Effects of IV dexmedetomidine as a pre-medication on clinical profile of bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia in lower abdominal surgeries: a randomized clinical study.

Introduction: to evaluate the effects of intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine as a pre-medication on clinical profile of bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia in lower abdominal surgeries. Methods: this prospective randomized double blind study was done on 60 patients with ASA grade I/II undergoing lower abdominal surgeries under bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia. They were allocated to group-1 and group-2. Group-1 (control group) received normal saline and group-2 (study group) received IV dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg over 10 min as premedication. Five minutes after premedication, subarachnoid block (SAB) was given with 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine following which sensory and motor blockade, hemodynamic changes, sedation, and complications of the surgery were recorded and this data was analyzed statistically using χ2 test, corrected χ2 test, Fisher´s exact test, and test of proportion (Z-test). Results: the results of the present study showed that in group-2 there was significant decrease in the onset of sensory block, higher level of sensory blockade achieved, less time required to attain highest level of anaesthesia, prolonged time required for 2 dermatomal regression, prolonged duration of sensory blockade, prolonged duration of analgesia, decrease in onset of motor blockade, no significant increase in duration of motor blockade, there was overall hemodynamic stability except for few cases of bradycardia responding to atropine and hypotension responding to mephentramine, adequate and acceptable intraoperative sedation, and significantly less incidence of shivering in perioperative period. Conclusion: IV infusion of dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg body weight prior to SAB can be recommended to achieve better sensory blockade and adequate hemodynamic stability and sedation.

Addition of Nitazoxanide to Standard Clarithromycin Based Triple Therapy for 2 Weeks Effectively Eradicates Treatment-Naive Helicobacter Pylori Infection. A Single Centre prospective, open-label study.

BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant strains of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) led to reduced success with traditional H. pylori treatments. This warrants further evaluation of other treatment options. One such treatment regimen of interest is nitazoxanide containing regimen. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of the addition of nitazoxanide to clarithromycin-based triple therapy in patients with H. pylori infection. METHODS: In this single-center prospective observational trial, patients with H. pylori infection were treated with a regimen comprising of nitazoxanide 1000 mg, amoxicillin 2000 mg, clarithromycin 1000 mg, and esomeprazole 80 mg per day (NACE regimen) for14 days. Eradication of H. pylori infection was assessed 4 weeks after completion of therapy by using stool antigen assay. Treatment compliance and adverse effects were also evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 111 patients who entered into the study for final analysis, H. pylori eradication was achieved in 93.7% (104 out of 111) patients in per-protocol analysis and 90.4% (104 out of 115) patients in intention to treat analysis. The treatment regimen was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The addition of nitazoxanide to standard clarithromycin-based triple therapy effectively eradicates H. pylori infection. This regimen is safe and well tolerated.

Comparative Evaluation of Different Doses of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine on Hemodynamic Response during Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Spine Surgeries: A Prospective, Double-Blind Study.

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine, a selective alpha 2 (α2)-adrenergic receptor agonist, has been used to blunt the hemodynamic response associated with laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation, which is a common concern for the anesthesiologist, especially in high-risk patients and geriatric age group. AIM AND OBJECTIVES: The current study is to evaluate and compare the effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine in controlling hemodynamic response during tracheal intubation in geriatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After getting approval from the Ethical Committee, 90 patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status Classes I and II, aged ≥60 years, were randomly assigned into three groups: Group I (normal saline, n = 30), Group II - dexmedetomidine (0.50 µg/kg, n = 30), and Group III - dexmedetomidine (1.00 µg/kg, n = 30). Dexmedetomidine was infused for 10 min before induction. Data were recorded as before infusion (T0), at the end of infusion (T1), before tracheal intubation (T2), at the moment of tracheal intubation (T3) 5 min after tracheal intubation (T4), and 10 min after tracheal intubation (T5). Modified observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale score was observed at the time of T0 and T1. All statistical analyses were done using SPSS version 22. RESULTS: Mean systolic blood pressure was statistically significantly (P < 0.05) more among Group I compared to Group II and III at T2, T3, and T4. Mean heart rate (HR) value was significantly (P < 0.05) more among Group I compared to Group III from T1 to T5, whereas there was no significant change in HR between Group I and Group II and at T4 and T5 h was comparable in Group II and Group III. CONCLUSION: This study concluded that more acceptable hemodynamic changes were seen with 0.50 µg/kg dexmedetomidine when compared with 1.0 µg/kg dexmedetomidine during intubation. A lower dose besides being cost-effective is also free of side effects associated with the higher dose of 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine.