Hybrid Approaches for Aortic Disease-Our Experience.

BACKGROUND: Despite significant technological advancements in endovascular aortic repair, the aortic arch remains a challenge due to anatomic complexity including arch angulation and morphology as well as the location of brachiocephalic vessels in relation to landing zones. Total endovascular solutions are in development and being studied, in the meantime, hybrid thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a viable alternative to traditional open total arch replacement. METHODS: A retrospective case series was performed reviewing outcomes of 71 patients who underwent hybrid TEVAR in the aortic arch over the past 12 years at our facility. RESULTS: Major morbidity in the first 30 days post procedure was experienced by 3 patients (15.7%) and included one patient with stroke (n = 1), and another who experienced paraplegia and pulmonary complications (n = 1). There was one in-hospital death as a result of respiratory failure in a patient with multiple underlying comorbidities including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on postoperative day 5 resulting in a 30-day mortality of 5.2%. After a mean follow-up of 30 months, the overall mortality remained 5.2%. Major morbidity occurred in one patient who developed retrograde type A dissection. There was no stenosis of bypass grafts identified on follow-up imaging. Endoleak was identified in 2 patients. One patient experienced persistent retrograde perfusion of the false lumen with interval aneurysmal degeneration which was managed with an Amplatz vascular plug at 120 months following the initial hybrid TEVAR (5.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Single-stage hybrid TEVAR in the aortic arch is technically feasible with a good mid-term survival and a long-term freedom from reintervention.

A Perspective from Los Angeles of COVID-19 effect and impact on cardiac surgery.

Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) captured worldwide attention as the virus spread from initial detection as a pneumonia of unknown cause in Wuhan, China in December 2019 to the declaration of a pandemic by the WHO only 3 months later. This paper describes the impact of COVID-19 on cardiac surgery services in the greater Los Angeles area. Discussion includes public health response to the pandemic, how local hospitals reacted to the expected surge in patients with COVID, the establishment of telemedicine services, and the projected future impact on California healthcare as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Cardiac surgeons' concerns, perceptions, and responses during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had an unprecedented impact on health care and cardiac surgery. We report cardiac surgeons' concerns, perceptions, and responses during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A detailed survey was sent to recruit participating adult cardiac surgery centers in North America. Data regarding cardiac surgeons' perceptions and changes in practice were analyzed. RESULTS: Our study comprises 67 institutions with diverse geographic distribution across North America. Nurses were most likely to be redeployed (88%), followed by advanced care practitioners (69%), trainees (28%), and surgeons (25%). Examining surgeon concerns in regard to COVID-19, they were most worried with exposing their family to COVID-19 (81%), followed by contracting COVID-19 (68%), running out of personal protective equipment (PPE) (28%), and hospital resources (28%). In terms of PPE conservation strategies among users of N95 respirators, nearly half were recycling via decontamination with ultraviolet light (49%), followed by sterilization with heat (13%) and at home or with other modalities (13%). Reuse of N95 respirators for 1 day (22%), 1 week (21%) or 1 month (6%) was reported. There were differences in adoption of methods to conserve N95 respirators based on institutional pandemic phase and COVID-19 burden, with higher COVID-19 burden institutions more likely to resort to PPE conservation strategies. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates the impact of COVID-19 on North American cardiac surgeons. Our study should stimulate further discussions to identify optimal solutions to improve workforce preparedness for subsequent surges, as well as facilitate the navigation of future healthcare crises.

In Vivo Assessment of Ascending and Arch Aortic Compliance.

