RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive debilitating lung disease with considerable morbidity. Heterogeneity in epidemiologic studies means the full impact of the disease is unclear. METHODS: A targeted literature search for population-based, observational studies reporting incidence and/or prevalence of IPF from January 2009 to April 2020 was conducted. Identified studies were aggregated by country. For countries with multiple publications, a weighted average was determined. Incidence and prevalence data were adjusted for between-study differences where possible. The final model included adjusted estimates of incidence and prevalence per 10,000 of the population with 95% confidence intervals. As prevalence estimates vary depending on the definitions used, estimates were based on a specific case definition of IPF. RESULTS: Overall, 22 studies covering 12 countries met the inclusion criteria, with 15 reporting incidence and 18 reporting prevalence estimates. The adjusted incidence estimates (per 10,000 of the population) ranged from 0.35 to 1.30 in Asia-Pacific countries, 0.09 to 0.49 in Europe, and 0.75 to 0.93 in North America. Unadjusted and adjusted incidence estimates were consistent. The adjusted prevalence estimates ranged from 0.57 to 4.51 in Asia-Pacific countries, 0.33 to 2.51 in Europe, and 2.40 to 2.98 in North America. South Korea had the highest incidence and prevalence estimates. When prevalence estimates were compared to country-specific rare disease thresholds, IPF met the definition of a rare disease in all countries except South Korea. There were notable geographic gaps for IPF epidemiologic data. CONCLUSIONS: Due to differences in study methodologies, there is worldwide variability in the reported incidence and prevalence of IPF. Based on the countries included in our analysis, we estimated the adjusted incidence and prevalence of IPF to be in the range of 0.09-1.30 and 0.33-4.51 per 10,000 persons, respectively. According to these prevalence estimates, IPF remains a rare disease. For consistency, future epidemiologic studies of IPF should take age, sex, smoking status, and the specificity of case definitions into consideration.
Asunto(s)
Salud Global , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/diagnóstico , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/epidemiología , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Salud Global/tendencias , Humanos , Incidencia , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto/métodos , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Vedolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against α4ß7 integrin, is used to treat adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). We investigated the time course of clinical response to vedolizumab in patients who were and were not previously treated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists. METHODS: We performed a post-hoc analysis of data from phase 3, randomized, controlled trials of vedolizumab vs placebo in adult patients with UC (N = 374) or CD (N = 784). We collected data on patient-reported symptoms (rectal bleeding and stool frequency for patients with UC, abdominal pain and loose stool frequency for patients with CD) reported at weeks 2, 4, and 6 of treatment. We reported mean percentage score changes from baseline and proportions of patients who achieved predefined scores. We performed multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with an early response (at week 2). RESULTS: In patients with UC (overall or naive to TNF antagonist therapy), a significantly greater percentage of patients given vedolizumab achieved the predefined composite symptom score at weeks 2, 4, and 6 compared to those given placebo. In patients with CD who were naive to TNF antagonists, a significantly greater percentage of patients given vedolizumab achieved the predefined score at weeks 2 and 4 compared to those given placebo. Among patients with UC given vedolizumab, 19.1% (overall) and 22.3% (TNF antagonist naive) achieved a composite score of rectal bleeding of 0 and stool frequency ≤1 at week 2 compared to 10% (overall) and 6.6% (TNF antagonist naive) of those receiving placebo. Among TNF antagonist-naive patients with CD, 15.0% of those given vedolizumab achieved an average daily composite score of abdominal pain ≤1 and loose stool frequency ≤3 at week 2 (compared to 7.9% given placebo), and 23.8% of those given vedolizumab achieved these by week 4 (compared to 10.3% given placebo). CONCLUSIONS: In a post-hoc analysis of data from phase 3 clinical trials, vedolizumab significantly improved patient-reported symptoms of UC and CD as early as week 2 of treatment, continuing through the first 6 weeks-especially when given as first-line biologic therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT00783718, NCT00783692, NCT01224171.