The impact of oophorectomy on survival from breast cancer in patients with CHEK2 mutations.

BACKGROUND: To estimate the impact of oophorectomy and other treatments on the survival of breast cancer patients with a CHEK2 mutation. METHODS: Women with Stage I-III breast cancer who were treated at 17 hospitals in Poland were tested for four founder mutations in the CHEK2 gene. 974 women (10%) were positive for a CHEK2 mutation. Control patients without a CHEK2 mutation were selected from a database of patients treated over the same time period. Information on treatments received and distant recurrences were retrieved from medical records. Treatments included chemotherapy, hormonal therapy (tamoxifen) and radiation therapy. Oophorectomies were performed for the treatment of breast cancer or for benign conditions. Dates of death were obtained from the Polish Vital Statistics Registry. Causes of death were determined by medical record review. Predictors of survival were determined using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: In all, 839 patients with a CHEK2 mutation were matched to 839 patients without a mutation. The mean follow-up was 12.0 years. The 15-year survival for CHEK2 carriers was 76.6% and the 15-year survival for non-carrier control patients was 78.8% (adjusted HR = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.84-1.34; P = 0.61). Among CHEK2 carriers, the 15-year survival for women who had an oophorectomy was 86.3% and for women who did not have an oophorectomy was 72.1% (adjusted HR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.38-0.90; P = 0.02). Among controls, the 15-year survival for patients who had an oophorectomy was 84.5% and for women who did not have an oophorectomy was 77.6% (adjusted HR = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.66-1.61; P = 0.90). CONCLUSION: Among women with breast cancer and a CHEK2 mutation, oophorectomy is associated with a reduced risk of death from breast cancer.

Predictors of survival for breast cancer patients with a BRCA1 mutation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate in a contemporary cohort the impacts of chemotherapy and oophorectomy on survival for breast cancer patients with a BRCA1 mutation. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We reviewed the pathology reports and medical records of 372 women with breast cancer and a BRCA1 mutation, diagnosed from 2005 to 2017, between the ages of 25 and 65 and followed them for death from all causes and death from breast cancer. Death was ascertained through the Poland vital statistics registry. We performed survival analysis to evaluate the impacts of chemotherapy (including neoadjuvant cisplatinum) and of oophorectomy on survival. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 5.6 years (median 5.2), 66 of the 372 women died; 56 of the deaths were from breast cancer and 6 were from ovarian cancer. 127 women received neoadjuvant cisplatinum and 245 women received other chemotherapies. Cisplatinum (versus all other therapies) was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.42 (95%CI 0.20-0.87) on breast cancer-specific survival. The 10-year actuarial all-cause survival for women who had both cisplatinum and an oophorectomy was 94.4%. The 10-year all-cause survival for women who had neither cisplatinum nor an oophorectomy was 65.4% (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Cisplatinum and oophorectomy are effective therapies for women with breast cancer and a BRCA1 mutation.

Screening with magnetic resonance imaging, mammography and ultrasound in women at average and intermediate risk of breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The addition of MRI to mammography and ultrasound for breast cancer screening has been shown to improve screening sensitivity for high risk women, but there is little data to date for women at average or intermediate risk. METHODS: Two thousand nine hundred and ninety-five women, aged 40 to 65 years with no previous history of breast cancer were enrolled in a screening program, which consisted of two rounds of MRI, ultrasound and mammography, one year apart. Three hundred and fifty-six women had a CHEK2 mutation, 370 women had a first-degree relative with breast cancer (and no CHEK2 mutation) and 2269 women had neither risk factor. Subjects were followed for breast cancer for three years from the second screening examination. RESULTS: Twenty-seven invasive epithelial cancers, one angiosarcoma and six cases of DCIS were identified over the four-year period. Of the 27 invasive cancers, 20 were screen-detected, 2 were interval cancers, and five cancers were identified in the second or third follow-up year (i.e., after the end of the screening period). For invasive cancer, the sensitivity of MRI was 86%, the sensitivity of ultrasound was 59% and the sensitivity of mammography was 50%. The number of biopsies incurred by MRI (n = 156) was greater than the number incurred by mammography (n = 35) or ultrasound (n = 57). Of the 19 invasive cancers detected by MRI, 17 (89%) were also detected by ultrasound or mammography. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of sensitivity, MRI is slightly better than the combination of mammography and ultrasound for screening of women at average or intermediate risk of breast cancer. However, because of additional costs incurred by MRI screening, and the small gain in sensitivity, MRI screening is probably not warranted outside of high-risk populations.

