ineligible for ICBT were enrolled. Radiotherapy consisted of whole-pelvis radiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions) followed by SBRT. Three dose levels of SBRT (19.5/21/22.5 Gy in three fractions) were set; the treatment protocol began at 21 Gy (level 2). The 'rolling-six' design study was used to establish the recommended dose of SBRT. Each dose level covered three or six patients. The primary endpoint included dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), defined as the occurrence of grade 3 (or worse) non-hematologic adverse effects within 6 months after SBRT. RESULTS: The median follow-up after registration was 17 (range, 8-32) months. Three patients were enrolled in study level 2 (SBRT of 21 Gy); none of the patients exhibited DLT within 6 months after treatment completion. In study level 3 (SBRT of 22.5 Gy), three patients did not exhibit DLT. Although all six patients achieved locoregional control during follow-up, one patient treated with level 2 SBRT experienced distant metastases 14 months after registration. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose of SBRT boost was 22.5 Gy in three fractions. We plan to conduct a phase II multi-center clinical trial using the methodology obtained from the current study.

Re-irradiation for painful bone metastases using stereotactic body radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is expected to achieve safe and effective re-irradiation for painful bone metastases. This study aimed to clarify the efficacy of re-irradiation using SBRT for painful bone metastases. METHODS: Prospective database at our institution for the period between September 2013 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed for patients with: (1) painful bone metastases; (2) history of radiotherapy to the metastasis; and (3) SBRT performed as re-irradiation. Pain response, pain failure-free duration, analgesics medications, and adverse events were evaluated. Pain was evaluated using the Numerical Rating Pain Score, and pain response was evaluated based on International Consensus Pain Response Endpoints. Best response during follow-up was noted. Patients with complete or partial response were defined as showing pain response, and patients with pain progression were defined as showing pain failure. Adverse events were evaluated based on the RTOG/EORTC Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Schema. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients selected from our database showed: median age, 65 years (range, 33-82 years); ECOG performance status, 0-1/2/3/4, 51/10/3/2; lesion histopathology, rectal/lung/renal/thyroid/other cancer, 13/11/9/5/28; median previous irradiated dose, 30 Gy (range, 8-70.4 Gy); median interval from latest irradiation, 21 months (range, 4-192 months); prescribed dose for SBRT, 24 Gy in 2 fractions/30 Gy in 5 fractions/35 Gy in 5 fractions, 51/13/2. Median follow-up after SBRT was 10 months (range, 1-37 months). Fifty-seven patients achieved pain response (86%). The 1-year pain failure-free rate was 55%. Median pain failure-free duration was 13 months (range, 1-24 months). Grade 4 adverse events were observed in six patients (vertebral compression fracture, n = 5; radiation myelopathy, n = 1). No other toxicities of Grade 3 or greater were encountered. CONCLUSIONS: Re-irradiation SBRT has potential to achieve good response and long-term pain control for painful bone metastases. Prospective analysis is necessary to confirm the safety and efficacy of SBRT as re-irradiation.

Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of chemoradiotherapy for postoperative lymph node recurrence of esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic strategies and prognostic risk factors in patients with lymph node (LN) recurrence of esophageal cancer remain controversial. We assessed clinical outcomes and prognostic factors related to the use of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for LN recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after curative resection. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated survival and prognostic factors in 57 patients with LN recurrence of ESCC after curative resection. Patients received CRT using 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin (FP) or docetaxel. Radiotherapy was delivered at 2 Gy (total dose, 60-66 Gy; median, 60 Gy). RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 24 (range, 3-116) months. The overall survival (OS) rates at 2, 3 and 5 years were 43.7%, 36.9% and 27.6%, respectively. In the univariate analysis of OS, treatment with FP, a single LN recurrence, and a single regional recurrence were associated with a significantly better prognosis (P = 0.04, P = 0.027 and P = 0.0001, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, the combination chemotherapy regimen [hazard ratio (HR), 2.50; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.23-5.07] and the number of the regional LNs with recurrence (HR, 5.76; 95% CI, 1.22-27.12) were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Approximately 28% of ESCC patients with LN recurrence after curative resection could achieve long-term survival with CRT. Treatment with FP or patients with a single regional recurrence might improve the treatment outcome.

