Patient reported outcomes after multivisceral resection for advanced rectal cancers in female patients.

INTRODUCTION: Multivisceral resections for rectal cancer can lead to long-term functional disturbances. This study aims to evaluate the quality-of-life outcomes in female patients who underwent multivisceral resection for rectal cancer, specifically focusing on urinary and sexual functions. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on female patients who underwent multivisceral rectal resections. Quality of life was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-CR29. RESULTS: Out of 198 female patients that underwent multivisceral resections, 69 were assessable for functional outcomes. The uterus was removed in 42 patients (61%), and the posterior vaginal wall in 34 (49%). A vaginal reconstructive procedure was carried out in 30% (21 patients). Patients reported the most troubles with urinary frequency (mean: 69.6; SD: 9.9), hair loss (mean: 64.7; SD: 13.9), pain during intercourse (mean: 44; SD: 40.7), and bowel frequency (mean: 36.9; SD: -10.7) in this order. Amongst the functional scales, anxiety about future health (mean: 42.5; SD: -018.9) and interest in sex (mean: 57.2; SD: 33.2) scored the lowest. CONCLUSION: Multivisceral rectal resections in female patients are associated with physical and psychosocial changes resulting in urinary and bowel complaints, anxiety about future health, poor sexual health, and pain.

Comparing robotic with laparoscopic beyond total mesorectal excision for advanced rectal cancer-a propensity-matched analysis.

AIM: Robotic surgery is increasingly being used for rectal resection, with short-term benefits such as reduced hospital stay, faster bowel recovery and fewer complications. However, its utility for advanced rectal cancers requiring beyond total mesorectal excision has not been adequately evaluated. The aim of this study was to compare robotic and laparoscopic approaches for extended rectal resection, with postoperative and short-term oncological outcomes as endpoints. METHOD: A retrospective, single-centre study of patients with advanced rectal cancer requiring extended rectal resection between January 2017 and December 2022 was carried out. Beyond total mesorectal excisions included pelvic exenteration, en bloc soft tissue or partial organ resection with the rectum, and lateral pelvic node dissection. Propensity score matching in a 4:1 ratio of laparoscopic to robotic was performed with age, sex, comorbidities, body mass index, organs involved, clinical T stage and colonoscopic obstruction. RESULTS: A total of 425 beyond total mesorectal excisions were performed by minimally invasive approaches during the study period, and after propensity matching 228 laparoscopic operations were compared with 57 robotic resections. All baseline characteristics were balanced. No difference in blood loss, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, positive resection margin or nodal yield was found, but there was a somewhat longer operating duration in robotics. The 2-year disease-free and overall survival were also similar. CONCLUSIONS: No differences in postoperative or short-term oncological outcomes were found between robotic and laparoscopic beyond total mesorectal excisions for advanced tumours when performed by teams experienced in both robotics and laparoscopy.

Complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer: Is D3 lymphadenectomy necessary?

AIM: Although complete mesocolic excision (CME) for colon cancer is oncologically sound, to date, there has been no consensus on the extent of lymphadenectomy in radical right colectomy. This study essentially compared the perioperative and survival outcomes of CME with two templates of lymphadenectomy for right colon cancer. METHOD: This was a propensity matched, retrospective analysis of a single centre, prospectively maintained database of all patients undergoing elective right colectomy for nonmetastatic, biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma from November 2013 to October 2018. CME + D3 was adopted selectively, documented prospectively, and compared with patients undergoing CME + central vascular ligation (CVL). The only technical difference between the groups was the excision of the surgical trunk of Gillot in the CME + D3 group. Postoperative, long-term outcomes and patterns of recurrence were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Of the 244 eligible patients, 88 (36.1%) and 156 (63.9%) underwent CME + D3 and CME + CVL, respectively. Matched groups (72 [CME + D3] vs. 108 [CME + CVL]) showed no difference in histology, tumour grade, postoperative complications, mortality, and hospital stay. CME + D3 was preferentially performed laparoscopically (35.2% vs. 9%), was associated with lower blood loss (215 mL vs. 297 mL, p = 0.001), higher nodal yield (31 vs. 25 nodes, p = 0.003) and a higher incidence of chyle leak (4 vs. 0, p = 0.013). At a median follow-up of more than 57 months, there was no significant difference in local recurrence, disease-free or overall survival. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, lymphadenectomy along the superior mesenteric vein, as a component of CME for right colon cancer, offered a higher nodal yield with no improvement in oncological outcome. Dissection of the SMV, over and above a D2 dissection, could therefore be restricted to specialized colorectal units until further studies establish the incremental oncological benefit of this extended lymphadenectomy or define a patient group in whom it is beneficial.