The risk of breast cancer in women with a BRCA1 mutation from North America and Poland.

Women with a BRCA1 mutation face a high lifetime risk of breast cancer. It is unknown to what extent environmental factors modify the inherent genetic risk. If women from different countries, but with similar mutations, experience different levels of cancer risk, nongenetic risk modifiers are likely to be present. Study subjects were a cohort of 1477 women with a BRCA1 mutation, from Canada (n = 358), the United States (n = 256) and Poland (n = 863). The women were followed for a mean of 4.3 years and 130 incident cases of breast cancer were recorded. Annual cancer incidence rates were calculated, and based on these, penetrance curves were constructed for women from North America and Poland. In a Cox proportional hazards model, residence in Poland, versus North America, was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.54 (95% CI 0.34-0.86; p = 0.01). The risk of breast cancer to age 70 was estimated to be 49% for women from Poland and 72% for women from North America. Among women with BRCA1 mutations, the risk of breast cancer in women who reside in Poland is less than that of women who reside in North America. The reasons for the difference are unknown, but this observation suggests that environmental factors or genetic modifiers are important in determining risk.

Use of natural cysteine protease inhibitors in limiting SARS-Co-2 fusion into human respiratory cells.

Specific antibodies that humans acquire as a result of disease or after vaccination are needed to effectively suppress infection with a specific variant of SARS CoV-2 virus. The S protein of the D614G variant of coronavirus is used as an antigen in known vaccines to date. It is known that COVID-19 disease resulting from infection with this coronavirus can often be very dangerous to the health and lives of patients. In contrast, vaccines produce antibodies against an older version of the protein S-D614G (January 2020) and therefore have difficulty recognizing new variants of the virus. In our project we propose to obtain specific and precise antibodies by means of so-called controlled infection against specific infectious variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus "here and now". Currently, several variants of this pathogen have already emerged that threaten the health and lives of patients. We propose to reduce this threat by partially, but not completely, blocking the fusion mechanism of the SARS-CoV-2 virus into human respiratory cells. According to our plan, this can be achieved by inhibiting cathepsin L activity in respiratory cells, after introducing natural and non-toxic cysteine protease inhibitors into this area. We obtain these inhibitors by our own method from natural, "human body friendly" natural resources. We hypothesize that blocking cathepsin L will reduce the number of infecting viruses in cells to such an extent that COVID-19 developing in infected individuals will not threaten their health and life. At the same time, the number of viruses will be sufficient for the body's own immune system to produce precise antibodies against a specific version of this pathogen.

The effects of chicken egg white cystatin and proteinase inhibitor on cysteine peptidase-like activity in the sera of patients with breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The activity of autogenic proteolytic enzymes is regulated in vivo by autogenic inhibitors. They play important roles in maintaining a balance in many processes in the human body. In pathological conditions, enzymes are overexpressed and the balance is disturbed. Such uncontrolled changes may lead to the development of local or systemic cancer. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of specific inhibitors, i.e., chicken egg white cystatin (CEWC) and proteinase inhibitor (E-64) on autogenic cysteine peptidases (CPs) in the sera of patients reporting for subsequent stages of treatment after being diagnosed with breast cancer. Cysteine peptidases play a vital role in the basic processes that are associated with cancer progression. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We selected serum samples from 108 patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer (stages IIA-IIIA) who had received no previous treatment. The blood samples were centrifuged, and the resulting serum was placed in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C. The biochemical tests were performed at the laboratory of the Department of Physical Chemistry and Microbiology. RESULTS: For CEWC, we found an inhibitory effect in 37 out of 108 samples; for E-64, 14 out of 22 samples displayed an inhibitory effect. In the remaining blood samples, these inhibitors caused an increase in fluorescence. In a parallel test, we added pure cathepsin B to 9 serum samples, and then used CEWC to inhibit the activity of autogenic CPs. Chicken egg white cystatin completely inhibited the cathepsin B that was added to the serum without changing its effect on the autogenic CPs. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that there may be a potential difference between the commercially available cathepsin B and its autogenic analogues found in the serum of cancer patients. The increase in fluorescence induced in the reaction between the inhibitors and autogenic CPs is still unexplained. There was no relationship between the observed inhibition/activation of CPs and any of the available indicators of the health of the patients examined.

Differences in cysteine peptidases-like activity in sera of patients with breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The key role in carcinogenesis with destruction of the extracellular matrix is played by proteases released by invasive cancer cells. Cysteine peptidases, such as cathepsin B and L, take an important role in cancer progression and metastasis. OBJECTIVES: Cysteine peptidase-like activity (CPA) in sera of patients with breast cancer at different stages of disease and the influence of genetic predisposition associated with BRCA-1 gene mutations were analysed. METHODS: CPA in serum was determined with the spectrofluorometric technique using Z-Phe-Arg-AMC as a substrate. Determination was carried out in 111 breast cancer patients in comparison to a control group of 50 healthy subjects. RESULTS: The highest CPA was found in breast cancer patients with a hereditary predisposition bearing BRCA1 gene mutations, and the lowest activity was found in patients who had a tumour surgically removed and before adjuvant therapy. The differences in the activities between control group and cancer groups were statistically significant (p< 0.05), except from group of cancer patients in complete remission (p< 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: Serum CPA in patients with breast cancer differs depending on the cancer stage and treatment methods. Our study demonstrate the correlation between BRCA-1 gene mutations and the increased level of CPA.

Antipapain activity in the serum of patients with breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Complement information about the share the role of antipapain activity in serum people with breast cancer. OBJECTIVE: We measured the activity of cysteine peptidase inhibitors in the sera of 150 patients with breast cancer. Patients were divided into four groups depending on the cancer type and treatment method. We also analysed the control group. The activity of cysteine peptidase inhibitors was defined as a 'defensiveness' marker. METHODS: The activity of cysteine peptidase inhibitors was measured against papain using the colorimetric method and the BANA substrate. RESULTS: The highest activity of enzymes was found in the group of patients with BC and hereditary predisposition to it, and the lowest activity was found in patients after surgical treatment. CONCLUSION: The activity of cysteine peptidase inhibitors in serum was measured against papain. We found that the activity levels were correlated with the cancer stage and treatment method. The lowest activity was found in patients after surgical treatment; the highest in women with active cancer and a hereditary predisposition to it.

Ten-year survival in patients with BRCA1-negative and BRCA1-positive breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To estimate 10-year overall survival (OS) rates for patients with early-onset breast cancer, with and without a BRCA1 mutation, and to identify prognostic factors among those with BRCA1-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 3,345 women with stage I to III breast cancer, age ≤ 50 years, were tested for three founder mutations in BRCA1. Information on tumor characteristics and treatments received was retrieved from medical records. Dates of death were obtained from the vital statistics registry. Survival curves for the mutation-positive and -negative subcohorts were compared. Predictors of OS were determined using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Of the 3,345 patients enrolled onto the study, 233 (7.0%) carried a BRCA1 mutation. The 10-year survival rate for mutation carriers was 80.9% (95% CI, 75.4% to 86.4%); for noncarriers, it was 82.2% (95% CI, 80.5% to 83.7%). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) associated with carrying a BRCA1 mutation was 1.81 (95% CI, 1.26 to 2.61). Among BRCA1 carriers with a small (< 2 cm) node-negative tumor, the 10-year survival rate was 89.9%. Among BRCA1 mutation carriers, positive lymph node status was a strong predictor of mortality (adjusted HR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.8 to 8.9). Oophorectomy was associated with improved survival in BRCA1 carriers (adjusted HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.75). CONCLUSION: The 10-year survival rate among women with breast cancer and a BRCA1 mutation is similar to that of patients without a BRCA1 mutation. Among women with a BRCA1 mutation, survival was much improved after oophorectomy.

Final results of an international retrospective observational study in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with oral vinorelbine-based chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Full oral chemotherapy (CT) is an active and convenient therapeutic option for patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC). In this retrospective analysis, we reviewed the characteristics and the outcome of patients treated by oral vinorelbine either as a single-agent or in combination with capecitabine as first- or second-line CT in the metastatic setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed 216 patients with ABC who started treatment with a full oral CT at 13 centers and seven countries between 2006 and 2008. To be eligible, patients must have received either as a first-(56%) or second-line (44%) therapy oral vinorelbine as a single-agent (54%) or in combination with capecitabine (46%). RESULTS: Main patients' characteristics in the full population (n=216): median age (range): 61 (32-87) years; categories of age: <50 years: 18%, 50-65 years: 44%, ≥ 65 years: 38%; hormone receptor-positive: 63%; ≥ 2 metastatic sites: 58%; visceral metastases: 49%; prior CT: 86%; prior CT for ABC: 44%; prior anthracycline treatment: 69%; prior taxane treatment: 43%, prior anthracycline plus taxane: 38%; prior endocrine therapy: 63%. Median number of cycles: 6 (range=1-54); 48% of patients received more than 6 cycles. G3/4 toxicities: neutropenia 8%, anaemia 2%, thrombocytopenia 1%, febrile neutropenia/neutropenic infection 2%, nausea 6%, vomiting 4%, diarrhea 6%, fatigue 6%, hand-foot syndrome 14% (combination with capecitabine), neuropathy 1%, alopecia (grade 2) 1%. EFFICACY: disease control was achieved in 77% of patients [95% confidence interval=71-83%], 74% as single-agent, 81% in combination, 82% in first-line, 71% in second-line. Median progression-free survival was 9.7 months [95% confidence interval=8.2-12.6 months] in first-line and 6.6 months [95% confidence interval=5.5-8.5 months] in second-line therapy. Caregivers described these oral regimens as convenient (81%), well-tolerated (84%) and with a good compliance by patients (76%). CONCLUSION: These data from everyday practice confirm, as shown in different clinical trials, that oral vinorelbine is an active and well-tolerated CT for ABC, either as a first- or second-line in patients pre-treated with anthracyclines or taxanes. The convenience of its oral administration in association with its good tolerance profile, allows for continuation of treatment until disease progression without a pre-planned maximum of cycles.

A high proportion of founder BRCA1 mutations in Polish breast cancer families.

Three mutations in BRCA1 (5382insC, C61G and 4153delA) are common in Poland and account for the majority of mutations identified to date in Polish breast and breast-ovarian cancer families. It is not known, however, to what extent these 3 founder mutations account for all of the BRCA mutations distributed throughout the country. This question has important implications for health policy and the design of epidemiologic studies. To establish the relative contributions of founder and nonfounder BRCA mutations, we established the entire spectrum of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a large set of breast-ovarian cancer families with origins in all regions of Poland. We sequenced the entire coding regions of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in 100 Polish families with 3 or more cases of breast cancer and in 100 families with cases of both breast and ovarian cancer. A mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 was detected in 66% of breast cancer families and in 63% of breast-ovarian cancer families. Of 129 mutations, 122 (94.6%) were in BRCA1 and 7 (5.4%) were in BRCA2. Of the 122 families with BRCA1 mutations, 119 (97.5%) had a recurrent mutation (i.e., one that was seen in at least 2 families). In particular, 111 families (91.0%) carried one of the 3 common founder mutations. The mutation spectrum was not different between families with and without ovarian cancer. These findings suggest that a rapid and inexpensive assay directed at identifying the 3 common founder mutations will have a sensitivity of 86% compared to a much more costly and labor-intensive full-sequence analysis of both genes. This rapid test will facilitate large-scale national epidemiologic and clinical studies of hereditary breast cancer, potentially including studies of chemoprevention.