Adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy for spinal cord ischemia after complex aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) with paraplegia or paraparesis is a devastating complication of complex aortic repair (CAR). Treatment includes cerebrospinal fluid drainage, maintenance of hemoglobin concentration (>10 g/L), and elevating mean arterial blood pressure. Animal and human case series have reported improvements in SCI outcomes with hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). We reviewed our center's experience with HBOT as a rescue treatment for spinal cord ischemia post-CAR in addition to standard treatment. METHODS: A retrospective review of the University Health Network's Hyperbaric Medicine Unit treatment database identified HBOT sessions for patients with SCI post-CAR between January 2013 and June 2021. Mean estimates of overall motor function scores were determined for postoperative, pre-HBOT, post-HBOT (within 4 hours of the final HBOT session), and at the final assessment (last available in-hospital evaluation) using a linear mixed model. A subgroup analysis compared the mean estimates of overall motor function scores between improvement and non-improvement groups at given timepoints. Improvement of motor function was defined as either a ≥2 point increase in overall muscle function score in patients with paraparesis or an upward change in motor deficit categorization (para/monoplegia, paraparesis, and no deficit). Subgroup analysis was performed by stratifying by improvement or non-improvement of motor function from pre-HBOT to final evaluation. RESULTS: Thirty patients were treated for SCI. Pre-HBOT, the motor deficit categorization was 10 paraplegia, three monoplegia, 16 paraparesis, and one unable to assess. At the final assessment, 14 patients demonstrated variable degrees of motor function improvement; eight patients demonstrated full motor function recovery. Seven of the 10 patients with paraplegia remained paraplegic despite HBOT. The estimated mean of overall muscle function score for pre-HBOT was 16.6 ± 2.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.9-22.3) and for final assessment was 23.4 ± 2.9 (95% CI, 17.7-29.1). The estimated mean difference between pre-HBOT and final assessment overall muscle function score was 6.7 ± 3.1 (95% CI, 0.6-16.1). The estimated mean difference of the overall muscle function score between pre-HBOT and final assessment for the improved group was 16.6 ± 3.5 (95% CI, 7.5-25.7) vs -4.9 ± 4.2 (95% CI, -16.0 to 6.2) for the non-improved group. CONCLUSIONS: HBOT, in addition to standard treatment, may potentially improve recovery in spinal cord function following SCI post-CAR. However, the potential benefits of HBOT are not equally distributed among subgroups.

A Prospective Cohort Study of Acute Pain and In-Hospital Opioid Consumption After Cardiac Surgery: Associations With Psychological and Medical Factors and Chronic Postsurgical Pain.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the association of acute pain intensity and opioid consumption after cardiac surgery with chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) can facilitate implementation of personalized prevention measures to improve outcomes. The objectives were to (1) examine acute pain intensity and daily mg morphine equivalent dose (MME/day) trajectories after cardiac surgery, (2) identify factors associated with pain intensity and opioid consumption trajectories, and (3) assess whether pain intensity and opioid consumption trajectories are risk factors for CPSP. METHODS: Prospective observational cohort study design conducted between August 2012 and June 2020 with 1-year follow-up. A total of 1115 adults undergoing cardiac surgery were recruited from the preoperative clinic. Of the 959 participants included in the analyses, 573 completed the 1-year follow-up. Main outcomes were pain intensity scores and MME/day consumption over the first 6 postoperative days (PODs) analyzed using latent growth mixture modeling (GMM). Secondary outcome was 12-month CPSP status. RESULTS: Participants were mostly male (76%), with a mean age of 61 ± 13 years. Three distinct linear acute postoperative pain intensity trajectories were identified: "initially moderate pain intensity remaining moderate" (n = 62), "initially mild pain intensity remaining mild" (n = 221), and "initially moderate pain intensity decreasing to mild" (n = 251). Age, sex, emotional distress in response to bodily sensations, and sensitivity to pain traumatization were significantly associated with pain intensity trajectories. Three distinct opioid consumption trajectories were identified on the log MME/day: "initially high level of MME/day gradually decreasing" (n = 89), "initially low level of MME/day remaining low" (n = 108), and "initially moderate level of MME/day decreasing to low" (n = 329). Age and emotional distress in response to bodily sensations were associated with trajectory membership. Individuals in the "initially mild pain intensity remaining mild" trajectory were less likely than those in the "initially moderate pain intensity remaining moderate" trajectory to report CPSP (odds ratio [95% confidence interval, CI], 0.23 [0.06-0.88]). No significant associations were observed between opioid consumption trajectory membership and CPSP status (odds ratio [95% CI], 0.84 [0.28-2.54] and 0.95 [0.22-4.13]). CONCLUSIONS: Those with moderate pain intensity right after surgery are more likely to develop CPSP suggesting that those patients should be flagged early on in their postoperative recovery to attempt to alter their trajectory and prevent CPSP. Emotional distress in response to bodily sensations is the only consistent modifiable factor associated with both pain and opioid trajectories.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for treatment of COVID-19-related parosmia: a case report.

