Long-term outcome of patients with and without super-response to CRT-D.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcome between patients with and without super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this cohort study, 167 consecutive CRT-D candidates were included. Super-response to CRT-D was defined clinically [improvement of ≥1 New York Heart Association (NYHA) class or ≥50 m in six-minute walk distance (6MWD)] and echocardiographically [increase of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥1 category (LVEF <30 to 30-40 % or 30-40 to 41-51 %) or reduction of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) ≥10 mm]. Clinical outcome (death, cardiac transplantation and appropriate shock therapy) was compared between super-responders (n = 32) and non-super-responders (n = 135). During follow-up (616 patient-years; median 3.3 years), all-cause mortality was significantly lower in super-responders compared to non-super-responders (log rank p < 0.05). At least one appropriate shock was noted in 22 % of super-responders and 39 % of non-super-responders (p = 0.069). Time to appropriate shock therapy was significantly longer in super-responders (log rank p < 0.05). Event-free survival from death or cardiac transplantation was comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Super-response to CRT-D is associated with improved survival and lower risk of appropriate shock therapy compared to non-super-responders. Further information about the mechanisms of super-response and its long-term consequences are needed to foresee favorable outcome after implantation of CRT-D.

Gender aspects in clinical presentation and prognostication of chronic heart failure according to NT-proBNP and the Heart Failure Survival Score.

AIMS: We performed a prospective multi-center study to assess gender-specific differences in the predictive value of the measured level of NT-proBNP and the calculated Heart Failure Survival Score (HFSS). METHODS: Baseline characteristics and follow-up data up to 5 years from 2,019 men and 530 women diagnosed with chronic heart failure (CHF) due to ischemic heart disease or dilated cardiomyopathy were prospectively compared. Death from any cause constituted the endpoint of the study. NT-proBNP was measured and HFSS calculated according to standard methods. Survival of men and women according to level of NT-proBNP and HFSS was analyzed in logistic regression models. RESULTS: Median NT-proBNP level in men was 1,394 ng/l (IQR 516-3,406 ng/l) and 1,168 ng/l (IQR 444-2,830 ng/l) in women (p = n.s.). Median HFSS value was 8.4 (IQR 7.7-9.1) and 8.5 (8.0-9.1) in men and women, respectively. NT-proBNP levels and HFSS score correlated well with survival rates in both genders (p for interaction = 0.22 for NT-proBNP and 0.93 for HFSS). The all-cause death rates were similar in men and women. CONCLUSION: Despite a number of gender-specific differences in CHF and the general predominance of men measured levels of NT-proBNP and HFSS score can be utilized for risk stratification with similar informative value in men and women.

Optimization of pharmacotherapy in chronic heart failure: is heart rate adequately addressed?

The aim of the study is to evaluate the use of beta-blockers in chronic heart failure (CHF) and the extent of heart rate reduction achieved in clinical practice and to determine differences in outcome of patients who fulfilled select inclusion criteria of the SHIFT study according to resting heart rate modulated by beta-blocker therapy. We evaluated an all-comer population of our dedicated CHF outpatient clinic between 2006 and 2010. For inclusion, individually optimized doses of guideline-recommended pharmacotherapy including beta-blockers had to be maintained for at least 3 months and routine follow-up performed at our outpatient CHF-clinic thereafter. Treatment dosages of beta-blockers, and demographic and clinical profiles including resting heart rate were assessed. The outcome of patients who fulfilled select inclusion criteria of the SHIFT study (left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35 %, sinus rhythm, NYHA II-IV) and were followed-up for at least 1 year was stratified according to resting heart rates: ≥75 versus <75 bpm and ≥70 versus <70 bpm. The composite primary endpoint was defined as all-cause death or hospital admission for worsening heart failure during 12-month follow-up. In total, 3,181 patients were assessed in regard to treatment dosages of beta-blockers, and demographic and clinical profiles including resting heart rate. Of the overall studied population, 443 patients fulfilled all inclusion criteria and entered outcome analysis. Median observation time of survivors was 27.5 months with 1,039.7 observation-years in total. Up-titration to at least half the evidence-based target dose of beta-blockers was achieved in 69 % and full up-titration in 29 % of these patients. Patients with increased heart rates were younger, more often male, exhibited a higher NYHA functional class and lower LVEF. The primary endpoint occurred in 21 % of patients in the ≥70 bpm group versus 9 % of patients in the group with heart rates <70 bpm (p <0.01). Likewise, comparing the groups ≥75 and <75 bpm, the primary endpoint was significantly increased in the group of patients with heart rates ≥75 bpm 27 vs. 12.2 %; p < 0.01). 5-year event-free survival was significantly lower among patients with heart rates ≥70 bpm as compared to those with <70 bpm (log-rank test p < 0.05) and among patients in the ≥75 bpm group versus <75 bpm group (log-rank test p < 0.01). In conclusion, in clinical practice, 53 % of CHF patients have inadequate heart rate control (heart rates ≥75 bpm) despite concomitant beta-blocker therapy. In this non-randomized cohort, adequate heart rate control under individually optimized beta-blocker therapy was associated with improved mid- and long-term clinical outcome up to 5 years. As further up titration of beta-blockers is not achievable in many patients, the administration of a selective heart rate lowering agent, such as ivabradine adjuvant to beta-blockers may pose an opportunity to further modulate outcome.