One year improvement of exercise capacity in patients with mechanical circulatory support as bridge to transplantation.

AIMS: Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) results in substantial improvement of prognosis and functional capacity. Currently, duration of MCS as a bridge to transplantation (BTT) is often prolonged due to shortage of donor hearts. Because long-term results of exercise capacity after MCS are largely unknown, we studied serial cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPETs) during the first year after MCS implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary exercise tests at 6 and 12 months after MCS implantation in BTT patients were retrospectively analysed, including clinical factors related to exercise capacity. A total of 105 MCS patients (67% male, 50 ± 12 years) underwent serial CPET at 6 and 12 months after implantation. Power (105 ± 35 to 114 ± 40 W; P ≤ 0.001) and peak VO2 per kilogram (pVO2/kg) improved significantly (16.5 ± 5.0 to 17.2 ± 5.5 mL/kg/min (P = 0.008)). Improvement in pVO2 between 6 and 12 months after LVAD implantation was not related to heart failure aetiology or haemodynamic severity prior to MCS. We identified maximal heart rate at exercise as an important factor for pVO2. Younger age and lower BMI were related to further improvement. At 12 months, 25 (24%) patients had a normal exercise capacity (Weber classification A, pVO2 > 20 mL/kg/min). CONCLUSIONS: Exercise capacity (power and pVO2) increased significantly between 6 and 12 months after MCS independent of Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) profile or heart failure aetiology. Heart rate at exercise importantly relates to exercise capacity. This long-term improvement in exercise capacity is important information for the growing group of long-term MCS patients as this is critical for the quality of life of patients.

Functional and haemodynamic recovery after implantation of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices in comparison with pulsatile left ventricular assist devices in patients with end-stage heart failure.

AIMS: Caused by ageing of the population, better survival from ischaemic heart disease, and improved treatment of chronic heart disease, the incidence of heart failure has increased enormously. Worldwide, left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly being used as a bridge or alternative to heart transplantation. In this study, we investigated whether there is difference in functional and haemodynamic recovery after implantation of pulsatile and continuous-flow pumps. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared laboratory and echocardiographic data and exercise performance in patients with end-stage heart failure, before and 3 months after implantation of pulsatile and continuous-flow LVADs. A significant improvement in all laboratory parameters after implantation of both types of LVADs was seen, as well as a significant decrease in heart rate and LV dimensions, indicating better haemodynamics and cardiac recompensation. This improvement was better for the pulsatile device, probably due to higher plasma levels and higher LV dimensions before implantation. Exercise capacity strongly improved: 3 months after implantation of pulsatile and continuous-flow LVADs, peak VO(2) was 20.2 ± 4.8 vs. 18.3 ± 4.8 mL/kg/min (P = 0.09) (53 ± 12 vs. 49 ± 11% of predicted for age and gender) (P = 0.28). CONCLUSION: Pulsatile and continuous-flow LVADs result in extensive haemodynamic recovery and exercise performance compatible with daily life activities. Exercise performance with continuous-flow LVADs is equal to that with pulsatile devices. This, in combination with improved survival of the newer devices, allows its use as an alternative to heart transplantation in selected patients.