Parosmia is a qualitative olfactory dysfunction characterized by distortion of odor perception. Traditional treatments for parosmia include olfactory training and steroids. Some patients infected with COVID-19 have developed chronic parosmia as a result of their infection. Here, we present the case of a patient who developed parosmia after a COVID-19 infection that was not improved by traditional treatments but found significant improvement after hyperbaric oxygen therapy[A1].

Predictors of one year chronic post-surgical pain trajectories following thoracic surgery.

PURPOSE: Chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) is a highly prevalent complication following thoracic surgery. This is a prospective cohort study that aims to describe the pain trajectories of patients undergoing thoracic surgery beginning preoperatively and up to 1 year after surgery METHODS: Two hundred and seventy nine patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery were enrolled. Participants filled out a preoperative questionnaire containing questions about their sociodemographic information, comorbidities as well as several psychological and pain-related statuses. They were then followed-up during their immediate postoperative period and at the three, six and 12 month time-points to track their postoperative pain, complications and pain-related outcomes. Growth mixture modeling was used to construct pain trajectories. RESULTS: The first trajectory is characterized by 185 patients (78.1%) with mild pain intensity across the 12 month period. The second is characterized by 32 patients (7.5%) with moderate pain intensity immediately after surgery which decreases markedly by 3 months and remains low at the 12 month follow-up. The final trajectory is characterized by 20 patients (8.4%) with moderate pain intensity immediately after surgery which persists at 12 months. Patients with moderate to severe postoperative pain intensity were much more likely to develop CPSP compared to patients with mild pain intensity. Initial pain intensity levels immediately following surgery as well as levels of pain catastrophizing at baseline were predicting pain trajectory membership. None of the surgical or anesthetic-related variables were significantly associated with pain trajectory membership. CONCLUSION: Patients who undergo thoracic surgery can have postoperative pain that follows one of the three different types of trajectories. Higher levels of immediate postoperative pain and preoperative pain catastrophizing were associated with moderately severe CPSP.

Hyperbaric Oxygen for Radiation Necrosis of the Brain.

INTRODUCTION: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) shows promising results in treating radionecrosis (RN) but there is limited evidence for its use in brain RN. The purpose of this study is to report the outcomes of using HBOT for symptomatic brain RN at a single institution. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients with symptomatic brain RN between 2008 and 2018 and was treated with HBOT. Demographic data, steroid use, clinical response, radiologic response and toxicities were collected. The index time for analysis was the first day of HBOT. The primary endpoint was clinical improvement of a presenting symptom, including steroid dose reduction. RESULTS: Thirteen patients who received HBOT for symptomatic RN were included. The median time from last brain radiation therapy to presenting symptoms of brain RN was 6 months. Twelve patients (92%) had clinical improvement with median time to symptom improvement of 33 days (range 1-109 days). One patient had transient improvement after HBOT but had recurrent symptomatic RN at 12 months. Of the eight patients with evaluable follow-up MRI, four patients had radiological improvement while four had stable necrosis appearance. Two patients had subsequent deterioration in MRI appearances, one each in the background of initial radiologic improvement and stability. Median survival was 15 months with median follow-up of 10 months. Seven patients reported side effects attributable to HBOT (54%), four of which were otologic in origin. CONCLUSIONS: HBOT is a safe and effective treatment for brain RN. HBOT showed clinical and radiologic improvement or stability in most patients. Prospective studies to further evaluate the effectiveness and side effects of HBOT are needed.