BACKGROUND: Dynamic compliance (Cd) of the adult thoracic ascending and arch aorta has had limited in vivo evaluation in patients with aortic disease. This study evaluates aortic compliance using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) across a range of thoracic aortic diseases. METHODS: Seventy-nine patients undergoing thoracic aortic endovascular procedures had Cd measurements of the ascending aorta proximal to the origin of the brachiocephalic trunk and distal to the origin of the left common carotid artery using IVUS before endograft deployment. Cd was calculated for each segment using the following equation, Cd = ΔD/(D • ΔP) where ΔD = change in aortic diameter, D = diameter in diastole, and ΔP = pulse pressure. RESULTS: Mean Cd of the ascending aorta in all patients (18.4%/mm Hg) and aortic arch (16.5 %/100 mm Hg) did not differ significantly. Compliance was significantly lower in patients being treated for thoracic aortic aneurysm and penetrating ulcer than in patients with traumatic rupture, acute and chronic dissection (P = 0.009). Compliance was significantly higher in patients with aortic transection compared with thoracic aneurysm or penetrating ulcer (P = 0.001). Compliance decreased with age by 0.44 ± 0.06 (P = 0.001) per year in the ascending aorta and 0.41 ± 0.05 (P = 0.001) per year in the aortic arch. Compliance did not increase with diameter when adjusted for age (P = 0.65). Compliance measured in the ascending aorta in 7 patients after descending thoracic aortic endograft repair decreased to 12.6%/100 mm Hg, although not significant (P = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Ascending and aortic arch compliance is significantly higher than reported for peripheral vessels. Thoracic aortic compliance decreases with age and is not related to aortic diameter. The results of the present study are important when considering the development of endoprosthesis devices and long-term effects on the thoracic aorta.

Recurrent Aortic Dissection: Observations From the International Registry of Aortic Dissection.

BACKGROUND: Improved medical care after initial aortic dissection (AD) has led to increased survivorship and a population of individuals at risk for further cardiovascular events, including recurrent AD. Reports describing recurrent ADs have been restricted to small numbers of patients from single institutions. We used the IRAD (International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection) database to examine the clinical profiles and outcomes of patients with recurrent AD. METHODS: We identified 204 patients enrolled in IRAD with recurrent AD. For the primary analysis, patient characteristics, interventions, and outcomes were analyzed and compared with 3624 patients with initial AD. Iterative logistic modeling was performed to investigate variables associated with recurrent AD. Cox regression analyses were used to determine variables associated with 5-year survival. A subset of recurrent AD patients was analyzed for anatomic and demographic details of initial and recurrent ADs. RESULTS: Patients with recurrent AD were more likely to have Marfan syndrome (21.5% versus 3.1%; P<0.001) but not bicuspid aortic valve (3.6% versus 3.2%; P=0.77). Descending aortic dimensions were greater in patients with recurrent AD than in patients with initial AD independently of sentinel dissection type (type A: 4.3 cm [3.5-5.6 cm] versus 3.3 cm [2.9-3.7 cm], P<0.001; type B: 5.0 cm [3.9-6.0 cm] versus 4.0 cm [3.5-4.8 cm], P<0.001), and this observation was accentuated among patients with Marfan syndrome. In multivariate analysis, the diagnosis of Marfan syndrome independently predicted recurrent AD (hazard ratio, 8.6; 95% confidence interval, 5.8-12.8; P<0.001). Patients with recurrent AD who presented with proximal followed by distal AD were younger than patients who experienced distal followed by proximal dissection AD (42.1±16.1 versus 54.3±14.8 years; P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Among those suffering acute aortic dissection, 5% have a history of a prior aortic dissection. Recurrent AD is strongly associated with Marfan syndrome.

