The influence of superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) repair on restoring baseline glenohumeral translation and increased biceps loading after simulated SLAP tear and the effectiveness of SLAP repair after long head of biceps tenotomy.

HYPOTHESIS: Biomechanical studies have shown increased glenohumeral translation and loading of the long head biceps (LHB) tendon after superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) tears. This may explain some of the typical clinical findings, including the prevalence of humeral chondral lesions, after SLAP lesions. The first hypothesis was that SLAP repair could restore the original glenohumeral translation and reduce the increased LHB load after SLAP lesions. The second hypothesis was that SLAP repair after LHB tenotomy could significantly reduce the increased glenohumeral translation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Biomechanical testing was performed on 21 fresh frozen human cadaveric shoulders with an intact shoulder girdle using a sensor-guided industrial robot to apply 20 N of compression in the joint and 50 N translational force at 0°, 30°, and 60° of abduction. LHB loading was measured by a load-cell with 5 N and 25 N preload. Type IIC SLAP lesions were created arthroscopically, and a standardized SLAP repair was done combined with or without LHB tenotomy. RESULTS: No significant difference of glenohumeral translation and increased LHB load in SLAP repair compared with the intact shoulder was observed under 5 N and 25 LHB preload, except for anterior translation under 25 N LHB preload. After LHB tenotomy after SLAP lesions, no significant difference of translation was observed with or without SLAP repair. CONCLUSIONS: SLAP repair without associated LHB tenotomy helps normalize glenohumeral translation and LHB loading. The stabilizing effect of the SLAP complex is dependent on the LHB. After biceps tenotomy, SLAP repair does not affect glenohumeral translation.

Severe damage of the femoral head after dislocation and difficult reduction maneuvers after total hip arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Aseptic loosening associated with osteolysis and release of wear particles is the main reason for revision of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Damage of femoral heads is well known to increase the wear rate at the articulating surface. Instability and dislocation are serious complications and are the second most frequent reason for revision surgery after THA. In the present work the possible damaging of the femoral head as a result of difficult reduction maneuvers of dislocated THA should be investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In three cases of total hip dislocation an open reduction was performed after dislocation of primary THA. Thereby one metal and two ceramic femoral heads were retrieved. Each head was analyzed macroscopically and by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) subsequently. RESULTS: In the first case the SEM analysis revealed severe titanium deposits on the retrieved ceramic head in the case of repeated unsuccessful closed reduction maneuvers. In the second case the retrieved ceramic head showed multiple scratches and a spalling of the surface structure. In the third case the retrieved metal head presented a roughened surface and severe scratches at the articulating area. DISCUSSION: Difficult reduction maneuvers following total hip dislocation can lead to severe damaging of the femoral head associated with an increase of the surface roughness. While repeated reduction maneuvers can lead to metallic deposits and spalling of the surface of ceramic heads, severe scratches can occur at metal heads. The damaging of the femoral head at the articulating surface can lead to increased wear and subsequent aseptic implant loosening. Therefore, open joint reduction has to be considered in cases of difficult or unsuccessful closed reduction maneuvers to prevent severe femoral head damage which may cause an increased release of wear particles.