Utilisation de l'oxygénothérapie hyperbare à la suite de séances de radiothérapie entraînant la mort du tissu cérébral. Introduction: Si l'oxygénothérapie hyperbare (OHB) laisse entrevoir des résultats prometteurs dans le traitement des radionécroses (RN), les preuves demeurent limitées quant à son utilisation dans le cas de RN du cerveau. L'objectif de cette étude est de présenter des résultats de recherche liés, dans un seul établissement de santé, à l'utilisation de l'OHB dans le cas de RN symptomatiques du cerveau. Méthodes: Pour ce faire, nous avons effectué une analyse rétrospective des dossiers de patients atteints de RN symptomatiques du cerveau entre 2008 et 2018 et ayant été traités lors de séances d'OHB. Nous avons aussi recueilli des données de nature démographique et d'autres portant sur l'utilisation de stéroïdes, sur la réponse clinique et radiologique des patients et sur les toxicités. Le point de départ (index time) de notre étude a été la première séance d'OHB alors que son principal indicateur de résultat a été l'amélioration sur le plan clinique d'un symptôme particulier, ce qui a inclus une réduction des doses de stéroïdes. Résultats: Au total, treize patients atteints de RN symptomatiques ont été inclus dans cette étude. Le temps médian entre une ultime séance de radiothérapie et l'apparition de symptômes de RN a été de 6 mois. Douze patients (92 %) ont donné à voir une amélioration de leur état médical, la période médiane d'amélioration de leurs symptômes étant de 33 jours (étendue : 1­109 jours). On a observé chez un seul patient une amélioration transitoire à la suite de séances d'OHB, les symptômes de RN étant réapparus au douzième mois. Sur les huit patients ayant subi un examen d'imagerie de suivi, quatre d'entre eux ont montré des signes d'amélioration sur le plan radiologique tandis que quatre autres ont donné à voir une RN stable. Fait à noter, deux patients chez qui l'on avait observé une amélioration radiologique initiale ou une stabilité de leur état ont montré une détérioration ultérieure à la suite d'un examen d'IRM. Le taux de survie médian de ces patients et leur suivi médian ont été respectivement de 15 mois et de 10 mois. Enfin, sept d'entre eux ont signalé des effets secondaires attribuables à l'OHB, dont quatre d'origine otologique. Conclusions: L'OHB demeure un traitement efficace et sécuritaire dans le cas des RN du cerveau. Elle a permis d'observer chez la plupart des patients une amélioration clinique et radiologique ou à tout le moins une stabilité de leurs symptômes. Cela dit, des études prospectives sont nécessaires afin de pouvoir évaluer plus en profondeur son efficacité et ses effets secondaires.

Smoking, Pain Intensity, and Opioid Consumption 1-3 Months After Major Surgery: A Retrospective Study in a Hospital-Based Transitional Pain Service.

Introduction: The present study investigated the associations between smoking, pain, and opioid consumption in the 3 months after major surgery in patients seen by the Transitional Pain Service. Current smoking status and lifetime pack-years were expected to be related to higher pain intensity, more opioid use, and poorer opioid weaning after surgery. Methods: A total of 239 patients reported smoking status in their presurgical assessment (62 smokers, 92 past smokers, and 85 never smokers). Pain and daily opioid use were assessed in hospital before postsurgical discharge, at first outpatient visit (median of 1 month postsurgery), and at last outpatient visit (median of 3 months postsurgery). Pain was measured using numeric rating scale. Morphine equivalent daily opioid doses were calculated for each patient. Results: Current smokers reported significantly higher pain intensity (p < .05) at 1 month postsurgery than never smokers and past smokers. Decline in opioid consumption differed significantly by smoking status, with both current and past smokers reporting a less than expected decline in daily opioid consumption (p < .05) at 3 months. Decline in opioid consumption was also related to pack-years, with those reporting higher pack-years having a less than expected decline in daily opioid consumption at 3 months (p < .05). Conclusions: Smoking status may be an important modifiable risk factor for pain intensity and opioid use after surgery. Implications: In a population with complex postsurgical pain, smoking was associated with greater pain intensity at 1 month after major surgery and less opioid weaning 3 months after surgery. Smoking may be an important modifiable risk factor for pain intensity and opioid use after surgery.

