Hemi-reverse revision arthroplasty in the setting of severe glenoid bone loss.

BACKGROUND: Glenoid bone loss is one of the main challenges in revision of failed shoulder arthroplasties. The concept of a hemi-reverse procedure is to implant a glenoid baseplate and glenosphere to protect the glenoid reconstruction to allow it to heal and to preserve the joint space for a potential second-stage humeral component implantation. The purpose of this study was to report the results of hemi-reverse procedures. METHODS: Revision to a hemi-reverse procedure was performed in 15 patients: 8 with a failed anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, 3 with a failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty, 3 with a failed humeral hemiarthroplasty, and 1 with placement of a cement spacer owing to sepsis after a total shoulder arthroplasty. After complete removal of the initial prosthesis, all patients underwent glenoid reconstruction with bone grafting and implantation of a reverse arthroplasty baseplate and glenosphere. A humeral implant was not placed in any case. The patients were prospectively followed up and underwent complete clinical and radiologic studies preoperatively and postoperatively at a minimum of 2 years after the surgical procedure. RESULTS: Thirteen hemi-reverse implants and glenoid bone grafts healed (86%) and remained radiographically stable. One hemi-reverse construct migrated and became mechanically loose, which was attributed to absent fixation of the central post in the native glenoid bone. In 1 patient, an implant-related infection developed; irrigation and debridement were performed, in addition to revision to a resection arthroplasty. After documented radiographic healing of the hemi-reverse glenoid reconstruction, 5 patients underwent a second-stage revision to a reverse procedure with insertion of a humeral component at a median of 6 months (interquartile range [IQR], 6-8 months). In this group, the median follow-up period was 73 months (IQR, 45-153 months), the median Constant score was 48 (IQR, 41-56), median active forward elevation was 135° (IQR, 100°-150°), and the median Subjective Shoulder Value was 50% (IQR, 50%-60%). In the group of 9 patients with remaining hemi-reverse implants, the median follow-up period was 38 months (IQR, 29-60 months), the median Constant score was 41 (IQR, 38-46), median active forward elevation was 100° (IQR, 80°-100°), and the median Subjective Shoulder Value was 50% (IQR, 40%-60%). CONCLUSION: The hemi-reverse procedure is an effective revision procedure to reconstruct a severely deficient glenoid. The hemi-reverse procedure may function as the definitive procedure, with satisfactory outcomes. Additionally, in patients who undergo the hemi-reverse procedure, second-stage revision to a total reverse procedure can be performed once imaging confirms bone graft and construct stability.

Factors associated with improvement or loss of internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Internal rotation (IR) with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) can be unpredictable. Identifying the factors associated with loss of or improved IR could aid preoperative patient counseling. This study quantifies the change in IR experienced by rTSA patients with nonfracture indications and identifies the patient, implant, and operative factors associated with IR loss or gain at 2-year minimum follow-up. METHODS: A total of 1978 primary rTSA patients were analyzed from an international database of a single rTSA prosthesis to quantify IR at 2 years' minimum follow-up. rTSA patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on their preoperative IR score, with group 1 patients having less active IR as defined by a preoperative IR score ≤3 and group 2 patients having greater active IR as defined by a preoperative IR score ≥4 (ie, L5 or higher). For both group 1 and 2 patients, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to quantify the risk factors associated with IR loss after rTSA. RESULTS: Overall, 58.9% of rTSA patients experienced IR improvement and 17.0% lost IR after rTSA. The occurrence of IR loss or gain was dependent on preoperative IR score, as 73.2% of group 1 patients improved IR and only 40.1% of group 2 patients improved IR, whereas 31.0% of group 2 patients lost IR and only 6.3% of group 1 patients lost IR after rTSA. Numerous risk factors for IR loss were identified. For group 1 patients, male sex (P = .004, odds ratio [OR] = 2.056), tobacco usage (P = .004, OR = 0.348), larger humeral stem diameter (P = .008, OR = 0.852), and not having subscapularis repaired (P = .002, OR = 2.654) were significant risk factors for IR loss. For group 2 patients, male sex (P = .005, OR = 1.656), higher body mass index (P = .002, OR = 0.946), a diagnosis other than osteoarthritis (P < .001, OR = 2.189), nonaugmented baseplate usage (P < .001, OR = 2.116), and not having subscapularis repaired (P < .001, OR = 3.052) were significant risk factors for IR loss. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients improve IR after rTSA in the nonfracture setting. rTSA patients with substantial IR prior to surgery had a greater probability for losing IR compared to patients with poor preoperative IR. Numerous risk factors for IR loss were identified; these risk factors are useful for counseling patients considering rTSA, as some patients are more likely to lose IR than others.

