Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 36
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Crit Care Med ; 48(3): 370-377, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31821187

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Tailoring hypothermia duration to ischemia duration may improve outcome from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We investigated the association between the hypothermia/ischemia ratio and functional outcome in a secondary analysis of data from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Amiodarone, Lidocaine, or Placebo Study trial. DESIGN: Cohort study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients screened for Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium-Amiodarone, Lidocaine, or Placebo Study. SETTING: Multicenter study across North America. PATIENTS: Adult, nontraumatic, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients screened for Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium-Amiodarone, Lidocaine, or Placebo Study who survived to hospital admission and received targeted temperature management between May 2012 and October 2015. INTERVENTIONS: Targeted temperature management in comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We defined hypothermia/ischemia ratio as total targeted temperature management time (initiation through rewarming) divided by calculated total ischemia time (approximate time of arrest [9-1-1 call or emergency medical services-witnessed] to return of spontaneous circulation). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was hospital survival with good functional status (modified Rankin Score, 0-3) at hospital discharge. We fitted logistic regression models to estimate the association between hypothermia/ischemia ratio and the primary outcome, adjusting for demographics, arrest characteristics, and Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium enrolling site. A total of 3,429 patients were eligible for inclusion, of whom 36.2% were discharged with good functional outcome. Patients had a mean age of 62.0 years (SD, 15.8), with 69.7% male, and 58.0% receiving lay-rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Median time to return of spontaneous circulation was 21.1 minutes (interquartile range, 16.1-26.9), and median duration of targeted temperature management was 32.9 hours (interquartile range, 23.7-37.8). A total of 2,579 had complete data and were included in adjusted regression analyses. After adjustment for patient characteristics and Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium site, a greater hypothermia/ischemia ratio was associated with increased survival with good functional outcome (odds ratio, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.82-2.23). This relationship, however, appears to be primarily driven by time to return of spontaneous circulation in this patient cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Although a larger hypothermia/ischemia ratio was associated with good functional outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in this cohort, this association is primarily driven by duration of time to return of spontaneous circulation. Tailoring duration of targeted temperature management based on duration of time to return of spontaneous circulation or patient characteristics requires prospective study.


Asunto(s)
Coma/etiología , Coma/terapia , Hipotermia Inducida/métodos , Isquemia Miocárdica/fisiopatología , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/complicaciones , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Temperatura Corporal , Coma/mortalidad , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Hipotermia Inducida/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Isquemia Miocárdica/etiología , América del Norte , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/mortalidad , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Alta del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Factores de Tiempo , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Ann Emerg Med ; 74(6): 797-806, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31248676

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: For patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the recommended dosing interval of epinephrine is 3 to 5 minutes, but this recommendation is based on expert opinion without data to guide optimal management. We seek to evaluate the association between the average epinephrine dosing interval and patient outcomes. METHODS: In a secondary analysis of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium continuous chest compression trial, we identified consecutive patients treated with greater than or equal to 2 doses of epinephrine. We defined average epinephrine dosing interval as resuscitation duration after the first dose of epinephrine divided by the total administered epinephrine, and categorized the dosing interval in minutes as less than 3, 3 to less than 4, 4 to less than 5, and greater than or equal to 5. We fit a logistic regression model to estimate the association of the average epinephrine dosing interval category with survival with favorable neurologic status (modified Rankin Scale score ≤3) at hospital discharge. RESULTS: We included 15,909 patients (median age 68 years [interquartile range 56 to 80 years], 35% women, 13% public location, 46% bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and 19% initial shockable rhythm). The median epinephrine dosing interval was 4.3 minutes (interquartile range 3.5 to 5.3 minutes). Survival with favorable neurologic status occurred in 4.7% of patients. Compared with the reference dosing interval of less than 3 minutes, longer epinephrine dosing intervals were associated with lower survival with favorable neurologic status: dosing interval 3 to less than 4 minutes, adjusted odds ratio 0.44 (95% confidence interval 0.32 to 0.60); 4 to less than 5 minutes, adjusted odds ratio 0.26 (95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.36); and greater than or equal to 5 minutes, adjusted odds ratio 0.21 (95% confidence interval 0.15 to 0.30). CONCLUSION: In this out-of-hospital cardiac arrest series, a shorter average epinephrine dosing interval was associated with improved survival with favorable neurologic status.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Epinefrina/administración & dosificación , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Alta del Paciente/tendencias , Sistema de Registros , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Canadá/epidemiología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/mortalidad , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vasoconstrictores/administración & dosificación
3.
Ann Emerg Med ; 71(5): 588-596, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29310869