Dexmedetomidine versus Propofol Sedation Reduces Delirium after Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium (POD) is a serious complication after cardiac surgery. Use of dexmedetomidine to prevent delirium is controversial. The authors hypothesized that dexmedetomidine sedation after cardiac surgery would reduce the incidence of POD. METHODS: After institutional ethics review board approval, and informed consent, a single-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients 60 yr or older undergoing cardiac surgery. Patients with a history of serious mental illness, delirium, and severe dementia were excluded. Upon admission to intensive care unit (ICU), patients received either dexmedetomidine (0.4 µg/kg bolus followed by 0.2 to 0.7 µg kg h infusion) or propofol (25 to 50 µg kg min infusion) according to a computer-generated randomization code in blocks of four. Assessment of delirium was performed with confusion assessment method for ICU or confusion assessment method after discharge from ICU at 12-h intervals during the 5 postoperative days. Primary outcome was the incidence of POD. RESULTS: POD was present in 16 of 91 (17.5%) and 29 of 92 (31.5%) patients in dexmedetomidine and propofol groups, respectively (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.92; P = 0.028). Median onset of POD was on postoperative day 2 (1 to 4 days) versus 1 (1 to 4 days), P = 0.027, and duration of POD 2 days (1 to 4 days) versus 3 days (1 to 5 days), P = 0.04, in dexmedetomidine and propofol groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with propofol, dexmedetomidine sedation reduced incidence, delayed onset, and shortened duration of POD in elderly patients after cardiac surgery. The absolute risk reduction for POD was 14%, with a number needed to treat of 7.1.

The prescription of medical cannabis by a transitional pain service to wean a patient with complex pain from opioid use following liver transplantation: a case report.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this case report is to describe a patient with a preoperative complex pain syndrome who underwent liver transplantation and was able to reduce his opioid consumption significantly following the initiation of treatment with medical cannabis. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 57-yr-old male with a history of hepatitis C cirrhosis underwent liver transplantation. Preoperatively, he was taking hydromorphone 2-8 mg⋅day(-1) for chronic abdominal pain. Postoperatively, he was given intravenous patient-controlled analgesia through which he received hydromorphone 30 mg⋅day(-1). Our multidisciplinary Transitional Pain Service was involved with managing his moderate to severe acute postsurgical pain in hospital and continued with weaning him from opioid medications after discharge. It was difficult to wean the patient from opioids, and he was subsequently given medical cannabis at six weeks postoperatively with remarkable effect. By the fifth postoperative month, his use of opioids had tapered to 6 mg⋅day(-1) of hydromorphone, and his functional status was excellent on this regimen. CONCLUSION: Reductions in opioid consumption were achieved with the administration of medical cannabis in a patient with acute postoperative pain superimposed on a chronic pain syndrome and receiving high doses of opioids. Concurrent benefits of initiating medical cannabis may include improvements in pain profile and functional status along with reductions in opioid-related side effects. This highlights the potential for medical cannabis as an adjunct medication for weaning patients from opioid use.

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy: A New Treatment for Chronic Pain?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is a treatment providing 100% oxygen at a pressure greater than that at sea level. HBOT is becoming increasingly recognized as a potential treatment modality for a broad range of ailments, including chronic pain. In this narrative review, we discuss the current understanding of pathophysiology of nociceptive, inflammatory and neuropathic pain, and the body of animal studies addressing mechanisms by which HBOT may ameliorate these different types of pain. Finally, we review clinical studies suggesting that HBOT may be useful in treating chronic pain syndromes, including chronic headache, fibromyalgia, complex regional pain syndrome, and trigeminal neuralgia. DATABASE AND DATA TREATMENT: A comprehensive search through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies relating to HBOT and pain was performed using the following keywords: hyperbaric oxygen therapy or hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT), nociceptive pain, inflammatory pain, neuropathic pain, HBOT AND pain, HBOT AND headache, HBOT AND fibromyalgia, HBOT AND complex regional pain syndrome, and HBOT AND trigeminal neuralgia. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies examining the role of HBOT in animal models of pain and human clinical trials were found and reviewed for this narrative review. CONCLUSIONS: HBOT has been shown to reduce pain using animal models. Early clinical research indicates HBOT may also be useful in modulating human pain; however, further studies are required to determine whether HBOT is a safe and efficacious treatment modality for chronic pain conditions.

Perioperative management of a patient undergoing Clagett window closure stabilized on Suboxone® for chronic pain: a case report.