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/patología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Placebos/administración & dosificación , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are an important measure of disease severity in terms of impaired disease progression, increased recovery time, healthcare resource utilization, overall morbidity and mortality. We aimed to quantify exacerbation and healthcare resource utilization rates among COPD patients in Sweden with respect to baseline treatments, exacerbation history, and comorbidities. METHODS: Patients with a COPD or chronic bronchitis (CB) diagnosis in secondary care at age of ≥40 years on 1.7.2009 were identified and followed until 1.7.2010 or death. Severe exacerbations were defined as hospitalizations due to respiratory disease, and healthcare resource utilization was measured by all-cause hospitalizations and secondary care visits. Poisson regression was used adjusting for age, gender, time since COPD/CB diagnosis, and Charlson comorbidity index. RESULTS: In 88,548 patients (54% females, mean age 72 years), previous respiratory hospitalizations and current high use of COPD medication (double or triple therapy) predicted an 8.3-fold increase in severe exacerbation rates and 1.8-fold increase in healthcare resource utilization rates in the following year, compared to patients without combination treatment and/or history of severe exacerbations. CONCLUSIONS: COPD/CB patients with history of severe exacerbations and high use of COPD medication experienced a significantly increased rate of severe exacerbations and healthcare resource utilization during the one-year follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Bronquitis Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Bronquitis Crónica/epidemiología , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Asma/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/uso terapéutico , Sistema de Registros , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Suecia/epidemiología , Brote de los SíntomasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumourgst (GIST) who fail currently available treatments imatinib and sunitinib (third-line treatment-eligible GIST) is unknown, but is expected to be below an ultra-orphan disease threshold of 2/100,000 population used in England and Wales. Our study was designed to estimate the prevalence and absolute number of UK patients with unresectable/metastatic GIST at first-, second- and eventually third-line treatment. METHODS: Our open population model estimates the probability that the prevalence of UK third-line treatment-eligible GIST patients will remain under the ultra-orphan disease threshold. Model parameters for incidence, proportion of unresectable/metastatic disease and survival estimates for GIST patients were obtained from a targeted literature review and a UK cancer register. The robustness of the results was checked through differing scenarios taking extreme values of the input parameters. RESULTS: The base-case scenario estimated a prevalence of third-line treatment-eligible GIST of 1/100,000 and a prevalence count of 598 with a 99.9% likelihood of being below the ultra-orphan disease threshold. The extreme scenarios, one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses and threshold analysis confirmed the robustness of these results. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of third-line treatment-eligible GIST is very low and highly likely below the ultra-orphan disease threshold.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Benzamidas/uso terapéutico , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/tratamiento farmacológico , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Piperazinas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Raras/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Raras/epidemiología , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/mortalidad , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/secundario , Humanos , Mesilato de Imatinib , Incidencia , Modelos Estadísticos , Prevalencia , Enfermedades Raras/mortalidad , Sistema de Registros , Sunitinib , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Reino Unido/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the UK, referrals to specialists are initiated by general practitioners (GPs). Study objectives were to estimate the incidence of diagnosed psoriasis in the UK and identify factors associated with GP referrals to dermatologists. METHODS: Newly diagnosed patients with psoriasis were identified in The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database between 01 July 2007-31 Oct 2009. Incidence of diagnosed psoriasis was calculated using the number of new psoriasis patients in 2008 and the mid-year total patient count for THIN in 2008. A nested case-control design and conditional logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with referral. RESULTS: Incidence rate of diagnosed adult psoriasis in 2008 was 28/10,000 person-years. Referral rate to dermatologists was 18.1 (17.3-18.9) per 100 person-years. In the referred cohort (N=1,950), 61% were referred within 30 days of diagnosis and their median time to referral was 0 days from diagnosis. For those referred after 30 days (39%, median time to referral: 5.6 months), an increase in the number of GP visits prior to referral increased the likelihood of referral (OR=1.87 95% CI:1.73-2.01). A prescription of topical agents such as vitamin D3 analogues 30 days before referral increased the likelihood of being referred (OR=4.67 95% CI: 2.78-7.84), as did corticosteroids (OR=2.45 95% CI: 1.45-4.07) and tar products (OR=1.95 95% CI: 1.02-3.75). CONCLUSIONS: Estimates of the incidence of diagnosed adult psoriasis, referral rates to dermatologists, and characteristics of referred patients may assist in understanding the burden on the UK healthcare system and managing this population in primary and secondary care.
