RESUMEN
Intramuscular adrenaline autoinjectors are accepted as first-line treatment for out-of-hospital anaphylaxis but face ongoing issues of patient nonadherence related to drug expiry, availability, correct administration, and public recognition of the disease. Adrenaline is associated with possible harms in patients with defined comorbidities but is still considered preferable. Further research and policy is required to facilitate the effective treatment of anaphylaxis.
Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia , Epinefrina , Humanos , Epinefrina/uso terapéutico , Anafilaxia/tratamiento farmacológico , Anafilaxia/epidemiología , Australia/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , HospitalesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The frequency of oxycodone adverse reactions, subsequent opioid prescription, effect on pain and patient care in general surgery patients are not well known. This study aimed to determine prevalence of documented oxycodone allergy and intolerances (independent variables) in a general surgical cohort, and association with prescribing other analgesics (particularly opioids), subjective pain scores, and length of hospital stay (dependent variables). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included general surgery patients from two South Australian hospitals between April 2020 and March 2022. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated associations between previous oxycodone allergies and intolerances, prescription records, subjective pain scores, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Of 12 846 patients, 216 (1.7%) had oxycodone allergies, and 84 (0.7%) oxycodone intolerances. The 216 oxycodone allergy patients had lower odds of receiving oxycodone (OR 0.17, P < 0.001), higher odds of tramadol (OR 3.01, P < 0.001) and tapentadol (OR 2.87, P = 0.001), but 91 (42.3%) still received oxycodone and 19 (8.8%) morphine. The 84 with oxycodone intolerance patients had lower odds of receiving oxycodone (OR 0.23, P < 0.001), higher odds of fentanyl (OR 3.6, P < 0.001) and tramadol (OR 3.35, P < 0.001), but 42 (50%) still received oxycodone. Patients with oxycodone allergies and intolerances had higher odds of elevated subjective pain (OR 1.60, P = 0.013; OR 2.36, P = 0.002, respectively) and longer length of stay (OR 1.36, P = 0.038; OR 2.24, P = 0.002, respectively) than patients without these. CONCLUSIONS: General surgery patients with oxycodone allergies and intolerances are at greater risk of worse postoperative pain and longer length of stay, compared to patients without. Many still receive oxycodone, and other opioids that could cause cross-reactivity.
Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad , Tramadol , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Oxicodona/efectos adversos , Australia del Sur/epidemiología , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Australia , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiologíaAsunto(s)
Asma/terapia , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Hipersensibilidad Respiratoria/terapia , Administración Sublingual , Alérgenos/administración & dosificación , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Alérgenos/inmunología , Asma/epidemiología , Asma/inmunología , Humanos , Inmunoterapia/efectos adversos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Hipersensibilidad Respiratoria/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad Respiratoria/inmunología , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/epidemiología , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/inmunología , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/terapia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic mucus chronic rhinosinusitis (EMCRS) can be subclassified using the criteria of detection of fungi in eosinophilic mucus and systemic fungal allergy. Allergic fungal sinusitis (AFS), a subgroup of EMCRS characterized by the presence of fungal allergy, is proposed to be an immunoglobulin (Ig)E-driven disease, distinct from other EMCRS subgroups. However, our recent studies cast doubt on the central pathogenic role of allergy in AFS. The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical features of EMCRS patients from the different subcategories to determine the relevance of this classification system. METHOD: The demographic, clinical, and immunologic characteristics of the EMCRS subgroups were examined prospectively and compared with three control groups: healthy volunteers, allergic rhinitis with fungal allergy, and chronic rhinosinusitis without eosinophilic mucus. RESULTS: EMCRS patients with allergy were younger than those without. There was no significant difference in clinicopathologic parameters between EMCRS subgroups. As a single group, EMCRS had a more severe sinus disease compared with chronic rhinosinusitis patients. CONCLUSIONS: AFS was not clinically distinct from other subgroups of EMCRS. However, eosinophilic mucus may mark a more severe and distinct form of sinus disease.