PURPOSE: Buprenorphine is a semisynthetic opioid with both agonist and antagonist activity at the opioid receptor. Currently, buprenorphine is commonly available in sublingual preparations combined with naloxone (e.g., Suboxone®, Subutex®). There has been increased use of buprenorphine derivatives in the areas of substance addiction and chronic pain. Nevertheless, there is limited and conflicting information in the literature pertaining to the optimal management of buprenorphine-stabilized patients presenting for surgery. We present our experience with a chronic pain patient on buprenorphine presenting for thoracic surgery. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 47-yr-old female with a history of a Clagett window procedure for pulmonary aspergillosis and subsequent chronic pain presented to our institute for a window closure procedure. Preoperatively, her pain regimen included Suboxone 16 mg bid, which was continued perioperatively. Postoperatively, her course was complicated by suboptimal pain at the surgical site requiring in excess of 70 mg/24 hr of intravenous hydromorphone. Liberal addition of long-acting oral opioids was ineffective in improving pain management. Eventually, concern was raised regarding opioid receptor blockade by her long-acting Suboxone, and the decision was made to taper her Suboxone. Following this, her pain control improved dramatically and her opioid requirements were markedly reduced. By discharge, her Suboxone was discontinued and she was managed on oral hydromorphone. CONCLUSION: In a chronic pain patient continued on Suboxone perioperatively, significant improvement in control of postoperative pain was observed following tapered doses, and eventually her use of Suboxone was discontinued. This case highlights the potential for opioid receptor blockade by Suboxone, which can interfere with acute pain management.

Use of preoperative antidepressants is not associated with postoperative hospital length of stay.

PURPOSE: Antidepressant medications are commonly prescribed for the treatment of depression, anxiety, and chronic pain. Their use may lead to a number of side effects with important implications in the perioperative period. Our aim was to examine the effect of preoperative antidepressant administration on post-surgical hospital length of stay (LOS) in elective non-cardiac surgery patients. DESIGN: Historical cohort study. METHODS: Demographic and preoperative data were collected by chart review for all non-cardiac surgery patients who were assessed in the preoperative consult clinic from April 2008 through February 2009. Patients were grouped according to whether or not they were taking antidepressant medications. Median length of stay was compared between patients who took antidepressants preoperatively and those who did not. RESULTS: Data were collected for 3,692 patients. Two hundred eighty-nine (7.8%) patients were taking antidepressants preoperatively. Use of antidepressants was not associated with an increased hospital LOS. The median LOS was four days both for patients who took antidepressants preoperatively (95% confidence interval [CI] 4 to 4) and for those who did not (95% CI 3 to 5) (P = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative use of antidepressant medications was not associated with increased postoperative hospital LOS following elective non-cardiac surgery.

Untreated preoperative depression is not associated with postoperative arrhythmias in CABG patients.

PURPOSE: The mechanism by which depression affects postoperative outcome may involve arrhythmias. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether untreated depression is associated with an increased incidence of postoperative arrhythmias in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). METHODS: One hundred seven patients were assessed for signs of depression with the Prime-MD Patient Health Questionnaire (brief PHQ) one week before surgery and subsequently underwent Holter monitoring for 48-72 hr postoperatively. The incidences of atrial fibrillation (AF); supraventricular tachycardia (SVT); ventricular tachycardia (VT), defined as three or more consecutive beats at a cycle length less than 600 msec; ventricular fibrillation (VF); and average heart rate (HR) were recorded in patients with and without signs of depression. RESULTS: The incidence of preoperative untreated depression was 27% (29/107). Twenty patients had mild depression (brief PHQ score of 5-9), seven patients had moderate depression (a score of 10-14), and two patients had severe depression (a score of 20). The incidences of postoperative AF, SVT, and non-sustained VT in depressed and non-depressed patients were 37.9% vs 35.9%, respectively (P = 0.50), 34.4% vs 52.5%, respectively (P = 0.07), and 17.2% vs 37.1%, respectively (P = 0.04). The average (SD) postoperative HR was similar in both groups [95 (12) beats·min(-1) in depressed patients and 92 (10) beats·min(-1) in non-depressed patients, (P = 0.25)]. Multivariate regression analysis showed that older age, but not depression, was a risk factor for postoperative arrhythmia. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative untreated depression is not related to postoperative arrhythmia in the early postoperative period in patients undergoing elective CABG. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (number: NCT00622024).

