Neoadjuvant systemic treatment of breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant systemic breast cancer therapy is the administration of systemic therapy to eligible breast cancer patients prior to surgery. This treatment modality was developed out of necessity to downstage inoperable tumors, but it has evolved into a tool for breast conservation surgery. The neoadjuvant approach is also commonly used now to explore the efficacy of new therapeutics by assessing their impact on pathologic complete response or other endpoints. This article will review the foundations of this treatment modality and the latest progress in the field. Considering the heterogeneity of breast cancer, it is clear that no single treatment will fit all types of breast cancer. Thus, there is a need to understand the biological underpinnings of the different types of breast cancer in order to design better treatments that will ultimately improve the eradication rate of this disease.

Thalidomide and hematopoietic-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: High-dose therapy with melphalan can prolong survival among patients with multiple myeloma. We assessed whether the addition of thalidomide, which has activity against advanced and refractory myeloma, would further improve survival. METHODS: Between October 1998 and February 2004, 668 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma received two cycles of intensive melphalan-based chemotherapy, each supported by autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. A total of 323 were randomly assigned to receive thalidomide from the outset until disease progression or undue adverse effects, and 345 did not receive thalidomide. The primary end point was the five-year event-free survival rate. Secondary end points were complete response and overall survival. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 42 months among survivors, the thalidomide and control groups had rates of complete response of 62 percent and 43 percent, respectively (P<0.001), and five-year event-free survival rates of 56 percent and 44 percent (P=0.01). The five-year rate of overall survival was approximately 65 percent in both groups (P=0.90). Median survival after relapse was 1.1 years in the thalidomide group and 2.7 years in the control group (P=0.001). Severe peripheral neuropathy and deep-vein thrombosis occurred more frequently in the thalidomide group than in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: When incorporated into high-dose therapy for myeloma, thalidomide increased the frequency of complete responses and extended event-free survival at the expense of added adverse effects without improving overall survival. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00083551.).

Clinical and biological features of multiple myeloma involving the gastrointestinal system.

We report 24 cases of multiple myeloma (MM) with involvement of the gastrointestinal (GI) system. We found a strong association with high A lactate dehydrogenase levels, plasmablastic morphology, and A unfavorable karyotype. GI involvement at the time of initial diagnosis was much rarer than later in the course of the disease. The A median survival after diagnosis of GI involvement was 7 months. Among 13 patients treated with stem cell transplantation, the response rate was 92%, and median progression-free survival was 4 months. We conclude that MM involving the GI system is associated with adverse biological features and with short-lasting remissions, even after A high-dose chemotherapy.

Cytopenia, dysplasia, and monocytosis: a precursor to chronic myelomonocytic leukemia or a distinct subgroup? Case reports and review of literature.

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) consists of disorders with overlapping dysplastic and proliferative features. The diagnosis of CMML requires absolute monocytosis (> 1000/µL) in addition to other criteria outlined by the World Health Organization (WHO) classification.(1) Monocytosis not reaching 1000/µL has been observed in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and presents a diagnostic challenge in classification especially if increases in leukocyte count occurring during disease shifts the monocyte count into the absolute range. We discuss the laboratory and clinical features of 3 patients with myelodysplasia and associated monocytosis. Absolute neutropenia was the dominant feature at presentation, with mild anemia, thrombocytopenia, monocytosis (as a percentage), multilineage dysplasia, and increased myeloblasts, consistent with a diagnosis of refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB). Absolute monocytosis fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for CMML developed over 6-8 months, prompting a change in diagnosis. Two of 3 patients had normal cytogenetic examinations. JAK2 V617F mutation was detected after transformation to CMML in 1 of them; in the other, a novel translocation t(5;12)(p13;q24) was observed at the time of progression to acute leukemia. The use of different diagnostic terminologies--MDS, dysplasia with reactive monocytosis, myeloproliferative, and myeloproliferative/myelodysplastic syndromes by different and even the same pathologists at different times created confusion among the clinicians and patients. The disease course in these 3 patients was characterized by better survival and prolonged time to progression to acute leukemia, than predicted based on the original diagnosis of RAEB, suggesting that MDS with monocytosis may represent a subgroup distinct from MDS or CMML.

Completion of premaintenance phases in total therapies 2 and 3 improves clinical outcomes in multiple myeloma: an important variable to be considered in clinical trial designs.

BACKGROUND: Total Therapy (TT) programs are complex and their execution over the course of several years is fraught with patient attrition due to failure and toxicity of therapy and patient/physician acceptance. METHODS: The impact of completion versus noncompletion of intended treatment steps was examined in protocols TT2 (n=668) and TT3 (n=303) on overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). RESULTS: By using appropriate landmarks of 36 months with TT2 and 18 months with TT3, representing the maxima to completion of premaintenance phases, postconsolidation OS was superior for 211 patients completing versus 311 patients not completing premaintenance steps on TT2 (P=.001), which also pertained to the 161 patients completing versus 47 not completing intended treatment steps on TT3 (P=.01). On multivariate analysis that included all patients, completion of therapy independently favored longer OS and EFS in the context of both standard prognostic factors and gene expression profiling-defined risk; in addition, TT3 prolonged EFS over results obtained with TT2. CONCLUSIONS: 1) Completion of intended therapy was a significant independent variable conferring superior OS and EFS in TT programs; and 2) after adjusting for completion of therapy, EFS was still superior with TT3 versus TT2, supporting the beneficial role of bortezomib included in TT3. Collectively, these data point to the importance of designing clinical trials that balance the treatment requirements for disease control with host acceptance and tolerance.