Postoperative Hyperbilirubinemia and Acute Liver Dysfunction after Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC.

How to cite this article: Kannancheeri A, Solanki SL, Kazi M, Saklani A. Postoperative Hyperbilirubinemia and Acute Liver Dysfunction after Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(1):80-81.

Outcomes of extended total mesorectal excision in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

AIM: Extended total mesorectal excision (eTME) is a complex procedure involving en bloc resection of the structures surrounding the various quadrants of the rectum. This study, presenting the largest series so far of patients undergoing eTME, aimed to assess the surgical and survival outcomes of patients following treatment with eTME and to compare these outcomes with historical data on pelvic exenteration. METHOD: The study is a retrospective review of all patients with locally advanced rectal cancer requiring an eTME (2014-2020). The database includes the demographic profile, operative details, histopathological features and follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty three patients who underwent eTME were analysed. The overall Clavien-Dindo complication rate of > IIIa was 21.1%. The anterior quadrant was the most common anatomical site resected (68.5%). The R1 resection rate was 10.4%. After a median follow-up of 28 months, there were 51 recurrences in the study and twenty two deaths were recorded. The local recurrence rate was 7.3% among the study population. The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival were 66.7% and 80.4%, respectively, at 3 years. The majority of the recurrences were distant metastasis (84.3%). In univariate analysis, the quadrant involved did not affect survival. In multivariate analysis, signet ring histology, metastatic presentation, inadequate tumour response and R1 resection affected DFS. CONCLUSION: The recurrence pattern, R1 resection rate and survival outcomes of patients in the present study were comparable with those for patients undergoing an exenteration. Therefore, eTME is probably a safe alternative to pelvic exenterations when R0 resection is achievable and when the procedure is performed in high-volume specialist tertiary care centres.

The use of an obstetric balloon as a pelvic spacer in preventing empty pelvis syndrome after total pelvic exenteration in rectal cancers - A prospective safety and efficacy study for the Bakri balloon.

AIM: Empty pelvis syndrome (EPS) is a source of considerable morbidity following total pelvic exenteration. None of the available methods have been universally successful in mitigating this problem. The aim of this work was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the obstetric Bakri balloon in preventing empty pelvis syndrome. METHOD: This study was a combined prospective and retrospective study of all total pelvic exenterations for rectal cancers from a single institution performed between October 2013 and May 2022. Since December 2019 the Bakri balloon was used in all patients who provided consent. EPS within 90 days was the primary end point, and included bowel obstruction, pelvic collection and entero-perineal fistula. Comparison with those patients who did not have a Bakri balloon was performed. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients with a Bakri balloon were compared with 96 patients without a balloon placed after pelvic exenteration. No patient experienced an untoward complication from balloon deployment. The incidence of EPS was 13.3% and 22.9% in the Bakri and no Bakri cohorts, respectively (p = 0.110). Every component of EPS was proportionally lower, without statistical significance. Based on point estimates, the number needed to treat to prevent EPS using the Bakri balloon was 10. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the Bakri balloon was safe without serious adverse events. The incidence of EPS after total pelvic exenteration was not statistically different with the use of the Bakri balloon despite a 9.6% reduction. A larger comparative study is needed to evaluate the efficacy of the balloon.

Should anorectal manometry be routine before stoma reversal in patients after an intersphincteric resection?

INTRODUCTION: Anorectal manometry (ARM) is sometimes performed before ostomy reversal in patients with an intersphincteric resection (ISR) to predict bowel function. However, no clinical predictive data exist regarding its utility. METHODS: The single-centre, retrospective data of ISR patients who had an ARM prior to ostomy reversal, and bowel functional assessment with the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) and Wexner incontinence scores at least 6 months after reversal, were considered. Correlation statistics were performed with each of the manometric parameters and functional outcome categories. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were included. The median basal and squeeze pressures were 41 and 100 mmHg, respectively. Any LARS (score ≥20) and major incontinence (score ≥11) was observed in 51.7% and 16.9%, respectively. None of the manometric parameters (median basal or maximum squeeze pressure, anal canal length, volume at urge and the ability to expel) correlated with LARS or incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: Anorectal manometry (ARM) before ostomy reversal to predict bowel function at 6 months or beyond was not helpful in patients with an ISR and diverting stoma. No manometric parameter correlated with the LARS or Wexner incontinence scores.