Type of anesthesia and postoperative delirium after vascular surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between general (GA), regional (RA), and local (LA) anesthetic techniques with respect to the development of delirium after vascular surgery. The authors hypothesized that patients undergoing GA for vascular surgery would have a higher incidence of postoperative delirium. The role of LA with respect to postoperative delirium in vascular surgery patients previously has not been reported. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Tertiary referral center, university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 500 patients undergoing vascular surgical procedures. INTERVENTIONS: Based on the chosen anesthetic technique, all patients were divided into GA, RA, and LA groups, respectively. Exclusion criteria were patients with preoperative dementia or abnormal level of consciousness, patients undergoing open abdominal aneurysm repair surgery, and patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. All anesthetic techniques were conducted according to routine institutional practices. Patients in both the RA and LA groups received intravenous sedation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-six (79%) patients received GA, 73 (15%) RA, and 31 (6%) LA. The overall incidence of delirium was 19.4% and rates were similar among the 3 groups, with 73 (18.4%) patients in the GA group, 17 (23.2%) in the RA group, and 7 (22.5%) in the LA group (p = 0.56). Patients in the LA group were more likely to have emergency surgery and also had a higher incidence of previous cerebrovascular accidents or transient ischemic attacks. There was no significant difference with respect to either onset or duration of delirium among the 3 groups. Median length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality were similar among the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Delirium rates after vascular surgery were similar with local, regional, or general anesthesia techniques. The presence of risk factors for the development of postoperative delirium should not influence the type of anesthesia provided.

The role of routine cardiac investigations before hyperbaric oxygen treatment.

Cardiac complications are a rare but potentially serious consequence of hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT), resulting from increased blood pressure and decreased heart rate and cardiac output associated with treatment. These physiologic changes are generally well-tolerated by patients without preexisting cardiac conditions, although those with known or undetected cardiac disease may be more vulnerable to treatment complications. Currently, there are no universally accepted guidelines for pre-HBOT cardiac screening to identify these patients at heightened risk, leading to variability in practice patterns. In the absence of HBOT-specific evidence, screening protocols might be adapted from the diving medicine community; however, given the important differences in physiological stressors, these may not be entirely applicable to patients undergoing HBOT. Traditional cardiac investigations such as electro- and echo-cardiograms are limited in their ability to detect relevant risk modifying states in the pre-HBOT patient, stymieing their cost-effectiveness as routine tests. In the absence of strong evidence to support routine cardiac investigation, we argue that a comprehensive history and physical exam - tailored to identify high-risk patients based on clinical parameters - may serve as a more practical screening tool. While certain unique patient groups such as those undergoing dialysis or with implanted cardiac devices may warrant specialised assessment, thorough evaluation may be sufficient to identify many patients unlikely to benefit from cardiac investigation in the pre-HBOT setting. A clinical decision-making tool based on suggested low-risk and high-risk features is offered to guide the use of targeted cardiac investigation prior to HBOT.

Safety of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in patients with heart failure: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has several hemodynamic effects including increases in afterload (due to vasoconstriction) and decreases in cardiac output. This, along with rare reports of pulmonary edema during emergency treatment, has led providers to consider HBOT relatively contraindicated in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, there is limited evidence regarding the safety of elective HBOT in patients with heart failure (HF), and no existing reports of complications among patients with HF and preserved LVEF. We aimed to retrospectively review patients with preexisting diagnoses of HF who underwent elective HBOT, to analyze HBOT-related acute HF complications. METHODS: Research Ethics Board approvals were received to retrospectively review patient charts. Patients with a history of HF with either preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), mid-range ejection fraction (HFmEF), or reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who underwent elective HBOT at two Hyperbaric Centers (Toronto General Hospital, Rouge Valley Hyperbaric Medical Centre) between June 2018 and December 2020 were reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients with a history of HF underwent HBOT, completing an average of 39 (range 6-62) consecutive sessions at 2.0 atmospheres absolute (ATA) (n = 11) or at 2.4 ATA (n = 12); only two patients received fewer than 10 sessions. Thirteen patients had HFpEF (mean LVEF 55 ± 7%), and seven patients had HFrEF (mean LVEF 35 ± 8%) as well as concomitantly decreased right ventricle function (n = 5), moderate/severe tricuspid regurgitation (n = 3), or pulmonary hypertension (n = 5). The remaining three patients had HFmEF (mean LVEF 44 ± 4%). All but one patient was receiving fluid balance therapy either with loop diuretics or dialysis. Twenty-one patients completed HBOT without complications. We observed symptoms consistent with HBOT-related HF exacerbation in two patients. One patient with HFrEF (LVEF 24%) developed dyspnea attributed to pulmonary edema after the fourth treatment, and later admitted to voluntarily holding his diuretics before the session. He was managed with increased oral diuretics as an outpatient, and ultimately completed a course of 33 HBOT sessions uneventfully. Another patient with HFpEF (LVEF 64%) developed dyspnea and desaturation after six sessions, requiring hospital admission. Acute coronary ischemia and pulmonary embolism were ruled out, and an elevated BNP and normal LVEF on echocardiogram confirmed a diagnosis of pulmonary edema in the context of HFpEF. Symptoms subsided after diuretic treatment and the patient was discharged home in stable condition, but elected not to resume HBOT. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HF, including HFpEF, may develop HF symptoms during HBOT and warrant ongoing surveillance. However, these patients can receive HBOT safely after optimization of HF therapy and fluid restriction.