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We seek to determine the effect of intraosseous over intravenous vascular access on outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS: This secondary analysis of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Prehospital Resuscitation Using an Impedance Valve and Early Versus Delayed (PRIMED) study included adult patients with nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrests treated during 2007 to 2009, excluding those with any unsuccessful attempt or more than one access site. The primary exposure was intraosseous versus intravenous vascular access. The primary outcome was favorable neurologic outcome on hospital discharge (modified Rankin Scale score ≤3). We determined the association between vascular access route and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcome with multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, initial emergency medical services-recorded rhythm (shockable or nonshockable), witness status, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, use of public automated external defibrillator, episode location (public or not), and time from call to paramedic scene arrival. We confirmed the results with multiple imputation, propensity score matching, and generalized estimating equations, with study enrolling region as a clustering variable. RESULTS: Of 13,155 included out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, 660 (5.0%) received intraosseous vascular access. In the intraosseous group, 10 of 660 patients (1.5%) had favorable neurologic outcome compared with 945 of 12,495 (7.6%) in the intravenous group. On multivariable regression, intraosseous access was associated with poorer out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival (adjusted odds ratio 0.24; 95% confidence interval 0.12 to 0.46). Sensitivity analyses revealed similar results. CONCLUSION: In adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients, intraosseous vascular access was associated with poorer neurologic outcomes than intravenous access.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Infusiones Intraóseas/métodos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Anciano , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/mortalidad , Competencia Clínica , Desfibriladores , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intraóseas/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/mortalidad , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular
4.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 22(2): 198-207, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28841080

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Prognostication bias, in which a clinician predicts a negative outcome and terminates resuscitation (TR) thereby ensuring a poor outcome, is a rarely identified limitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) research. We sought to estimate the number of deaths due to intra-arrest prognostication in a cohort of OHCA's, and use this data to estimate the incremental benefit of continuing resuscitation. METHODS: This study examined a cohort of consecutive non-traumatic EMS-treated OHCAs from a provincial ambulance service, between 2007 and 2011 inclusive. We used Cox and logistic regression modeling, adjusting for Utstein covariates, to estimate the probability of ROSC, survival, and favorable neurological outcomes as a function of resuscitation time, and applied these models to estimate the number of missed survivors in those who had TR (prior to 20, 30, or 40 minutes). We determined the time juncture at which (1) the likelihood of survival fell below 1%, and (2) the proportion of survivors who had achieved ROSC exceeded 99%. RESULTS: Of 5674 adult EMS-treated cases, 46% achieved ROSC, and 12% survived. The median time of TR was 27.0 minutes (IQR 19.0-35.0). Continuing resuscitation until 40 minutes yielded an estimated 17 additional survivors (95% CI 13-21), 10 (95% CI 7-13) with favorable neurological outcomes. The probability of survival of those in refractory arrest decreased below 1% at 28 minutes (95% CI 24-30 minutes). At 36 minutes (95% CI 34-38 minutes) >99% of survivors had achieved ROSC. CONCLUSION: We identified possible deaths due to intra-arrest prognostication. Resuscitation should be continued for a minimum of 30 minutes in all patients, however for those with initial shockable rhythms 40 minutes appears to be warranted. Interventional trials and observational studies should standardize or adjust for duration of resuscitation prior to TR.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/mortalidad , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Privación de Tratamiento , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Aplicación de la Ley , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Supervivencia
5.
Ann Emerg Med ; 70(3): 374-381.e1, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28302424