Asunto(s)
Eosinofilia/diagnóstico , Micosis/diagnóstico , Rinitis/diagnóstico , Sinusitis/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Antifúngicos/análisis , Enfermedad Crónica , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Eosinofilia/complicaciones , Eosinofilia/microbiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hongos/inmunología , Hongos/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Moco/microbiología , Micosis/microbiología , Senos Paranasales/diagnóstico por imagen , Senos Paranasales/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Rinitis/complicaciones , Rinitis/microbiología , Sinusitis/complicaciones , Sinusitis/microbiología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: An immunoglobulin (Ig)E-mediated allergic pathogenesis is presumed in allergic fungal sinusitis (AFS), yet extensive polyps and eosinophilic mucus (EM) in the paranasal sinuses may also occur in the absence of allergy. Although a noninvasive fungal pathogenesis is presumed in all chronic rhinosinusitis with EM (EMCRS), fungal-specific nonallergic immune responses have not been thoroughly investigated. We tested the hypothesis that there is a fungal-specific humoral response in EMCRS and that it is not confined to IgE. STUDY DESIGN: EMCRS patients were prospectively stratified into subgroups based on the presence or absence of fungi within EM and of fungal-specific systemic IgE. There were 12 AFS, 5 AFS-like, 8 nonallergic fungal eosinophilic sinusitis (NAFES), and 5 nonallergic, nonfungal eosinophilic sinusitis (NANFES) patients. METHODS: Alternaria alternata and Aspergillus fumigatus-specific serum IgE, IgG, IgM, and IgA was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and compared with strictly defined healthy and disease-control groups. RESULTS: Fungal-specific IgG (Alternaria alternata P = .0002; Aspergillus fumigatus P = .004), and IgA levels (Alternaria alternata P = .0016; Aspergillus fumigatus P = .002) were higher in EMCRS compared with healthy volunteers but not with disease controls. Fungal-specific IgG3 levels were significantly elevated in all the EMCRS subgroups compared with controls for either fungal antigen (P < .0001). Importantly, fungal-specific IgE levels were not significantly different between fungal-allergic EMCRS and disease controls. CONCLUSIONS: Fungal-specific immunity characterized by serum IgG3 and not IgE, distinguished the EMCRS subgroups from control groups regardless of the presence of fungus within EM or of systemic fungal allergy. Fungal-specific IgE responses in fungal-allergic EMCRS were no different to those in fungal-allergic controls, thus challenging the presumption of a unique pathogenic role of fungal allergy in "allergic fungal sinusitis."
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antifúngicos/inmunología , Micosis/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad Respiratoria/microbiología , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/microbiología , Sinusitis/microbiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Alternaria/inmunología , Aspergilosis/inmunología , Aspergillus fumigatus/inmunología , Enfermedad Crónica , Eosinófilos/inmunología , Eosinófilos/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina A/sangre , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inmunoglobulina M/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Moco/inmunología , Moco/microbiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Hipersensibilidad Respiratoria/inmunología , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/inmunología , Sinusitis/inmunologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Allergic fungal sinusitis (AFS) is considered a different disease from other polypoid chronic rhinosinusitis diseases (CRS) with eosinophilic mucus (EM) termed eosinophilic mucus chronic rhinosinusitis (EMCRS). To substantiate this, studies on cellular responses to fungi and sinus mucosal inflammatory cell populations in AFS and other EMCRS diseases are required. This study was designed to examine polyp inflammatory cell populations and peripheral blood fungal-specific T-cell responses in AFS, other EMCRS subgroups (defined later), and polypoid CRS without EM. METHODS: A prospective study was performed. Clinical characteristics, including CRS symptoms, sinus computed tomography (CT) scans, allergy status, intraoperative endoscopy, presence of EM, and fungal culture results were used to define patient groups. Polyps and peripheral blood were examined for populations of eosinophils, lymphocytes (CD4+, CD8+ T cells, natural killer cells, and B cells), and neutrophils using immunohistochemistry, cytospin preparations and flow cytometry. Fungal-specific peripheral blood lymphocyte proliferation was examined in AFS patients, other EMCRS patients, CRS patients, and controls. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the percentage of cell populations and fungal-specific lymphocyte proliferation between AFS and other EMCRS diseases. However, AFS and other EMCRS polyps had a higher percentage of eosinophils and CD8+ T cells whereas CRS polyps had higher CD4+ T cells. Fungal-specific lymphocyte proliferation was significantly greater in AFS and other EMCRS patients regardless of fungal allergy, whereas in CRS and controls, higher proliferation was observed in fungal-allergic individuals. CONCLUSION: These findings question the basis for differentiating AFS from other EMCRS diseases based on fungal allergy and fungi in EM. Fungal-specific cellular response was present in AFS and other EMCRS diseases, different from that associated with fungal allergy, suggesting a nonallergic fungal immune response. Increased CD8+ T cells in EMCRS polyps signify a different type of inflammation to CRS that may be driven by CD8+ T cells.
Asunto(s)
Antígenos Fúngicos/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad/inmunología , Micosis/inmunología , Sinusitis/inmunología , Linfocitos T/metabolismo , Adulto , Proliferación Celular , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad/etiología , Hipersensibilidad/patología , Hipersensibilidad/fisiopatología , Inmunidad Celular , Inmunohistoquímica , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Micosis/complicaciones , Micosis/diagnóstico , Micosis/patología , Micosis/fisiopatología , Pólipos Nasales/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Sinusitis/diagnóstico , Sinusitis/etiología , Sinusitis/patología , Sinusitis/fisiopatología , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Linfocitos T/microbiología , Linfocitos T/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
Ciclesonide is a novel corticosteroid which is optimized for topical use. It is a pro-drug which is activated locally in the airway mucosa, lipid-conjugated for local retention, and has very high protein binding in circulation leading to low systemic bioavailability. These characteristics should lead to highly selective activity with reduced local and systemic side effects. It has been established as an inhaled medication for asthma and has also been shown in double-blind trials to be efficacious for the treatment of seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis. However no data have yet demonstrated superiority over existing nasal topical corticosteroids, either in terms of efficacy or adverse effects, and trials have not yet clearly shown efficacy in rhinitis in children. Therefore the place of ciclesonide in the treatment of allergic rhinitis relative to other existing products remains unclear.