'One millimetre equals one degree' is a major source of inaccuracy in planning osteotomies around the knee for metaphyseal deformities compared to the digital planning.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of virtually performed osteotomies around the knee. The comparison was made between the Miniaci method (method 1), considered the gold standard planning, with the widely held dogma that one degree of correction required equates to one millimetre of opening/closing (method 2). METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted between December 2018 and September 2022 in patients aged at least 15 years with metaphyseal knee deformity. Osteotomy planning was performed in methods 1 and 2 utilising calibrated long-leg alignment X-rays in the frontal plane. In both methods, the desired correction was defined by the Fujisawa point. The error % in measurement (ratio method 1/method 2) and the difference in millimetres (method 1 - method 2) between the two methods were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 107 osteotomies with 27 (25.2%) distal femoral osteotomies, 54 (50.5%) proximal tibial osteotomies and 26 (24.3%) double-level osteotomies were performed virtually with a mean hip-knee-ankle angle of 176.4 ± 6.6. In distal femur osteotomy, the mean error % between methods 1 and 2 was 38.9 ± 16.7% and 22.4 ± 16.8% for the opening and closing groups, respectively. In proximal tibial osteotomies, the mean error % was 22.7 ± 15.6% and 9 ± 10.8% for the opening and closing groups, respectively. In double-level osteotomy, the mean error % of femur-based corrections was 34.9 ± 19% and 19.5 ± 21% for the opening and closing groups, respectively, and the mean error of the tibial-based corrections was 26.4 ± 12.1% for the opening group and 10.8 ± 10% for the closing group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Planning one millimeter per degree of desired correction for osteotomies around the knee in metaphyseal deformities is a major source of error when compared with digital planning using the Miniaci method. This was seen most frequently with osteotomies of the distal femur and all opening wedge osteotomies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level Ⅲ, retrospective cross-sectional study.

Osteotomy around the painful degenerative varus knee has broader indications than conventionally described but must follow a strict planning process: ESSKA Formal Consensus Part I.

PURPOSE: The European consensus was designed with the objective of combining science and expertise to produce recommendations that would educate and provide guidance in the treatment of the painful degenerative varus knee. Part I focused on indications and planning. METHODS: Ninety-four orthopaedic surgeons from 24 European countries were involved in the consensus, which focused on the most common indications for osteotomy around the knee. The consensus was performed according to an established ESSKA methodology. The questions and recommendations made were initially designed by the consensus steering group. And 'best possible' answers were provided based upon the scientific evidence available and the experience of the experts. The statements produced were further evaluated by ratings and peer review groups before a final consensus was reached. RESULTS: There is no reliable evidence to exclude patients based on age, gender or body weight. An individualised approach is advised; however, cessation of smoking is recommended. The same applies to lesser degrees of patellofemoral and lateral compartment arthritis, which may be accepted in certain situations. Good-quality limb alignment and knee radiographs are a mandatory requirement for planning of osteotomies, and Paley's angles and normal ranges are recommended when undertaking deformity analysis. Emphasis is placed upon the correct level at which correction of varus malalignment is performed, which may involve double-level osteotomy. This includes recognition of the importance of individual bone morphology and the maintenance of a physiologically appropriate joint line orientation. CONCLUSION: The indications of knee osteotomies for painful degenerative varus knees are broad. Part I of the consensus highlights the versatility of the procedure to address multiple scenarios with bespoke planning for each case. Deformity analysis is mandatory for defining the bone morphology, the site of the deformity and planning the correct procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, consensus.