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The Universal Termination of Resuscitation Rule (TOR Rule) was developed to identify out-of-hospital cardiac arrests eligible for field termination of resuscitation, avoiding futile transportation to the hospital. The validity of the rule in emergency medical services (EMS) systems that do not routinely transport out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients to the hospital is unknown. We seek to validate the TOR Rule in British Columbia. METHODS: This study included consecutive, nontraumatic, adult, out-of-hospital cardiac arrests treated by EMS in British Columbia from April 2011 to September 2015. We excluded patients with active do-not-resuscitate orders and those with missing data. Following consensus guidelines, we examined the validity of the TOR Rule after 6 minutes of resuscitation (to approximate three 2-minute cycles of resuscitation). To ascertain rule performance at the different time junctures, we recalculated TOR Rule classification accuracy at subsequent 1-minute resuscitation increments. RESULTS: Of 6,994 consecutive, adult, EMS-treated, out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, overall survival was 15%. At 6 minutes of resuscitation, rule performance was sensitivity 0.72, specificity 0.91, positive predictive value 0.98, and negative predictive value 0.36. The TOR Rule recommended care termination for 4,367 patients (62%); of these, 92 survived to hospital discharge (false-positive rate 2.1%; 95% confidence interval 1.7% to 2.5%); however, this proportion steadily decreased with later application. The TOR Rule recommended continuation of resuscitation in 2,627 patients (38%); of these, 1,674 died (false-negative rate 64%; 95% confidence interval 62% to 66%). Compared with 6-minute application, test characteristics at 30 minutes demonstrated nearly perfect positive predictive value (1.0) and specificity (1.0) but a lower sensitivity (0.46) and negative predictive value (0.25). CONCLUSION: In this cohort of adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients, the TOR Rule applied at 6 minutes falsely recommended care termination for 2.1% of patients; however, this decreased with later application. Systems using the TOR Rule to cease resuscitation in the field should consider rule application at points later than 6 minutes.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/normas , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Órdenes de Resucitación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colombia Británica , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/ética , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/mortalidad , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/mortalidad , Órdenes de Resucitación/ética , Tasa de Supervivencia
6.
Emerg Med J ; 31(1): 19-23, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23302506

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Although it has been suggested that the increase in older population contributes to overcrowding in emergency departments (EDs), there are limited data defining this relationship. This study examines whether patients' mean age per day affects length of ED stay. METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis evaluated how patient age affects length of ED stay. The study was conducted at an ED attached to Fujisawa City Hospital, Japan, between 1 November 2009 and 31 October 2010. Patients scheduled to visit for childbirth and patients under age 15 were excluded. The primary outcome measure was the relationship between length of ED stay and patient age. The secondary outcome was the relationship between patient age and patient dispositions indicated by column chart and 100% staked column chart. RESULTS: Over the study period, there were 17 744 patient visits to the ED. The study included 15 840 (89.3%) patients. The mean (SD) age of these patients was 56.9 (21.5) years. In single and multiple linear regression analyses, mean patient age per day was an important factor in length of ED stay for the total number of patients visiting the ED (single linear regression analysis: regression coefficient=1.59 min/year, r(2)=0.005, p<0.001; multiple linear regression analysis: regression coefficient=0.72 min/year, r(2)=0.24, p<0.001). The ratio of admitted and transferred patients increased with patient age. CONCLUSION: The increase in older patients visiting the ED has a direct significant negative effect on overcrowding in the ED.


Asunto(s)
Envejecimiento , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Hospitales Urbanos , Humanos , Japón , Tiempo de Internación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente , Análisis de Regresión
7.
Resusc Plus ; 17: 100560, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38328748

RESUMEN

Background: The impact of extreme heat on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) incidence and outcomes is under-studied. We investigated OHCA incidence and outcomes over increasing temperatures. Methods: We included non-traumatic EMS (Emergency Medical Services)-assessed OHCAs in British Columbia during the warm seasons of 2020-2021. We fit a time-series quasi-Poisson generalized linear model to estimate the association between temperature and incidence of both EMS-assessed, EMS-treated, and EMS-untreated OHCAs. Second, we employed a logistic regression model to estimate the association between "heatwave" periods (defined as a daily mean temperature > 99th percentile for ≥ 2 consecutive days, plus 3 lag days) with survival and favourable neurological outcomes (cerebral performance category ≤ 2) at hospital discharge. Results: Of 5478 EMS-assessed OHCAs, 2833 were EMS-treated. OHCA incidence increased with increasing temperatures, especially exceeding a daily mean temperature of 25 °C Compared to the median daily mean temperature (16.9 °C), the risk of EMS-assessed (relative risk [RR] 3.7; 95%CI 3.0-4.6), EMS-treated (RR 2.9; 95%CI 2.2-3.9), and EMS-untreated (RR 4.3; 95%CI 3.2-5.7) OHCA incidence were higher during days with a temperature over the 99th percentile. Of EMS-treated OHCAs, during the heatwave (n = 179) and non-heatwave (n = 2654) periods, 4 (2.2%) and 270 (10%) survived and 4 (2.2%) and 241 (9.2%) had favourable neurological outcomes, respectively. Heatwave period OHCAs had decreased odds of survival (adjusted OR 0.28; 95%CI 0.10-0.79) and favourable neurological outcome (adjusted OR 0.31; 95%CI 0.11-0.89) at hospital discharge, compared to other periods. Conclusion: Extreme heat was associated with a higher incidence of OHCA, and lower odds of survival and favourable neurological status at hospital discharge.