Asunto(s)
Psoriasis/epidemiología , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Colecalciferol/análogos & derivados , Colecalciferol/uso terapéutico , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The effects of filgotinib on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from 3 trials in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis were investigated. METHODS: Methotrexate (MTX)-naïve patients received filgotinib 200 or 100 mg plus MTX (FIL200+MTX, FIL100+MTX), filgotinib 200 mg monotherapy (FIL200), or MTX monotherapy through 52 weeks (NCT02886728). Patients with inadequate response (IR) to MTX (MTX-IR) received FIL200+MTX, FIL100+MTX, adalimumab 40 mg +MTX (ADA+MTX), or placebo (PBO)+MTX (rerandomized to FIL200+MTX or FIL100+MTX at week 24) through 52 weeks (NCT02889796). Patients with IR to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD-IR) received FIL200 or FIL100 or PBO with background stable conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs for up to 24 weeks (NCT02873936). PROs included Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical/mental component summary (PCS/MCS), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Rheumatoid Arthritis (WPAI-RA), and Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA). Data are reported as least-squares mean changes from baseline with standard error to the timepoint representing each study's primary endpoint. All statistical comparisons are of filgotinib groups vs their respective control groups. RESULTS: At week 24, among MTX-naïve patients, change from baseline (standard deviation) in HAQ-DI was - 1.00 (0.03; P < 0.001) with FIL200+MTX, - 0.94 (0.04; P < 0.01) with FIL100+MTX, and - 0.91 (0.04; P < 0.05) with FIL200 alone compared with - 0.81 (0.03) with MTX alone. At week 12, among MTX-IR patients, change from baseline in HAQ-DI was - 0.69 (0.04; P < 0.001 vs PBO+MTX, P < 0.05 vs ADA) with FIL200+MTX, - 0.57 (0.04; P < 0.001 vs placebo) with FIL100+MTX, and - 0.60 (0.04) with ADA vs - 0.40 (0.04) with PBO+MTX. At week 12, among bDMARD-IR patients, change from baseline in HAQ-DI was - 0.50 (0.06; P < 0.001) with FIL200+csDMARD and - 0.46 (0.05; P < 0.001) with FIL100+csDMARD vs - 0.19 (0.06) with placebo+csDMARD. Changes in SF-36 PCS and MCS, FACIT-Fatigue, WPAI, and PtGA tended to favor filgotinib over PBO, MTX, and ADA. Greater proportions of patients experienced clinically meaningful differences with either dosage of FIL in combination with csDMARDs (including MTX) and with FIL200 monotherapy vs comparators. CONCLUSIONS: Filgotinib provided improvements in PROs across patient populations. These findings suggest filgotinib can be an effective treatment option for patients with insufficient response to MTX or bDMARDs and patients who are MTX-naïve. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , FINCH 1, NCT02889796 , first posted September 7, 2016; FINCH 2, NCT02873936 , first posted August 22, 2016, retrospectively registered; FINCH 3, NCT02886728 , first posted September 1, 2016, retrospectively registered.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento , TriazolesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid-free clinical remission is important in ulcerative colitis. OBJECTIVE: This GEMINI 1 post hoc analysis evaluated vedolizumab efficacy in achieving sustained corticosteroid-free clinical remission in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: GEMINI 1 included a 6-week induction period followed by a 46-week maintenance period. Patients received stable corticosteroid dosing at baseline/during induction and tapered dosing during maintenance. Analysis groups included vedolizumab (induction and maintenance); vedolizumab/placebo (vedolizumab induction, placebo maintenance); and placebo (induction and maintenance). The primary endpoint was sustained corticosteroid-free clinical remission (partial Mayo score ≤2, no individual subscore >1, for ≥32 weeks). Multivariate analyses identified covariates associated with the primary endpoint. Safety endpoints included adverse events. RESULTS: Baseline demographics and concomitant corticosteroid use were similar across groups (n=454). A greater proportion (95% confidence interval) of the vedolizumab group achieved sustained corticosteroid-free clinical remission (10.2% [6.9 to 13.6]) vs the placebo group (1.4% [0.0 to 7.3]; difference 8.9% [-3.8 to 21.4]). Proportions were similar between the vedolizumab/placebo and placebo groups. Covariates associated with sustained corticosteroid-free clinical remission (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]) were treatment (vedolizumab vs placebo: 9.35 [1.25 to 71.43]; p=0.0605), anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha exposure (yes vs no: 0.26 [0.12 to 0.57]; p=0.0008), and disease duration (≤2 vs >2 years: 2.66 [0.99-7.19]; p=0.0531). Adverse events were similar across groups. CONCLUSION: A numerically greater proportion of vedolizumab-treated patients with ulcerative colitis achieved sustained corticosteroid-free clinical remission. Vedolizumab treatment, no previous anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha exposure, and shorter disease duration were associated with sustained corticosteroid-free clinical remission. CLINICALTRIALSGOV: NCT00783718.