Surgical strategy and complication management of osteotomy around the painful degenerative varus knee: ESSKA Formal Consensus Part II.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the European consensus was to provide recommendations for the treatment of patients with a painful degenerative varus knee using a joint preservation approach. Part II focused on surgery, rehabilitation and complications after tibial or femoral correction osteotomy. METHODS: Ninety-four orthopaedic surgeons from 24 countries across Europe were involved in the consensus, which focused on osteotomies around the knee. The consensus was performed according to the European Society for Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy consensus methodology. The steering group designed the questions and prepared the statements based on the experience of the experts and the evidence of the literature. The statements were evaluated by the ratings of the peer-review groups before a final consensus was released. RESULTS: The ideal hinge position for medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOW HTO) should be at the upper level of the proximal tibiofibular joint, and for lateral closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LCW DFO) just above the medial femoral condyle. Hinge protection is not mandatory. Biplanar osteotomy cuts provide more stability and quicker bony union for both MOW HTO and LCW DFO and are especially recommended for the latter. Osteotomy gap filling is not mandatory, unless structural augmentation for stability is required. Patient-specific instrumentation should be reserved for complex cases by experienced hands. Early full weight-bearing can be adopted after osteotomy, regardless of the technique. However, extra caution should be exercised in DFO patients. Osteotomy patients should return to sports within 6 months. CONCLUSION: Clear recommendations for surgical strategy, rehabilitation and complications of knee osteotomies for the painful degenerative varus knee were demonstrated. In Part 2 of the consensus, high levels of agreement were reached by experts throughout Europe, under variable working conditions. Where science is limited, the collated expertise of the collaborators aimed at providing guidance for orthopaedic surgeons developing an interest in the field and highlighting areas for potential future research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, consensus.

A significant rate of tibial overcorrection with an increased JLO occurred after isolated high tibial osteotomy without considering international consensus.

PURPOSE: The recent ESSKA consensus recommendations defined indications and outlined parameters for osteotomies around a degenerative varus knee. The consensus collated these guidelines based on the published literature available to answer commonly asked questions including the importance of identifying the site and degree of the lower limb deformity. In the consensus, the authors suggest that a knee joint line obliquity (JLO) greater than 5° or a planned medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) > 94° preferentially indicates a double level osteotomy (DLO) compared to an isolated opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). This study aimed to analyze the corrections performed on a cohort of isolated opening wedge high tibial osteotomies (OWHTOs) prior to the recent ESSKA recommendations, with a focus on the impact of knee joint line obliquity (JLO) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) on the choice of osteotomy procedure. METHODS: This monocentric, retrospective study included 129 patients undergoing medial OWHTO for symptomatic isolated medial knee osteoarthritis (Ahlbäck grade I or II) and a global varus malalignment (hip-knee-ankle angle ≤ 177°). An automated software trained to automatically detect lower limb deformity was implemented using patients preoperative long leg alignment X-rays to identify suitability for an isolated HTO in knee varus deformity. Based on the ESSKA recommendations, the site of the osteotomy was identified as well as the degree of correction required. The ESSKA consensus considers avoiding an isolated high tibial osteotomy if the planned resultant knee joint line orientation exceeds 5 ̊ or MPTA exceeds 94°. A preoperative abnormal MPTA was defined by a value lower than 85° and a preoperative abnormal LDFA by a value greater than 90°. The cases of DLO or DFO suggested by the software and the number of extra-tibial anomalies were collected. Multiple linear regression models were developed to establish a relationship between preoperative values and the risk of being outside of ESSKA recommendations postoperatively. RESULTS: Based on ESSKA recommendations and on threshold values considered abnormal, the software suggested a DLO in 17.8% (n = 23/129) of cases, a distal femoral osteotomy in 27.9% (n = 36/129) of cases and advised against an osteotomy procedure in 24% (n = 31/129) of cases. The software detected a femoral anomaly in 34.9% (n = 45/129) of cases and an JLCA > 6° in 9.3% (n = 12/129). Postoperatively, the MPTA exceeds 94° in 41.1% (n = 53/129) and the JLO exceeds 5° in 29.4% (n = 38/129). On multivariate analysis, a high preoperative MPTA was associated with higher risk of postoperative MPTA > 94° (R2 = 0.36; p < 0.001). Similarly, the probability of the software advising a DLO or DFO was associated with the presence of an "normal" preoperative MPTA (R2 = 0.42; p < 0.001) or an abnormal preoperative LDFA (R2 = 0.48; p < 0.001) or a planned JLO > 5° (R2 = 0.27; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of patients who underwent an isolated OWHTO prior to the ESSKA guidelines, demonstrated a significant rate of post-operative tibial overcorrection and a resultant increased JLO. Pre-operative planning that considers the ESSKA guidelines, allows for better identification of those patients requiring a DFO or DLO and avoidance of resultant post-operative deformities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, case-series.