Feasibility of endovascular repair of ascending aortic pathologies as part of an FDA-approved physician-sponsored investigational device exemption.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular treatment of ascending aortic lesions has been reported, but to date, no FDA-approved studies have been conducted to define feasibility and the use of endografts in this particular location or to analyze the critical factors involved. METHODS: Patients were consented for entry into an FDA-approved physician-sponsored investigational device exemption study to investigate the outcome of those with ascending aortic pathologies. These patients were suitable according to the instructions for use for endovascular repair with a Valiant Captivia (Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) thoracic stent graft, a device designed specifically for deployment in the ascending aorta. All patients had sequential gated-cardiac computed tomography scans, with data being entered into the VQI Complex TEVAR software (West Lebanon, NH). All procedures were performed in a hybrid room, with the capability to convert to an open repair to ensure maximal patient protection. The first five patients constituted the feasibility study, with continued enrollment based on initial results and submission of an annual report to the FDA. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were screened, and six patients were entered into the physician-sponsored investigational device exemption study. Although there was no early mortality, there was one late death. All patients had sequential computed tomographies and cardiac echocardiograms with no evidence of migration, one type 1a endoleak, one postoperative stroke, and regression of the aortic lesions in the excluded aortic segment. CONCLUSIONS: In this feasibility study, the preliminary evaluation of endovascular treatment for ascending aortic pathologies demonstrates uniform accuracy of deployment and secure fixation up to 17.5 months of follow-up. There is positive remodeling of the excluded aortic segments similar to surveillance studies involving the descending aorta.

Evolution of lesion-specific management of blunt thoracic aortic injury.

Developments in diagnosis and treatment have transformed the management of blunt thoracic aortic injuries (BTAIs). For patients in stable condition, treatment practice has shifted from early open repair to nonoperative management for low-grade lesions and routine delayed endovascular repair for more significant injuries. However, effective therapy depends on accurate staging of injury grade and stability to select patients for appropriate management. Recent developments in BTAI risk stratification enable lesion-specific management tailored to the patient and aortic lesion. This review summarizes advances in lesion assessment and treatment and proposes an integrated scheme for the modern management of BTAI.

Nonoperative Management of Traumatic Aortic Pseudoaneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Current blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) guidelines recommend early repair of traumatic pseudoaneurysms (PSAs) due to risk for subsequent aortic rupture. Recent analyses indicate that early repair is required only in the setting of high-risk features, while delayed repair is safe and associated with lower morbidity and mortality in appropriately selected patients. To evaluate the appropriate indications for nonoperative management (NOM) of traumatic PSAs, we performed a systematic review of studies reporting outcomes for this management strategy. We hypothesized that NOM is safe in appropriately selected patients with traumatic aortic PSAs. METHODS: English language single- and multi-institutional series reporting NOM of traumatic thoracic aortic PSAs were identified by systematic literature search and review. A descriptive analysis was performed of NOM, with stratification by lesion size and patient follow-up. The primary outcomes were late aortic intervention, aortic-related death, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Eighteen studies, which included 937 patients with traumatic PSAs, were analyzed. One hundred ninety-one patients were managed nonoperatively. The primary indication for NOM was prohibitive risk for aortic repair due to severe comorbidities or concurrent injuries. Where reported, PSAs with <50% circumferential involvement accounted for 88% of lesions selected for NOM. Late interventions were required in 4% of patients. Inpatient aortic-related mortality was 2%, and all-cause inpatient mortality was 32%. Although survival at up to 4-7 years was reported, postdischarge follow-up after PSA NOM was limited to <1 year in most studies. CONCLUSIONS: NOM of traumatic aortic PSAs is a common practice in BTAI series reporting lesion-specific management, and is associated with low rates of treatment failure. These findings suggest that routine early repair may not be required for traumatic PSAs, particularly for lesions limited to <50% of the aortic circumference. Definitive repair can be delayed until patient stability and repair timing can be guided by assessment of lesion stability on follow-up imaging.

Total Aortic Arch Revascularization with Extra-anatomic Bypass for Takayasu Arteritis.

Total arch replacement with median sternotomy and hypothermic circulatory arrest is described for Takayasu arteritis (TA) with aortic arch and supra-aortic trunk involvement.(1,2) We report aortic arch revascularization using extra-anatomic bypass through partial sternotomy, without cardiopulmonary bypass, in a TA patient. Avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass may enhance outcomes and represent an attractive approach to arch revascularization in TA.