Splenic flexure cancer: is right extended hemicolectomy better than left hemicolectomy?

INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus on the optimal surgery for splenic flexure cancers. METHODS: Review of a prospectively maintained database of patients with splenic flexure cancer undergoing either a right extended hemicolectomy or left hemicolectomy at a tertiary care cancer hospital from 14.5.2010 to 16.9.2021. The primary outcome measures were postoperative morbidity and hospital stay with secondary outcomes being overall survival, disease-free survival, and long-term patient reported functional and quality of life outcomes. RESULTS: The demographic variables were evenly distributed between groups, and median follow-up was 44 months. The groups were comparable in terms of postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo complication ≥ 3a 10.6% vs 10%, p = 0.322) and hospital stay (8 days vs 7 days, p = 0.316). Oncological outcomes were similar in both groups (3-year disease-free survival 71.8% vs 67.8%, p = 0.877, and 3-year overall survival 83.9% vs 75.8%, p = 0.787), and long-term patient-reported functional outcomes were excellent in both groups. CONCLUSION: Oncological outcomes, post operative morbidity, and long-term patient reported functional outcomes are comparable in patients undergoing either a right extended or left hemicolectomy for splenic flexure cancer.

Empty pelvis syndrome: a retrospective audit from a tertiary cancer center.

INTRODUCTION: Empty pelvis syndrome (EPS) has been defined as a complications arising as a sequel of empty space created after extensive pelvic surgery involving perineal resection. However this definition has been heterogenous throughout the limited literature available. Hence, EPS is a significant yet under recognized complication vexing both patients and surgeons. Even till date, prevention and management of EPS remain a challenge. Various preventive strategies have been employed each with its own complications. Few small studies mentioned incidence of this dreaded complication in between 20 and 40%. But most of these studies quote vague evidence and especially only after TPE surgeries. To the best of our knowledge, incidence after APR and PE has never been mentioned in literature. PURPOSE: To assess the clinical burden of empty pelvis syndrome in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection (APR), posterior exenteration (PE), or total pelvic exenteration (TPE) for low rectal cancers. METHODS: This is a retrospective audit from a high-volume tertiary cancer center in India. Patients who underwent APR, PE, or TPE between the years 2013 to 2021 were screened and analyzed for incidence, presentation, and management of empty pelvic syndrome (EPS). RESULTS: A total of 1224 patients' electronic medical records were screened for complications related to empty pelvis. The overall incidence of EPS was 95/1224 (7%) with 55/1024 (5%) in APR, 8/39 (20.5%) in PE, and 32/143 (21.9%) in TPE. The most common clinical presentation was small bowel obstruction 43/95 (45.2%) and most presented late, 56/95 (60%), i.e., after 30 days of surgery. Most of the patients who had EPS were managed conservatively 55/95 (57%). CONCLUSION: EPS is a significant clinical problem that can lead to major morbidity, especially after exenterative surgeries warranting effective preventive strategies.

Prognostic Nutritional Index Prior to Rectal Cancer Resection Predicts Overall Survival.

Prognostic nutritional index (PNI) correlates with postoperative complications and survival in colorectal cancers. Separate studies for rectal cancers are not available where the majority have preoperative radiation, operated by minimally invasive approaches and have diverting ostomies.Consecutive rectal resections between October 2014 and December 2017 from a single center were included. PNI was calculated as 10 x (serum Albumin) + 0.005 x TLC (per mm3) before operation. Multivariate cox regression was used with overall survival (OS) as the dependent variable. Interaction terms of PNI with neoadjuvant therapy, surgical approach and postoperative complications were used to assess specific subgroups.Three-hundred forty elective rectal resections were included with a mean PNI of 46.711 (SD - 6.692), and a median follow up of 44 mo. In multivariable regression, PNI predicted OS (HR - 0.943; p-0.001). Interaction of PNI with preoperative radiation or surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, or robotic) did not change its influence on survival. PNI predicted survival with similar hazard even in patients without major postoperative complicationsDespite routine diversion after rectal resections, PNI predicted OS with an absolute survival benefit of 1.2% at 3-year for every unit increase in PNI irrespective of preoperative therapy or surgical approach.

Bowel Functional Outcomes After Long-Course or Short-Course Radiation for Advanced Rectal Cancers: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Despite short-course radiation and chemotherapy gaining popularity because of similar or better oncological outcomes, functional outcomes relative to long-course radiation have not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To compare bowel function outcomes after long-course or short-course radiation and delayed operation for advanced rectal cancers. DESIGN: Propensity-matched analysis. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a single tertiary cancer center. Patients were operated on between 2014 and 2020. PATIENTS: The study included patients with locally advanced, nonmetastatic, mid, and low rectal cancers who underwent low anterior resection with stapled anastomosis and diverting ostomy. Extended or beyond total mesorectal excisions and lateral node dissections were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Long-course radiation delivered as a radiation dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions or short-course radiation (5 Gy in 5 fractions) and delayed surgery after 4 to 6 weeks with or without chemotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: One-time assessment of low anterior resections syndrome and Wexner incontinence scores at least 6 months after stoma reversal. RESULTS: After matching 124 patients in the 1:2 ratio between short- and long-course radiations, 93 patients were included for analysis. Any low anterior resection syndrome was found in 90.3% of short-course patients compared to 54.8% after long-course radiation (p < 0.001). Major incontinence was detected in 6.5% after short-course radiation as opposed to 8.1% of patients after long-course radiation (p = 0.781). On multivariate logistic regression, short-course radiation predicted the development of any low anterior resection syndrome with an OR of 4.4. LIMITATIONS: Selection and misclassification biases from retrospective recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with locally advanced, nonmetastatic, mid, and low rectal cancers who underwent preoperative radiation followed by stapled low anterior resection, short-course radiation had higher probability of developing low anterior resection syndrome than long-course radiation. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C37. RESULTADOS DE LA FUNCIN INTESTINAL DESPUS DE LA RADIACIN DE CICLO LARGO O CORTO EN CNCER DE RECTO AVANZADO UN ANLISIS EMPAREJADO DE PROPENSIN: ANTECEDENTES:A pesar de que la radiación de corta duración y la quimioterapia están ganando popularidad debido a resultados oncológicos similares o mejores, los resultados funcionales en relación con la radiación de larga duración no han sido evaluado.OBJETIVO:Comparar resultados de la función intestinal después de la radiación de ciclo largo o corto y cirugía diferida para los en cáncer de recto avanzado.DISEÑO:Análisis emparejado de propensión.ENTORNO CLINICO:Centro único de cáncer terciario. Pacientes operados entre 2014 y 2020.PACIENTES:Cánceres de recto medio y bajo localmente avanzados, no metastásicos, que se sometieron a resección anterior baja con anastomosis grapada y ostomía de derivación. Se excluyeron las escisiones total de mesorecto extendidas o más allá del plano y las disecciones de los ganglios laterales.INTERVENCIONES:Radiación de ciclo largo administrada como 50 Gy en 25 fracciones o radiación de ciclo corto (5 Gy en 5 fracciones) y cirugía diferida después de 4 a 6 semanas con o sin quimioterapia.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Evaluación única del síndrome de reseccion anterior baja y escala de Wexner de incontinencia al menos seis meses después de la restitución del tránsito intestinal.RESULTADOS:Después de emparejar 124 pacientes en la proporción 1:2 entre radiación de ciclo corto y largo, se incluyeron 93 pacientes para el análisis. Se encontró cualquier síndrome de resección anterior baja en el 90,3% de los pacientes de ciclo corto en comparación con el 54,8% después de la radiación de ciclo largo (p < 0,001). Se detectó incontinencia grave en el 6,5% después de un tratamiento de corta duración frente al 8,1% de los pacientes que recibieron un tratamiento de radiación de larga duración (p = 0,781). En la regresión logística multivariable, la radiación de corta duración predijo el desarrollo de cualquier síndrome de resección anterior baja con una probabilidad de 4,4.LIMITACIONES:Sesgos de selección y clasificación errónea de reclutamiento retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:Para los cánceres de recto medio e inferior localmente avanzados, no metastásicos, que se sometieron a radiación preoperatoria seguida de resección anterior baja con grapas, curso corto tuvo una mayor probabilidad de desarrollar síndrome de resección anterior baja en comparación con radiación de curso largo. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C37. (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon).

Bladder preserving robotic pelvic exenteration for locally advanced rectal cancer-technique and short-term outcomes.

AIM: In selected patients with advanced rectal cancers involving the prostate or seminal vesicles, the bladder can be preserved to avoid the complications associated with an ileal conduit. The study was aimed at reviewing the technique and short-term outcomes of patients that underwent bladder sparing robotic pelvic exenteration with suprapubic cystostomy (SPC). METHODS: Case series of bladder preserving exenteration from a single tertiary care center. Technique for en-bloc prostatectomy with abdominoperineal resection is described. RESULTS: Five patients underwent bladder sparing robotic pelvic exenteration with SPC, all had R0 resections. Four patients had prostatic invasion and one patient had prostatic adenocarcinoma. Postoperative complications were seen in three patients of which two were re-explored. At a median follow-up of 10 months, two patients developed systemic relapses. There were no local recurrences. CONCLUSION: Robotic bladder sparing exenteration is technically feasible, provides acceptable short-term outcomes, and avoids complications of ileal conduit.

Learning curves for minimally invasive total mesorectal excision beyond the competency phase - a risk-adjusted cumulative sum analysis of 1000 rectal resections.

AIM: The learning curve of total mesorectal excision (TME) by minimally invasive surgery (MIS) beyond the competency phase has not been adequately reported with large numbers or using a statistical control limit. The aim of this work was to study the learning curve of MIS TME in the proficiency phase. METHOD: Risk-adjusted (RA) cumulative sum (CUSUM) and RA Bernoulli CUSUM charts were plotted for sequential MIS TME performed by a surgical team over 1000 cases. Surgical failure, a composite endpoint of conversions, complications of grade IIIA or above, R1 resections and inadequate nodal yield were used to monitor the performance. RESULTS: The RA CUSUM detected an inflection point around the 600th operation. Two peaks were identified that could be traced back to probable causes of surgical failure. Similar inflection points were detected at the 450th case for laparoscopic TME and the 367th case for sphincter preservation. No single definite threshold point was noticed for robotic or abdominoperineal operations. At no point did the curves cross the safety threshold. The probability of surgical failure reduced with increasing experience in the multivariate regression (OR 0.899, p = 0.000). This association persisted irrespective of the surgical approach (laparoscopic versus robotic) or the type of operation (sphincter preservation versus abdominoperineal resection). CONCLUSION: The learning curves for MIS TME did not cross the safety threshold beyond the competency phase. However, a 10% reduction of relative risk in surgical failure was observed for every 100 cases operated on.

Laparoscopic ovarian transposition in teenage and young women with locally advanced rectal cancer: Respite amidst cancer chaos.

AIM: Ovarian transposition is an established surgical technique to salvage ovaries in premenopausal women requiring pelvic radiation. The success rate of ovarian transposition varies widely depending on the route, technique of surgery, type of cancer and treatment. Here, we aimed to analyse the effectiveness of laparoscopic ovarian transposition (LOT) in teenage and young women prior to pelvic radiation in locally advanced rectal cancers (LARC). METHODS: Patients who underwent LOT for rectal cancers were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database from June 2013-September 2019. Disease characteristics, return of menstrual function and oncological outcomes were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 46 women with a mean age of 25.2 years who underwent LOT at the cancer centre were included in the study. Seventy percent were nulliparous. All patients were fit for discharge by 24 h. Mean time to start radiation was 19.6 days (range 3-47 days). Median follow-up of patients was 42 months. A total of 41 patients were assessable for ovarian function, 65.5% had resumption of menses. Median ovarian survival was 79 months and 5-year ovarian survival was 54%. Median overall survival from rectal cancer was 51 months. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic ovarian transposition is a safe and effective technique of ovarian protection from the gonadotoxic effects of pelvic radiation in LARC. It does not delay primary treatment and does not compromise oncological outcomes. Long-term follow-up is required to evaluate fertility and quality of life.