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Anal fistula is a pathological connection between the anal canal and perianal skin, which most commonly develops from an infected anal crypt. While the majority of anal fistulas are idiopathic, they are also associated with Crohn's disease (CD) and other inflammatory conditions. The prevalence of anal fistula is estimated to be 1-2 per 10000 patients, but population-based studies on anal fistula epidemiology are limited and outdated. AIM: To assess the prevalence of anal fistula and relevant comorbidities, with and without CD in the United Kingdom and Europe. METHODS: A retrospective population-representative observational cohort study was performed in The Health Improvement Network (THIN), a United Kingdom primary care database. Mid-year point prevalence of anal fistula was calculated on the first of July for each year between 2014 and 2017. Estimates were calculated for anal fistula overall and by CD status and standardized to the United Kingdom and European population. Prevalence of relevant comorbidities including lymphogranuloma venereum, hidradenitis suppurativa, anal presentation of sexually transmitted diseases, diabetes mellitus, and radiation in the pelvic area was reported. RESULTS: The United Kingdom-standardized overall point prevalence of anal fistula was 1.80 (95%CI: 1.65-1.94) per 10000 patients in 2017, while the Europe standardized estimate was 1.83 (95%CI: 1.68-1.98) per 10000 patients. Both these standardized point prevalence estimates ranged from 1.89 to 2.36 between 2014-2016. The United Kingdom-standardized point prevalence of anal fistula without CD was 1.35 (95%CI: 1.23-1.48) per 10000 patients, while the Europe-standardized estimate was 1.39 (95%CI: 1.26-1.52) per 10000 patients. In contrast, the standardized point prevalence estimate of anal fistula with CD was lower for both United Kingdom and Europe (0.44; 95%CI United Kingdom: 0.37-0.52, 95%CI Europe: 0.37-0.51) per 10000 patients in 2017. In 2017, 19% of anal fistula patients without CD and 13% of anal fistula patients with CD had at least one relevant comorbidity. These results show that anal fistulas are infrequent in the general population. 24.5% of prevalent anal fistulas are associated with CD, but other potentially etiological comorbidities are rare. CONCLUSION: This real-world evidence study estimated the United Kingdom-standardized prevalence of anal fistula was 1.80 per 10000 patients in 2017. Approximately 25% of cases may be associated with CD, while other comorbidities are rare.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Despite the fact that perianal fistulas are associated with significant morbidity and impaired quality of life, their prevalence in Europe is unknown. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of perianal fistulas in Europe, overall and according to etiology. METHODS: Two independent literature reviews were performed using different search strategies to maximize the identification of potentially relevant studies. Data from relevant articles were used to estimate the prevalence of perianal fistulas in Europe. The robustness of the estimate was evaluated using data from a large population-based database from the UK. RESULTS: A total of 26 studies provided epidemiological data on perianal fistulas, of which 16 provided suitable data to estimate the prevalence. Estimations using these data yielded a total prevalence of 1.69 per 10,000 population. Cryptoglandular infection and Crohn's disease (CD) were the predominant etiologies, with prevalence rates at 0.86 and 0.76 per 10,000 population, respectively. Comparison of prevalence data from the UK population-based database with the European population resulted in a standardized prevalence estimate of all perianal fistulas of 1.83 per 10,000 population, confirming the robustness of the literature-based estimate. CONCLUSION: Although in terms of incidence cryptoglandular fistulas were clearly predominant, the prevalence of fistulas in CD and cryptoglandular infection appeared more balanced. This is due to the longer duration and higher frequency of relapses of fistulas in CD. The estimated prevalence implies that perianal fistulas meet the criteria to be considered as a rare condition in Europe (prevalence less than 5 per 10,000 population). FUNDING: This study was funded by Takeda Pharmaceutical U.S.A., Inc. and TiGenix SAU.