Results of a multicenter, prospective trial of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for blunt thoracic aortic injury (RESCUE trial).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the early outcomes of patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair for blunt thoracic aortic injuries. METHODS: A prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter trial using the Medtronic Valiant Captivia stent graft was conducted at 20 sites in North America. Fifty patients with blunt thoracic aortic injuries were enrolled between April 2010 and January 2012 and will be followed for 5 years. The injuries were classified into categories (grades I-IV) based on severity: intimal tear, intramural hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, or rupture. The primary end point was 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary end points were adverse events occurring within 30 days that were related to the procedure, device or aorta, and aortic-related mortality. Technical success was measured as successful device delivery and deployment. RESULTS: Seventy-six percent (38/50) of patients were male with mean age of 41 ± 17 years. Fifty-one Medtronic Valiant Captivia thoracic stent grafts and a single Talent thoracic stent graft were implanted within a median of 1.0 days following injury (mean, 1.8 ± 4.0 days). Seventy percent (35/50) of aortic injuries were grade III or higher, including one patient with free rupture. Mean injury severity score was 38 ± 14. Fifty-four percent of stent grafts were ≤26 mm (28/52). The left subclavian artery was completely covered in 40% of patients (20/50) and partially covered in 18% of patients (9/50). Four patients underwent subclavian artery revascularization: one at the time of the endograft procedure and three others after developing arm ischemia after the initial endograft procedure. Cerebral spinal fluid was drained in two patients. The median procedure time was 91 minutes, and median hospital stay was 12 days. There was 100% successful device delivery and deployment. Four (8%) patients died within 30 days. Nonfatal adverse events within 30 days that were related to the procedure, device, or aorta were experienced by 12% (6/50) of patients. No nonfatal adverse events related to the device were reported; a single death was conservatively adjudicated as device-, procedure-, and aorta-related because of insufficient information. No patient developed spinal cord injury, and there were no cerebrovascular accidents. However, one patient had an anoxic brain injury following aortic rupture. No patient underwent conversion to open repair or required an endovascular reintervention. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the early outcomes, the Medtronic Valiant Captivia stent graft appears to be a promising treatment modality for blunt thoracic aortic injuries. Long-term follow-up is necessary to substantiate the effectiveness of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in treatment of blunt thoracic aortic injuries.

An update on endovascular management of acute thoracic aortic disease and future directions.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become an alternative treatment option for acute thoracic aortic disease. This review focuses on current endovascular treatment of acute thoracic aortic disease and future directions of TEVAR. TEVAR is a promising alternative approach to open surgery, with lower early mortality and morbidity rates, especially in high-risk cohorts. Furthermore, with accumulating experience and improving device technology and imaging modalities, TEVAR has become safer and has potential to expand treatment options to include ascending and arch pathologies.

Pathogenesis and management of retrograde type A aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

BACKGROUND: Retrograde type A aortic dissection is a feared complication of thoracic aortic endografting. The aim of this study was to review the incidence, etiology, and management of this life-threatening complication. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the literature in the last 10 years was performed. Data on retrograde type A aortic dissection from this literature search, along with authors' personal experience, provided the basis for this review. RESULTS: The incidence of retrograde type A aortic dissection ranges from 1.3% to 6.8%. In is most commonly associated with endografting of acute or chronic aortic dissection. Up to one third of patients will have this complication 3 months or later after the index procedure. Open surgical repair remains the "gold standard" for retrograde type A aortic dissection, although medical and endovascular approaches may be utilized in selected patients with prohibitive operative risk. Mortality remains high ranging from 20% to 57%. Potential etiologies of retrograde type A aortic dissection include aortic injury from catheter and wire or stent graft manipulation, poor perioperative antihypertensive control, inappropriate patient and device selection, aggressive balloon dilation, and stent graft oversizing. CONCLUSIONS: Retrograde type A aortic dissection remains a deadly complication of thoracic aortic endografting. The high incidence of delayed type A aortic dissection underscores the importance of imaging follow-up in patients undergoing a thoracic endograft procedure.

Gene modules and genes associated with postoperative atrial fibrillation: weighted gene co-expression network analysis and circRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulatory network analysis.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common complication in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, the pathogenesis of postoperative AF (POAF) is elusive, and research related to this topic is sparse. Our study aimed to identify key gene modules and genes and to conduct a circular RNA (circRNA)-microRNA (miRNA)-messenger RNA (mRNA) regulatory network analysis of POAF on the basis of bioinformatic analysis. Methods: The GSE143924 and GSE97455 data sets from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database were analyzed. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was used to identify the key gene modules and genes related to POAF. A circRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulatory network was also built according to differential expression analysis. Functional enrichment analysis was further performed according to Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis. Results: WGCNA identified 2 key gene modules and 44 key genes that were significantly related to POAF. Functional enrichment analysis of these key genes implicated the following important biological processes (BPs): endosomal transport, protein kinase B signaling, and transcription regulation. The circRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulatory network suggested that KLF10 may take critical part in POAF. Moreover, 2 novel circRNAs, hsa_circRNA_001654 and hsa_circRNA_005899, and 2 miRNAs, hsa-miR-19b-3p and hsa-miR-30a-5p, which related with KLF10, were involved in the network. Conclusions: Our study provides foundational expression profiles following POAF based on WGCNA. The circRNA-miRNA-mRNA network offers insights into the BPs and underlying mechanisms of POAF.

Endovascular management of acute complicated type B aortic dissection in North America.

The management of patients with complicated acute type B aortic dissection is challenging. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair has shown promising results in small series; however, using nonstandard definitions and improper inclusion criteria confounds the published results. This article reviews the techniques and outcome of patients who underwent endovascular treatment for complicated acute type B aortic dissection in North America. Primary stent grafting for treatment of complicated acute type B aortic dissection compares favorably with the surgical outcome. Thoracic aortic endovascular repair can be offered with a relatively low postoperative morbidity and mortality in experienced hands. It also appears to have a favorable outcome in mid-term follow-up. Longevity of the repair and durability of the stent grafts in the thoracic aorta are yet to be established.

Shone's complex and aortic dissection: case report and review of a rare, underdiagnosed congenital heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Shone's complex is a rare congenital heart disease consisting of a variety of left ventricular inflow and outflow tract lesions. Patients typically present in childhood requiring early surgical intervention; however, with improved surgical techniques, these patients are surviving later into adulthood. This increased survival comes with a new set of medical complications that providers need to be aware of. CASE PRESENTATION: A 27 year old man with a complex cardiac history including an incomplete Shone's complex and persistent symptomatic atrial flutter presented with sharp chest pain radiating to his back. He was found to have type A aortic dissection on imaging in the setting of severe patient-prosthesis mismatch. He had multiple valvular surgeries in childhood. The patient was being followed-up as an outpatient for an enlarging chronic aortic aneurysm and was non-compliant with his medications. He was taken emergently to the operating room for a skirted Bentall procedure, aortic valve replacement, and right sided MAZE. CONCLUSIONS: Shone's complex is a rare congenital heart disease associated with significant morbidities including atrial flutter, patient-prosthesis mismatch, and aortic dissection. As patients continue to live longer into adulthood with this disease, it is important to raise awareness of this rare syndrome for providers and highlight its potential complications. Further research is needed to determine appropriate guidelines for when to intervene on aortopathy-associated CHD.

A narrative review of hybrid ablation for persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained arrhythmia and is characterized by rapid and irregular atrial activation with loss of atrial contraction. There has been a significant evolution of treatments over the past 30 years. Initially, cardiac surgeons developed approaches via sternotomy with superior efficacy, however early iterations of the procedure were associated with prolonged recovery time and frequent need for pacemaker placement. The current surgical approach to the maze procedure via sternotomy yields excellent efficacy and is a Class 1 recommendation for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing a concomitant procedure. Several years following the initial development of the surgical maze procedure, cardiac electrophysiologists developed less invasive, however less efficacious catheter ablation options by percutaneous approach. Both the surgical and transcatheter approaches have their advantages and disadvantages with varying risks of complications and efficacy. Through the combination of expertise of cardiac surgeons paired with the electrophysiology team, a hybrid ablation procedure has been developed offering an increased efficacy with a less-invasive approach than the current gold standard treatment of Cox-maze IV procedure. This review will discuss the hybrid ablation procedure, review recent associated clinical trials, and discuss advantages and challenges associated with this multidisciplinary approach for management of patients with AF.

