Revisiting the Anatomical Landmark-Guided Central Venous Access Device Insertion: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (USG) guidance is superior to blind and open cut-down techniques for accurate puncture of the internal jugular vein (IJV) or subclavian vein, but it increases the cost and duration of the procedure. Here, we report our experience with the reliability and consistency of anatomic landmark-guided technique for Central Venous Access Device (CVAD) insertion in a low-resource setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing CVAD insertion through one of the jugular veins was performed. Central venous access was achieved using a standardized anatomic insertion landmark (apex of Sedillot's triangle). Ultrasonography (USG) and/or fluoroscopy assistance was taken as and when required. RESULTS: Over 12 months (October 2021 to September 2022), a total of 208 patients underwent CVAD insertion. Central venous access was successfully achieved using anatomic landmark-guided technique in all but 14 patients (6.7%), in whom USG guidance or C-arm was used. Eleven out of 14 patients who needed guidance for CVAD insertion had body mass index (BMI) of more than 25, one had thyromegaly while the remaining two had an arterial puncture during cannulation. CVAD insertion-related complications included deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in five, extravasation of chemotherapeutic agent in one, spontaneous extrusion related to a fall in one, and persistent withdrawal-related occlusion in seven patients. CONCLUSION: Anatomical landmark-guided technique of CVAD insertion is safe and reliable, and can reduce the need for USG/C-arm in 93% of the patients.

Radiological tumor thickness as a clinical predictor of pathological depth of invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: Inclusion of depth of invasion (DOI) in the recent AJCC/UICC TNM staging for oral cancer has incorporated the concept of tumor third dimension and its prognostic importance. However, there is no uniform consensus about measuring DOI at clinical setting at present. For more practical reasons, radiological tumor thickness (rTT) is a simple and practical measurement which can be used as a clinical predictor of pDOI. METHODS: We compared rTT and pathological DOI (pDOI) of 179 patients with OSCC who underwent curative surgery from April 2018 to April 2020 at AIIMS Rishikesh, India. Spearman correlation was used to determine correlation between rTT and pDOI. ROC curve was used to determine inter-group cutoff values. RESULTS: Overall, rTT showed a strong correlation with pDOI (rho = 0.74; 95% CI 0.667-0.8; p < 0.001). The inter-group cutoff value for rTT were 8 mm (Sn 89.1%; Sp 53.2%) between Group A (pDOI ≤ 5 mm) and B (pDOI > 5 mm, ≤ 10 mm), and 14 mm (Sn 89.5%; Sp 78.3%) between Group B and C (pDOI > 10 mm), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: rTT is a clinical predictor of pDOI in OSCC, and may be considered as a surrogate of DOI in the clinical setting.

Discordance of COVID-19 guidelines for patients with cancer: A systematic review.

This review was aimed to systematically evaluate the available literature on the impact of COVID-19 on cancer care and to critically analyze the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies suggested by various healthcare providers, societies, and institutions. Majority guidelines for various types of cancers favored a delay in treatment or a nonsurgical approach wherever feasible. These guidelines are based on a low level of evidence and have significant discordance for the role and timing of surgery, especially in early tumors.

A multidisciplinary team and patient perspective on omission of surgery after neoadjuvant systemic therapy for early breast cancer: A European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO) Research Academy survey.

BACKGROUND: Surgical de-escalation aims to reduce morbidity without compromising oncological outcomes. Trials to de-escalate breast cancer (BC) surgery among exceptional responders after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) are ongoing. Combined patient and clinician insights on this strategy are unknown. METHODS: The European Society of Surgical Oncology Young Surgeons Alumni Club (EYSAC) performed an online survey to evaluate the perspective of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) on omission of surgery ("no surgery") following complete response to NST for early BC. The aim was to identify MDT considerations and perceived barriers to omission of BC surgery. Patient insights were obtained through a focused group discussion (FGD) with four members of the patient advocacy group, Guiding Researchers and Advocates to Scientific Partnerships (GRASP). RESULTS: The MDT survey had 248 responses, with 229 included for analysis. Criteria for a "no surgery" approach included: patient's tumor and nodal status before (39.7 %) and after (45.9 %) NST and comorbidities (44.3 %). The majority chose standard surgery for hypothetical cases with a complete response to NST. Barriers for implementation were lack of definitive trials (55.9 %), "no surgery" not being discussed in MDTs (28.8 %) and lack of essential diagnostic or therapeutic options (24 %). Patients expressed communication gaps about BC surgery, lack of trust regarding accuracy of imaging, fear of regret and psychosocial burden of choosing less extensive surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Before accepting "no surgery" after complete response to NST, MDTs and patients need level 1 evidence from clinical trials, access to standard diagnostic modalities and treatments. Patient's fear of regretting less surgery need to be acknowledged and addressed.

A leap towards changing gender dynamics in oncology leadership - An ESSO-EYSAC initiative.

Despite the importance of diversity for the success and survival of biological and social systems, women are underrepresented in leadership positions, particularly in the medical field. Data from seven internationally renowned academic associations in surgical, medical, and radiation oncology show that women's representation in leadership roles is only 11%, with no individual society exceeding 20%. Possible justifications for the underrepresentation of women include unconscious biases and societal norms. Fortunately, a notable development in the form of an increased number of women attaining leadership positions in many major professional societies has emerged over recent times, thereby reflecting a positive transformation in the direction of gender equality. The authors recommend organizational interventions such as mentorship, leadership development programs, and national-level initiatives with global collaboration. The oncology community must promote a culture of cooperation and gender equality to ensure equitable opportunities for women in all aspects of life, including professional hierarchy.

Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Drainage Mapping for Localization of Contralateral Lymph Node Metastasis in Locally Advanced Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma - A Prospective Pilot Study.

Aim/Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become the standard of care for nodal staging in early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) as an alternative to elective neck dissection. However, the role of sentinel lymph node (SLN) and lymphatic drainage mapping with image-guided surgery has not been studied in locally advanced OSCC. Therefore, this study was undertaken to evaluate the role of lymphatic drainage mapping in the identification of contralateral cervical lymph node metastasis in locally advanced OSCC (Stage III-IVb). Materials and Methods: We have prospectively analyzed treatment-naïve patients of locally advanced, lateralized OSCC (n = 20). All patients underwent SLN imaging using peritumoral injection 0.5-1.0 mCi of 99 mTc-Sulfur colloid (Filtered) and intraoperative identification of contralateral neck nodes using a handheld gamma probe (Crystal Photonics). Results: A total of 20 patients (18 males and 2 females) with a median age of 52.5 (33-70 years) were included. Ipsilateral SLN was localized in 18 (90%) patients. Bilateral cervical nodes were visualized only in 7 (35%) patients on lymphoscintigraphy (LSG). Out of the seven patients, 5 patients underwent bilateral neck dissection and 2 patients had unilateral neck dissection with LSG-guided exploration of contralateral cervical node and intraoperative frozen section examination. Six out of these seven patients had one or other risk factor for contralateral metastasis (patients had either primary in the tongue, involvement of floor of mouth, or tumor thickness >3.75 mm). On postoperative HPE, only 1/20 (5%) patient showed metastasis in the contralateral cervical lymph node. Conclusion: Correct identification of metastatic disease in contralateral neck directly influences clinical management, as it can reduce contralateral neck failure rate and limit the morbidity associated with unnecessary contralateral neck dissection, and it is also crucial in radiotherapy planning in locally advanced OSCC. In the current study, lymphatic drainage mapping showed a metastatic rate of 5% in the contralateral neck nodes in locally advanced, lateralized OSCC. However, the role of SLNB and lymphatic drainage mapping in this subgroup of OSCC needs to be studied in larger population to validate these findings.

Assessing the Prevalent Myths and Misconceptions Among Caregivers of Patients With Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Introduction Certain popular ideas about how cancer starts and spreads, though scientifically wrong, can seem to make sense, especially when those ideas are rooted in old theories. The present study was conducted to assess the prevalence of myths and misconceptions among caregivers of patients with cancer. Materials and methods A hospital-based survey in a tertiary teaching hospital in a sub-Himalayan region of North India was conducted where caregivers (aged 18-70 years) were administered questionaries containing 10 close-ended questions. The study was conducted in small batches of 20-25 participants. The questionnaire was analyzed, and a healthcare worker discussed it with the participants and clarified their myths. Results A total of 400 participants were included in the study. The median age of the participants was 45 years (IQR 35-59). The majority of the participants were males (85%, n=340). The prevalent myths among the caregivers were the following: (a) cancer is always very painful (45.5%), (b) the cause of cancers is some sin/harm done to others (26%), (c) cancer results from some form of injuries (22.8%), and (d) cancer spreads from one person to another (20.8%). Over 90% of the participants (347/378) informed that post-survey counselling was effective in ameliorating their myths. Conclusion The present study highlights the widespread cancer myths and misconceptions among the caregivers of patients with cancer. Therefore, the need of the hour is to eliminate them to avoid any unnecessary treatment delays and strengthen the emotional and social support system for patients with cancer.