Early-onset non-metastatic colon cancers do not portend worse prognosis - implications for adjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Early-onset colon cancers are increasing and the independent influence of age on prognosis and therapeutic efficacy of adjuvant therapy is unclear. The primary aim of the present study was to determine if young age was an independent prognostic factor for survival. Secondarily, age would be used in the context of known factors that predict benefit with adjuvant chemotherapy in stages II and III. METHODS: Retrospective, single centre study of operated, non-metastatic colon cancer (> 15 cm from anal verge) without pre-operative therapy. Early onset cancers were defined as age ≤ 45 years. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Six-hundred thirty-three patients were included with 206 (32.5%) early-onset cancers. With a median follow-up of 48 months, 5-year DFS was 79.5% and 76.2% for early and late-onset cancers, respectively (p - 0.585). In multivariate analysis, only tumour sidedness, family history, T4 stage, node positivity and microsatellite instability status influenced DFS and not the age of onset (HR - 0.969; 95% - 0.63-1.49). These results were consistent with different models and with stage-wise distribution. CONCLUSIONS: Early-onset colon cancers treated with curative intent had survivals similar to older cohorts. Age was not an independent prognostic factor for recurrences. Age did not influence disease-free survival when stage-wise predictive variables for therapeutic benefit with adjuvant chemotherapy were considered.

Outcomes of rectal cancer patients with a positive pathological circumferential resection margin.

PURPOSE: Evidence-based management of positive pathological circumferential resection margin (pCRM) following preoperative radiation and an adequate rectal resection for rectal cancers is lacking. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained single-centre institutional database was done to study the patterns of failure and management strategies after a rectal cancer surgery with a positive pCRM. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma with a positive pCRM were identified over 8 years (2011-2018). Majority had low-lying rectal cancers (90.7%) and were operated after preoperative radiotherapy (95.3%). Operative procedures included abdomino-perineal resections, inter-sphincteric resections, low anterior resections and pelvic exenteration in 61 (70.9%), 9 (10.5%), 11(12.8%) and 5 (5.8%) patients respectively. A total of 83 (96.5%) received chemotherapy as the sole adjuvant treatment modality while 2 patients (2.3%) were given post-operative radiotherapy and 1 patient underwent revision surgery. A total of 53 patients (61.6%) had recurrence, with 16 (18.6%), 20 (23.2%), 8(9.3%) and 9 (10.5%) patients having locoregional, systemic, peritoneal and simultaneous local-systemic relapse. Systemic recurrences were more often detected either by surveillance in an asymptomatic patient (20.1%) while local (13.1%) and peritoneal (13.2%) recurrences were more often symptomatic (p = 0.000). The 2-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of the cohort was 82.4% and 74.0%. Median local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was 10.3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a positive pCRM have high local and distal relapse rates. Systemic relapses are more often asymptomatic as compared to peritoneal or locoregional relapse and detected on follow-up surveillance. Hence, identification of such recurrences while still salvageable via an intensive surveillance protocol is desirable.

Elevated CEA with negative PET scan on surveillance of colorectal cancers-a role of CEA kinetics.

INTRODUCTION: The management of patients with elevated CEA after curative treatment of colorectal cancers without structural disease is uncertain. The aim was to study the clinical risk factors, CEA thresholds, and kinetics that could predict relapses. METHODS: Retrospective study of colorectal cancers patients that were detected to have an elevated CEA (> 5 ng/ml on 2 separate occasions) and normal clinical exam, colonoscopy, and positron emission tomography (PET). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine the optimal cutoff for absolute CEA values and proportional rise that could predict recurrences. RESULTS: 162 patients were followed for a median of 42 months. 32 patients (19.7%) relapsed of which 11 (34.4%) had a peritoneal disease. Besides known clinical risk factors, higher CEA at the time of negative PET and rising CEA trend predicted disease recurrence on multivariate logistic regression. CEA threshold of 10.05 ng/ml provided a sensitivity/specificity of 53%/86.2%, while CEA velocity of 1.36 ng/ml over 3 months presented a sensitivity/specificity of 80%/70.6% for subsequent relapse. CONCLUSIONS: The discriminatory value of CEA kinetics was more than that of a single absolute value. An algorithm for managing these patients based on clinical risk factors, absolute CEA value, and its kinetics is suggested.

Long-term oncological outcomes of the sphincter preserving total mesorectal excision with varying distal resection margins.