Distribution of intimomedial tears in patients with type B aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair is a promising means of treating patients with complicated type B aortic dissection by excluding the intimomedial tears. This study aims to characterize the location of tears and to propose a classification of type B aortic dissections based on these findings. METHODS: Advanced protocols in computed tomography scans of patients with type B aortic dissection were used to identify the size and location of intimomedial tears in relation to the origin of the left subclavian artery. Aortic imaging details in 72 un-operated patients were used as a reference standard. From 1999 to 2005, 44 patients underwent primary endovascular treatment for complications of type B aortic dissection. RESULTS: Each patient had an average of 2.8 +/- 2.11 intimomedial tears. The median intimomedial tear surface area was 0.63 cm(2). The presence of >or=3 or >or=5 intimomedial tears in the descending thoracic aorta did not correlate with aortic branch malperfusion (P > .05). Thirteen of 26 (50%) patients with a tear >1.9 cm(2) had aortic branch malperfusion (P = .032). Ten of 14 (71%) patients with a tear >4.86 cm(2) (mean plus one standard deviation) had aortic branch malperfusion (P = .002). The location of tears ranged from -6 mm to +459.2 mm from the left subclavian artery orifice: 80.5% (n = 99) of these tears were above the reference origin of the celiac artery. Eight of 13 patients (62%) with a tear distal to 282 mm (the orifice of the celiac artery) had aortic branch malperfusion in (P = .04). A classification for the location of intimomedial tears is proposed with potential clinical relevance to endovascular repair: type 1 has no identifiable tears; type 2 has one or more tears with no tears distal to the orifice of the celiac artery; type 3 has tears involving the branch vessels of the abdominal aorta; and type 4 has intimomedial tears distal to the aortic bifurcation. CONCLUSIONS: Characterization and location of intimomedial tears using computed tomography (CT) imaging is feasible and represents an important step in the management of type B aortic dissection. The location and surface area of tears is associated with malperfusion. Based on the proposed classification and anatomic reference data, three out of every four patients may have a favorable constellation of intimomedial tears (type 1 or 2) that would be amenable to endovascular repair and reverse aortic remodeling. The clinical correlation will be established in upcoming studies.

Surgical Site Infections in Cardiac Surgery.

Surgical site infection (SSI) can be a significant complication of cardiac surgery, delaying recovery and acting as a barrier to enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery. Several risk factors predisposing patients to SSI including smoking, excessive alcohol intake, hyperglycemia, hypoalbuminemia, hypo- or hyperthermia, and Staphylococcus aureus colonization are discussed. Various measures can be taken to abolish these factors and minimize the risk of SSI. Glycemic control should be optimized preoperatively, and hyperglycemia should be avoided perioperatively with the use of intravenous insulin infusions. All patients should receive topical intranasal Staphylococcus aureus decolonization and intravenous cephalosporin if not penicillin allergic.

Delirium Prevention in Postcardiac Surgical Critical Care.

This review provides an overview for health care teams involved in the perioperative care of cardiac surgery patients. The intention is to summarize key determinants of delirium, its impact on short- and long-term outcomes as well as to discuss effective management strategies. The first component of this review examines the prevalence and the factors associated with an increased risk of postoperative delirium. A multitude of predisposing (eg, baseline vulnerability and comorbidities) and precipitating (eg, type of cardiac surgery and postoperative care) factors that contribute to the occurrence of delirium are discussed.