Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
1.
Med Teach ; 42(1): 24-29, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30707849

RESUMEN

Inpatient bedside teaching rounds provide an opportunity to foster effective interprofessional collaboration between members of the healthcare team. Although effective interprofessional practice has been shown to improve patient satisfaction, patient outcomes, and job satisfaction, there is limited literature for successful implementation of interprofessional teaching rounds. To address this gap, we have compiled 12 tips for conducting effective interprofessional bedside teaching rounds. These tips offer strategies for creating a structured rounding system, with clear delineation of expectations, defined opportunities for learning across disciplines, and active engagement of and respect for all team members. By adopting and promoting this model of interprofessional collaborative practice, the quality and effectiveness of bedside teaching rounds can be improved for the benefit of patients, trainees, and the team as a whole.


Asunto(s)
Relaciones Interprofesionales , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Rondas de Enseñanza/métodos , Conducta Cooperativa , Humanos , Participación del Paciente
3.
Clin Teach ; 21(4): e13727, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38273464

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Advancements in technology continue to transform the landscape of medical education. Virtual reality (VR) and remote simulation represent unique approaches to teaching students clinical skills through experiential learning. APPROACH: We developed, implemented and evaluated a virtual simulation-based course modelled on Kolb's Learning Cycle. A 5-day, 15-h virtual clerkship clinical skills curriculum designed to help students recognise a patient requiring urgent or emergent care was piloted in May 2020. VR and remote simulations facilitated concrete experiences, reflective observation, concept formation, and active experimentation. Curricular evaluation included analysis of usage, performance, self-assessment, and perceptions of educational value. EVALUATION: One hundred and fifty-six students completed 436 VR sessions (median 3 per student). Students repeated virtual cases, on average, 75% of the time, demonstrating improvement in average performance scores from 59% (attempt 1) to 72% (attempt 2). Post-course evaluations, completed by 109 (69.9%) students, demonstrated significant improvements in mean scores in all domains of a self-assessment based on emergent care skills. IMPLICATIONS: We developed and implemented a virtual clinical skills course that allowed students to progress through all four stages of Kolb's Learning Cycle. VR and remote simulations represent an opportunity for educators to reimagine and expand opportunities for experiential learning. The number of students accommodated, total virtual simulations completed, and positive student feedback suggests that this may be a feasible, acceptable, and scalable method for increasing opportunities for progression through Kolb's Learning Cycle. Further investigation into impact on educational outcomes is needed.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Realidad Virtual , Humanos , Curriculum , Entrenamiento Simulado/métodos , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas/métodos , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos , Prácticas Clínicas , Estudiantes de Medicina , Evaluación Educacional , Simulación por Computador
4.
ATS Sch ; 2(4): 651-664, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35079743

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Advancements in technology continue to transform the landscape of medical education. The need for technology-enhanced distance learning has been further accelerated by the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. The relatively recent emergence of virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and alternate reality has expanded the possible applications of simulation-based education (SBE) outside of the traditional simulation laboratory, making SBE accessible asynchronously and in geographically diverse locations. OBJECTIVE: In this review, we will explore the evidence base for use of emerging technologies in SBE as well as the strengths and limitations of each modality in a variety of settings. METHODS: PubMed was searched for peer-reviewed articles published between 1995 and 2021 that focused on VR in medical education. The search terms included medical education, VR, simulation, AR, and alternate reality. We also searched reference lists from selected articles to identify additional relevant studies. RESULTS: VR simulations have been used successfully in resuscitation, communication, and bronchoscopy training. In contrast, AR has demonstrated utility in teaching anatomical correlates with the use of diagnostic imaging, such as point-of-care ultrasound. Alternate reality has been used as a tool for developing clinical reasoning skills, longitudinal patient panel management, and crisis resource management via multiplayer platforms. CONCLUSION: Although each of these modalities has a variety of educational applications in health profession education, there are benefits and limitations to each that are important to recognize prior to the design and implementation of educational content, including differences in equipment requirements, cost, and scalability.