Postoperative radiographic findings of an uncemented convertible short stem for anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Several short-stemmed press-fit humeral components have been developed in recent years for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) as well as reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Varying radiographic outcomes have been reported, with some studies reporting concerning rates of aseptic loosening. This study analyzed the radiographic findings of a press-fit convertible short-stemmed humeral component in both TSA and RSA. METHODS: There were 150 anatomic TSAs (group 1) and 77 RSAs (group 2) analyzed radiographically at a minimum follow-up of 2 years postoperatively. Plain radiographs were reviewed for stem loosening, alignment, signs of stress shielding, and the filling ratio. RESULTS: At final follow-up, 49% of group 1 and 65% of group 2 had no evidence for radiographic changes. In those with radiographic changes, low bone adaptions were found in 83% and high adaptions in 17% in both groups. Larger stem sizes with higher filling ratios were associated with high radiographic adaptions in both groups (P = .02). The overall filling ratios were higher in group 2 (P = .002). Cortical contact of the stem led to higher bone adaptions (P = .014). CONCLUSIONS: The short humeral component analyzed in this study showed encouraging survival rates without aseptic loosening. Radiographic changes are associated with a higher filling ratio and cortical contact of the stem. Surgeons should aim to achieve fixation with the minimal required canal filling to minimize radiographic changes with the uncemented humeral component used in this study.

One and two-year clinical outcomes for a polyethylene glenoid with a fluted peg: one thousand two hundred seventy individual patients from eleven centers.

PURPOSE: Clinical shoulder science lacks a benchmark against which the early clinical value of new glenoid components can be compared; such a benchmark may be derived from a multicenter study of patients receiving an established, internationally used design of glenoid component. METHODS: We obtained data from 11 centers on 1270 patients having total shoulder arthroplasty using an all-polyethylene component with a fluted central peg. We analyzed individual patient outcomes at 1 and 2 years after surgery. We compared the improvement for each patient to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and calculated each patient's improvement as a percent of maximal possible improvement (MPI). RESULTS: The preoperative scores improved from SST 3 ± 2, ASES 37 ± 15, Constant score 36 ± 16, and Penn score 30 ± 19 to SST 10 ± 2, ASES 90 ± 12, Constant 76 ± 13, and Penn 80 ± 24 (p < 0.001 for each). A high percentage of patients improved by more than the MCID (SST 96%, ASES 98%, Constant 94%, Penn 93%) and obtained improvement of at least 30% of the MPI (SST 95%, ASES 98%, Constant 91%, Penn 87%). The clinical outcomes realized with this glenoid design were not worse for the 41% of shoulders with preoperative type B glenoids or for the 30% of shoulders with more than 15 degrees of glenoid retroversion. CONCLUSIONS: Individual patients from 11 international practices having total shoulder arthroplasty using a basic glenoid component design obtained highly significant clinical outcomes, providing a benchmark against which the early outcomes of new designs can be compared to determine whether they provide increased clinical value.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty with an anatomic press-fit short stem.

BACKGROUND: There is limited information assessing outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) with a press-fit short stem. The purpose of this study was to evaluate early clinical and radiographic outcomes and complications after TSA with an anatomic press-fit short stem. METHODS: We identified 118 TSAs completed with press-fit short stem and minimum 2-year follow-up; 85 of these patients had a grit-blasted (GB) short stem placed, whereas 33 patients had short stems with proximal porous coating (PPC). Shoulder function scores, active mobility measurements, and radiographs were assessed. RESULTS: The average age at surgery was 66.7 years, with average follow-up of 3 years. Significant improvements were noted for all shoulder function scores and active mobility measurements from the preoperative state to final follow-up (P < .001). There was no stem loosening in any patients with minimum 2-year follow-up; however, 3 female patients with GB stems had gross loosening of their humeral components before 1 year, 2 requiring revision. Radiolucent lines around the humeral component were found in 5.9% without evidence of loosening. Osseous resorption at the medial cortex was noted in 9.3%. Of patients with PPC stems, no patients were observed to have radiolucent lines compared with 8.2% in the GB group (P = .09). CONCLUSION: TSAs with anatomic press-fit short stem showed significant clinical improvements from the preoperative state to final short-term follow-up, with few complications and minimal radiographic changes. Lack of PPC may contribute to early loosening in patients with poor bone quality. The authors now use a short stem with PPC.

Radiographic comparison of finned, cementless central pegged glenoid component and conventional cemented pegged glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Radiographic lucency of the glenoid component remains a problem after cement fixation in primary total shoulder arthroplasty. Glenoid component design likely contributes to rates of glenoid lucency. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare radiographic lucency between a finned, cementless central pegged glenoid component (CL component) and a conventional cemented pegged glenoid component (P component) on immediate postoperative and minimum 2-year follow-up radiographs. METHODS: Fifty-four patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty were prospectively randomized to receive an all-polyethylene CL component or a conventional all-polyethylene P component. Three raters graded glenoid lucency and bone interdigitation on immediate postoperative and latest follow-up radiographs. Patients who had undergone revision surgery or had died before evaluation were excluded. Minimum 2-year follow-up was required for inclusion of radiographic evaluation. RESULTS: Fifty patients met inclusion criteria; 42 patients (84%; 20 CL and 22 P) were available for follow-up with the original glenoid implant in place. The mean follow-up duration was 35 months (24-64 months). There were no significant differences in glenoid radiolucency between CL (1/20 [5%]) and P (2/22 [9%]) components at last follow-up (P = .999). Five patients (25%) in the CL group had bone interdigitation. No instances of aseptic glenoid loosening occurred. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in the rate of glenoid lucency between the 2 groups at immediate or an average 35-month follow-up. Both techniques appear to be viable options for initial glenoid component fixation, with CL components allowing possible osseointegration, imparting potential long-term stability.

Increased scapular spine fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a humeral onlay short stem: an analysis of 485 consecutive cases.

BACKGROUND: Scapular stress fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) are a potentially serious complication with modern lateralized and onlay implants. The aim of this study was to report the scapular spine stress fracture rate after RSA with an onlay, 145° humeral stem, analyzing potential fracture risk factors and clinical outcomes in a large cohort of patients. METHODS: A consecutive series of 485 RSAs were implanted with the Aequalis Ascend Flex stem. Data collection included preoperative and postoperative clinical and radiographic assessment findings (rotator cuff Goutallier grade; Hamada, Walch, and Favard classifications; range of motion; Constant score) and perioperative data. Patients with a scapular spine fracture following RSA were matched with nonfracture control patients, and preoperative variables were tested to determine whether they were predictive of a scapular spine fracture. RESULTS: A scapular spine fracture following RSA occurred in 21 patients (4.3%), with a mean time to diagnosis of 8.6 months (range, 1-34 months). No preoperative factor was found to be a significant predictor of scapular spine fracture. Both groups showed significant improvements in active mobility measurements and Constant scores from preoperatively to final follow-up (P < .001). The control group scored significantly better than the scapular spine fracture group regarding the Constant score and forward flexion. CONCLUSION: Scapular spine fractures have shown an increased prevalence after onlay-design RSA. This series was not able to link any clear risk factors. Functional results are limited, regardless of the fracture management.

Radiographic and clinical comparison of pegged and keeled glenoid components using modern cementing techniques: midterm results of a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Glenoid component loosening remains a significant issue after anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. Pegged glenoid components have shown better lucency rates than keeled components in the short term; however, midterm to long-term results have not fully been determined. We previously reported early outcomes of the current randomized controlled group of patients, with higher glenoid lucency rates in those with a keeled glenoid. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of these components at minimum 5-year follow-up. METHODS: Fifty-nine total shoulder arthroplasties were performed in patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Patients were randomized to receive either a pegged or keeled glenoid component. Three raters graded radiographic glenoid lucencies. Clinical outcome scores and active mobility outcomes were collected preoperatively and at yearly postoperative appointments. RESULTS: Of the 46 shoulders meeting the inclusion criteria, 38 (82.6%) were available for minimum 5-year radiographic follow-up. After an average of 7.9 years, radiographic lucency was present in 100% of pegged and 91% of keeled components (P = .617). Grade 4 or 5 lucency was present in 44% of pegged and 36% of keeled components (P = .743). There were no differences in clinical outcome scores or active mobility outcomes between shoulders with pegged and keeled components at last follow-up. Within the initial cohort, 20% of the keeled shoulders (6 of 30) and 7% of the pegged shoulders (2 of 29) underwent revision surgery (P = .263). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference in survival rates between groups (P = .560). CONCLUSION: At an average 7.9-year follow-up, non-ingrowth, all-polyethylene pegged glenoid implants are equivalent to keeled implants with respect to radiolucency, clinical outcomes, and need for revision surgery.