8.
Resuscitation ; 195: 110107, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38160902

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Multiple jurisdictions reported a significant increase in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) incidence over the past decade, however the reasons for this remain unclear. We investigated how drug-associated OHCA (DA-OHCA) contributed to overall OHCA incidence, and whether the likelihood of treatment by emergency medical services (EMS) was associated with DA-OHCA classification. METHODS: Using a large provincial cardiac arrest registry, we included consecutive, non-traumatic adult OHCA from 2016-2022. We classified as drug-associated if there were historical accounts of non-prescription drug use within the preceding 24 hours or evidence of paraphernalia at the scene. We examined year-by-year trends in OHCA and DA-OHCA incidence. We also investigated the association between DA-OHCA and odds of EMS treatment using an adjusted logistic regression model. RESULTS: Of 33,365 EMS-assessed cases, 1,985/18,591 (11%) of EMS-treated OHCA and 887/9,200 (9.6%) of EMS-untreated OHCA were DA-OHCA. Of EMS-treated DA-OHCA, the median age was 40 years (IQR 31-51), 1,059 (53%) had a known history of non-prescription drug use, and 570 (29%) were public-location. From 2016 to 2022, EMS-treated OHCA incidence increased from 60 to 79 per 100,000 person-years; EMS-treated DA-OHCA incidence increased from 3.7 to 9.1 per 100,000 person-years. The proportion of overall OHCA classified as DA-OHCA increased from 6.1% to 11.5%. DA-OHCA was associated with greater odds of EMS treatment (AOR 1.34; 95%CI 1.13-1.58). CONCLUSION: Although EMS-treated DA-OHCA incidence increased by nearly three-fold, it comprised a minority of the overall OHCA increase during the study period. DA-OHCA was associated with an increased likelihood of EMS treatment.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Adulto , Humanos , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/efectos adversos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/epidemiología , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Incidencia , Sistema de Registros
10.
Resuscitation ; 193: 110031, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37923113

RESUMEN

AIM: Humeral and tibial intraosseous (IO) vascular access can deliver resuscitative medications for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), however the optimal site is unclear. We examined the association between IO tibia vs. humerus as the first-attempted vascular access site with OHCA outcomes. METHODS: We used prospectively-collected data from the British Columbia Cardiac Arrest registry, including adult OHCAs treated with IO humerus or IO tibia as the first-attempted intra-arrest vascular access. We fit logistic regression models on the full study cohort and a propensity-matched cohort, to estimate the association between IO site and both favorable neurological outcomes (Cerebral Performance Category 1-2) and survival at hospital discharge. RESULTS: We included 1041 (43%) and 1404 (57%) OHCAs for whom IO humerus and tibia, respectively, were the first-attempted intra-arrest vascular access. Among humerus and tibia cases, 1010 (97%) and 1369 (98%) had first-attempt success, and the median paramedic arrival-to-successful access interval was 6.7 minutes (IQR 4.4-9.4) and 6.1 minutes (IQR 4.1-8.9), respectively. In the propensity-matched cohort (n = 2052), 31 (3.0%) and 44 (4.3%) cases had favourable neurological outcomes in the IO humerus and IO tibia groups, respectively; compared to IO humerus, we did not detect an association between IO tibia with favorable neurological outcomes (OR 1.44; 95% CI 0.90-2.29) or survival to hospital discharge (OR 1.29; 95% CI 0.83-2.01). Results using the full cohort were similar. CONCLUSIONS: We did not detect an association between the first-attempted intra-arrest IO site (tibia vs. humerus) and clinical outcomes. Clinical trials are warranted to test differences between vascular access strategies.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Adulto , Humanos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Tibia , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Húmero , Resucitación/métodos , Infusiones Intraóseas/métodos
11.
Resuscitation ; 172: 47-53, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35077855

