RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate sex-differences in outcomes after trans-catheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in a population-based cohort from Ontario, Canada. BACKGROUND: Prior studies comparing outcomes in men and women after TAVR have yielded divergent results. Some studies have suggested that women have better survival than men while others have not corroborated this finding. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted using chart abstraction data on all TAVR procedures performed between 2007 and 2013 in Ontario, Canada. Patients who had emergency TAVR procedures were excluded. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 30-days and 1-year. Secondary outcomes included mortality at last follow-up, cause-specific, and all-cause hospital readmission. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using propensity score was used to adjust for baseline differences between men and women. RESULTS: The final study cohort consisted of 453 women and 546 men with a mean follow-up of 3.5 years. Women were generally older and more frail but had less comorbid conditions. Women had lower unadjusted mean EuroScores (7% ± 5% vs 8% ± 7%; P = 0.008), but underwent significantly more trans-apical procedures (26.5% vs 19.2%; P = 0.006) than men. After IPTW, the groups were well balanced. Although mortality was numerically higher for women at 30-days (7.2% vs 5.4%), this was not statistically significant (P = 0.34). At 1-year, there was no difference in mortality (18.2% vs 19.2%; P = 0.85). There were no significant differences in all-cause readmission. CONCLUSION: In this population-based cohort including all patients undergoing TAVR, mortality or all-cause readmission were not significantly different between men and women. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/mortalidad , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Ontario , Readmisión del Paciente , Puntaje de Propensión , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/mortalidad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of invasive coronary angiography in stable ischemic heart disease (IHD) varies widely. OBJECTIVE: To validate the 2012 appropriate use criteria for diagnostic catheterization by examining the relationship between the appropriateness of cardiac catheterization in patients with suspected stable IHD and the proportion of patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and subsequent revascularization. DESIGN: Population-based, observational, multicenter cohort study. SETTING: The Cardiac Care Network, a registry of all patients having elective angiography at 18 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, between 1 October 2008 and 30 September 2011. PATIENTS: Persons without prior coronary revascularization or myocardial infarction who had angiography for suspected stable CAD. MEASUREMENTS: Appropriateness scores were ascertained by using data collected at the time of the index angiography and were categorized as appropriate, inappropriate, or uncertain. RESULTS: Among the final cohort of 48 336 patients, 58.2% of angiographic studies were classified as appropriate, 10.8% were classified as inappropriate, and 31.0% were classified as uncertain. Overall, 45.5% of patients had obstructive CAD. In patients with appropriate indications for angiography, 52.9% had obstructive CAD, with 40.0% undergoing revascularization. In those with inappropriate indications, 30.9% had obstructive CAD and 18.9% underwent revascularization; in those with uncertain indications, 36.7% had obstructive CAD and 25.9% had revascularization. Although more patients with appropriate indications had obstructive CAD and underwent revascularization (P < 0.001), a substantial proportion of those with inappropriate or uncertain indications had important coronary disease. LIMITATION: Data were not available on whether symptoms were atypical. CONCLUSION: Despite the association between appropriateness category and obstructive CAD, this study raises concerns about the ability of the appropriate use criteria to guide clinical decision making. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Oclusión Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Adhesión a Directriz , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios de Cohortes , Oclusión Coronaria/terapia , Femenino , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Isquemia Miocárdica/terapia , Revascularización Miocárdica , Ontario , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos InnecesariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The ratio of revascularization to medical therapy (referred to herein as the revascularization ratio) for the initial treatment of stable ischemic heart disease varies considerably across hospitals. We conducted a comprehensive study to identify patient, physician and hospital factors associated with variations in the revascularization ratio across 18 cardiac centres in the province of Ontario. We also explored whether clinical outcomes differed between hospitals with high, medium and low ratios. METHODS: We identified all patients in Ontario who had stable ischemic heart disease documented by index angiography performed between Oct. 1, 2008, and Sept. 30, 2011, at any of the 18 cardiac centres in the province. We classified patients by initial treatment strategy (medical therapy or revascularization). Hospitals were classified into equal tertiles based on their revascularization ratio. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Patient follow-up was until Dec. 31, 2012. Hierarchical logistic regression models identified predictors of revascularization. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, with a time-varying covariate for actual treatment received, were used to evaluate the impact of the revascularization ratio on clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Variation in revascularization ratios was twofold across the hospitals. Patient factors accounted for 67.4% of the variation in revascularization ratios. Physician and hospital factors were not significantly associated with the variation. Significant patient-level predictors of revascularization were history of smoking, multivessel disease, high-risk findings on noninvasive stress testing and more severe symptoms of angina (v. no symptoms). Treatment at hospitals with a high revascularization ratio was associated with increased mortality compared with treatment at hospitals with a low ratio (hazard ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.21). INTERPRETATION: Most of the variation in revascularization ratios across hospitals was warranted, in that it was driven by patient factors. Nonetheless, the variation was associated with potentially important differences in mortality.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Isquemia Miocárdica/terapia , Revascularización Miocárdica/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Fumar/epidemiología , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Angina Estable/diagnóstico por imagen , Angina Estable/epidemiología , Angina Estable/terapia , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Angiografía Coronaria , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Femenino , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Hiperlipidemias/epidemiología , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Renta/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia Miocárdica/epidemiología , Ontario , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/epidemiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Coronary angiograms are important in the diagnostic workup of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. However, little is known about the clinical predictors of normal angiograms and whether this rate varies across different cardiac centers in Ontario. METHODS: We conducted a study using the Cardiac Care Network Variations in Revascularization Practice in Ontario database of 2,718 patients undergoing an index cardiac catheterization for an indication of stable angina between April 2006 and March 2007 at one of 17 cardiac hospitals in Ontario. We determined predictors of normal coronary angiograms (0% coronary stenosis) and compared rates of patients with normal catheterizations across centers. RESULTS: Overall, 41.9% of patients with stable angina had a normal catheterization. A multivariate model demonstrated female gender to be the strongest predictor of a normal angiogram (odds ratio 3.55, 95% CI 2.93-4.28). In addition, atypical ischemic symptoms or no symptoms, the absence of diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smoking history, peripheral vascular disease, and angiography performed at a nonteaching site were associated with higher rates of normal catheterization. The rate of normal angiograms studied varied from 18.4% to 76.9% across hospitals and was more common in community compared with academic settings (47.1% vs 35.4%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The absence of traditional cardiac risk factors, female gender, and lack of typical angina symptoms are all associated with a higher frequency of normal cardiac catheterizations. The wide variation in Ontario in the frequency of normal angiograms in patients with stable angina suggests that there are opportunities to improve patient case selection.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Circulación Coronaria/fisiología , Vasos Coronarios/fisiología , Anciano , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario/epidemiología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although cardiac procedures are commonly used to treat cardiovascular disease, they are costly. Administrative data sources could be used to track cardiac procedures, but sources of such data have not been validated against clinical registries. OBJECTIVES: To examine accuracy of cardiac procedure coding in administrative databases versus a prospective clinical registry. SAMPLE: We examined a total of 182,018 common cardiac procedures including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, valve surgery, and cardiac catheterization procedures during fiscal years 2005 and 2006 across 18 cardiac centers in Ontario, Canada. RESEARCH DESIGN: Accuracy of codes in the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) administrative databases were compared with the clinical registry of the Cardiac Care Network. RESULTS: Comparing 17,511 CIHI and 17,404 registry procedures for CABG surgery, the positive predictive value (PPV) of CIHI-coded CABG surgery was 97%. In 6229 CIHI-coded and 5885 registry-coded valve surgery procedures, the PPV of the administrative data source was 96%. Comparing 38,527 PCI procedures in CIHI to 38,601 in the registry, the PPV of CIHI was 94%. Among 119,751 CIHI-coded and 111,725 registry-coded cardiac catheterization procedures, the PPV of administrative data was 94%. When the procedure date window was expanded from the same day to ±1 days, the PPV was 96% (PCI) and exceeded 98% (CABG surgery), 97% (valve surgery), and 95% (cardiac catheterization). CONCLUSIONS: Using a clinical registry as the gold standard, the coding accuracy of common cardiac procedures in the CIHI administrative database was high.