Final report of survival and late toxicities in the Phase I study of stereotactic body radiation therapy for peripheral T2N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer (JCOG0702).

PURPOSE: A dose escalation study to determine the recommended dose with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for peripheral T2N0M0 non-small cell carcinomas (JCOG0702) was conducted. The purpose of this paper is to report the survival and the late toxicities of JCOG0702. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The continual reassessment method was used to determine the dose level that patients should be assigned to and to estimate the maximum tolerated dose. The starting dose was 40 Gy in four fractions at D95 of PTV. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled. Ten patients were treated with 40 Gy at D95 of PTV, four patients with 45 Gy, eight patients with 50 Gy, one patient with 55 Gy and five patients with 60 Gy. Ten patients were alive at the last follow-up. Overall survival (OS) for all patients was 67.9% (95% CI 47.3-81.8%) at 3 years and 40.8% (95% CI 22.4-58.5%) at 5 years. No Grade 3 or higher toxicity was observed after 181 days from the beginning of the SBRT. Compared to the toxicities up to 180 days, chest wall related toxicities were more frequent after 181 days. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year OS of 40.8% indicates the possibility that SBRT for peripheral T2N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer is superior to conventional radiotherapy. The effect of the SBRT dose escalation on OS is unclear and further studies are warranted.

Palliative radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in stage IVA/B esophageal cancer patients with dysphagia.

BACKGROUND: Palliative therapeutic strategies in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients with dysphagia remain controversial. Only few studies have assessed therapeutic effect factors related to improvement in dysphagia score and nutrition-support-free survival (NSFS). OBJECTIVE: The present study assessed the efficacy and therapeutic effect factors related to the use of palliative radiotherapy (RT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in ESCC patients with dysphagia. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 70 patients with stage IVA/B ESCC. Patients received RT of 30 Gy in 10 fractions or concurrent CRT using 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin of 40 Gy in 20 fractions. The change in the dysphagia score from before to after treatment was assessed, and NSFS was evaluated. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 6 months (range 1-41 months). The overall rate of improvement in the dysphagia score was 60%. The median NSFS was 7.5 months. Craniocaudal tumor length < 6 cm, tumor circumference < 3/4, and CRT of 40 Gy in 20 fractions were associated with a significant improvement in the dysphagia score (p = 0.0036, p = 0.0069, and p = 0.03, respectively). NSFS was significantly longer with CRT than with RT (p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: Palliative RT and CRT are effective treatment options for ESCC patients with dysphagia. Craniocaudal tumor length < 6 cm, tumor circumference < 3/4, and CRT of 40 Gy in 20 fractions may improve dysphagia. CRT of 40 Gy in 20 fractions may improve NSFS.

[Definitive Radiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation with Conditioning of Total Body Irradiation].

A 24-year-old man with acute lymphoblasticleukemia underwent allogeneicperipheral blood stem cell transplantation (allo-PBSCT)from a human leukocyte antigen-matched sibling after myeloablative conditioning, with a regimen including total body irradiation(TBI)(12 Gy/6 fractions), 6 years ago. The patient developed extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease(cGVHD)of the skin, mouth, liver, and gut four months after allo-PBSCT. Treatment with cyclosporine and prednisolone was necessary to control the cGVHD. Six years after allo-PBSCT, the patient experienced odynophagia and was diagnosed with cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(cT1bN1M0, cStage II B). Because we considered laryngeal preservation, risk of anastomotic leakage, and infection related to the operation, the patient was planned to receive chemoradio- therapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin. Regarding irradiation, the patient received radiotherapy(50.4 Gy/28 fractions)for a primary tumor and lymph node without an elective nodal area. The patient achieved complete response and remained disease- free without any treatment-related complications for 3 years.

Involved-field chemoradiotherapy for postoperative solitary lymph node recurrence of esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: For patients with postoperative lymph node (LN) recurrent esophageal cancer, the appropriate irradiation field in chemoradiotherapy (CRT) remains controversial. We assessed the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors related to involved-field CRT for postoperative solitary LN recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 21 patients who had received curative resection, with LN recurrence of ESCC. Patients received CRT using 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin or docetaxel, prescribed at 60 Gy in 30 fractions. We evaluated the pattern of failure, toxicities, survivals, and prognostic factors. We defined elective nodal failure (ENF) as recurrence in a regional LN without involved-field failure. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 32 months (range, 4-106 months). Nine patients experienced failure-4 (19%) within involved-field and 5 (24%) with distant metastasis. No patients had ENF. We observed no severe toxicities. The 2-year overall survival (OS) rate was 78%. In the univariate analysis of OS, two factors, the maximal diameter of the metastatic LN < 25 mm and the absence of serum p53 antibodies (s-p53-Abs), were associated with a significantly better prognosis (p = 0.025 and p = 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Involved-field CRT for postoperative solitary LN recurrence of ESCC did not cause ENF and was without severe toxicities. Two factors, a length of the metastatic LN < 25 mm and the absence of s-p53-Abs may improve the treatment outcome. Involved-field CRT is a treatment option worthy of consideration for postoperative solitary LN recurrence of ESCC.

A comparison of clinical outcomes between three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reduces the dose delivered to organs at risk. However, there have been few direct comparisons of IMRT with conventional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefit of IMRT in terms of toxicity and biochemical control. METHODS: The medical records of 203 consecutive patients with localized to non-metastatic (stage T1a-T3bN0M0) prostate cancer between 2007 and 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. The prescribed dose was 76 Gy delivered in 38 fractions in both the 3DCRT and IMRT treatment groups. The frequency of grade 2 or greater late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary toxicity and biochemical control were estimated by the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model with and without adjustment by the propensity score for treatment choice. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients were included in the study (3DCRT: 70 patients, IMRT: 89 patients). The median follow-up period was 4.7 years. The estimated 5-year cumulative risk of late GI toxicity was significantly lower in the IMRT group than in the 3DCRT group (3.6 vs 13.2%, respectively, p = 0.022). After adjustment by propensity score, IMRT remained associated with a lower risk of late GI toxicity (hazard ratio 0.22; 95% confidence interval 0.058-0.85; p = 0.028). The 5-year biochemical failure-free rate was 93.2% in the 3DCRT group and 95.4% in the IMRT group (non-significant difference). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of late GI toxicity was significantly lower in the IMRT group than in the 3DCRT group, while the biochemical control rates were no different between the two groups. These clinical data suggest the benefit of IMRT in the reduction of late GI toxicity.

Oligo-recurrence predicts favorable prognosis of brain-only oligometastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic radiosurgery or stereotactic radiotherapy: a multi-institutional study of 61 subjects.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the prognostic value of oligo-recurrence in patients with brain-only oligometastases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). METHODS: Patients treated with SRS or SRT for brain-only NSCLC oligometastases in 6 high-volume institutions in Japan between 1996 and 2008 were reviewed. Eligible patients met 1), 2), and 4) or 1), 3), and 4) of the following: 1) NSCLC with 1 to 4 brain metastases on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) treated with SRS or SRT; 2) control of the primary lesions (thorax) at the time of SRS or SRT for brain metastases (patients meeting this criterion formed the oligo-recurrence group); 3) with SRS or SRT for brain metastases, concomitant treatment for active primary lesions (thorax) with curative surgery or curative stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), or curative chemoradiotherapy (sync-oligometastases group); and 4) Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥70. RESULTS: The median overall survival (OS) of all 61 patients was 26 months (95 % CI: 17.5-34.5 months). The 2-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 60.7 and 15.7 %, respectively. Stratified by oligostatus, the sync-oligometastases group achieved a median OS of 18 months (95 % CI: 14.8-21.1 months) and a 5-year OS of 0 %, while the oligo-recurrence group achieved a median OS of 41 months (95 % CI: 27.8-54.2 months) and a 5-year OS of 18.6 %. On multivariate analysis, oligo-recurrence was the only significant independent factor related to a favorable prognosis (hazard ratio: 0.253 (95 % CI: 0.082-0.043) (p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of oligo-recurrence can predict a favorable prognosis of brain-only oligometastases in patients with NSCLC treated with SRS or SRT.