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) investigations may elect to exclude cases with resuscitation terminated for reasons other than a full resuscitative attempt. We sought to examine characteristics of these cases and regional variability in classification. METHODS: Using the North American Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epistry, we included adult emergency medical services (EMS)-treated cases, examining the rationale ("futility", do-not resuscitate [DNR] order, "verbal directive", or "obvious death") and timing of resuscitation termination, and the timing of ROSC among hospital-discharge survivors. We tested regional variability in EMS patient arrival-to-termination intervals with one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: Of 63,554 included cases, 27,232 were declared dead in the prehospital setting: (1) 23,009 (36%) for futility (after a median of 24 minutes [IQR 19-31] of professional resuscitation); (2) 1622 (2.6%) for a DNR order (at 6.3 minutes [IQR 3.0-11]); (3) 1018 (1.6%) for a verbal directive (at 12 minutes [IQR 7.0-17]); and, (4) 1583 (2.5%) for obvious death (at 5.4 minutes [IQR 3.0-9.0]). The EMS patient arrival-to-ROSC interval among hospital-discharge survivors was 7.7 (3.8-13) minutes. Among regions, 0.20-12% and 0.20-5.3% were terminated to due to obvious death or verbal directives, respectively. There were significant regional differences in the EMS patient arrival-to-termination interval for futility (p < 0.010) and obvious death (p < 0.010). CONCLUSION: There is significant variation in the rationale and interval until termination of resuscitation between regions. Cases terminated due to obvious death or DNR orders/verbal directives are often treated with similar durations of resuscitation as survivors. These data highlight a considerable risk of bias in between-region comparisons or observational analyses.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Adulto , Humanos , Inutilidad Médica , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Órdenes de Resucitación
12.
Chudoku Kenkyu ; 24(4): 305-10, 2011 Dec.
Artículo en Japonés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22338341

RESUMEN

We experienced the first death case of the serotonin syndrome in Japan caused by fluvoxamine and tandospirone. A 15-year-old man was transported to our hospital for shock, muscle hypertonia and hyperthermia after cardiopulmonary arrest. His serum concentrations of fluvoxamine and tandospirone were 3,554 ng/mL and 698 ng/mL respectively after 24 hours from oral intake. He was dead in spite of intensive treatments. The progress of the serotonin syndrome is usually rapid. So, it should be monitored appropriately a patient with serotonin syndrome. If he has hyperthermia, immediate paralysis should be induced. We should aware of the serotonin syndrome a case of overdose on a serotonergic agent.


Asunto(s)
Ansiolíticos/efectos adversos , Fiebre/inducido químicamente , Fluvoxamina/efectos adversos , Isoindoles/efectos adversos , Hipertonía Muscular/inducido químicamente , Piperazinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/efectos adversos , Agonistas de Receptores de Serotonina/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Ansiolíticos/sangre , Sobredosis de Droga , Resultado Fatal , Fluvoxamina/sangre , Paro Cardíaco/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Isoindoles/sangre , Japón , Masculino , Piperazinas/sangre , Pirimidinas/sangre , Agonistas de Receptores de Serotonina/sangre , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/sangre , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Choque/inducido químicamente , Síndrome
13.
Resuscitation ; 167: 49-57, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34389454