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/clasificación , Codificación Clínica/normas , Unidades de Cuidados Coronarios/organización & administración , Bases de Datos como Asunto , Control de Formularios y Registros/normas , Sistemas de Registros Médicos Computarizados/normas , Sistema de Registros , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/cirugía , Codificación Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/clasificación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/clasificación , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Ontario/epidemiología , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patient and provider-related factors affecting access to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) have been extensively studied, but health-system administration factors have not. The objectives of this study were to investigate hospital administrators' (HA) awareness and knowledge of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), perceptions regarding resources for and benefit of CR, and attitudes toward and implementation of inpatient transition planning for outpatient CR. METHODS: A cross-sectional and observational design was used. A survey was administered to 679 HAs through Canadian and Ontario databases. A descriptive examination was performed, and differences in HAs' perceptions by role, institution type and presence of within-institution CR were compared using t-tests. RESULTS: 195 (28.7%) Canadian HAs completed the survey. Respondents reported good knowledge of what CR entails (mean=3.42±1.15/5). Awareness of the closest site was lower among HAs working in community versus academic institutions (3.88±1.24 vs. 4.34±0.90/5 respectively; p=.01). HAs in non-executive roles (4.77±0.46/5) perceived greater CR importance for patients' care than executives (4.52±0.57; p=.001). HAs perceived CR programs should be situated in both hospitals and community settings (n=134, 71.7%). CONCLUSIONS: HAs value CR as part of patients' care, and are supportive of greater CR provision. Those working in community settings and executives may not be as aware of, or less-likely to value, CR services. CR leaders from academic institutions might consider liaising with community hospitals to raise awareness of CR benefits, and advocate for it with the executives in their home institutions.
Asunto(s)
Rehabilitación Cardiaca , Atención a la Salud/economía , Administradores de Hospital/psicología , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Canadá , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Hospitales Públicos , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The ratio of percutaneous coronary interventions to coronary artery bypass graft surgeries (PCI:CABG ratio) varies considerably across hospitals. We conducted a comprehensive study to identify clinical and nonclinical factors associated with variations in the ratio across 17 cardiac centres in the province of Ontario. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we selected a population-based sample of 8972 patients who underwent an index cardiac catheterization between April 2006 and March 2007 at any of 17 hospitals that perform invasive cardiac procedures in the province. We classified the hospitals into four groups by PCI:CABG ratio (low [< 2.0], low-medium [2.0-2.7], medium-high [2.8-3.2] and high [> 3.2]). We explored the relative contribution of patient, physician and hospital factors to variations in the likelihood of patients receiving PCI or CABG surgery within 90 days after the index catheterization. RESULTS: The mean PCI:CABG ratio was 2.7 overall. We observed a threefold variation in the ratios across the four hospital ratio groups, from a mean of 1.6 in the lowest ratio group to a mean of 4.6 in the highest ratio group. Patients with single-vessel disease usually received PCI (88.4%-99.0%) and those with left main artery disease usually underwent CABG (80.8%-94.2%), regardless of the hospital's procedure ratio. Variation in the management of patients with non-emergent multivessel disease accounted for most of the variation in the ratios across hospitals. The mode of revascularization largely reflected the recommendation of the physician performing the diagnostic catheterization and was also influenced by the revascularization "culture" at the treating hospital. INTERPRETATION: The physician performing the diagnostic catheterization and the treating hospital were strong independent predictors of the mode of revascularization. Opportunities exist to improve transparency and consistency around the decision-making process for coronary revascularization, most notably among patients with non-emergent multivessel disease.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/estadística & datos numéricos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Cateterismo Cardíaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Coronaria/cirugía , Enfermedad Coronaria/terapia , Femenino , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Revascularización Miocárdica/estadística & datos numéricos , Ontario , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Multi-disciplinary heart failure (HF) clinics have been shown to improve outcomes for HF patients in randomized clinical trials. However, it is unclear how widely available specialized HF clinics are in Ontario. Also, the service models of current clinics have not been described. It is therefore uncertain whether the efficacy of HF clinics in trials is generalizable to the HF clinics currently operating in the province. METHODS: As part of a comprehensive evaluation of HF clinics in Ontario, we performed an environmental scan to identify all HF clinics operating in 2010. A semi-structured interview was conducted to understand the scope of practice. The intensity and complexity of care offered were quantified through the use of a validated instrument, and clinics were categorized as high, medium or low intensity clinics. RESULTS: We identified 34 clinics with 143 HF physicians. We found substantial regional disparity in access to care across the province. The majority of HF physicians were cardiologists (81%), with 81% of the clinics physically based in hospitals, of which 26% were academic centers. There was a substantial range in the complexity of services offered, most notably in the intensity of education and medication management services offered. All the clinics focused on ambulatory care, with only one having an in-patient focus. None of the HF clinics had a home-based component to care. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple HF clinics are currently operating in Ontario with a wide spectrum of care models. Further work is necessary to understand which components lead to improved patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Centros Comunitarios de Salud/organización & administración , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Centros Comunitarios de Salud/economía , Financiación Gubernamental , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Ontario/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Health system stakeholders at different levels are focused more than ever on improvements to quality of care. With heart disease continuing to be a top health issue for Canadians, quality improvement initiatives aimed at improving cardiac care are increasingly important. The Cardiac Care Quality Indicators are one such initiative, with the goal of supporting cardiac care centres in their quality improvement efforts by providing comparable facility-level information on a number of cardiac quality outcome indicators. Working together, the Canadian Institute for Health Information and the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario completed the pilot project for this initiative in Ontario and British Columbia in 2010. Based on the success of the pilot, a national expansion of the initiative is currently under way. This article details some of the processes that led to the success of the project and presents some high-level, de-identified results.
Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías/terapia , Hospitales Públicos/normas , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Canadá , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Proyectos PilotoRESUMEN
Recent data from the World Health Organization (WHO) indicate that nearly one billion people in the world are suffering from hypertension. Forecasts suggest that, with the aging of the population, this number could reach 1.5 billion by 2025 (Kearney, Whelton, & Reynolds, 2005). In developed countries, more than one in five adults have hypertension (Vasan, Beiser, Seshadri, Larson, Kannel, & D'Agostino, 2002). Statistics for Canada reveal that fewer than 15% of those diagnosed with hypertension are adequately controlled (Joffres, Hamet, MacLean, L'italien, & Fodor, 2001). Part of the effort to improve hypertension detection, assessment and treatment is an annual process to produce and update evidence-based recommendations for the management of hypertension and to implement the recommendations (Zarnke, Campbell, McAlister, & Levine, 2000; Campbell, Nagpal, & Drouin, 2001). The most up-to-date 2007 Canadian recommendations for the assessment and management of hypertension are presented. Contemporary nursing practice requires that nurses take responsibility and a role in the primary prevention, detection and treatment of hypertension.
Asunto(s)
Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Hipertensión/prevención & control , Adulto , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Canadá , Comorbilidad , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Hipertensión/enfermería , Estilo de Vida , Cooperación del PacienteRESUMEN
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the treatment of choice for inoperable and high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. Our objectives were to elucidate potential differences in clinical outcomes and safety between balloon-expandable versus self-expandable transcatheter heart valves (THV). We performed a retrospective cohort study of all transfemoral TAVI procedures in Ontario, Canada, from 2007 to 2013. Patients were categorized into either balloon-expandable or self-expandable THV groups. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 1-year death, with secondary outcomes of all-cause readmission. Safety outcomes included bleeding, permanent pacemaker implantation, need for a second THV device, postprocedural paravalvular aortic regurgitation, stroke, vascular access complication, and intensive care unit length of stay. Inverse probability of treatment-weighted regression analyses using a propensity score were used to account for differences in baseline confounders. Our cohort consisted of 714 patients, of whom 397 received a self-expandable THV, whereas 317 had a balloon-expandable THV system. There were no differences in death or all-cause readmission. In terms of safety, the self-expandable group was associated with significantly higher rates of inhospital stroke (p value <0.05), need for a second THV device (5.3% vs 2.7%; p value = 0.013), and permanent pacemaker (22.6% vs 8.9%; p value <0.001), whereas the balloon-expandable group had more vascular access site complications (23.1% vs 16.7%; p value = 0.002). Thus, we found similar clinical outcomes of death or readmission for patients who underwent transfemoral TAVI with either balloon-expandable or self-expandable THV systems. However, there were important differences in their safety profiles.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/instrumentación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Ontario , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Diseño de Prótesis , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is generally more expensive than surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) due to the high cost of the device. Our objective was to understand the patient and procedural drivers of cumulative healthcare costs during the index hospitalisation for these procedures. DESIGN: All patients undergoing TAVI, isolated SAVR or combined SAVR+coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at 7 hospitals in Ontario, Canada were identified during the fiscal year 2012-2013. Data were obtained from a prospective registry. Cumulative healthcare costs during the episode of care were determined using microcosting. To identify drivers of healthcare costs, multivariable hierarchical generalised linear models with a logarithmic link and γ distribution were developed for TAVI, SAVR and SAVR+CABG separately. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 1310 patients with aortic stenosis, of whom 585 underwent isolated SAVR, 518 had SAVR+CABG and 207 underwent TAVI. The median costs for the index hospitalisation for isolated SAVR were $21â 811 (IQR $18â 148-$30â 498), while those for SAVR+CABG were $27â 256 (IQR $21â 741-$39â 000), compared with $42â 742 (IQR $37â 295-$56â 196) for TAVI. For SAVR, the major patient-level drivers of costs were age >75â years, renal dysfunction and active endocarditis. For TAVI, chronic lung disease was a major patient-level driver. Procedural drivers of cost for TAVI included a non-transfemoral approach. A prolonged intensive care unit stay was associated with increased costs for all procedures. CONCLUSIONS: We found wide variation in healthcare costs for SAVR compared with TAVI, with different patient-level drivers as well as potentially modifiable procedural factors. These highlight areas of further study to optimise healthcare delivery.
RESUMEN
Although the appropriate use criteria incorporate common clinical scenarios for coronary revascularization, a significant proportion of patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) cannot be assigned an appropriateness score. Our objective was to characterize these patients and to evaluate whether coronary revascularization is associated with improved outcomes. A population-based cohort of patients aged ≥66 years, who underwent cardiac catheterization in Ontario, Canada, were included. Clinical characteristics were compared between patients with and without an appropriateness score. Clinical outcomes between coronary revascularization and medical therapy in patients with unclassified appropriateness score were compared using the inverse probability of treatment-weighted propensity method for confounder adjustment. Of the 19,228 patients with stable CAD, 11.2% (2,153 patients) were not assigned to an appropriateness score, mostly (92.9%) because of a lack of ischemic evaluation or a noninterpretable test. These patients were older, had higher rate of severe angina, and had more medical co-morbidities compared to patients with an appropriateness score. The 2-year rate of death or myocardial infarction in patients with unclassified appropriateness score was 15.3% in the revascularization group versus 20.7% in the medical therapy group. After propensity weighting, revascularization was associated with significantly lower hazard ratio (0.70; 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 0.79) for death or myocardial infarction compared with medical therapy. In conclusion, in patients aged ≥66 years with stable CAD and unclassified appropriateness score, revascularization is associated with improved outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Circulación Coronaria/fisiología , Revascularización Miocárdica/métodos , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados/tendencias , Anciano , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Radial access is associated with less bleeding and vascular complications. However, it may delay reperfusion during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: A provincial database prospectively collected clinical and procedural characteristics for all urgent percutaneous coronary intervention procedures performed between June 2010 and September 2011 in Ontario for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, including time of arrival in the catheterization laboratory and time of first balloon inflation. After excluding patients with cardiogenic shock, with previous bypass surgery, or who received fibrinolysis, 2947 patients were included in the analysis. Propensity score matching was used to minimize difference in clinical characteristics between radial and femoral access procedures. Predictors of radial access included younger age and male sex. After propensity score matching, the median time from arrival in the cardiac catheterization laboratory to first balloon was 27 minutes (25th%-75th%, 21-34) for the femoral group and 30 minutes (25th%-75th %, 24-39) for the radial group (P<0.001). When hospitals were stratified based on the proportion of primary percutaneous coronary intervention cases that were performed using radial access, there was no difference in treatment times between radial and femoral access in the tercile of hospitals that used radial access most frequently. There were no significant differences in the rates of death or myocardial infarction at 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: This contemporary multicenter registry demonstrates that the time to first balloon inflation is slightly longer with radial access than with femoral access, although the 3 minute difference is unlikely to be clinically relevant. There is no difference in treatment times at hospitals that frequently use radial access for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Short-term mortality and reinfarction rates are similar with radial and femoral access.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/métodos , Arteria Femoral/fisiología , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Reperfusión Miocárdica/métodos , Arteria Radial/fisiología , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/fisiopatología , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
The authors present an introduction to the basics of lipid metabolism including an overview of the structure and function of lipoproteins and a description of the pathways of lipid metabolism. Dyslipidemia is an important risk factor in the context of cardiovascular disease, and appropriate intervention can have a significant impact on clinical outcomes. The information presented herein will help to provide a foundation of knowledge on which to base the assessment and treatment of dyslipidemic patients. A better understanding of lipid metabolism will help health care professionals to provide better care in the realm of dyslipidemia management.