One-year opioid consumption trajectories among individuals receiving multidisciplinary postsurgical care: a single-center observational study from the Toronto General Hospital Transitional Pain Service.

INTRODUCTION: The Transitional Pain Service (TPS) is an innovative, personalized approach to postsurgical opioid consumption and pain management. The objectives of this study were to identify trajectories of opioid consumption and pain intensity within 12 months after initiating treatment through the TPS, identify biopsychosocial factors associated with trajectory membership, and examine the relationship between trajectory membership and other outcomes of interest over the same 12-month period. METHODS: Consecutive patients referred to the TPS were included in the present study (n=466). After providing informed consent, they completed self-report questionnaires at the initial visit at the TPS (either pre surgery or post surgery) and at every TPS visit until 12 months. Growth mixture modeling was used to derive trajectories and identify associated factors. RESULTS: Results showed three distinct opioid consumption trajectories for both presurgical opioid consumers and opioid-naïve patients. These trajectories all decreased over time and among those who were consuming opioids before surgery that returned to presurgical levels. Being man, having a substance use disorder, or reporting higher levels of pain interference were associated with higher daily opioid consumption for presurgical opioid consumers. For presurgical opioid-naïve individuals, higher opioid consumption trajectories were associated with higher levels of psychological distress. Five pain intensity trajectories were identified, and there were no significant association between opioid consumption and pain intensity trajectories. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that opioid consumption and pain intensity trajectories mostly decrease after surgery in a high-risk population enrolled in a TPS. Results also show heterogeneity in postsurgical recovery and highlight the importance of using personalized interventions to optimize individual trajectories.

Gabapentin reduces preoperative anxiety and pain catastrophizing in highly anxious patients prior to major surgery: a blinded randomized placebo-controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Gabapentin is increasingly being used for the treatment of postoperative pain and a variety of psychiatric diseases, including chronic anxiety disorders. Trials have reported mixed results when gabapentin has been administered for the treatment of preoperative anxiety. We tested the hypothesis that gabapentin 1,200 mg vs placebo would reduce preoperative anxiety in patients who exhibit moderate to high preoperative anxiety. METHODS: A blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted from September 2009 to June 2011 at the Toronto General Hospital. Following ethics approval and informed consent, 50 female patients with a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) anxiety score of greater than or equal to 5/10 consented to receive either gabapentin 1,200 mg (n = 25) or placebo (n = 25) prior to surgery. Randomization was computer generated, and the Investigational Pharmacy was responsible for the blinding and dispensing of medication. All patients and care providers, including physicians, nurses, and study personnel, were blinded to group allocation. Before administering the study medication, baseline anxiety levels were measured using a NRS, the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventories, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale-20. Baseline pain intensity (0-10 NRS) and level of sedation (0-10 NRS and Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale [RASS]) were also measured. Two hours after the administration of gabapentin or placebo (prior to surgery), patients again rated their anxiety, pain, and sedation levels using the same measurement tools as at baseline. The main outcome was a reduction in preoperative anxiety. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (22 treated with gabapentin 1,200 mg and 22 treated with placebo) were included in the analysis of the primary outcome. Analysis of covariance in which pre-drug NRS anxiety scores were used as the covariate showed that post-drug preoperative NRS anxiety (Effect size, 1.44; confidence interval [CI] 0.19 to 2.70) and pain catastrophizing (Effect size, 0.43; CI 0.12 to 0.74) scores were significantly lower in the gabapentin group than in the placebo control group, respectively. Post-drug sedation (Effect size, -3.02; CI -4.28 to -1.77) and RASS (Effect size, 0.41; CI 0.12 to 0.71) scores were significantly higher in the gabapentin group than in the placebo group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of gabapentin 1,200 mg prior to surgery reduces preoperative NRS anxiety scores and pain catastrophizing scores and increases sedation prior to entering the operating room. These results suggest that gabapentin 1,200 mg may be a treatment option for patients who exhibit high levels of preoperative anxiety and pain catastrophizing; however, the sedative properties of the medication and the possibility of delayed postoperative discharge in the elective ambulatory population need to be considered.