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) the effect of intraosseous (IO) or intravenous (IV) access on outcomes is unclear. METHODS: We analyzed prospectively collected data of non-traumatic OHCA in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium registry from 2011 to 2015. We included EMS-treated patients ≤17 years of age, classified patients based on vascular access routes, and calculated success rates of IO and IV attempts. After excluding patients with obvious non-cardiac etiologies and those with unsuccessful vascular access or multiple routes, we fit a logistic regression model to evaluate the association of IO vascular access (reference IV access) with the primary outcome of survival, using multiple imputation to address missing data. We analyzed a subgroup of patients at least 2 years of age. RESULTS: There were 1549 non-traumatic OHCA: 895 (57.8%) patients had an IO line attempted with 822 (91.8%) successful; 488 (31.5%) had an IV line attempted with 345 (70.7%) successful (difference 21%, 95% CI 17 to 26%). Of the 761 patients included in our logistic regression, 601 received IO (30 [5.2%] survived) and 160 received IV (40 [25%] survived) vascular access. Intraosseous access was associated with a decreased probability of survival (adjusted OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.21-0.98). Patients at least 2 years of age showed a similar association (adjusted OR 0.36; CI 0.15-0.86). CONCLUSIONS: Intraosseous access was associated with decreased survival among pediatric non-traumatic OHCA. These results are exploratory and support the need for further study to evaluate the effect of intravascular access method on outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Niño , Humanos , Infusiones Intraóseas , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos
14.
Resuscitation ; 168: 27-34, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34509554

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is substantial regional variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival. We investigated whether regional emergency medical services (EMS) intra-arrest transport (IAT) practices are associated with patient outcomes. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of a multi-center North American clinical trial dataset, which enrolled EMS-treated adult OHCA cases from 49 regional population-based clusters. The exposure of interest was regional-level intra-arrest transport (IAT), calculated as the proportion of cases in each cluster transported to hospital prior to return of spontaneous circulation, examined as quartiles and as a continuous variable. Multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression modeling estimated the association between regional IAT with survival to hospital discharge and favorable neurologic status (modified Rankin Scale ≤ 3) at hospital discharge. RESULTS: Of 26,148 subjects (median age 68 years; 36% female; 23% shockable initial rhythm) 2424 (9.3%), survived to hospital discharge and 1993 (7.6%) had favourable neurological outcomes. Across regional clusters, IAT ranged from 0.84% to 75% (quartiles <6.2%, 6.2-19.6%, 19.6-30.4%, and ≥30.4%). For each quartile, 13.3%, 7.9%, 7.4%, and 4.8% survived, and 10.4%, 7.8%, 7.4%, and 4.8% had favourable neurological status. Regional IAT (per 10% change) was associated with decreased probability of survival (AOR 0.86, 95% CI 0.82-0.91) and favorable neurological outcome (AOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.76-0.85). CONCLUSION: Treatment within a region that utilizes IAT less frequently was associated with improved clinical outcomes at hospital discharge. These findings may account for some of the known regional variation in OHCA outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Alta del Paciente
15.
Resuscitation ; 155: 211-218, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32522699

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rapid emergency medical service (EMS) response after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major determinant of survival, however this is typically measured until EMS vehicle arrival. We sought to investigate whether the interval from EMS vehicle arrival to patient attendance (curb-to-care interval [CTC]) was associated with patient outcomes. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of the "CCC Trial" dataset, which includes EMS-treated adult non-traumatic OHCA. We fit an adjusted logistic regression model to estimate the association between CTC interval (divided into quartiles) and the primary outcome (survival with favourable neurologic status at hospital discharge; mRS ≤ 3). We described the CTC interval distribution among enrolling clusters. RESULTS: We included 24,685 patients: median age was 68 (IQR 56-81), 23% had initial shockable rhythms, and 7.6% survived with favourable neurological status. Compared to the first quartile (≤62 s), longer CTC quartiles (63-115, 116-180, and ≥181 s) demonstrated the following associations with survival with favourable neurological status: adjusted odds ratios 0.95, 95% CI 0.83-1.09; 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.89; 0.66, 95% CI 0.56-0.77, respectively. Of the 49 study clusters, median CTC intervals ranged from 86 (IQR 58-130) to 179 s (IQR 112-256). CONCLUSION: A lower CTC interval was associated with improved patient outcomes. These results demonstrate a wide range of access metrics within North America, and provide a rationale to create protocols to mitigate access obstacles. A 2-min CTC threshold may represent an appropriate target for quality improvement.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Adulto , Anciano , Humanos , América del Norte , Oportunidad Relativa , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia
16.
Resuscitation ; 155: 219-225, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32553923