Assessment of return to sport and functional outcomes following distal femoral, double level and high tibial osteotomies for active patients with symptomatic varus malalignment.

PURPOSE: This study indicated the outcomes of three surgical techniques for the treatment of symptomatic unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (UKOA) with varus malalignment in younger, active patients: distal femoral osteotomy (DFO), double-level osteotomy (DLO) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO). The outcomes measured included the return to sport, sport activity and functional scores. METHODS: A total of 103 patients (19 DFO, 43 DLO, 41 HTO) were enrolled in the study and were divided into three groups based on their oriented deformity, each undergoing one of the three surgical techniques. All patients underwent pre- and post-operative evaluations including X-rays, physical exams and functional assessments. RESULTS: All three surgical techniques were effective in treating UKOA with constitutional malalignment. The average time to return to sport was similar among the three groups (DFO: 6.4 ± 0.3 [5.8-7] months, DLO: 4.9 ± 0.2 [4.5-5.3] months, HTO: 5.6 ± 0.2 [5.2-6] months). The sport activity and functional scores improved significantly for all three groups, with no significant differences observed among the groups. CONCLUSION: Various knee osteotomy procedures, DFO, DLO, and HTO, result in high RTS rates and quick RTS times with satisfactory functional scores. Despite pre- to post-operative improvements in sport activities following DFO and DLO, pre-symptom levels were not reached following all evaluated procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective case-control study, Level III.

An artificial intelligence based on a convolutional neural network allows a precise analysis of the alignment of the lower limb.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to develop a numeric tool to automate the analysis of deformity from lower limb telemetry and assess its accuracy. Our hypothesis was that artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm would be able to determine mechanical and anatomical angles to within 1°. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, 1175 anonymized patient telemetries were extracted from a database of more than ten thousand telemetries. From this selection, 31 packs of telemetries were composed and sent to 11 orthopaedic surgeons for analysis. Each surgeon had to identify on the telemetries fourteen landmarks allowing determination of the following four angles: hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), and joint line convergence angle (JLCA). An algorithm based on a machine learning process was trained on our database to automatically determine angles. The reliability of the algorithm was evaluated by calculating the difference of determination precision between the surgeons and the algorithm. RESULTS: The analysis time for obtaining 28 points and 8 angles per image was 48 ± 12 s for the algorithm. The average difference between the angles measured by the surgeons and the algorithm was around 1.9° for all the angles of interest: 1.3° for HKA, 1.6° for MPTA, 2.1° for LDFA, and 2.4° for JLCA. Intraclass correlation was greater than 95% for all angles. CONCLUSION: The algorithm showed high accuracy for automated angle measurement, allowing the estimation of limb frontal alignment to the nearest degree.

Global varus malalignment increase from double-leg to single-leg stance due to intra-articular changes.

PURPOSE: Preoperatively planned correction for tibial osteotomy surgery is usually based on weightbearing long-leg Xrays, while the surgery is performed in a supine non-weightbearing position. The purpose of this study was to assess the differences in lower limb alignment in three different weightbearing conditions: supine position, double-leg (DL) stance and single-sleg (SL) stance prior to performing a medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) for varus malalignment. The hypothesis of this study was that progressive limb-loading would lead to an increased preoperative varus deformity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 89 patients (96 knees) with isolated medial knee osteoarthritis (Ahlbäck grade I or II) and significant metaphyseal tibial vara (> 6°). The differences between supine position, DL stance and SL stance were analysed for the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), weight-bearing line ratio (WBL) and joint line convergence angle (JLCA). RESULTS: From a supine position to DL stance, the HKA angle slightly increased from 175.5° ± 1.1° to 176.3° ± 1.1° and JLCA changed from 2.0° ± 0.3° to 1.8° ± 0.3° without a statistically significant difference. From DL to SL stances, the HKA angle decreased from 176.3° ± 1.1° to 174.4° ± 1.1° (p < 0.05) and the JLCA increased from 1.8° ± 0.3° to 2.6° ± 0.3° (p < 0.05). A significant correlation was found between ΔHKA and ΔJLCA between the DL and the SL stances (R2 = 0.46; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Varus malalignment increases with weight-bearing loading from double-leg to single-leg stances with an associated JLCA increase. Thus, single-leg stance radiographs may be useful to correct preoperative planning considering patient-specific changes in JLCA. LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE: III, retrospective comparative study.

Patients with varus knee osteoarthritis undergoing high tibial osteotomy exhibit more femoral varus but similar tibial morphology compared to non-arthritic varus knees.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare alignment parameters between patients undergoing high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for knee osteoarthritis (OA) and non-arthritic controls. METHODS: Pre-operative computed tomography images from 194 patients undergoing HTO for medial knee OA and 118 non-arthritic controls were utilized. All patients had varus knee alignment (mean age: 57 ± 11 years; 45% female). The hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and non-weight-bearing joint line convergence angle (nwJLCA) were compared between "control group" and "HTO group". Femoral and tibial phenotypes were also assessed and compared between groups. Variables found on univariate analysis to be different between the groups were entered into a binary logistic regression model. RESULTS: The mean age was lower (Δ = 4 ± 6 years, p = 0.024), body mass index (BMI) was higher (Δ = 1.1 ± 2.8 kg/m2, p = 0.032) and there were more females (Δ = 14%, p = 0.020) in the HTO group. The HTO group had more overall varus (7° ± 4.7° vs 4.8° ± 1.3°, p < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the mean mLDFA between the two groups with the HTO group having more femoral varus (88.7 ± 3.2° vs 87.3 ± 1.8°, p < 0.001). MPTA was similar between the groups (p = 0.881). Age was found to be a strong determinant for femoral varus (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing HTO for medial knee OA have more femoral varus compared to non-arthritic controls while tibial morphology was similar. This will be an important consideration in pre-operating planning for realignment osteotomy in patients presenting with medial knee OA and warrants further investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective comparative study.

Double level knee osteotomy using patient-specific cutting guides is accurate and provides satisfactory clinical results: a prospective analysis of a cohort of twenty-two continuous patients.

PURPOSE: Double level osteotomy (DLO) (femoral and tibial) is a technically demanding procedure for which pre-operative planning accuracy and intraoperative correction are key factors. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of the achieved correction using patient-specific cutting guides (PSCGs) compared to the planned correction, its ability to maintain joint line obliquity (JLO), and to evaluate clinical outcomes and level of patient satisfaction at a follow-up of two years. METHODS: A single-centre, prospective observational study including 22 patients who underwent DLO by PSCGs between 2014 and 2018 was performed. Post-operative alignment was evaluated and compared with the target angular values to define the accuracy of the correction for the hip-knee-ankle angle (ΔHKA), medial proximal tibial angle (ΔMPTA), lateral distal femoral angle (ΔLDFA), and posterior proximal tibial angle (ΔPPTA). Pre- and post-operative JLO was also evaluated. At two year follow-up, changes in the KOOS sub-scores and patient satisfaction were recorded. The Mann-Whitney U test with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was used to evaluate the differences between two variables; the paired Student's t test was used to estimate evolution of functional outcomes. RESULTS: The mean ΔHKA was 1.3 ± 0.5°; the mean ΔMPTA was 0.98 ± 0.3°; the mean ΔLDFA was 0.94 ± 0.2°; ΔPPTA was 0.45 ± 0.4°. The orientation of the joint line was preserved with a mean difference in the JLO of 0.4 ± 0.2. At last follow-up, it was recorded a significant improvement in all KOOS scores, and 19 patients were enthusiastic, two satisfied, and one moderately satisfied. CONCLUSION: Performing a DLO using PSCGs produces an accurate correction, without modification of the joint line orientation and with good functional outcomes at two year follow-up.

Evaluation of the "Minimal Clinically Important Difference" (MCID) of the KOOS, KSS and SF-12 scores after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy.

PURPOSE: Defining a Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) value for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) is crucial for determining the effectiveness of a procedure and calculating the sample size for trial planning. The purpose of this study was to determine the MCID of several PROMs (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Society Score (KSS) and the SF-12) in patients who underwent medial opening-wedge High-Tibial Osteotomy (owHTO) with Patient-Specific Cutting Guides (PSCGs), using anchor-based methods. METHODS: Patients undergoing isolated medial owHTO with PSCGs between January 2013 and January 2017 were enrolled in this single-center, prospective, observational study. Three outcome scores were collected pre-operatively and at the 2 years follow-up evaluation: KOOS, KSS and SF-12. The MCIDs were calculated using anchor-based method: at 2 years postoperatively: "Compared with before surgery, how would you rate operated joint now?" The responses were recorded using a five-point scale. Patients who answered "about the same" or "somewhat worse" were classified into the no change group, while those who answered "somewhat better" were classified into the minimal change group. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to define the cutoff point that best discriminated between the minimal change and no change groups for each PROMs RESULTS: 196 patients were included, 75 (somewhat better) and 24 patients (about the same and somewhat worse) were, respectively, assigned to the "no change" and "minimal change" groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of baseline characteristics and postoperative complications. At 24 months follow-up all the PROMs (KOOS, KSS and SF-12) were significantly better for the "minimal change" group compared to the "no change" group. MCID was 15.4 for KOOS pain, 15.1 for KOOS symptoms, 17 for KOOS ADL, 11.2 for KOOS sports/recreation, 16.5 for KOOS QQL, 3 for KSS symptoms, 5.6 for KSS activity, 7.2 for SF-12 physical component and 6.3 for PCS mental component. CONCLUSION: This study determined the MCIDs of common used PROMs in patients undergoing owHTO. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective Cohort Study, Level II.

Improved Survival of Computer-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: 252 Cases With a Minimum Follow-Up of 5 Years.

BACKGROUND: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an underutilized implant for medial tibiofemoral arthritis despite proven benefits in performance and reduced complications. This is likely related to registry recorded higher revision rates compared with total knee arthroplasty. It is our feeling that better component alignment resulting from the usage of computer-assisted surgery should improve longer-term functional results and survival of UKAs. METHODS: Between August 2003 and June 2007, 265 medial UKAs were performed in 264 consecutive patients using navigation. RESULTS: Eighty-eight women and 176 men with an average age of 51.7 (±4.63) years were assessed for function and survival over a follow-up period of 92.6 (63-120) months (7.7 years). The final survival rate over 5 years for this cohort was 97.6% at 5 years. CONCLUSION: We conclude that computer-assisted UKA, to treat medial tibiofemoral joint arthritis, produces 5-year survival rates that are comparable with total knee arthroplasty.

Radiological and Functional Outcomes in Computer Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Between Consultants and Trainees - A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Computer Aided Surgery has consistently shown superior alignment of components when compared to non-navigated jig based techniques. The aim of this study is to assess the mid-term clinical outcome of TKA performed by a consultant orthopedic surgeon, compared to trainee surgeons. Ninety-two patients were matched and randomly allocated to have CAS surgery performed by either a consultant or trainee and followed up prospectively for 5-years. Knee society scores, mechanical axis, tourniquet time and blood loss data were collected. Our study demonstrated that trainees were able to achieve equal coronal alignment (P=0.15), blood loss (P=0.45) and functional scores (P=0.15). The Consultant group had a significantly (P<0.001) shorter tourniquet time. We confirm that CAS can assist less experienced surgeons to reliably achieve good mid-term outcomes in TKA.

Distal femoral osteotomy planning: Reversed Miniaci's method is more accurate than Dugdale and Paley methods.

PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to validate the reversed Miniaci method for distal femoral osteotomies and to compare the accuracy with Dugdale and Paley methods. METHODS: Between January 2019 and October 2021, 59 DFO were performed in a single center. Following application of the eligibility and exclusion criteria, radiographic measurements and analysis was performed for 24 patients by two independent observers, then repeated after one month. Medical planning software: PeekMed v2.3.7.6® was used. For all patients the following measurements were performed: Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), joint line obliquity (JLO), width of the proximal tibia and the weight-bearing line (WBL). Each image was then analysed using the following planning methods for realignment surgery: Reversed Miniaci, Dugdale and Paley. Measurements were recorded post deformity correction. Difference between target and post-correction WBL was evaluated. This difference was adjusted by the objective in order to limit biases related to the different objectives according to the method. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were managed for a varus osteotomy and 6 for a valgus osteotomy. Preoperative data was, HKA at 176.7±6.3, mLDFA at 90.6±5.4, MPTA 88.9±1.1, a WBL for valgus 80.9%±9.1 and for varus deformity 23.5%±11.7. Inter- and intra-rater reliability was>0.8 for every method. After normalizing reported precision on the amount of correction expected, reversed Miniaci method was the most accurate with a mean deviation from the target of 3%, compared to the Dugdale's method with 9% (p<0.001) and to Paley's method with 8.6% (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The reversed Miniaci method is effective and reliable for planning distal femoral osteotomies. Compared to other planning methods, it is the most accurate approach for achieving a correction goal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective cohort study.

Double-level osteotomy for varus knees using patient-specific cutting guides allow more accurate correction but similar clinical outcomes as compared to conventional techniques.

PURPOSE: Patient-specific cutting guides are increasingly used in the field of osteotomies around the knee and can improve the accuracy of planned correction and more specifically in the case of double-level osteotomy (DLO). The purpose of this study was to analyse the accuracy of postoperative coronal alignment after DLO using patient-specific cutting guides techniques (PSI) compared to conventional techniques. The secondary objective was to compare the functional results between the two groups at short-term follow-up. HYPOTHESIS: The accuracy of global correction (HKA angle) is better with patient-specific cutting guides compared to conventional techniques for double-level osteotomy METHODS: This multicentric comparative retrospective study included 53 patients (mean age: 53.8 ± 5.2 years, male/female: 44/9) who underwent a DLO for knee varus malalignment. The coronal correction accuracy (as expressed by the difference between postoperative angular values and preoperative targeted correction) was compared between techniques using patient-specific cutting guides (PSI group, n = 27) or conventional techniques (n = 26) for the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA). Postoperatively, the global alignment expressed by the hip-knee-ankle angle and the joint line obliquity were compared between groups. The postoperative functional results for KOOS and UCLA activity scale score were also compared at a mean follow-up of 1.7 years (1.0-3.1 years). RESULTS: No difference was observed for the postoperative global alignment between the PSI and the conventional groups (Δ = 0.6 °, p = 0.11) neither for the postoperative posterior proximal tibial angle (Δ = 1.6°, p = 0,99) or the joint line obliquity (Δ = 0.3°, p = 0,17). In the coronal plane, the postoperative MPTA was lower in the PSI group (Δ = 2.3°, p < 0.001) as well as the postoperative LDFA (Δ = 0.9°, p = 0.01). Concerning correction accuracy in the coronal plane, the results showed a significant higher accuracy of the planned correction in the PSI group compared to the conventional group for MPTA (2.2 ± 0.2 versus 0.8 ± 0.7, Δ = 1.5 °, p < 0.001) and LDFA (1.3 ± 1.0 versus 0.6 ± 0.9, Δ = 0.7°, p < 0.001). No improvement difference was observed between the conventional group and the PSI group respectively for the KOOS symptoms (p = 0.12), the KOOS Pain (p = 0,57), the KOOS activities of daily living (p = 0.61), the KOOS sport/rec (p = 0.65), or for the KOOS Quality of Life (p = 0.99) neither for the UCLA (p = 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the use of custom-made cutting guides improves the accuracy of planned correction in double-level osteotomy compared with conventional techniques, which may have implications particularly in centers not performing a large volume of osteotomies. This improved accuracy is not associated with any difference in joint line obliquity or functional results but these results need to be confirmed by a randomized prospective study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; Retrospective comparative study.

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Double-Level Osteotomy Versus Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Bifocal Varus Deformity.

Background: In bifocal varus deformity, double-level osteotomy (DLO) is advocated to treat lower limb alignment to prevent an adverse increase in joint line obliquity. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological results after DLO and open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) in patients with combined varus deformity. It was hypothesized that DLO would improve clinical results without increasing the complication rate compared with OWHTO. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Inclusion criteria were medial tibiofemoral compartment pain, varus knee deformity with an abnormal medial proximal tibial angle <84° and a lateral distal femoral angle >90°, a functional anterior cruciate ligament, failure of nonoperative treatment, and a minimum 2-year follow-up with all clinical and radiological data. The rate of return to work or sports; the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS); the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score; and patient satisfaction were assessed at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Statistical comparison of the 2 groups was made using the chi-square or Student t test. Results: A total of 69 consecutive patients were analyzed, of whom 38 underwent OWHTO and 31 underwent DLO surgery. A significant between-group difference was found for all radiological parameters; in particular, there was less joint line obliquity after DLO compared with OWHTO (1.7° vs 5.6°; P < .001). DLO provided better outcomes compared with OWHTO regarding the UCLA score (4.3 vs 6.7; P < .001) and patient satisfaction (2.6 vs 3.9; P < .001), but no significant difference in KOOS or return to work or sports was observed. The OWHTO group had more hinge fractures than the DLO group (34.2% vs 12.9%; P < .001). Conclusion: For combined tibial and femoral varus deformity, DLO produced more physiologic joint line obliquity with slightly improved UCLA and patient satisfaction scores. A greater incidence of hinge fracture was observed after isolated OWHTO compared with DLO due to a larger tibial correction; however, this had little effect on clinical results at the 2-year follow-up.

Clinical Outcomes Following Use of Tranexamic Acid in High Tibial Osteotomy: A Systematic Review.

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes following administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) in patients undergoing high tibial osteotomy (HTO) through a systematic review of current available evidence. A systematic database search of PubMed, Embase and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) was performed from inception up to December 2022, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). Inclusion criteria were (i) randomised control trials, cohort studies or case-control studies that had more than 10 patients; (ii) studies reporting outcomes after TXA administration, of any route, before or after HTO, compared to placebo, control and different doses or routes; and (iii) studies reporting blood loss, including haemoglobin (Hb) drop, estimated blood loss, transfusion requirement and complications. Case reports, reviews, abstracts, non-HTO studies, non-human studies and duplicates were excluded. A synthesized comparison of drain output, wound complications, transfusion requirement and pooled analyses of blood loss and Hb drop was performed. Eleven studies involving 974 patients were included. Nine studies had placebo comparison, and two used single-dose TXA versus multiple doses. All studies reported on postoperative hemoglobin and nine on blood loss. In the six TXA versus placebo studies reporting on total blood loss, the TXA group had a pooled, estimated standardised mean difference (SMD) in blood loss of -2.37 (95% confidence interval (CI) -3.67, -1.07; P = 0.0004). For the Hb drop, on postoperative days (PODs) one, two, and five, the SMDs were -0.97 (95% CI -1.19, -0.75; P < 0.00001) for POD1, -0.74 (95% CI -1.03, -0.46; P < 0.00001) for POD2 and -0.87 (95% CI -1.10, -0.64; P < 0.00001) for POD5. TXA administration in HTO significantly reduces perioperative blood loss. This can greatly improve recovery, reduce complications and shorten length of stay. This is especially pertinent given supply shortages of NHS blood resources.

Pivot shift intraoperative quantitative assessment using a smartphone accelerometer in ACL deficient knees.

PURPOSE: The Pivot Shift (PS) test is a complex clinical sign that assesses the internal rotation and anterior tibial translation, which occurs abnormally in ACL deficient-knees. Because of the high inter-observer variability, different devices have been designed to characterize this complex movement in quantitative variables. The objective of this pilot study is to validate the reproducibility of intraoperative quantitative assessment of the PS with a smartphone accelerometer. METHODS: Twelve ACL-injured knees were included and compared with the contralateral uninjured side. The PS was measured by two independent observers utilizing a smartphone accelerometer and graded according to the IKDC classification. Measurements were taken preoperatively, intraoperatively and postoperatively. Intraoperative readings were taken during each stage of reconstruction or repair of meniscoligamentous lesions including meniscal lesions, ramp lesions, ACL reconstruction and lateral tenodesis. Reproducibility of the measurements were evaluated according to an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The intra-observer reliability was good for the first examiner and excellent for the second examiner, with the ICC 0.89 [0.67, 0.98] p < 0,001 and ICC 0.97 [0.91, 1.0] p < 0,001 respectively. The inter-observer reliability was excellent between the two observers with the ICC 0.99 [0.97, 1.0] p < 0,001. The mean tibial acceleration measured 3.45 m.s2 (SD = 1.71) preoperatively on the injured knees and 1.03 m.s2 (SD = 0.36) on the healthy knees, demonstrating a significant difference following univariate analysis p < 0.001. Postoperatively, no significant difference was observed between healthy and reconstructed knees The magnitudes of tibial acceleration values were correlated with the PS IKDC grade. CONCLUSION: The smartphone accelerometer is a reproducible device to quantitatively assess the internal rotation and anterior tibial translation during ACL reconstruction surgery. The measurements are influenced by the different surgical steps. Other larger cohort studies are needed to evaluate the specific impact of each step of the ACL reconstruction and meniscal repair on this measurement. An external validation using other technologies are needed to validate the reliability of this device to assess the PS test. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series, pilot study.

Reduced mortality associated to cementless total hip arthroplasty in femoral neck fracture.

Mortality related to femoral neck fractures remains a challenging health issue, with a high mortality rate at 1 year of follow-up. Three modifiable factors appear to be under control of the surgeon: the choice of the implant, the use of cement and the timing before surgery. The aim of this research project was to study the impact on mortality each of these risk factors play during the management of femoral neck fractures. A large retrospective epidemiological study was performed using a national database of the public healthcare system. The inclusion criteria were patients who underwent joint replacement surgery after femoral neck fracture during the years 2015 to 2017. All data points were available for at least 2 years after the fracture. The primary outcome was mortality within 2 years following the surgery. We evaluated the association between mortality and the type of the implant hemiarthroplasty (HA) versus total hip arthroplasty (THA), cemented versus non cemented femoral stem as well as the timing from fracture to surgical procedure. A multivariate analysis was performed including age, gender, comorbidities/autonomy scores, social category, and obesity. We identified 96,184 patients who matched the inclusion criteria between 2015 and 2017. 64,106 (66%) patients underwent HA and 32,078 (33.4%) underwent THA. After multivariate analysis including age and comorbidities, patients who underwent surgery after 72 h intra-hospital had a higher risk of mortality: Hazard Ratio (HR) = 1.119 (1.056-1.185) p = 0.0001 compared to the group who underwent surgery within 24 h. THA was found to be a protective factor HR = 0.762 (0.731-0.795) p < 0.0001. The use of cement was correlated with higher mortality rate: HR = 1.107 (1.067-1.149) p < 0.0001. Three key points are highlighted by our study in the reduction of mortality related to femoral neck fracture: the use of hemiarthroplasty a surgery performed after 48 h and the use of cement for femoral stem fixation adversely affect mortality risk.

Ecological Burden of Modern Surgery: An Analysis of Total Knee Replacement's Life Cycle.

Background: It is estimated that surgical procedures account for 20%-30% of the greenhouse gases emissions from health-care systems. Total knee replacements (TKR) are one of the most frequently performed procedures in orthopaedics. The aim of this study was to identify and quantify the environmental impacts generated by TKRs, the factors that generate the most emissions, and those that can be easily modified. Methods: To calculate the life cycle carbon footprint of a posterior stabilized cemented TKR performed in a single orthopaedic surgery department, 17 TKRs performed between October 12 and 20, 2020 by 4 senior surgeons were analysed. The analysis of the life cycle included the manufacture of the implant, from raw materials to distribution; the journey made by patients and staff; and the surgery including all consumables required to facilitate the procedure. Results: The overall life cycle carbon footprint of a single TKR was 190.5 kg of CO2. This consisted of 53.7 kg CO2 (28%) for the manufacture of the prosthesis, 50.9 kg CO2 (27%) for travel, 57.1 kg CO2 (30%) for surgery, and 28.8 kg CO2 (15%) for waste management. This is comparable to a New York-Detroit direct flight. Conclusions: The production of a total knee prosthesis, throughout its life cycle, generates emissions with important consequences on the environment and therefore on our health. Although much data are currently missing to make precise estimates, and especially regarding benefits in terms of patient function and its impact on carbon emissions, these data serve as a starting point for other more detailed or comparative studies.

Minimally Invasive Double Level Osteotomy in Severe Knee Varus: Pearls and Pitfalls.

Minimally invasive double-level osteotomy (DLP) surgery is performed in severe knee varus, when extra-articular deformity is identified in both the distal femur and proximal tibia. The main advantage is to maintain a horizontal joint line and avoid creating secondary anatomic deformities. This article considers the pearls and pitfalls in performing minimally invasive DLO surgery.