Asunto(s)
Fístula Rectal/epidemiología , Adulto , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Calidad de Vida , Recurrencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sustaining clinical remission is an important treatment goal in moderate-to-severe UC. This post hoc exploratory analysis assessed the long-term efficacy of vedolizumab in the subset of patients with UC in the GEMINI 1 study who were in clinical remission by week 14 after 3 induction doses, administered at weeks 0, 2, and 6. METHODS: Sustained clinical remission (primary endpoint) was evaluated using 2 definitions: (1) a partial Mayo Score (pMS) of ≤2 with no subscore >1 and (2) a rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) of 0 throughout weeks 14, 26, 38, and 52. RESULTS: The proportion of patients in clinical remission at week 14 was significantly higher in patients receiving vedolizumab (n = 620) compared with placebo (n = 149) (pMS: 32.7% vs 20.1% [percentage-point difference (∆) 12.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.2-20.0]; RBS: 47.3% vs 28.9% [∆18.4%; 95% CI, 10.1-26.7]). Of patients in clinical remission at week 14, a significantly higher proportion of vedolizumab-treated patients achieved sustained clinical remission compared with placebo (pMS: 66.5% vs 26.7%; ∆39.8%; 95% CI, 22.7-56.9; RBS: 56.7% vs 20.9%; ∆35.7%; 95% CI, 22.3-49.1). Findings were consistent in tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist-naive and antagonist-failure patients. CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, 35%-40% more patients receiving a full induction course of vedolizumab had sustained clinical remission after 52 weeks of therapy. This result was observed irrespective of TNF antagonist treatment history. Clinical remission at week 14 may therefore be a predictor for sustained clinical remission with vedolizumab.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia de Inducción , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Pronóstico , Inducción de RemisiónRESUMEN
The number needed to treat (NNT) is considered an intuitive as well as popular effect measure. The aims of this review were to 1) explain why we cannot compare trial-specific NNT estimates for the competing treatments evaluated in different randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 2) outline the principles of how relative treatment effects of different trials can be compared and results can be presented as NNT, without violating the principles of valid between-trial comparisons. Our premise is that ratio measures for relative treatment effects of response outcomes are less prone to effect modification than absolute difference measures of response outcomes. Accordingly, any between-trial comparisons of the efficacy of competing interventions using the study-specific ORs are less likely to be invalid or biased than comparisons based on the study-specific NNT estimates. However, treatment-specific ORs obtained from a meta-analysis or taken directly from an individual study can be transformed into consistent treatment-specific NNT estimates that allow for credible comparisons of treatments when these ratio measures are applied to the same reference response estimate. The theoretical discussion is illustrated with a relevant indirect comparison of biologics for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Between-trial comparisons directly based on the NNT of individual trials may result in erroneous conclusions and should be avoided. Treatment-specific NNT estimates need to be based on the same probability of response with the common reference treatment against which the interventions are compared.
RESUMEN
AIM: To systematically review the literature on epidemiology, disease burden, and treatment outcomes for Crohn's disease (CD) patients with complex perianal fistulas. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for relevant articles (published 2000-November 2016) and congress abstracts (published 2011-November 2016). RESULTS: Of 535 records reviewed, 62 relevant sources were identified (mostly small observational studies). The cumulative incidence of complex perianal fistulas in CD from two referral-centre studies was 12%-14% (follow-up time, 12 years in one study; not reported in the second study). Complex perianal fistulas result in greatly diminished quality of life; up to 59% of patients are at risk of faecal incontinence. Treatments include combinations of medical and surgical interventions and expanded allogeneic adipose-derived stem cells. High proportions of patients experience lack of or inadequate response to treatment (failure and relapse rates, respectively: medical, 12%-73% and 0%-41%; surgical: 0%-100% and 11%-20%; combined medical/surgical: 0%-80% and 0%-50%; stem cells: 29%-47% and not reported). Few studies (1 of infliximab; 3 of surgical interventions) have been conducted in treatment-refractory patients, a population with high unmet needs. Limited data exist on the clinical value of anti-tumour necrosis factor-α dose escalation in patients with complex perianal fistulas in CD. CONCLUSION: Complex perianal fistulas in CD pose substantial clinical and humanistic burden. There is a need for effective treatments, especially for patients refractory to anti-tumour necrosis factor-α agents, as evidenced by high failure and relapse rates.
Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Enfermedad de Crohn/complicaciones , Fístula Cutánea/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida , Fístula Rectal/epidemiología , Tejido Adiposo/citología , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Fístula Cutánea/etiología , Fístula Cutánea/terapia , Drenaje/métodos , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Fístula Rectal/etiología , Fístula Rectal/terapia , Recurrencia , Trasplante de Células Madre , Células Madre , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidoresRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Selective patient recruitment can produce discrepancies between clinical trial results and real-world effectiveness. METHODS: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess vedolizumab real-world effectiveness and safety in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD). MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for real-world studies of vedolizumab in adult patients with UC/CD reporting clinical response, remission, corticosteroid-free remission, UC/CD-related surgery or hospitalization, mucosal healing, or safety published from May 1, 2014-June 22, 2017. Response and remission rates were combined in random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS: At treatment week 14, 32% of UC patients [95% confidence interval (CI) 27-39%] and 30% of CD patients (95% CI 25-34%) were in remission; and at month 12, 46% for UC (95% CI 37-56%) and 30% for CD (95% CI 20-42%). For UC, the rates of corticosteroid-free remission were 26% at week 14 (95% CI 20-34%) and 42% at month 12 (95% CI 31-53%); for CD they were 25% at week 14 (95%, CI 20-31%) and 31% at month 12 (95%, CI 20-45%). At month 12, 33-77% of UC and 6-63% of CD patients had mucosal healing. Nine percent of patients reported serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Vedolizumab demonstrated real-world effectiveness in patients with moderate-to-severely active UC or CD, with approximately one-half and one-third of patients, respectively, in remission at treatment month 12. These findings are consistent with clinical trial data and support the long-term benefit-risk profile of vedolizumab.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/efectos adversos , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Humanos , Mucosa Intestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Mucosa Intestinal/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inducción de Remisión , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cohort matching and regression modeling are used in observational studies to control for confounding factors when estimating treatment effects. Our objective was to evaluate exact matching and propensity score methods by applying them in a 1-year pre-post historical database study to investigate asthma-related outcomes by treatment. METHODS: We drew on longitudinal medical record data in the PHARMO database for asthma patients prescribed the treatments to be compared (ciclesonide and fine-particle inhaled corticosteroid [ICS]). Propensity score methods that we evaluated were propensity score matching (PSM) using two different algorithms, the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), covariate adjustment using the propensity score, and propensity score stratification. We defined balance, using standardized differences, as differences of <10% between cohorts. RESULTS: Of 4064 eligible patients, 1382 (34%) were prescribed ciclesonide and 2682 (66%) fine-particle ICS. The IPTW and propensity score-based methods retained more patients (96%-100%) than exact matching (90%); exact matching selected less severe patients. Standardized differences were >10% for four variables in the exact-matched dataset and <10% for both PSM algorithms and the weighted pseudo-dataset used in the IPTW method. With all methods, ciclesonide was associated with better 1-year asthma-related outcomes, at one-third the prescribed dose, than fine-particle ICS; results varied slightly by method, but direction and statistical significance remained the same. CONCLUSION: We found that each method has its particular strengths, and we recommend at least two methods be applied for each matched cohort study to evaluate the robustness of the findings. Balance diagnostics should be applied with all methods to check the balance of confounders between treatment cohorts. If exact matching is used, the calculation of a propensity score could be useful to identify variables that require balancing, thereby informing the choice of matching criteria together with clinical considerations.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Extrafine-particle inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have greater small airway deposition than standard fine-particle ICS. We sought to compare asthma-related outcomes after patients initiated extrafine-particle ciclesonide or fine-particle ICS (fluticasone propionate or non-extrafine beclomethasone). METHODS: This historical, matched cohort study included patients aged 12-60 years prescribed their first ICS as ciclesonide or fine-particle ICS. The 2 cohorts were matched 1:1 for key demographic and clinical characteristics over the baseline year. Co-primary endpoints were 1-year severe exacerbation rates, risk-domain asthma control, and overall asthma control; secondary endpoints included therapy change. RESULTS: Each cohort included 1,244 patients (median age 45 years; 65% women). Patients in the ciclesonide cohort were comparable to those in the fine-particle ICS cohort apart from higher baseline prevalence of hospitalization, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and rhinitis. Median (interquartile range) prescribed doses of ciclesonide and fine-particle ICS were 160 (160-160) µg/day and 500 (250-500) µg/day, respectively (P<0.001). During the outcome year, patients prescribed ciclesonide experienced lower severe exacerbation rates (adjusted rate ratio [95% CI], 0.69 [0.53-0.89]), and higher odds of risk-domain asthma control (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI], 1.62 [1.27-2.06]) and of overall asthma control (2.08 [1.68-2.57]) than those prescribed fine-particle ICS. The odds of therapy change were 0.70 (0.59-0.83) with ciclesonide. CONCLUSIONS: In this matched cohort analysis, we observed that initiation of ICS with ciclesonide was associated with better 1-year asthma outcomes and fewer changes to therapy, despite data suggesting more difficult-to-control asthma. The median prescribed dose of ciclesonide was one-third that of fine-particle ICS.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are associated with accelerated disease progression and are important drivers of health care resource utilization. The study aimed to quantify the rates of COPD exacerbations in England and assess health care resource utilization by severity categories according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2013. METHODS: Data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to Hospital Episode Statistics were used to identify patients with a COPD diagnosis aged ≥40 years. Those with complete spirometric, modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale information, and exacerbation history 12 months prior to January 1, 2011 (index date) were classified into GOLD severity groups. Study outcomes over follow-up (up to December 31, 2013) were exacerbation rates and resource utilization (general practitioner visits, hospital admissions). RESULTS: From the 44,201 patients in the study cohort, 83.5% were classified into severity levels GOLD A: 33.8%, GOLD B: 21.0%, GOLD C: 18.1%, and GOLD D: 27.0%. Mean age at diagnosis was 66 years and 52.0% were male. Annual exacerbation rates per person-year increased with severity, from 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81-0.85) for GOLD A to 2.51 (95% CI: 2.47-2.55) for GOLD D. General practitioner visit rates per person-year also increased with severity, from 4.82 (95% CI: 4.74-4.93) for GOLD A to 7.44 (95% CI: 7.31-7.61) for GOLD D. COPD-related hospitalization rates per person-year increased from less symptoms (GOLD A: 0.28, GOLD C: 0.39) to more symptoms (GOLD B: 0.52, GOLD D: 0.84). CONCLUSION: Patients in the most severe category (GOLD D) experienced nearly three times the number of exacerbations and COPD-related hospitalizations as those in the least severe category (GOLD A), in addition to increased general practitioner visits. Better patient management to stabilize the disease progression could allow for an improvement in exacerbation frequency and a reduction in health care resource utilization.
Asunto(s)
Progresión de la Enfermedad , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Anciano , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Inglaterra , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: In 2013, the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) updated the management strategy on COPD based on severity using a combined assessment of symptoms, degree of airflow limitation, and number of exacerbations. This study quantified prevalence and incidence of COPD in the United Kingdom and estimated disease severity by GOLD 2013 categories A/B (low risk) and C/D (high risk). METHODS: The Clinical Practice Research Datalink was used to identify COPD patients ≥40 years. Patient characteristics were described, and prevalence was calculated on December 31, 2013. Five-year incidence (2009-2013) was estimated, with rates standardized using 2011 UK population age and sex. To classify patients by GOLD categories, spirometry results, the modified British Medical Research Council grade, and history of exacerbations were used. RESULTS: The prevalent cohort comprised 49,286 patients with COPD with mean age 70 years; 51.0% were male. Overall prevalence was 33.3 per 1,000 persons (95% confidence interval [CI]: 33.1-33.6); 66.4% were classified as GOLD A/B and 33.6% as C/D. The standardized prevalence of GOLD A/B was 21.9 per 1,000 persons (95% CI: 21.7-22.1) and of C/D was 11.1 (95% CI: 10.9-11.2). A total of 27,224 newly diagnosed COPD patients were identified with mean age 67 years at diagnosis; 53.0% were male. Incidence was 2.2 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI: 2.2-2.3); 68.7% were classified in categories A/B and 31.3% in C/D, of which 17.2% did not receive COPD maintenance medication. CONCLUSION: A third of COPD patients in the UK are considered high risk (GOLD 2013 categories C/D), and a third of patients are diagnosed for the first time at these severe stages. Given the progressive nature of the disease, results suggest that closer attention to respiratory symptoms for early detection, diagnosis, and appropriate treatment of COPD in the UK is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Espirometría , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Comorbilidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Quimioterapia Combinada , Disnea/diagnóstico , Disnea/epidemiología , Disnea/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Prevalencia , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reino Unido/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe biologic treatment patterns and effectiveness among patients with psoriasis who initiated biologic therapy. METHODS: A chart review was conducted for 169 patients with psoriasis initiating biologic treatment between 1 July 2005 and 30 June 2009 from six dermatology clinics. Severity was measured by the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at baseline and time of treatment change. Biologic treatment patterns in the 12 months following initiation (discontinuation, switching, dose increase, and persistence) were collected. RESULTS: Mean (SD) PASI score at initiation was 18.4 (7.8). Eighteen percent of patients discontinued biologic use, 12% switched, and 7% increased biologic dose within the first 12 months. Patients persistent on initial biologic therapy (64%) achieved a mean PASI score of 3.8 at 12 months; 69% achieved PASI ≥75. For patients who discontinued due to lack of effectiveness, mean PASI score was 22.6; no patient reached PASI ≥75. Among patients who switched, mean PASI was 15.7 (0% PASI ≥75) at the time of switch. In those who increased their dose, mean PASI score was 9.1 (43% reached PASI ≥75) at the time of dose increase. CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion (36%) of patients changed or discontinued biologic therapy within the first year. These patients experienced limited PASI response, if any, suggesting an unmet need for this population.
Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Psoriasis/terapia , Adulto , Inglaterra , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psoriasis/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the incidence of clinically diagnosed congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), clinical features and age at first presentation. To assess the potential benefit of newborn screening for CAH. DESIGN: Active surveillance through the British Paediatric Surveillance Unit of all children aged under 16 years with newly diagnosed CAH, undertaken prospectively between August 2007 and August 2009. Twelve laboratories testing for CAH reported new diagnoses between August 2007 and January 2009. Reporting clinicians completed clinical questionnaires. SETTING: England, Wales and Scotland. RESULTS: 144 children with CAH were reported, of whom 132 (92%) had 21-hydroxylase deficiency. Thirty-six (25%) children were Asian and 62 (43%; 95% CI 35% to 51%) were boys. Incidence of new diagnoses in children ≤ 16 years was 0.60 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.71) per 100,000. Eighty-six (59%; 36 boys) children were diagnosed in the first year of life (estimated birth prevalence 5.48 (95% CI 4.42 to 6.81) per 100,000), most (77; 89%) of whom presented in the first month of life. Virilised genitalia were found in three-quarters of girls. Twenty-seven newborns first presented with salt-wasting crises, of whom 18 (67%; 16 boys) presented on or after 14 days of age. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one child in every 18 000 born in Great Britain has CAH. Similar numbers of boys and girls present clinically in the first year of life, but boys present with more severe manifestations, such as salt-wasting crises. Around 70% of newborns who first present with salt-wasting crisis would be detected earlier through newborn screening.