Blood and Blood Product Conservation: Results of Strategies to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Open Heart Surgery Patients at a Tertiary Hospital Are Maintained 4 Years after Initiation.

Blood product usage is an important outcome for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. In 2015, our center made a concerted effort with multiple departments to focus on reducing transfusion rates in surgical patients requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Specific changes included an upgrade of the oxygenator in mid-2015 and, in early 2016, implementation of a hemostasis management system (HMS) that used heparin dose-response titration assays for heparin and protamine management. A retrospective chart review demonstrated significant decreases in the quarterly average of patients receiving packed red blood cells (PRBCs) from a baseline of 26.7% to 22.7% following the oxygenator upgrade (p = .021) and from 22.7% to 8.8% following implementation of the HMS (p = .0017). Platelet usage decreased from an average of 50.5% during the baseline and oxygenator upgrade periods to 22.2% following implementation of the HMS (p < .0001). Usage of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) decreased from an average of 28.2% of cases during the baseline and oxygenator upgrade periods to 10.4% during 2016, and cryoprecipitate usage decreased from 38.5% to 15.4%. Heparin usage averaged 56,903 units before implementation of the HMS, decreasing to an average of 43,796 units following HMS implementation (p < .0001). During the same time periods, protamine usage averaged 340.3 mg and 183.2 mg, respectively. Because improvements achieved during quality initiatives may revert back to their pre-intervention state once the assessment period is over, we performed a second retrospective analysis to determine whether the improvements achieved were maintained during the 48 months following the initial study. During 2017-2020, quarterly average usage of blood products was as follows: PRBCs, 11.9%; platelets, 14.7%; FFP, 6.2%; and cryoprecipitate, 11.5%. Quarterly, average use of heparin and protamine were 31,556 ± 2,757 units and 189 ± 113 mg, respectively. These findings indicate that the improvements achieved were not limited to the duration of the initial quality initiative.

Blood and Blood Product Conservation: Results of Strategies to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Open Heart Surgery Patients at a Tertiary Hospital.

Blood product usage is a quality outcome for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. To address an increase in blood product usage since the discontinuation of aprotinin, blood conservation strategies were initiated at a tertiary hospital in Oakland, CA. Improving transfusion rates for open heart surgery patients requiring Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) involved multiple departments in coordination. Specific changes to conserve blood product usage included advanced CPB technology upgrades, and precise individualized heparin dose response titration assay for heparin and protamine management. Retrospective analysis of blood product usage pre-implementation, post-CPB changes and post-Hemostasis Management System (HMS) implementation was done to determine the effectiveness of the blood conservation strategies. Statistically significant decrease in packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, cryoprecipitate, and platelet usage over the stepped implementation of both technologies was observed. New oxygenator and centrifugal pump technologies reduced active circuitry volume and caused less damage to blood cells. Individualizing heparin and protamine dosing to a patient using the HMS led to transfusion reductions as well. Overall trends toward reductions in hospital length of stay and intensive care unit stay, and as a result, blood product cost and total hospitalization cost are positive over the period of implementation of both CPB circuit changes and HMS implementation. Although they are multifactorial in nature, these trends provide positive enforcement to the changes implemented.

Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery III: Training and Robotic-Assisted Approaches.

Minimally invasive mitral valve operations are increasingly common in the United States, but robotic-assisted approaches have not been widely adopted for a variety of reasons. This expert opinion reviews the state of the art and defines best practices, training, and techniques for developing a successful robotics program.

Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery I: Patient Selection, Evaluation, and Planning.

Widespread adoption of minimally invasive mitral valve repair and replacement may be fostered by practice consensus and standardization. This expert opinion, first of a 3-part series, outlines current best practices in patient evaluation and selection for minimally invasive mitral valve procedures, and discusses preoperative planning for cannulation and myocardial protection.

Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery II: Surgical Technique and Postoperative Management.

Techniques for minimally invasive mitral valve repair and replacement continue to evolve. This expert opinion, the second of a 3-part series, outlines current best practices for nonrobotic, minimally invasive mitral valve procedures, and for postoperative care after minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.