A Phase 1 First-in-Human Study of FS118, a Tetravalent Bispecific Antibody Targeting LAG-3 and PD-L1 in Patients with Advanced Cancer and PD-L1 Resistance.

PURPOSE: This phase 1 study (NCT03440437) evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and activity of FS118, a bispecific antibody-targeting LAG-3 and PD-L1, in patients with advanced cancer resistant to anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with solid tumors, refractory to anti-PD-(L)1-based therapy, received intravenous FS118 weekly with an accelerated dose titration design (800 µg to 0.3 mg/kg) followed by 3+3 ascending dose expansion (1 to 20 mg/kg). Primary objectives were safety, tolerability, and PK. Additional endpoints included antitumor activity, immunogenicity, and pharmacodynamics. RESULTS: Forty-three patients with a median of three prior regimens in the locally advanced/metastatic setting, including at least one anti-PD-(L)1 regimen, received FS118 monotherapy. FS118 was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events relating to FS118 reported. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were observed, and an MTD was not reached. The recommended phase 2 dose of FS118 was established as 10 mg/kg weekly. The terminal half-life was 3.9 days. Immunogenicity was transient. Pharmacodynamic activity was prolonged throughout dosing as demonstrated by sustained elevation of soluble LAG-3 and increased peripheral effector cells. The overall disease control rate (DCR) was 46.5%; this disease control was observed as stable disease, except for one late partial response. Disease control of 54.8% was observed in patients receiving 1 mg/kg or greater who had acquired resistance to PD-(L)1-targeted therapy. CONCLUSIONS: FS118 was well tolerated with no DLTs observed up to and including 20 mg/kg QW. Further studies are warranted to determine clinical benefit in patients who have become refractory to anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. See related commentary by Karapetyan and Luke, p. 835.

Durable response of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma to FS118, a bispecific LAG-3/PD-L1 antibody, after checkpoint inhibitor progression: a case report.

Anaplastic thyroid cancer represents a rare, highly aggressive form of thyroid cancer with a poor prognosis and an overall survival ranging from 5 to 12 months. Unfortunately, treatment options remain limited, even for patients with a targetable driver mutation. Here, we present a case of a patient with a BRAF V600E-mutated, PD-L1 positive (tumor proportion score of 95%) anaplastic thyroid cancer refractory to standard therapies, including debulking surgery, followed by chemoradiation, who had further progressed on PD-1 monotherapy, and was unable to tolerate BRAF/MEK inhibition. Ongoing treatment with FS118, a bispecific LAG-3/PD-L1 antagonist, has afforded 3 years of disease control, including a late confirmed partial response, with excellent tolerability. Given this response, further investigation is required to delineate the mechanism by which dual PD-L1/LAG-3 blockade by FS118 overcomes initial PD-1 pathway resistance, and therefore, identify which patients are most likely to benefit. Simultaneously, expanded use should be considered for those with refractory disease, especially if PD-L1 positive. Insights Dual PD-L1/LAG-3 blockade may be an effective treatment strategy for refractory metastatic tumors, including anaplastic thyroid cancer.

A phase I safety and pharmacologic study of a twice weekly dosing regimen of the oral taxane BMS-275183.

PURPOSE: BMS-275183, an orally administered C-4 methyl carbonate paclitaxel analogue, showed promising activity in a phase I trial investigating a weekly treatment regimen, but was associated with a relatively high incidence of neuropathic side effects. The current dose escalation phase I trial was initiated to investigate whether twice weekly administration of BMS-275183 would improve its safety and tolerability. Additionally, the pharmacokinetics and possible antitumor activity were studied. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A cycle consisted of 4 weeks (i.e., eight twice weekly oral doses). The starting dose was 60 mg/m(2) and the dose was increased by 20 mg/m(2) increments. Cohorts consisted of three patients and were expanded to at least six patients when toxicity was encountered. Plasma pharmacokinetics were done on days 1 and 15. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients were enrolled. The maximum tolerated dose was 100 mg/m(2) twice weekly. Seventeen patients were treated at the maximum tolerated dose; 3 of 17 patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity, consisting of a combination of neutropenia, neuropathy, and diarrhea. BMS-275183 seemed to have a considerably lower incidence of neuropathic side effects compared with the weekly treatment regimen. Confirmed partial responses were observed in two patients with non-small cell lung cancer, one patient with prostate cancer, and one patient with melanoma. In addition, a long-lasting prostate-specific antigen response was observed in a patient with prostate carcinoma with nonmeasurable disease. CONCLUSIONS: BMS-275183 is preferably given in a twice weekly regimen and has considerable antitumor activity. A phase II trial in non-small cell lung cancer using the twice weekly schedule has been initiated.

Gemcitabine and epirubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a phase I/II study.

