Genomic Evidence of In-Flight Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Despite Predeparture Testing.

Since the first wave of coronavirus disease in March 2020, citizens and permanent residents returning to New Zealand have been required to undergo managed isolation and quarantine (MIQ) for 14 days and mandatory testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). As of October 20, 2020, of 62,698 arrivals, testing of persons in MIQ had identified 215 cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among 86 passengers on a flight from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, that arrived in New Zealand on September 29, test results were positive for 7 persons in MIQ. These passengers originated from 5 different countries before a layover in Dubai; 5 had negative predeparture SARS-CoV-2 test results. To assess possible points of infection, we analyzed information about their journeys, disease progression, and virus genomic data. All 7 SARS-CoV-2 genomes were genetically identical, except for a single mutation in 1 sample. Despite predeparture testing, multiple instances of in-flight SARS-CoV-2 transmission are likely.

Incidence of maternal sensitisation to Rh(D) in Christchurch, New Zealand and reasons for prophylaxis failures.

AIM: To estimate the current incidence of maternal sensitisation to Rh(D) and examine reasons for prophylaxis failures. METHOD: Retrospective chart review of new sensitisations to Rh(D) detected in antenatal records, between 2005 and 2012 in Christchurch, New Zealand and systematic examination of circumstances likely to have caused prophylaxis failures. RESULTS: Fifty-four new sensitisations in an at-risk population of about 4624 in 8 years means an incidence of roughly 1.1%. In 86.6% of 45 sensitisations where information was available, there was a recognised sensitising event including previous deliveries while in 13.3% there were none. Of those with recognised sensitising events, 46.1% had anti-D prophylaxis per local guidelines, in 12.8%, prophylaxis was given though it did not conform, entirely, to guideline. No prophylaxis at all was given to 41% despite a sensitising event being recognised. CONCLUSION: The incidence of maternal sensitisation to Rh(D) in Christchurch, New Zealand, is as expected given our prophylaxis regimen. Half the sensitisations were associated with complete or partial failure to follow local guidelines. Better adherence to this may reduce incidence of sensitisation. It is also thrice as high as might be expected with a routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis (RAADP) program. An economic analysis of RAADP in New Zealand will be useful.