The role of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the management of perioperative peripheral nerve injury: a scoping review of the literature.

BACKGROUND/IMPORTANCE: Peripheral nerve injury is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of anesthesia and surgery, for which there are limited effective treatment options. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is a unique medical intervention which improves tissue oxygen delivery and reduces ischemia via exposure to oxygen at supra-atmospheric partial pressures. While the application of hyperbaric oxygen therapy has been evidenced for other medical conditions involving relative tissue ischemia, its role in the management of peripheral nerve injury remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review seeks to characterize rehabilitative outcomes when hyperbaric oxygen therapy is applied as an adjunct therapy in the treatment of perioperative peripheral nerve injury. EVIDENCE REVIEW: The review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for scoping reviews, using a systematic screening and extraction process. The search included articles published from database inception until June 11, 2022, which reported clinical outcomes (in both human and non-human models) of peripheral nerve injury treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy. FINDINGS: A total of 51 studies were included in the narrative synthesis. These consisted of animal (40) and human studies (11) treating peripheral nerve injury due to various physiological insults. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy protocols were highly heterogenous and applied at both early and late intervals relative to the time of peripheral nerve injury. Overall, hyperbaric oxygen therapy was reported as beneficial in 88% (45/51) of included studies (82% of human studies and 90% of animal studies), improving nerve regeneration and/or time to recovery with no reported major adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Existing data suggest that hyperbaric oxygen therapy is a promising intervention in the management of perioperative peripheral nerve injury, in which tissue ischemia is the most common underlying mechanism of injury, neurological deficits are severe, and treatment options are sparse. This positive signal should be further investigated in prospective randomized clinical trials.

Successful treatment of neurologic injury after complex spinal surgery with hyperbaric oxygen therapy: a case report.

Background: Neurologic injury is relatively common in the context of spinal surgery, and is often treated with physiotherapy, pharmacotherapy, or surgical intervention. Emerging evidence supports a possible role for hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in the treatment of peripheral and spinal nerve injuries. We describe the successful use of HBOT in improving neurologic recovery after complex spine surgery with new-onset postoperative unilateral foot drop. Case Description: A 50-year-old woman was found to have new right-sided foot drop and L2-S1 motor deficits following complex thoracolumbar revision spinal surgery. She received standard conservative management for a provisional diagnosis of acute traumatic nerve ischemia, but demonstrated no neurologic improvement. On postoperative day four, after other avenues of treatment were exhausted, she was referred for HBOT. The patient received a total of twelve sessions of HBOT at 2.0 absolute atmospheres (ATA) of pressure, for 90 minutes (including two air breaks) per session, before transfer to a rehabilitation facility. Conclusions: The patient displayed marked neurologic improvement after the first hyperbaric session, and further recovery thereafter. She concluded therapy with a significantly improved range of motion and lower limb power, ability to ambulate, and pain control. HBOT was associated with a rapid, sustained improvement when applied in this case as a salvage therapy for persistent postoperative neurologic deficit. Mounting evidence supports the consideration of hyperbaric therapy as a standard adjunct treatment for traumatic neurologic injury.

Clinical Considerations for Implanted Neurological Devices in Patients Undergoing Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy: A Case Report and Review of Manufacturer Guidelines.

Patients with implanted medical devices are increasingly referred for hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT), and the safety of exposing some of these devices to hyperbaric environments has not previously been explored. There is a paucity of evidence surrounding the management of implanted neurological devices such as neurostimulators and intrathecal drug delivery (IDD) pumps in the context of HBOT. However, these devices can be expected to harbor unique risks; for example, vacant space in the reservoir of an implanted IDD pump may change in pressure and volume during the compression and decompression phases of HBOT, resulting in a damaged or dysfunctional device. We present the case of a 27-year-old woman with cerebral palsy referred for HBOT to manage a necrotizing soft tissue infection cultured from a dehiscent abdominal wound at the previous implantation site of an intrathecal baclofen pump. An HBOT protocol was ultimately chosen in partnership with the patient and her family, but treatment was not performed due to a paucity of evidence that the implanted IDD pump could safely withstand hyperbaric exposure. In this review, we have synthesized manufacturer recommendations regarding the management of implanted neurological devices before, during, and after HBOT to inform future decision-making in this setting. Among these recommendations, we highlight that neurostimulators should be switched off for the duration of HBOT and implanted pumps should be refilled prior to each treatment session to minimize empty reservoir space.