RESUMEN
Healthcare disparities in genomic medicine are well described. Despite some improvements, we continue to see fewer individuals of African American, Asian, and Hispanic ancestry undergo genetic counseling and testing compared to those of European ancestry. It is well established that variant of uncertain significance (VUS) rates are higher among non-European ancestral groups undergoing multi-gene hereditary cancer panel testing. However, pathogenic variant (PV) yields, and genomic data in general, are often reported in aggregate and derived from cohorts largely comprised of individuals of European ancestry. We performed a retrospective review of clinical and ancestral data for individuals undergoing multi-gene hereditary cancer panel testing to determine ancestry-specific PV and VUS rates. An ancestry other than European was reported in 29,042/104,851 (27.7%) of individuals. Compared to Europeans (9.4%), individuals of Middle Eastern ancestry were more likely to test positive for one or more pathogenic variants (12.1%, p = .0025), while African Americans were less likely (7.9%, p < .0001). Asian and Middle Eastern individuals were most likely (34.8% and 33.2%, respectively) to receive a report with an overall classification of VUS, while individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish and European ancestry were least likely (17.1% and 20.4%, respectively). These data suggest that in addition to higher VUS rates, there may be ancestry-specific PV yields. Providing aggregate data derived from cohorts saturated with European individuals does not adequately reflect genetic testing outcomes in minority groups, and interrogation of ancestry-specific data is a step toward a more personalized risk assessment.
Asunto(s)
Asiático/genética , Negro o Afroamericano/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Hispánicos o Latinos/genética , Neoplasias/genética , Femenino , Asesoramiento Genético , Pruebas Genéticas , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Población BlancaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Genes in the homologous recombination pathway have shown varying results in the literature regarding ovarian cancer (OC) association. Recent case-control studies have used allele counts alone to quantify genetic associations with cancer. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was performed on 6,182 women with OC referred for hereditary cancer multi-gene panel testing (cases) and 4,690 mothers from trios who were referred for whole-exome sequencing (controls). We present age-adjusted odds ratios (ORAdj) to determine association of OC with pathogenic variants (PVs) in homologous recombination genes. RESULTS: Significant associations with OC were observed in BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C and RAD51D. Other homologous recombination genes, BARD1, NBN, and PALB2, were not significantly associated with OC. ATM and CHEK2 were only significantly associated with OC by crude odds ratio (ORCrude) or by ORAdj, respectively. However, there was no significant difference between ORCrude and ORAdj for these two genes. The significant association of PVs in BRIP1 by ORCrude (2.05, CI = 1.11 to 3.94, P = 0.03) was not observed by ORAdj (0.87, CI = 0.41 to 1.93, P = 0.73). Interestingly, the confidence intervals of the two effect sizes were significantly different (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The lack of association of PVs in BRIP1 with OC by ORAdj is inconsistent with some previous literature and current management recommendations, highlighted by the significantly older age of OC onset for BRIP1 PV carriers compared to non-carriers. By reporting ORAdj, this study presents associations that reflect more informed genetic contributions to OC when compared to traditional count-based methods.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: An association of Lynch syndrome (LS) with breast cancer has been long suspected; however, there have been insufficient data to address this question for each of the LS genes individually. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of personal and family history in 423 women with pathogenic or likely pathogenic germ-line variants in MLH1 (N = 65), MSH2 (N = 94), MSH6 (N = 140), or PMS2 (N = 124) identified via clinical multigene hereditary cancer testing. Standard incidence ratios (SIRs) of breast cancer were calculated by comparing breast cancer frequencies in our study population with those in the general population (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 data). RESULTS: When evaluating by gene, the age-standardized breast cancer risks for MSH6 (SIR = 2.11; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.56-2.86) and PMS2 (SIR = 2.92; 95% CI, 2.17-3.92) were associated with a statistically significant risk for breast cancer whereas no association was observed for MLH1 (SIR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.42-1.83) or MSH2 (SIR = 1.22; 95% CI, 0.72-2.06). CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that two LS genes, MSH6 and PMS2, are associated with an increased risk for breast cancer and should be considered when ordering genetic testing for individuals who have a personal and/or family history of breast cancer.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales Hereditarias sin Poliposis/genética , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/genética , Endonucleasa PMS2 de Reparación del Emparejamiento Incorrecto/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales Hereditarias sin Poliposis/complicaciones , Neoplasias Colorrectales Hereditarias sin Poliposis/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Asociación Genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Pruebas Genéticas , Mutación de Línea Germinal/genética , Humanos , Anamnesis , Persona de Mediana Edad , Homólogo 1 de la Proteína MutL/genética , Proteína 2 Homóloga a MutS/genética , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Knowledge of a germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant (PV) may inform breast cancer management. BRCA1/2 PV often impact surgical decisions, but data for multi-gene panel testing are lacking. Expedited genetic testing reduces turn-around times based on request for treatment-related decision making. This report aims to describe the clinical utility of expedited multi-gene panel testing for patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. METHODS: Clinical and demographic information were reviewed for patients with newly diagnosed female breast cancer undergoing expedited panel testing between 2013 and 2017. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines (NCCN, version 1.2018) were evaluated in terms of published management recommendations for the genes in which PVs were identified. RESULTS: The overall PV yield was 9.5% (678/7127) for women undergoing expedited panel testing, with 700 PVs identified among 678 women. PVs were identified in genes other than BRCA1/2 in 55.9% (391/700) of cases. The NCCN guidelines recommend management for the genes in which 96.6% (676/700) of PVs are identified. The NCCN guidelines also recommend risk-reducing mastectomy for 46.0% (322/700) of PVs identified. An additional 45.6% (319/700) of PVs were identified in genes for which NCCN recommends mastectomy based on family history. In addition, 49.9% (349/700) of PVs were in genes with NCCN guidelines recommending prophylactic surgery for tissues other than breast. CONCLUSION: A majority of the patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer were candidates for surgical intervention according to the NCCN guidelines, and half of these patients would have been missed if only BRCA1/2 testing had been ordered. Expedited multi-gene hereditary cancer panel testing should be considered as a first-line approach to provide comprehensive information for breast cancer management.
Asunto(s)
Proteína BRCA1/genética , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Pruebas Genéticas , Mutación de Línea Germinal , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Mastectomía , Persona de Mediana Edad , PronósticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The recognition of genes implicated in ovarian cancer risk beyond BRCA1, BRCA2, and the Lynch syndrome genes has increased the variety of testing options available to providers and patients. We report the frequency of pathogenic variants identified among individuals with ovarian cancer undergoing clinical genetic testing via a multi-gene hereditary cancer panel. METHODS: Genetic testing of up to 32 genes using a hereditary cancer panel was performed on 4439 ovarian cancer cases, and results were analyzed for frequency of pathogenic variants. Statistical comparisons were made using t-tests and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: The positive yield was 13.2%. While BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants were most frequent, one third (33.7%) of positive findings were in other homologous recombination genes, and accounted for over 40.0% of findings in endometrioid and clear cell cases. Women with a personal history of breast cancer (22.1%), who reported a family history of ovarian cancer (17.7%), and/or serous histology (14.7%) were most likely to harbor a pathogenic variant. Those with very early onset (<30â¯years) and late onset (≥70â¯years) ovarian cancer had low positive yields. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the genetic heterogeneity of ovarian cancer, showing that a large proportion of cases are not due to BRCA1/2 and the Lynch syndrome genes, but still have an identifiable hereditary basis. These findings substantiate the utility of multi-gene panel testing in ovarian cancer care regardless of age at diagnosis, family history, or histologic subtype, providing evidence for testing beyond BRCA1/2 and the Lynch syndrome genes.
Asunto(s)
Mutación de Línea Germinal/genética , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Germ-line testing for panels of cancer genes using next-generation sequencing is becoming more common in clinical care. We report our experience as a clinical laboratory testing both well-established, high-risk cancer genes (e.g., BRCA1/2, MLH1, MSH2) as well as more recently identified cancer genes (e.g., PALB2, BRIP1), many of which have increased but less well-defined penetrance. METHODS: Clinical genetic testing was performed on over 10,000 consecutive cases referred for evaluation of germ-line cancer genes, and results were analyzed for frequency of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, and were stratified by testing panel, gene, and clinical history. RESULTS: Overall, a molecular diagnosis was made in 9.0% of patients tested, with the highest yield in the Lynch syndrome/colorectal cancer panel. In patients with breast, ovarian, or colon/stomach cancer, positive yields were 9.7, 13.4, and 14.8%, respectively. Approximately half of the pathogenic variants identified in patients with breast or ovarian cancer were in genes other than BRCA1/2. CONCLUSION: The high frequency of positive results in a wide range of cancer genes, including those of high penetrance and with clinical care guidelines, underscores both the genetic heterogeneity of hereditary cancer and the usefulness of multigene panels over genetic tests of one or two genes.Genet Med 18 8, 823-832.
Asunto(s)
Mutación de Línea Germinal , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/métodos , Neoplasias/genética , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Pruebas Genéticas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) for various aneuploidies based on cases referred for follow-up cytogenetic testing. Secondarily, we wanted to determine the false-negative (FN) rate for those cases with a negative NIPS result. STUDY DESIGN: We compared the cytogenetic findings (primarily from chromosome analysis) from 216 cases referred to our laboratories with either a positive or negative NIPS result, and classified NIPS results as true positive, false positive, true negative, or FN. Diagnostic cytogenetic testing was performed on the following tissue types: amniotic fluid (n = 137), chorionic villi (n = 69), neonatal blood (n = 6), and products of conception (n = 4). RESULTS: The PPV for NIPS were as follows: 93% for trisomy (T)21 (n = 99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 86-97.1%), 58% for T18 (n = 24; 95% CI, 36.6-77.9%), 45% for T13 (n = 11; 95% CI, 16.7-76.6%), 23% for monosomy X (n = 26; 95% CI, 9-43.6%), and 67% for XXY (n = 6; 95% CI, 22.3-95.7%). Of the 26 cases referred for follow-up cytogenetics after a negative NIPS result, 1 (4%) was FN (T13). Two cases of triploidy, a very serious condition but one not claimed to be detectable by the test providers, were among those classified as true negatives. CONCLUSION: T21, which has the highest prevalence of all aneuploidies, demonstrated a high true-positive rate, resulting in a high PPV. However, the other aneuploidies, with their lower prevalence, displayed relatively high false-positive rates and, therefore, lower PPV. Patients and physicians must fully understand the limitations of this screening test and the need in many cases to follow up with appropriate diagnostic testing to obtain an accurate diagnosis.