Asunto(s)
Lípidos/sangre , Transporte Biológico/fisiología , Biomarcadores/sangre , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/metabolismo , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Hiperlipidemias/epidemiología , Hiperlipidemias/metabolismo , Lipoproteínas/sangre , Lipoproteínas/metabolismo , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Wide variation exists in the detection rate of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) with elective coronary angiography for suspected stable ischemic heart disease. We sought to understand the incremental impact of nonclinical factors on this variation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included all patients who underwent coronary angiography for possible suspected stable ischemic heart disease, from October 1, 2008, to September 30, 2011, in Ontario, Canada. Nonclinical factors of interest included physician self-referral for angiography, the physician type (invasive or interventional), and hospital type. Hospitals were categorized into diagnostic angiogram only centers, stand-alone percutaneous coronary intervention centers, or full service centers with coronary artery bypass surgery available. Multivariable hierarchical logistic models were developed to identify system and physician-level predictors of obstructive CAD, after adjustment for patient factors. Our cohort consisted of 60 986 patients, of whom 31 726 had obstructive CAD (52.0%), with significant range across hospitals from 37.3% to 69.2%. Fewer self-referral patients (49.8%) had obstructive CAD compared with nonself-referral patients (53.5%), with an odds ratio of 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.93; P<0.001). Angiograms performed by invasive physicians had a lower likelihood of obstructive CAD compared with those by interventional physicians (48.2% versus 56.9%; odds ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.90; P<0.001). Fewer angiograms at diagnostic only centers showed obstructive CAD (42.0%) compared with full service centers (55.1%; odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.98; P=0.04). Nonclinical factors accounted for 23.8% of the variation between hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Physician and system factors are important predictors of obstructive CAD with coronary angiography.
Asunto(s)
Arteriopatías Oclusivas/diagnóstico , Vasos Coronarios/patología , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico , Auto Remisión del Médico , Anciano , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/complicaciones , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/epidemiología , Canadá , Estudios de Cohortes , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Atención a la Salud , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Isquemia Miocárdica/complicaciones , Isquemia Miocárdica/epidemiología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Variation in Revascularization Practice in Ontario (VRPO) project helped describe variations in revascularization across Ontario. Coronary anatomy was the most important predictor of revascularization strategy. We conducted a novel angiographic substudy of the VRPO cohort to: (1) validate "real-world" coronary angiographic reporting in the province of Ontario; and (2) understand the relationship between variability in revascularization and coronary anatomy complexity. METHODS: Seventeen hundred eighty-seven angiograms from 17 cardiac centres were randomly sampled from the VRPO cohort. The core lab assessment involved blinded interpretation of each angiographic film. A comparison of agreement in coronary anatomy and treatment strategy between abstracted chart data from the VRPO study and blinded film review was undertaken. Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) scores were calculated for all patients with multivessel disease. RESULTS: The weighted κ statistic for coronary anatomy was 0.75 (95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.77), suggesting substantial agreement between abstracted chart data and blinded film review. The weighted κ for revascularization strategy was 0.51 (95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.54) suggesting only moderate agreement. There were no significant differences in the mean/median SYNTAX scores across all 4 percutaneous coronary intervention: coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) groups. CONCLUSIONS: Abstracted chart data in the VRPO project provides a valid assessment of coronary anatomy and furthermore serves as validation of "real-world" coronary angiographic reporting in the province of Ontario. The uniform distribution of coronary complexity across centres in Ontario, with respect to the SYNTAX score, suggests the variation of percutaneous coronary intervention: CABG ratio is not related to a difference in coronary anatomy complexity across sites, but rather a difference in management strategies for the same anatomy.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Revascularización Miocárdica/métodos , Anciano , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
In March of 2010, the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-term Care and Ontario Medical Association jointly commissioned a Working Group to make recommendations regarding the provision and accreditation of echocardiographic services in Ontario. That commission undertook a process to examine all aspects of the provision, reporting and interpretation of echocardiographic examinations, including the echocardiographic examination itself, facilities, equipment, reporting, indications, and qualifications of personnel involved in the acquisition and interpretation of studies. The result was development of a set of 54 performance standards and a process for accreditation of echocardiographic facilities, initially on a voluntary basis, but leading to a process of mandatory accreditation. This article, and its accompanying Supplemental Material, outline the mandate, process undertaken, standards developed, and accreditation process recommended.
Asunto(s)
Acreditación/normas , Ecocardiografía/normas , Cardiopatías/diagnóstico por imagen , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Agencias Gubernamentales , Humanos , Ontario , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Sociedades MédicasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The study assessed the appropriateness of coronary revascularization in Ontario, Canada, and examined its association with longer-term outcomes. BACKGROUND: Although appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization have been developed to improve the rational use of cardiac invasive procedures, it is unknown whether greater adherence to appropriateness guidelines is associated with improved clinical outcomes in stable coronary artery disease. METHODS: A population-based cohort of stable patients undergoing cardiac catheterization was assembled from April 1, 2006, to March 31, 2007. The appropriateness for coronary revascularization at the time of coronary angiography was retrospectively adjudicated using the appropriate use criteria. Clinical outcomes between coronary revascularization and medical treatment without revascularization, stratified by appropriateness categories, were compared. RESULTS: In 1,625 patients with stable coronary artery disease, percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting was only performed in 69% who had an appropriate indication for coronary revascularization. Coronary revascularization was associated with a lower adjusted hazard of death or acute coronary syndrome (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42 to 0.88) at 3 years compared with medical therapy in appropriate patients. The rate of coronary revascularization was 54% in the uncertain category and 45% in the inappropriate category. No significant difference in death or acute coronary syndrome between coronary revascularization and no revascularization in the uncertain category (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.28 to 1.16) and the inappropriate category (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.48 to 2.02) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Using the appropriateness use criteria, we identified substantial underutilization and overutilization of coronary revascularization in contemporary clinical practice. Underutilization of coronary revascularization is associated with significantly increased risks of adverse outcomes in patients with appropriate indications.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/tendencias , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/normas , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Limited employment opportunities for recently trained cardiac surgeons are deterring medical students from entering cardiac surgery residency programs. Given the lengthy training period and the aging of both the general population and currently practicing cardiac surgeons, this reduced enrollment raises concerns about the adequacy of the future cardiac surgery workforce. A workforce model was developed to explore the future need for cardiac surgeons in Canada. METHODS: A novel system dynamics model was developed to simulate the supply and demand for cardiac surgery in Canada between 2008 and 2030 to identify whether an excess or shortage of surgeons would exist. Several different scenarios were examined, including varying surgeon productivity, revascularization rates, and residency enrollment rates. RESULTS: The simulation results of various scenarios are presented. In the base case, a surgeon shortage is expected to develop by 2025, although this depends on surgeons' response to demand-supply gap changes. An alternative scenario in which residency enrollment directly relates to the presence of unemployed surgeons also projects substantial shortages after 2021. The model results indicate that if residency enrollment rates remain at the 2009 level an alarming shortage may develop soon, possibly reaching almost 50% of the Canadian cardiac surgical workforce. CONCLUSIONS: These workforce model results project an eventual cardiac surgeon shortage in Canada. This study highlights the possibility of a crisis in cardiac surgery and emphasizes the urgency with which enrollment into cardiac surgery training programs and the employability of recently trained cardiac surgery graduates need to be addressed.