INTRODUCTION: A subcentimeter distal resection margin (DRM) appears to be acceptable for most patients, however, long-term follow up and specific subsets where DRM would influence recurrences have not been adequately investigated. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all sphincter-preserving resections for mid and low rectal cancers between July 2011 and May 2015 was performed. Extended total mesorectal excisions (TME) and patients with positive pathologic circumferential margins (CRM) were excluded. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-six patients fit the inclusion criteria. DRM > 20 mm was obtained in 117 patients (49.6%), between 10 and 20 mm in 78 (33%) and <10 mm in 41 (17.4%) patients. Pathological DRM was positive in 4 patients (1.7%). Sixty-five recurrences occurred at a median follow up of 78.5 months. DRM did not influence any of the oncological outcomes. In a subset analysis of patients with poor pathological response to neoadjuvant radiation, that is, tumor regression grade > 3, DRM influenced disease-free survival (DFS) but not overall survival with a hazard ratio of 4.4 (p = 0.02). This was confirmed on multivariate regression analysis in this subgroup as well where pathological nodal status and DRM < 10 mm were independent predictors of DFS. CONCLUSIONS: A subcentimeter DRM may be acceptable in most patients except those who have an inadequate response to neoadjuvant radiation.

Optimal neoadjuvant strategy for signet ring cell carcinoma of the rectum-Is TNT the solution?

INTRODUCTION: The results of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for locally advanced rectal cancers (LARC) cannot be extrapolated to signet-ring cell cancers (SRCC) that have an extremely aggressive biology. METHODS: A retrospective study comparing long course chemoradiation (CTRT) against short course radiation (SCRT) and 12 weeks of chemotherapy for high-risk LARC. Primary endpoints were treatment failure and disease-free survival (DFS) RESULTS: CTRT was given to 74 (59.7%) and SCRT/Chemotherapy to 50 patients (40.3%). Additional chemotherapy was required in 54.1% and 28%, respectively. Except for nodal staging, no other MRI parameter down-staged. Treatment failures were seen in 33.9% and 25.8% had progression. The peritoneum was the commonest site of progression (59.4%). Of the patients that were surgically explored, 63.7% had R0 resections and pathological complete response was seen in 9.7%. At a median follow-up of 35 months, 56.5% had DFS events with a 3-year DFS of 39.5%. Recurrences were noted in 45.1% after curative resections and the 3-year OS/DFS of these patients were 67.2%/56.4%. On multivariate regression, the type of preoperative therapy did not influence treatment failures or DFS. CONCLUSIONS: SRCC is a very aggressive disease and none of the treatment strategies could show superiority over the other with very high peritoneal progression rates and relapses.

Outcomes of radical surgical resections for nonmetastatic anorectal melanomas: Experience from a tertiary care centre.

AIM: The outcome of radical surgery in nonmetastatic anorectal melanoma (AM) patients is studied infrequently. Here, we aimed to explore the stage-wise outcomes and the impact of radical resections in these patients. METHODS: In this single-centre retrospective study, data of 154 eligible patients were recorded and analysed. Data were obtained from November 2010 to September 2019 with follow-up until November 2020. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was calculated by Kaplan Meir method and univariate analysis of prognostic factors by Cox regression. RESULTS: Of 154 patients, 110 were metastatic (stage III) and 44 were nonmetastatic (stage I:22, stage II:22) and underwent curative resections. Median follow-up was 48 months (14-119 months). A total of 39 patients underwent total mesorectal excisions (TME) and five transanal excision (TAE) were performed. Seven patients underwent extended resections. Stage I and II patients had 3- and 5-year OS of 40% and 36%; and DFS of 45% and 33.2%, respectively. Median OS and DFS were 31 and 24 months, respectively. Stage II (node-positive) patients had better median OS compared to stage III (21 vs. 4 months; p = 0.000), and 54.5% patients had recurrences, most commonly both systemic and nodal (45.83%). Median OS of patients without recurrence was 34 months. CONCLUSION: In this large surgical series of AMs, outcome in stage I and II patients was significantly better than stage III and patients with stage II disease can have acceptable oncological outcomes. Radical surgical resections with or without lymphadenectomy could be considered in these patients. The role of adjuvant systemic therapy and radiation needs to be explored as part of multimodality treatment.