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The "no flow" interval is the time from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Its prognostic value is important to define for prehospital resuscitation decisions, post-resuscitation care and prognostication, and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) candidacy assessment. METHODS: We examined bystander-witnessed OHCAs without bystander CPR from two Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium datasets. We used modified Poisson regression to model the relationship between the no-flow interval (9-1-1 call to professional resuscitation) and favourable neurological outcome (Modified Rankin Score ≤ 3) at hospital discharge. Furthermore, we identified the no-flow interval beyond which no patients had a favourable outcome. We analysed a subgroup to simulate ECPR-treated patients (witnessed arrest, age < 65, non-asystole initial rhythm, and >30 min until return of circulation). RESULTS: Of 43,593 cases, we included 7299; 616 (8.4%) had favourable neurological outcomes. Increasing no-flow interval was inversely associated with favourable neurological outcomes (adjusted relative risk 0.87, 95% CI 0.85-0.90); the adjusted probability of a favourable neurological outcome decreased by 13% (95% CI 10-15%) per minute. No patients (0/7299, 0%; 1-sided 97.5% CI 0-0.051%) had both a no-flow interval >20 min and a favourable neurological outcome. In the hypothetical ECPR group, 0/152 (0%; 1-sided 97.5% CI 0-2.4%) had both a no-flow interval >10 min and a favourable neurological outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The probability of a favourable neurological outcome in OHCA decreases by 13% for every additional minute of no-flow time until high-quality CPR, with the possibility of favourable outcomes up to 20 min.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Humanos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Pronóstico , Órdenes de Resucitación
17.
Resuscitation ; 150: 17-22, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32126247

RESUMEN

AIM: While public access automated external defibrillator (AED) programs appear to improve outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) it is unclear if men and women benefit equally. We examined gender-based differences in OHCA location to determine what proportion were potentially eligible for public access AED application, and if patient gender was associated with AED utilization. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium registry (2011-2015). We compared differences in OHCA locations by gender. We fit multivariate logistic regression models, restricted to public location OHCAs and public-location cases with bystander intervention, to calculate the association between gender and public access AED application. RESULTS: Among 61 473 cases, 34% were female and 50% had bystander resuscitation. The incidence of public OHCA was 8.8% for women and 18% for men (risk difference 9.2%, 95% CI 8.7-9.7%). Women had significantly fewer OHCAs on roadways, in public buildings, places of recreation, and farms, but more in homes, non-acute healthcare facilities, and residential institutions. Female gender was associated with a lower odds of AED application in public OHCA (adjusted OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.90) and public-location cases with bystander interventions (adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71-0.99). CONCLUSION: Women had fewer OHCA in public locations that may have public access AEDs. Even among public location OHCA with bystander interventions, women were less likely to have public access AED applied. Initiatives to optimize AED locations and to engage the public with gender-specific resuscitation training may improve outcomes in women with OHCA.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Desfibriladores , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/epidemiología , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia
18.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 8(9): e012001, 2019 05 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31055981

RESUMEN

Background Targeted temperature management ( TTM ) is a recommended treatment modality to improve neurological outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The impact of the duration from hospital admission to TTM initiation (door-to- TTM ; DTT ) on clinical outcomes has not been well elucidated. We hypothesized that shorter DTT initiation intervals would be associated with improved survival with favorable neurological outcome. Methods and Results We performed a post hoc analysis of nontraumatic paramedic-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. The primary outcome was favorable neurological status at hospital discharge, with a secondary outcome of survival to discharge. We fit a logistic regression analysis to determine the association of early compared with delayed DTT , dichotomized by the median DTT duration, and outcomes. Of 3805 patients enrolled in the CCC (Continuous Chest Compressions) Trial in British Columbia, 570 were included in this analysis. There was substantial variation in DTT among patients receiving TTM . The median DTT duration was 122 minutes (interquartile range 35-218). Favorable neurological outcomes in the early and delayed DTT groups were 48% and 38%, respectively. Compared with delayed DTT (interquartile range 167-319 minutes), early DTT (interquartile range 20-81 minutes) was associated with survival (adjusted odds ratio 1.56, 95% CI 1.02-2.38) but not with favorable neurological outcomes (adjusted odds ratio 1.45, 95% CI , 0.94-2.22) at hospital discharge. Conclusions There was wide variability in the initiation of TTM among comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors. Initiation of TTM within 122 minutes of hospital admission was associated with improved survival. These results support in-hospital efforts to achieve early DTT among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients admitted to the hospital.