Gemcitabine and epirubicin were evaluated in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), efficacy, and toxicity of the combination. Patients initially received 800 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine (days 1 and 8) and 50 mg/m(2) of epirubicin (day 1) every 21 days. Each dose level had three to eight patients. Phase II used the dose level preceding the MTD. Forty-eight patients enrolled without reaching MTD; therefore, phase II used the highest dose level (1500 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine, 90 mg/m(2) of epirubicin). After 23 patients (group A) experienced hematologic toxicities and frequent dose reductions, 15 received 1250 mg/m(2) gemcitabine (days 1 and 4) and 90 mg/m(2) epirubicin (day 1) every 21 days (group B). Out of 38 patients, 46% responded (group A 32%, group B 67%). Median response duration was 8.5 months; median time to progression 8.4 months; and median time to treatment failure 4.8 months. Gemcitabine and epirubicin are well tolerated and active in MBC patients, and the group B regimen warrants further investigation.

Pemetrexed combined with oxaliplatin or carboplatin as first-line treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial.

PURPOSE: To determine efficacy and toxicity of two pemetrexed-based regimens in chemonaive patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients were randomly assigned to receive pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) plus oxaliplatin 120 mg/m(2) (PemOx) or pemetrexed plus carboplatin AUC6 (PemCb). All drugs were given on day 1 of a 21-day cycle for up to six cycles. Folic acid and vitamin B(12) were given to all patients to minimize pemetrexed-related toxicities. RESULTS: Forty-one patients received PemOx and 39 received PemCb. Objective tumor response rates were 26.8% for PemOx patients (95% confidence interval, 14.2-42.9) and 31.6% for PemCb patients (95% confidence interval, 17.5-48.7). Median time to progression was 5.5 and 5.7 months, respectively, for PemOx and PemCb. Median overall survival times were 10.5 months for both treatment groups (range, <1 to >20 months). The 1-year survival rate was 49.9% for PemOx patients and 43.9% for PemCb patients. Common toxicity criteria grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities among PemOx patients were grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (7.3%), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (2.4%), and grade 3 anemia (2.4%). PemCb patients experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (25.6%), grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (17.9%), and grade 3 anemia (7.7%). Grade 3 vomiting occurred in three PemOx patients and grade 3 fatigue occurred in three PemCb patients. One grade 3 neurosensory toxicity occurred in the PemOx group. Three patients (PemOx 1 and PemCb 2) experienced febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy measures for both regimens seem similar to the most effective chemotherapies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (platinum combinations) with less hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity. Comparing either of these two regimens to platinum-based therapies in a large randomized trial is warranted.

PARP1 impact on DNA repair of platinum adducts: preclinical and clinical read-outs.

Evaluation of DNA repair proteins might provide meaningful information in relation to prognosis and chemotherapy efficacy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients. The role of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase (PARP) in DNA repair of platinum adducts has not been firmly established. We used a DNA repair functional test based on antibody recognition of cisplatin intrastrand platinum adducts on DNA. We evaluated the effect of PARP inhibition on DNA repair functionality in a panel of cisplatin cell lines treated by the clinical-grade pharmacological inhibitor CEP8983 (a 4-methoxy-carbazole derivate) and the commercially available inhibitor PJ34 (phenanthridinone). We determined PARP1 protein expression in whole tumor sections from the International Adjuvant Lung cancer Trial (IALT)-bio study and tested a 3-marker PARP1/MSH2/ERCC1 algorithm combining PARP1 tumor status with previously published data. Chemosensitivity of cisplatin in NSCLC cell lines was correlated with the accumulation of cisplatin DNA adducts (P=0.0004). Further, the pharmacological inhibition of PARP induced a 1.7 to 2.3-fold increase in platinum adduct accumulation (24h) in A549 cell line suggesting a slow-down of platinum DNA-adduct repair capacity. In parallel, PARP1 inhibition increased the sensitivity to cisplatin treatment. In patient samples, PARP1 expression levels did not influence patient survival or the effect of platinum-based post-operative chemotherapy in the global IALT-bio population (interaction P=0.79). Among cases with high expression of all three markers (triple positive), untreated patients had prolonged survival with a median DFS of 7.8 years, (HR=0.34, 95%CI [0.19-0.61], adjusted P=0.0003) compared to triple negative patients (1.4 years). Remarkably, triple positive patients suffered from a detrimental effect (4.9-year reduction of median DFS) by post-operative cisplatin-based chemotherapy (HR=1.79, 95%CI [1.01-3.17], adjusted P=0.04, chemotherapy vs. control). Combinatorial sub-group analysis of the 3 markers further suggested that PARP1 tumor positivity might constitute a molecular context with high theranostic interest of ERCC1 and MSH2 in NSCLC. In conclusion, our data confirm that platinum DNA adduct accumulation is linked to chemosensitivity, which increase by pharmacological PARP inhibitors points to a role of PARP-dependent DNA repair in the process. We further suggest DNA repair biomarkers should be analyzed in a larger context of multiple DNA repair pathway regulation.