Asunto(s)
Aberraciones Cromosómicas , Trastornos de los Cromosomas/diagnóstico , ADN/sangre , Adulto , Amniocentesis , Aneuploidia , Muestra de la Vellosidad Coriónica , Trastornos de los Cromosomas/genética , Cromosomas Humanos Par 13/genética , Cromosomas Humanos Par 18/genética , Estudios de Cohortes , Análisis Citogenético , Síndrome de Down/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Down/genética , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Femenino , Humanos , Síndrome de Klinefelter/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Klinefelter/genética , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Embarazo , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trisomía/diagnóstico , Trisomía/genética , Síndrome de la Trisomía 13 , Síndrome de la Trisomía 18 , Síndrome de Turner/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Turner/genéticaRESUMEN
Heterozygous (HET) TP53 pathogenic variants (PVs) are associated with Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), a dominantly inherited condition causing high risk for sarcoma, breast, and other cancers. Recent reports describe patients without features of LFS and apparently HET TP53 PVs in blood cells but not fibroblasts (FBs), suggesting the variant occurred sporadically during hematopoiesis and rose to high allele fraction through clonal expansion. To explore possible clonal hematopoiesis in patients undergoing hereditary cancer testing, FB testing was performed for patients with apparently HET or mosaic TP53 PVs identified in blood, oral rinse, or buccal specimens via next-generation sequencing panels. Among 291 individuals with TP53 PVs, 146 (50.2%) appeared HET and 145 (49.8%) were mosaic. Twenty-eight HET cases were proven constitutional through familial testing. FB testing was completed for 17 apparently HET and 36 mosaic patients. FB testing was positive in 11 of 17 (64.7%) apparently HET patients, only one of whom met Chompret criteria. Of 36 mosaic patients, 5 (13.9%) were also mosaic in FBs, indicating constitutional mosaicism. Breast cancers in patients with constitutional TP53 PVs were diagnosed at younger ages (P < 0.0001) and more likely to demonstrate human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression (P = 0.0003). These results demonstrate the utility of cultured FB testing to clarify constitutional status for TP53 PVs identified on next-generation sequencing panels, particularly for patients not meeting LFS or Chompret criteria.
Asunto(s)
Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Pruebas Genéticas , Variación Genética , Heterocigoto , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/genética , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Femenino , Estudios de Asociación Genética/métodos , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Humanos , Síndrome de Li-Fraumeni/complicaciones , Síndrome de Li-Fraumeni/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Li-Fraumeni/genética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Although CHEK2 is a well-established cancer gene, questions remain including whether risks vary substantially between different variants and whether biallelic carriers have higher risks than heterozygotes. We report on a cohort of individuals with CHEK2 pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants (collectively, PV) in order to better characterize this gene. METHODS: We retrospectively queried samples submitted for multi-gene hereditary cancer testing to identify individuals with CHEK2 PVs and assessed differences in phenotypes among various genotypes. RESULTS: CHEK2 PVs were identified in 2508 individuals, including 32 individuals with biallelic CHEK2 PVs. Breast (female, 59.9% and male, 11.8%), prostate (20.1%), and colorectal (3.5%), were among the most frequently reported cancers. Select missense PVs showed similar cancer prevalence to truncating PVs while some others showed lower prevalence. No significant differences were observed between biallelic carriers and heterozygotes. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support that some, but not all, CHEK2 missense PVs demonstrate lower cancer prevalence; further studies are needed to continue characterizing possible variant specific risks. In addition, biallelic CHEK2 PVs do not appear to be associated with a more severe phenotype than single CHEK2 PVs. Furthermore, co-occurrences with PVs in other cancer risk genes are common among CHEK2 heterozygotes and often warrant additional management.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Quinasa de Punto de Control 2/genética , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Variación Genética , Heterocigoto , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/genética , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/patología , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Biallelic pathogenic variants (PVs) in MUTYH cause MUTYH-Associated Polyposis (MAP), which displays phenotypic overlap with other hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) syndromes including Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) and Lynch syndrome. We report the phenotypic spectrum of MAP in the context of multi-gene hereditary cancer panel testing. Genetic testing results and clinical histories were reviewed for individuals with biallelic MUTYH PVs detected by panel testing at a single commercial molecular diagnostic laboratory. Biallelic MUTYH PVs were identified in 82 individuals (representing 0.2% of tested individuals) with most (75/82; 91.5%) reporting a personal history of CRC and/or polyps. Ten percent (6/61) of individuals reporting polyp number reported fewer than 10 polyps and therefore did not meet current MAP testing criteria. Extracolonic cancers (21/82; 25.6%), multiple primaries (19/82; 23.2%), Lynch-like (17/82; 20.7%) and FAP-like phenotypes (16/82; 19.5%) were observed, including individuals with mismatch repair-deficient tumors (3/82; 3.7%), sebaceous neoplasms (2/82; 2.4%), or congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium (CHRPE) (2/82; 2.4%). We report what is to our knowledge the first cohort of individuals with MAP identified by panel testing. The phenotypic spectrum of MAP observed in this cohort aligns with the published literature. In addition to standard indications for MUTYH testing, our data provide evidence to support consideration of MAP in the differential diagnosis for some individuals with fewer than 10 polyps, depending on other personal and/or family history, as well as for individuals suspected to have Lynch syndrome or FAP.
Asunto(s)
Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/genética , Variación Biológica Poblacional/genética , ADN Glicosilasas/genética , Neoplasias Primarias Múltiples/genética , Fenotipo , Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Alelos , Estudios de Cohortes , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Primarias Múltiples/diagnóstico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: CDH1 pathogenic variants have been estimated to confer a 40% to 70% and 56% to 83% lifetime risk for gastric cancer in men and women, respectively. These are likely to be overestimates owing to ascertainment of families with multiple cases of gastric cancer. To our knowledge, there are no penetrance estimates for CDH1 without this ascertainment bias. OBJECTIVE: To estimate CDH1 penetrance in a patient cohort not exclusively ascertained based on strict hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) criteria. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective review of 75 families found to have pathogenic variants in CDH1 through clinical ascertainment and multigene panel testing at a large commercial diagnostic laboratory from August 5, 2013, to June 30, 2018. CDH1 pathogenic variants were identified in 238 individuals from 75 families. Pedigrees from those families included cancer status for 1679 relatives. Penetrance estimates are based on 41 families for which completed pedigrees were available. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Gastric cancer standardized incidence ratio estimates relative to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program incidence for pathogenic CDH1 variants from families ascertained without regard to HDGC criteria. RESULTS: Among the 238 individuals with a CDH1 pathogenic variant, mean (SD) age was 49.3 (18.1) years and 63.4% were female. Ethnicity was reported for 67 of 75 (89%) families; of these 67 families, 51 (76%) reported European ancestry, whereas Asian, African, Latino, and 2 or more ancestries were reported for 4 families (6%) each. Standardized incidence ratios for gastric and breast cancer were significantly elevated above SEER incidence. Extrapolated cumulative incidence of gastric cancer at age 80 years was 42% (95% CI, 30%-56%) for men and 33% (95% CI, 21%-43%) for women with pathogenic variants in CDH1, whereas cumulative incidence of female breast cancer was estimated at 55% (95% CI, 39%-68%). International Gastric Cancer Linkage Consortium criteria were met in 25 of the 75 (33%) families; however, dispensing with the requirement of confirmation of HDGC histologic subtype, 43 (57%) would meet criteria. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The cumulative incidence of gastric cancer for individuals with pathogenic variants in CDH1 is significantly lower than previously described. Because prophylactic gastrectomy can have bearing upon both physical and psychological health, further discussion is warranted to assess whether this surgical recommendation is appropriate for all individuals with pathogenic variants in CDH1.
RESUMEN
Interstitial deletions of chromosome 6q are a relatively rare finding. Deletions have ranged from the loss of a single band to larger deletions spanning multiple bands. The clinical phenotype varies, but some features commonly seen include cardiac anomalies, hypotonia, facial dysmorphism and mental retardation. To further delineate the syndrome, we report an infant with facial dysmorphism, ectrodactyly and tetralogy of Fallot owing to interstitial deletion 6q16.1-6q22.32. On array comparative genomic hybridization analysis, the deletion spanned from the 93 377 323rd base to the 127 650 582nd base on chromosome 6 [coordinates are based on Human Mar. 2006 (hg18) assembly of International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium]. A literature review identified 16 additional cases with overlapping interstitial deletions of chromosome 6q between q13 and q23.1. Genotype-phenotype correlations are considered.