Asunto(s)
Regulación de la Temperatura Corporal , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Auxiliares de Urgencia , Masaje Cardíaco , Hemodinámica , Hipotermia Inducida , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Anciano , Colombia Británica , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/efectos adversos , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/mortalidad , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Masaje Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Masaje Cardíaco/mortalidad , Humanos , Hipotermia Inducida/efectos adversos , Hipotermia Inducida/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/diagnóstico , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/mortalidad , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/fisiopatología , Admisión del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Recuperación de la Función , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Resuscitation ; 135: 137-144, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30576783

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Data demonstrating benefit of advanced life support (ALS) practitioners for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is conflicting. In our tiered emergency medical services (EMS) system, we sought to determine if the ALS response interval was associated with patient outcomes. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of consecutive adult OHCAs (2006-2016) in British Columbia. Primary and secondary outcomes were survival and favorable neurological outcomes (mRS ≤ 3) at hospital discharge. Logistic regression estimated the association of ALS response interval (911 call-to-ALS arrival, continuous and categorical analyses) and outcomes, adjusting for first EMS response interval, and other clinical characteristics. We calculated the optimal time threshold to differentiate "early" vs "late" ALS response intervals for a binary comparison. RESULTS: Of 12,722 included cases, 12% survived to discharge. Median response interval was 6.4 min (IQR 5.2-8.3) for the first EMS unit and 11.8 min (IQR 8.7-16.5) for ALS. ALS response interval (per minute) was associated with decreased survival (adjusted OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.99) and favourable neurological outcome (0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99). ALS response ≤10 min (the optimal threshold) was associated with improved survival (adjusted OR 1.46; 95% CI 1.27-1.68) and favourable neurological outcomes (adjusted OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.18-1.68). CONCLUSION: In our tiered EMS system, earlier ALS arrival was associated with improved survival and favorable neurological outcomes. ALS attendance within 10 min of the 9-1-1 call in tiered systems of prehospital care may improve patient outcomes and serve as a quality metric.


Asunto(s)
Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado/métodos , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Anciano , Colombia Británica/epidemiología , Intervención Médica Temprana/métodos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/etiología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/prevención & control , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/etiología , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/mortalidad , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Recuperación de la Función , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Supervivencia
20.
Resuscitation ; 135: 51-56, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30639788

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Certain subgroups of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) may not benefit from treatment. Early identification of this cohort in the prehospital (EMS) setting prior to any resuscitative efforts would prevent futile medical therapy and more appropriately allocate EMS and hospital resources. We sought to validate a clinical criteria from Bokutoh, Japan that identified a subgroup of OHCAs for whom withholding resuscitation may be appropriate. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of the "Trial of Continuous or Interrupted Chest Compressions during CPR", which enrolled EMS-treated adult non-traumatic OHCA. We classified patients as per the Bokutoh criteria ("Bokutoh Positive": age ≥ 73, unwitnessed arrest, non-shockable initial rhythm) and calculated test performance for the primary outcome of favourable neurologic outcome (mRS ≤ 3) at hospital discharge. We calculated the number of EMS-hours and hospital days per patient with a favourable neurologic outcome. RESULTS: Of 26,148 patients in the parent trial, 5442 (21%) were "Bokutoh Positive", among whom 0.51% (95% CI 0.35- 0.75%) had favourable neurologic outcomes, and 1.2% (95% CI 0.92-1.5%) survived. The positive predictive value was 0.995 (95% CI 0.992-0.997). EMS and hospital-based resource utilization per favourable neurological outcome was 91 h and 199 days for in the "Bokutok Positive" group, respectively, and 5.7 h and 33 hospital days in the "Bokutok Negative" group. CONCLUSION: In this validation of the Bokutoh criteria in a large North American cohort of OHCA patients, 0.51% meeting criteria had favourable neurological outcomes. This may rapidly and reliably identify the one-fifth of OHCA who are very unlikely to benefit from resuscitation.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Selección de Paciente , Órdenes de Resucitación , Anciano , Canadá , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/normas , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Inutilidad Médica , Examen Neurológico , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/diagnóstico , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Pronóstico , Recuperación de la Función , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA