Validation of the Vulvovaginal Symptom Questionnaire in Turkish women with genitourinary syndrome of menopause.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to psychometrically validate the Turkish version of the Vulvovaginal Symptom Questionnaire (VSQ). METHODS: Postmenopausal women with and without genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) were included as the target population and the control group. Psychometric properties were validated both for sexually active (21 items) and passive women (16 items). Several a priori hypotheses were formulated to assess construct validity. Scores of GSM-Assessment Tool, Female Sexual Function Index, Michigan Incontinence Severity Index, Female Genital Self-Image Scale, and Menopause Rating Scale and their correlation with VSQ scores were compared. RESULTS: A total of 242 postmenopausal women were included. The VSQ showed good internal consistency with a Cronbach alpha coefficient of 0.822 (0.800-0.821) and 0.873 (0.853-0.870) in sexually active and passive women, respectively. Originally proposed model (4-factor model, n = 162) showed adequate fit in women with active sexuality and the 3-factor model (n = 242) showed moderate fit. The test-retest reliability was good for symptoms, emotions, and life impact subscales (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.846, 0.835, and 0.755, respectively) and moderate for sexual impact subscale (ICC: 0.643). More than 75% of hypotheses were confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows successful cross-cultural adaptation and validation with sufficient psychometric properties for VSQ to be used in Turkish postmenopausal women with GSM.

Lung ultrasonography in pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic: an interobserver agreement study among obstetricians.

PURPOSE: This study investigated interobserver agreement in lung ultrasonography (LUS) in pregnant women performed by obstetricians with different levels of expertise, with confirmation by an expert radiologist. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted at a tertiary "Coronavirus Pandemic Hospital" in April 2020. Pregnant women suspected to have coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were included. Two blinded experienced obstetricians performed LUS on pregnant women separately and noted their scores for 14 lung zones. Following a theoretical and hands-on practical course, one experienced obstetrician, two novice obstetric residents, and an experienced radiologist blindly evaluated anonymized and randomized still images and videoclips retrospectively. Weighted Cohen's kappa and Krippendorff's alpha tests were used to assess the interobserver agreement. RESULTS: Fifty-two pregnant women were included, with confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis rate of 82.7%. In total, 336 eligible still images and 115 videoclips were included in the final analysis. The overall weighted Cohen's kappa values ranged from 0.706 to 0.912 for the 14 lung zones. There were only seven instances of major disagreement (>1 point) in the evaluation of 14 lung zones of 52 patients (n=728). The overall agreement between the radiologist and obstetricians for the still images (Krippendorff's α=0.856, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.797 to 0.915) and videoclips (Krippendorff's α=0.785; 95% CI, 0.709 to 0.861) was good. CONCLUSION: The interobserver agreement between obstetricians with different levels of experience on still images and videoclips of LUS was good. Following a brief theoretical course, obstetricians' performance of LUS in pregnant women and interpretation of pre-acquired LUS images can be considered consistent.