5.
ATS Sch ; 2(2): 265-277, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34409420

RESUMEN

Background: Dedicated ambulatory training during pulmonary and critical care medicine (PCCM) fellowships is often limited. A novel 2-year longitudinal outpatient pulmonary fellowship curriculum was previously developed, piloted, and studied. The exportability and potential impact of this ambulatory curriculum on PCCM fellowship training nationally is not known. Objective: We aim to understand the current state of ambulatory training in PCCM fellowships and the impact of a standardized outpatient curriculum on fellows' ambulatory knowledge and competency. Methods: Nineteen programs participated in the study from 2017 to 2019. Six programs received the first year of content, seven programs received the entire 2-year curriculum, and seven programs served as a control. Fellows, faculty, and program directors (PDs) completed a series of surveys assessing satisfaction with ambulatory education and the curriculum. Fellows completed a series of medical knowledge inventories, and programs submitted in-training exam scores. Results: A total of 221 fellows (39%) and 17 PDs (89%) completed the precurriculum surveys, and 38 (12%) fellows and 10 (53%) PDs completed postcurriculum surveys. Before curriculum implementation, only 34.4% of fellows rated the quality of their ambulatory education as good or outstanding compared with 57.9% at the end of the study. Eighty-five percent of faculty and 89% of PDs rated the curriculum as good or excellent. Faculty believed that the teaching scripts were easy to use (78.4%), were factually accurate (86.3%), and provided high-yield information (82.1%). The majority of PDs indicated that the curriculum positively impacted patient care (78%) and fulfilled an unmet educational need (100%), and most planned to continue the curriculum after the study (78%). Feedback surrounded the need for updated content based on recently published guidelines and studies. Conclusion: The curriculum is a standardized and feasible way to address a previously unmet need in PCCM fellowship education. PDs rated the curriculum highly and most plan to continue it in the future. Our limited data set suggests that the curriculum was well received by fellows and faculty and positively impacted perceptions of ambulatory education and preparedness for independent practice. Future study with a larger sample of fellows is needed to better understand the generalizability of these findings.

6.
ATS Sch ; 1(2): 161-169, 2020 Mar 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33870280

RESUMEN

Background: Ambulatory education is currently underemphasized in pulmonary and critical care medicine (PCCM) fellowship training. Existing clinic precepting models, originally developed for students and residents, do not meet the unique needs of fellow-level trainees. Objective: We aimed to develop and implement a novel fellow-led precepting model to improve ambulatory education for PCCM trainees. Methods: We performed a mixed-methods needs assessment, including surveys, focus groups, and direct observations, to explore perceptions of ambulatory training, define current precepting practices, and identify target areas for improvement. On the basis of these findings, we developed, implemented, and evaluated a novel model for PCCM outpatient precepting. Results: A targeted needs assessment identified that current precepting practices did not meet fellows' needs for graduated autonomy, development of assessment and management skills, and self-directed learning. We developed and implemented a novel, learner-driven precepting model (Set the Stage, Tell the Story, Educational Goals, Preliminary Plan, Uncertainties, Plan Recap [STEP-UP]), designed to prioritize clinical reasoning skills and self-identification of learning goals. Implementation of the STEP-UP model improved perceptions of overall outpatient training and precepting. However, we faced several barriers to uptake of the new model, including increased cognitive burden of integrating a new process. Conclusion: A robust assessment of ambulatory education at a single PCCM fellowship program identified a need to align precepting processes with the unique goals of advanced trainees. We developed a learner-driven precepting model focused on development of clinical reasoning skills and self-directed educational objectives. Additional study is warranted to refine, adapt, and test the model in different setting.

7.
ATS Sch ; 1(4): 384-394, 2020 Aug 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33870309

RESUMEN

Background: Whether graduating pulmonary and critical care medicine (PCCM) fellows feel adequately trained in interstitial lung disease (ILD) remains unknown. In addition, there are no published data describing the current approach to educating trainees about ILD. Objective: To characterize the present state of ILD training during fellowship and to determine graduating PCCM fellows' perceived abilities to diagnose and manage ILD. Methods: We surveyed PCCM fellowship program directors nationwide and compared their perceptions of graduating fellows' abilities to diagnose, provide initial management to, and offer longitudinal care to patients with ILD using a series of unpaired t tests. We also inquired about existing practices for educating fellows about ILD. We then surveyed graduating PCCM fellows from 19 different preselected programs to assess comfort level with ILD in comparison with other core clinical domains. Results: Program director respondents (n = 74, 40% response rate) rated graduating fellows' abilities to establish specific ILD diagnoses and to provide initial management similarly (4.3 ± 0.8 on five-point Likert scale), whereas the ability to provide longitudinal expert care was rated significantly lower (3.8 ± 0.9, P = 0.001). Most respondents (n = 52, 70.3%) reported having dedicated outpatient ILD specialists with whom fellows could rotate, but only half required this rotation. In addition, very few (n = 17, 23.0%) reported that a majority of patients with suspected or newly diagnosed ILD were scheduled in fellow clinics, many of whom received subsequent longitudinal care from dedicated ILD specialists. Among 71 third-year fellow respondents, confidence in managing ILD was rated poorly (3.2 ± 1.0 on a five-point Likert scale) in contrast to more common diseases like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (4.4 ± 0.7, P < 0.001) and asthma (4.2 ± 0.8, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Trainee exposure to ILD in both clinical and educational settings varied across PCCM fellowships nationwide. Fellows nearing graduation were significantly less confident in their ability to manage ILD compared with other more common pulmonary diseases.

10.
J Grad Med Educ ; 9(6): 748-754, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29270266

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Video recording of resuscitation from fixed camera locations has been used to assess adherence to guidelines and provide feedback on performance. However, inpatient cardiac arrests often happen in unpredictable locations and crowded rooms, making video recording of these events problematic. OBJECTIVE: We sought to understand the feasibility of Google Glass (GG) as a method for recording inpatient cardiac arrests and capturing salient resuscitation factors for post-event review. METHODS: This observational study involved recording simulated cardiac arrest events on inpatient medical wards. Each simulation was reviewed by 3 methods: in-room physician direct observation, stationary video camera (SVC), and GG. Nurse and physician specialists analyzed the videos for global visibility and audibility, as well as recording quality of predefined resuscitation events and behaviors. Resident code leaders were surveyed regarding attitudes toward GG use in the clinical emergency setting. RESULTS: Of 11 simulated cardiac arrest events, 9 were successfully recorded by all observation methods (1 GG failure, 1 SVC failure). GG was judged slightly better than SVC recording for average global visualization (3.95 versus 3.15, P = .0003) and average global audibility (4.77 versus 4.42, P = .002). Of the GG videos, 19% had limitations in overall interpretability compared with 35% of SVC recordings (P = .039). All 10 survey respondents agreed that GG was easy to use; however, 2 found it distracting and 3 were uncomfortable with future use during actual resuscitations. CONCLUSIONS: GG is a feasible and acceptable method for capturing simulated resuscitation events in the inpatient setting.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Anteojos , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Entrenamiento Simulado/organización & administración , Grabación en Video , Competencia Clínica , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Internado y Residencia , Maniquíes , Philadelphia , Proyectos Piloto
11.
Ann Am Thorac Soc ; 13(4): 540-4, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26862999

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has mandated that pulmonary fellows practice evidence-based medicine "across multiple care settings." Currently, most clinical fellowship training is inpatient based, suggesting that more robust fellowship training in outpatient pulmonology is needed. No standardized ambulatory pulmonary curriculum is currently available. OBJECTIVES: To design, implement and test the feasibility of a standardized, case-based outpatient curriculum implemented for pulmonary fellows at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. METHODS: A list of 20 topics in ambulatory pulmonology was generated and was used to create a series of literature-based teaching scripts, which served as the foundation for twice-monthly small group teaching sessions. Before implementation, the fellows were asked to complete a survey regarding their impressions of their existing outpatient training and their competency in ambulatory patient care. Participants were surveyed again at 6 and 12 months thereafter. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fellow survey respondents reported that the curriculum improved the overall ambulatory educational experience. Before implementation, only 6 of 12 fellows (50%) agreed that their current instruction on relevant outpatient pulmonary topics was adequate, compared with 100% after the curriculum (P = 0.01, n = 10). In addition, only five fellows (42%) initially agreed or strongly agreed that their current outpatient educational experience had prepared them well for independent pulmonary practice, compared with 90% on the 12-month survey (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: We created a standardized outpatient pulmonary curriculum and demonstrated its feasibility in positively influencing fellows' perceived competency in ambulatory pulmonology. Additional assessment of knowledge, performance outcomes, and applicability at other institutions is needed.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/normas , Curriculum/normas , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/normas , Becas/normas , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Neumología/educación , Acreditación , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Pennsylvania , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
12.
Chest ; 148(3): 833-838, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25811774

RESUMEN

Patient satisfaction is an important factor for consideration in pulmonary practice management. Although evidence regarding the correlation of patient satisfaction with care quality remains mixed, there is an increasing national emphasis on the importance of patient experience in physician reimbursement, credentialing, and public opinion. The introduction of the Affordable Care Act and value-based care purchasing has tied a portion of reimbursement to patient experience surveys and other metrics related to care quality rather than quantity. Through nationally recognized assessments such as the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) surveys and easily accessible websites such as RateMD and Yelp, patient opinion of care quality is more widely available and more important to pulmonary practice than ever before. Physician credentialing may also be impacted by the American Board of Internal Medicine's Maintenance of Certification program and potential future requirements for physicians to assess the patient experience to maintain certification. In the continually evolving health-care delivery, credentialing, and reimbursement climate, a thorough understanding of the increasing importance of patient satisfaction as well as strategies for successfully approaching this issue are essential to modern pulmonary inpatient and outpatient practice management.


Asunto(s)
Satisfacción del Paciente , Neumología/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Humanos , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA