RESUMEN
Veterans answered our nation's call, surrendering their civilian constitutional protections so that we may live free. They have experienced combat, deployment, and many of the stresses that come with military life. They deserve our respect and gratitude at the time of death, not just on Veterans Day.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been reported as a valuable tool for bedside diagnoses of abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAA). However, no data exist regarding POCUS in measuring follow-up AAA diameter studies in patients with existing AAAs. The purpose of this study was to determine the variability of aortic measurements performed by a non-physician using POCUS vs standard of care (SOC) measurements by a registered vascular technologist or an abdominal/pelvic CT scan. METHODS: A prospective observational ultrasound study was performed from 1/1/2019 to 3/31/2021 on patients with a diagnosis of an AAA (≥3.0 cm). A research coordinator (non-physician) underwent a 3-hour training session in ultrasound operation and basic human anatomy to measure AAA diameter. The maximum aortic diameter was documented and compared to measurements obtained by SOC ultrasonography or CT scan. The POCUS and SOC ultrasounds were separated by no more than 90 days. Clinical risk factors including age, race, body mass index, coronary artery disease, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, diabetes, and current smoking were also collected. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients (mean age: 73.6 ± 5.8 years, body mass index: 29.5 ± 6.2 kg/m2) were being followed in a vascular clinic and underwent both a POCUS and SOC ultrasounds. One indeterminant study was reported in identifying an AAA diagnosis, due to an overlying colostomy. The average follow-up time from initial screening aortic diameter to POCUS was 4.4 ± 3.7 years. Overall average aortic diameter measurements obtained were 4.1 ± .9 cm for POCUS and 4.0 ± .9 cm for SOC (P = NS). Average difference in aortic measurement for POCUS and SOC was -.1 ± .3 cm. CONCLUSIONS: POCUS is an accurate method to follow AAA diameter in patients. POCUS could improve patient follow up with AAA diameter measurements, streamline care and reduce overall burden for both patients and Radiology Departments in assessing follow up AAA diameters.
RESUMEN
Purpose The purpose of this study was to describe Sub-Saharan African immigrants' health-illness transition experiences associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) self-management. Methods A qualitative description methodology was used in this study. Face-to-face semi-structured in-depth interviews lasting 60 to 90 minutes were conducted with 10 Sub-Saharan African immigrant men and women with T2DM recruited using purposive and snowball sampling. Each interview was audio-taped, transcribed, and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results Participants' mean age was 60.3 years (range, 44-76 years), 5 men and 5 women; most had lived in the US for more than 10 years (70%) and with T2DM for more than 5 years (60%). Four overarching domains described the health-illness transition experiences the participants had with T2DM self-management: (1) knowledge of T2DM self-management behaviors, (2) current T2DM self-management behaviors, (3) inhibitors of T2DM self-management, and (4) facilitators of T2DM self-management. Conclusions Health professionals should be equipped with an understanding of the properties and conditions of health-illness transition. This understanding is necessary to build a foundation that facilitates healthy adaptation to the T2DM transition requiring the development and mastery of new skills consistent with gaining control of T2DM. Culturally tailored interventions need to be developed to decrease inhibitors of and encourage self-management in daily T2DM care for Sub-Saharan African immigrants with T2DM.